[07:03] have any of you guys done some gtk3.20 testing [07:22] wouldn't know where to test it from [07:25] there's a PPA for yakkety [07:25] ppa:ubuntu-desktop/gtk320 [07:25] not for xenial (yet) [07:26] ochosi: nope - not tested that [07:26] can do though :) [07:26] if you do, i guess i should also give you a greybird version along with it [07:26] No really? :P [07:27] nope [07:27] no greybird [07:30] here's a branch: https://github.com/shimmerproject/Greybird/tree/gtk3.20 [07:30] fwiw, i will most likely drop greybird's current versioning scheme and just align it with gtk3 release numbers [07:30] I'll look later - that time of the day again [07:31] that way it'll be clearer what greybird version goes with which gtk3 [07:31] sure, hf flocculant [11:10] mmm - stuck with the old 'what do I do with that then' when I've got it :p [11:27] ochosi: didn't bother with the gtk320 ppa yet - seems to just be a bunch of unity and ubuntu packages, certainly not greybird [12:00] flocculant: the ppa contains gtk3 itself, which is the important part [12:01] and greybird you'll have to install from the branch i linked to above, it's basically not much more than untaring it to ~/.themes [12:01] but i'm currently considering to look into backporting that gtk3 PPA to xenial so we can also test it here [15:53] ochosi: ok - so some things are rather ewww at a first glance e.g. http://i.imgur.com/uNKZzpH.png [15:55] indicator panel, some setting dialogues, some apps (firefox (but that's probably due to the ff which is in that ppa), synaptic, fileroller [15:55] http://i.imgur.com/f9Mx7Lt.png kind of sums it up [15:56] flocculant: eeeewwww [15:59] davmor2: but it's ok - party line is blame Canonical :p [16:00] flocculant: why it's all imports from debian, blame them :D [16:00] \o/ [16:00] personally I think I'll blame Gove :D [16:01] borris [16:01] as well [19:38] ochosi: though I find that if instead of grabbing that and unpacking but git clone it - not the same [20:09] hello [20:10] hi [20:10] flocculant: aha, how so? [20:11] ochosi: panel is ok now [20:11] flocculant: ah ok, now i looked at all your screeners. the indicator stuff is actually sorta expected [20:11] really? i'm stunned [20:11] what changed between "then" and "now"? [20:12] I git cloned instead of downloading and unpacking, logged out - picked the cloned one [20:12] you always picked the 3.20 branch though, right? [20:13] cause with master it'll just look mostly fugly [20:13] authenticate dialogue has no password 'box' [20:13] or like the calculator, which is straight adwaita [20:13] yea - not picked the normal greybird [20:13] yup calc is naff [20:13] yeah, i also saw more broken than working stuff tbh [20:13] i wonder how ppl on github or fedora can claim that it's "ok" [20:14] who knows - I'm with you on that :) [20:14] source is all bugered up? [20:14] GTK3, so of course. [20:16] ochosi: oooh - so not actually able to highlight url in browser to copy it to here lol [20:16] bear in mind - some 'new' firefox came from the ppa [20:16] yeah, not sure about that one [20:16] likely a build with gtk3 enabled though [20:17] That's the default though... [20:17] yea afaik [20:17] i.imgur.com/7SMcojx.png [20:17] ah right, well maybe they adjusted some stuff for the 3.20 changes [20:18] that's again adwaita [20:18] which means the branch doesn't get applied at all [20:18] mmm - ff is pretty lost ... [20:19] Unit193: any idea why a .changes file i supposedly successfully dput to a ppa (at least the terminal says i did, and trying again says it's already there) doesn't show up in said PPA at all? [20:20] ochosi: can't cope with that - purging that ppa lol [20:20] I'll set it all up in a vm though [20:21] ochosi: 1. Got an email about it? 2. Uploaded it to the right repo? 3. Do you have an .upload file next to .changes now? 4. Right release targetted? [20:21] I tried it in Debian, this looks pretty normal greybird I think... [20:21] 1. nope 2. i would say yes..? 3. yes 4. yup, xenial [20:22] Wait a couple minutes just to make sure. [20:22] i pushed it 6hrs ago... [20:22] (Because, sometimes LP takes a few...Oh.) [20:22] https://launchpad.net/~ochosi/+archive/ubuntu/gtk3.20 is the repo [20:23] and i mean there it even tells you the instructions on how to dput [20:23] so it's hard not to put it to the right repo [20:23] the only thing i can think of is that the "." is not a good idea [20:23] https://launchpad.net/~ochosi/+archive/ubuntu/gtk3.20/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all [20:23] hardly any PPA has a dot in it (the docs state dots are ok though) [20:24] no no, those are just the failed copy-rebuilds from Laney's PPA [20:24] my package is -ppa2 [20:24] err ~ppa2 [20:24] Ah, OK. So, try dput -f it. [20:24] ok, shall i also sudo it or what..? :D [20:25] i thought pushing a newer package would automatically push it above the old one [20:25] and then that didn't happen so i deleted the other pkg [20:25] which is why that build history is a bit misleading now [20:26] ok, the output says (again) that the upload was successful [20:27] alllllright, i think i might have had a problem with 2) [20:29] ochosi: FWIW, I said '-f' because you already have an '.upload' file. [20:29] ochosi: What is it you want a screenshot with this Greybird? [20:29] yeah, i supposed so. just in a sarcastic mood since i can't seem to get something so easy to work [20:29] well one thing is that i wanna find out what the current state of it is with the port of poma [20:30] the other is that i need a devel environment if i shall port [20:32] Any reason you can't use the other PPA? [20:32] yeah, dependency on libwayland-client0 and libmirclient (or something) that doesn't work in xenial [20:33] so basically i tried to just disable both backends in debian/rules and that's my "change" for building with xenial [20:33] OK, that's a pretty good reason. [20:36] hm, anyway, it still doesn't seem to show up there [20:36] guess i'll have to wait some more [20:36] ...If all else fails, tar it all up and pass it to me? [20:37] ok, will do! [20:37] i'd really like to learn something here though [20:37] (for a change) [20:37] Sure, but I'm a horrible teacher. Also if I can poke it with a stick... :P [20:38] i'm ok with learning just very little as well [20:41] But nothing you specifically wanted a screenie of? [20:41] well sure, if you have one available i'm interested in almost any app [20:41] i tried in my yakkety vbox and everything just looked really really broken [20:42] (not flocculant broken, cause that was just adwaita, i mean really broken) [20:45] ochosi: https://sigma.unit193.net/~unit193/gtk320_greybird.png [20:46] gtk3 terminal? [20:47] also, could you give focus to evince? somehow it doesn't look like greybird's headerbar [20:47] or maybe it does, just the disabled color is a bit blander than i remember [20:47] maybe open a file so i see the scrollbar, that's usually the easiest indicator [20:47] and the open-file dialog would be nice to see [20:48] GTK2, not touching the GTK3 terminal yet. :P [20:50] it's working really ok though [20:50] i've been using it for a few weeks alredy [20:50] already [20:51] ...How the heck do I paste a url into evince?! Screw it, terminal is better. [20:53] https://sigma.unit193.net/~unit193/evince.png https://sigma.unit193.net/~unit193/opendialog.png [20:57] ok, both is adwaita [20:57] so it's not working(tm) [20:57] or if it is, it's not a port, just a copy of adwaita [20:57] Really? Adwaita is usually more childish. [20:59] nope [20:59] that's it's current look [20:59] its [20:59] :P [21:00] yeah [21:00] thank you for your contribution. [21:00] you can't thank me enough. [21:00] Unit193: is it possible that LP thought that i didn't change anything and consequently rejected my upload? [21:01] It doesn't care. [21:01] right, another thing i read in the docs... [21:02] then i guess it just doesn't like me [21:34] ok, on to fixing greybird with xfce4-notifyd-gtk3 and then i'll do a release of it [22:15] ok, finally some support for xfce4-notifyd-gtk3 in greybird [22:15] i just wonder whether any of this will still work with gtk3.20... [22:15] anyway, night everyone [22:16] G'nighty. [22:41] night