tjaalton | huh, xenial update shut down my desktop midway during upgrade | 06:43 |
---|---|---|
pitti | Good morning | 06:44 |
smb | morning... *sigh* another week another partial upload for grub2 to trusty... | 07:09 |
ricotz | hmm, the gcc-5 upgrade in xenial-proposed is quite large, seems it wasn't properly stripped | 07:10 |
pitti | ricotz: oh, thanks for pointing out; that's a backporting error | 07:35 |
pitti | ricotz: doko often keeps debugging stuff on in devel, but that shouldn't happen in stable | 07:35 |
pitti | ricotz: err, is it? | 07:37 |
pitti | 8548582 vs. 8548494 bytes, that's not much difference | 07:37 |
pitti | oh, cpp-5 | 07:37 |
ricotz | pitti, yeah, I was referring to the source package | 07:38 |
ricotz | so g++-5 and cpp-5 are not stripped | 07:39 |
pitti | ricotz: thanks, I adjusted bug 1586673 | 07:40 |
ubottu | bug 1586673 in gcc-5 (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport GCC 5.4.0 and binutils 2.26.1 to 16.04 LTS" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1586673 | 07:40 |
pitti | jamespage: hey! | 08:00 |
pitti | jamespage: is the server team still interested in floodlight? it's been FTBFS for several cycles, not getting along with our current java | 08:01 |
pitti | it's not in Debian either | 08:01 |
pitti | infinity: yay, latest Debian dpkg now has the Test-Depends: stuff; do you want to do the merge (as you TIL), or want me to? | 08:15 |
infinity | pitti: I'll grab it. | 08:18 |
flexiondotorg | Morning. | 08:19 |
flexiondotorg | Can I request a little help progressing a few SRUs? | 08:20 |
flexiondotorg | They are intended for 16.04. | 08:21 |
flexiondotorg | I've got a couple of seemingly conflicting feedback. One bug I've been asked to open an additional but, which I'm happy to do although I don't understand what I'm being asked to do. | 08:21 |
flexiondotorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1581168 | 08:22 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1581168 in ubuntu-mate "SRU: GTK3 scrollbars in Radiant-MATE not styled like GTK2" [High,Fix committed] | 08:22 |
flexiondotorg | And bug I'm being asking to track the SRU in just one bug, not two. Again, happy to do that. | 08:22 |
flexiondotorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-mate-settings/+bug/1577706 | 08:22 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1577706 in ubuntu-mate-settings (Ubuntu) "SRU: ubuntu-mate-settings 16.05.5.2 bug fix" [Undecided,Invalid] | 08:22 |
flexiondotorg | I'd just like to better understand the correct way to progress SRUs in the future. | 08:23 |
infinity | pitti: Ooo, lots of reproducibility patches in this upload too. | 08:32 |
pitti | infinity: indeed, this looks like "want it" | 08:33 |
infinity | pitti: Yeahp, just going over the diff and merging now. Keynotes don't need my full attention. :P | 08:33 |
pitti | infinity: ah, you're at debconf too? enjoy! | 08:33 |
infinity | pitti: *nod* | 08:34 |
pitti | infinity: our 119kB patch is almost exclusively teh changelog :) | 08:34 |
pitti | actual changes are fairly small these days, fortunately | 08:34 |
infinity | pitti: I know, I've been TIL for a long time, and I take pride in that diff. | 08:34 |
infinity | pitti: It was several MB when I took it over. :P | 08:34 |
pitti | *clap* *clap* | 08:34 |
infinity | pitti: Was there an LP bug for this, or did I make you file it upstream so we could avoid that? | 08:39 |
infinity | Oh, wait, found it. | 08:40 |
pitti | infinity: for what? | 08:40 |
infinity | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1491145 | 08:40 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1491145 in dpkg (Ubuntu) "trigger tests for updated reverse test dependencies" [Medium,In progress] | 08:40 |
pitti | ah, yes, that | 08:40 |
pitti | the Debian bug is linked | 08:40 |
* infinity nods. | 08:40 | |
infinity | pitti: Test-building, will upload during the next session. | 08:51 |
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
LocutusOfBorg | broken dpkg makes me saaaaaad | 10:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | :( | 10:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | infinity, please fix? :) | 10:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | hi btw | 10:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=383260e568cef224269ab19d4250f2a87177b778 | 10:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | this patch is the fix | 10:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | getting failures such as https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mrpt/1:1.4.0-1build2/+build/10315241 | 10:31 |
* LocutusOfBorg is sorry if it already is reported | 10:31 | |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg, infinity: uploaded, since this is OMGkittens urgency | 10:37 |
pitti | I hope dpkg itself will build now :) | 10:38 |
LocutusOfBorg | I guess everywhere except for armhf | 10:39 |
LocutusOfBorg | some bootstrap might be needed | 10:39 |
LocutusOfBorg | damn I uploaded a fixed mrpt, that is making opencv migrate | 10:39 |
LocutusOfBorg | :( | 10:39 |
LocutusOfBorg | and it is ftbfs on armhf for this bug | 10:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | lets hope to finish the transition by some hours | 10:40 |
LocutusOfBorg | and thanks for the quick upload | 10:40 |
pitti | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/270800128/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-i386.dpkg_1.18.8ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 10:41 |
pitti | crap | 10:41 |
pitti | "pull yourself out of a swamp" situation | 10:41 |
LocutusOfBorg | sad | 10:41 |
pitti | ok, hang on; I'll try to remove the previous dpkg | 10:41 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh... you not on -release | 10:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | I asked that some minutes ago | 10:42 |
pitti | dear remove-package, I don't want to remove ubuntu2, but ubuntu1 | 10:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | [12:33:55] <LocutusOfBorg> pretty please kick dpkg out of -proposed? :) | 10:42 |
LocutusOfBorg | [12:34:13] <LocutusOfBorg> rationale: debian bug 829542 | 10:42 |
ubottu | Debian bug 829542 in dpkg-dev "dpkg-dev: dpkg-buildpackage misses import of Dpkg::Control::Info" [Grave,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/829542 | 10:42 |
pitti | ok, done (I think) | 10:42 |
pitti | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+publishinghistory | 10:43 |
pitti | infinity: so I guess let's just re-merge 1.18.9? | 10:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | <3 | 10:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | yes, I guess so | 10:43 |
infinity | pitti: D'oh. I hope a test was committed with the fix. | 10:44 |
pitti | not in the same commit | 10:45 |
infinity | Not at all, actually. Oh well. | 10:45 |
* infinity merges. | 10:45 | |
pitti | cheers | 10:45 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks you both | 10:45 |
pitti | yay for having a little bit of fun in devel :) | 10:46 |
* LocutusOfBorg goes back in his cave | 10:46 | |
LocutusOfBorg | broken dpkg is always fun | 10:46 |
infinity | That'll teach me to go to lunch after an upload. | 10:46 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: btw, I suppose you need to wait ~ 30 mins for retrying your FTBFS, still needs a publisher run | 10:47 |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, I guess so | 10:47 |
pitti | infinity: *shrug*, don't we all? | 10:47 |
LocutusOfBorg | but meh, I already retried :) | 10:47 |
pitti | Friday evening is ZE BEST time to upload systemd *whistle* | 10:47 |
Odd_Bloke | Doing `apt-get install python3.4` on xenial doesn't return a non-zero error code (despite the fact that it hasn't found such a package, and nothing has been installed): http://paste.ubuntu.com/18443198/ | 10:47 |
Odd_Bloke | I'm not sure what I should file a bug for that against. | 10:47 |
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, possibly untested ;) | 10:48 |
pitti | Note, selecting 'libpython3.4-minimal' for regex 'python3.4' | 10:48 |
pitti | Odd_Bloke: apt itself, I suppose | 10:48 |
Odd_Bloke | (This is going to break people doing a t->x upgrade where they explicitly install python3.4; their automation isn't going to fall over because apt didn't report an error, and then they'll be unexpectedly running 3.5) | 10:48 |
pitti | apt's greedy "try to interpret everything as regexp" has gone on my nerves more than once already | 10:49 |
pitti | it's really not helping | 10:49 |
infinity | libpython3.4-minimal also isn't in xenial. | 10:49 |
pitti | yeah, I suppose it appears in some Breaks: or so | 10:50 |
Odd_Bloke | Yeah, it's in findutils' Breaks. | 10:51 |
pitti | I really wish apt-get install, apt-cache showsrc etc. would just stick to "do what I said", not "try to second-guess me by interpreting my package name as a RE and then desperately try anything that matches" | 10:51 |
smb | FourDollars, slangasek, Just to make sure, are you aware that the upload to grub2 in Trusty will also need a follow-up upload of grub2-signed? (proposed enabled threatens me with the removal of signed grub again) | 10:56 |
FourDollars | smb: yes, I am aware that. | 10:57 |
FourDollars | smb: Any concern? | 10:59 |
smb | FourDollars, ok. So there is hope that there soon will be one, I guess. My concern right now is more that I cannot dist-upgrade without loosing signed. :) | 11:00 |
FourDollars | smb: I see. | 11:02 |
infinity | pitti: That's weird. dpkg-buildpackage worked on amd64... | 11:03 |
* infinity waits for the publisher to finish before retrying the rest. | 11:03 | |
pitti | infinity: yeah, my previous ubuntu2 also worked on amd64, not sure why | 11:09 |
infinity | pitti: I'm tyring not to think about it. I'm sure there's a reasonable explanation that will give me an aneurysm on the way to understanding it. | 11:10 |
pitti | +1 :) | 11:11 |
infinity | My not having .za power is going to get really old, really soon. | 11:11 |
FourDollars | pitti: Could you also help to update grub2-signed for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1591818? | 11:12 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1591818 in OEM Priority Project "Add support for running a 64-bit Linux kernel on a 32-bit EFI." [High,New] | 11:12 |
pitti | FourDollars: err, tell me how? | 11:13 |
infinity | pitti: pull-lp-source grub2-signed, add changelog entry, change build-deps in debian/control | 11:14 |
pitti | ah, just a no-change upload? | 11:14 |
infinity | Well, no-change, except for debian/control. :P | 11:14 |
infinity | A not-much-change upload. | 11:14 |
pitti | right | 11:15 |
pitti | wow, current version is against 1.8, we have 1.11 in -proposed; what happened to .9 and .10 | 11:15 |
pitti | and the build against 1.8 b-deps on >= 1.7 | 11:15 |
infinity | 1.8 is in updates. | 11:16 |
infinity | Looks like proposed keeps getting overwritten. | 11:16 |
pitti | FourDollars, infinity: http://paste.ubuntu.com/18444168/ ? | 11:16 |
FourDollars | pitti: I am not sure if you can upload grub2-signed or not. | 11:16 |
infinity | Or something. | 11:16 |
infinity | pitti: Bad version number. | 11:17 |
infinity | pitti: Should be 1.34.10 | 11:17 |
pitti | I can, its binaries will just land in unapproved for another archive admin inspection, AFAIK (at least linux-signed does) | 11:17 |
infinity | pitti: Otherwise fine. | 11:17 |
pitti | ack, thanks | 11:17 |
FourDollars | pitti: thx, it looks OK. | 11:17 |
infinity | Err, WTF? | 11:19 |
pitti | Rejected: | 11:19 |
pitti | File grub2-signed_1.34.10.tar.xz already exists in Primary Archive for Ubuntu, but uploaded version has different contents. See more information about this error in | 11:19 |
pitti | meh | 11:19 |
infinity | pitti: Hold on. | 11:19 |
* pitti checks publishing history and bumps | 11:19 | |
infinity | pitti: Why did you accept that grub2 upload? | 11:19 |
infinity | pitti: It reverted what was in proposed. | 11:19 |
pitti | infinity: that's what I thought too | 11:20 |
pitti | infinity: and I rejected it | 11:20 |
smb | infinity, pitti The versions are missing for a previous attempt to update that got broken by some current softlink not correct and then taken back | 11:20 |
pitti | infinity: slangasek then told me that it was deliberately reverted, and that this was ok, so I re-accepted it | 11:20 |
infinity | Oh. | 11:20 |
infinity | Oookay. | 11:20 |
FourDollars | Oops | 11:20 |
pitti | ok, 1.34.13 it is | 11:20 |
infinity | I hope someone told cyphermox he got trumped. | 11:21 |
smb | infinity, I think he know (was some kind of "oh we don't need the grub2 changes after all" thing | 11:22 |
infinity | smb: Kay. | 11:22 |
pitti | it's diffy now in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=1 | 11:24 |
pitti | but I don't want to self-accept | 11:24 |
infinity | pitti: I already got it. | 11:25 |
pitti | cheers | 11:25 |
=== hikiko is now known as desrt_ | ||
=== desrt_ is now known as hikiko | ||
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
=== dpm_ is now known as dpm | ||
Bluefoxicy | lol... ternary DNS | 12:48 |
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
=== hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
cyphermox | infinity: pitti: grub2> all is good | 13:13 |
infinity | cyphermox: Check. | 13:29 |
Odd_Bloke | pitti: infinity: Apparently not considered a bug in apt: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1598810 | 13:42 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1598810 in apt (Ubuntu) "`apt-get install python3.4` on xenial exits 0 despite python3.4 not being available" [Undecided,Opinion] | 13:42 |
Odd_Bloke | In the classic vein of "I wrote and/or use this every day so I can't see that it's in some ways deficient" with a nice helping of condescension towards the bug reporter. | 13:43 |
=== marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
=== marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
LocutusOfBorg | pitti, please retry talloc and pptpd? :) | 13:51 |
LocutusOfBorg | I should have retried everything that was failing on universe/multiverse | 13:51 |
LocutusOfBorg | they are both in main and failed for dpkg | 13:52 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: done | 14:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | <3 | 14:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'll look at them, thanks | 14:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | I don't know how to check which packages needs retry, but I think we should be good now | 14:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | I looked at excuses for missing builds | 14:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | but only to stuff uploaded/syncd today, older builds might have failed | 14:02 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+builds?build_text=&build_state=failed&arch_tag=all isn't a too bad place to start | 14:02 |
pitti | actually, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+builds?build_text=&build_state=failed&arch_tag=i386 is easier (it should have failed on i386) | 14:02 |
pitti | LocutusOfBorg: there are only a handful which failed today, I'll retry them all | 14:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | indeed thanks | 14:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | but I guess I already retried them | 14:03 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm trying to understand something that was "given back" on a particular architecture only | 14:04 |
pitti | nope, that was it, no further victims | 14:04 |
LocutusOfBorg | wonderful | 14:04 |
* LocutusOfBorg leaves | 14:05 | |
xnox | slangasek, should initramfs have valid /etc/passwd & /etc/group ? such that e.g. | 14:07 |
doko | jamespage, rbasak: python2.7 2.7.10 is now in -proposed. would be nice if you could give it a quick check (openstack) | 14:07 |
xnox | people can set non-default user names & groups in mdadm and expect it to work | 14:07 |
infinity | xnox: That's certainly never been a design goal. | 14:08 |
infinity | xnox: But if mdadm relies on that, it should figure out how to make it work. | 14:09 |
xnox | infinity, yes, that's what i'm trying to make work | 14:09 |
xnox | the default is "if no config found use: 0 (root), and 6 (disk)" | 14:09 |
xnox | the initramfs hooks write out CREATE user=root, group=disk -> which then fails to resolve lol | 14:10 |
infinity | xnox: Can the IDs be resolved at hook time, and used numerically at boot time? | 14:11 |
rbasak | doko: my team doesn't touch openstack any more. I'll leave to jamespage - not sure if he's in today or not. | 14:12 |
xnox | infinity, code does not support that in mdadm at the moment. | 14:12 |
* xnox ponders stuff | 14:12 | |
rbasak | Or maybe beisner can help, but I expect he's on vacation today (US holiday) | 14:12 |
xnox | infinity, yeah i need your help =) | 14:13 |
infinity | xnox: What are you doing in the next session slot? | 14:18 |
xnox | infinity, no idea. | 14:18 |
infinity | xnox: Well, if you want to find somewhere to get hacky, we can. | 14:19 |
xnox | not doing much now either, would love to have your opinion. | 14:19 |
xnox | infinity, where are you? | 14:19 |
infinity | xnox: Listening to Vangrant talk about his reproducible build network. | 14:19 |
xnox | ack | 14:19 |
zyga | pitti: hey, what kind of extra reassurance do you need for snapd to migrate in xenial? | 14:48 |
pitti | zyga: 1597329 hasn't been verified, it's only been 4 days, and yakkety is still broken | 14:51 |
zyga | pitti: ok, I'm looking at why yakkety may be broken | 15:00 |
zyga | pitti: once I unbreak or understand yakkety, what's the next step, just verification? | 15:00 |
pitti | zyga: yes | 15:00 |
pitti | zyga: y> appreciated; it's been broken since 2.0.2 | 15:01 |
zyga | pitti: this fits into my "make snappy work everywhere" goal :) | 15:02 |
zyga | ubuntu too :) | 15:02 |
sil2100 | !dmbping | 15:09 |
sil2100 | !dmb-ping | 15:09 |
sil2100 | hmmm | 15:09 |
sil2100 | Ah, no ubottu? | 15:09 |
sil2100 | No, he's here | 15:09 |
ubottu | bdmurray, BenC, cyphermox, infinity, micahg, rbasak, sil2100: DMB ping. | 15:09 |
* zyga runs autopackagetests for snappy on yakkety, trying to understand the issue | 15:23 | |
rbasak | Laney, infinity: I added juliank to ~ubuntu-core-dev, which indirectly makes him a member of ~ubuntu-dev. So I don't need to explicitly add him to ~ubuntu-dev, right? | 15:32 |
rbasak | (also he was already an Ubuntu member anyway) | 15:33 |
infinity | rbasak: Yeah, the implicit membership should be fine. | 15:34 |
rbasak | OK, thanks. | 15:34 |
juliank | xnox: I'm a core-dev now, we should celebrate! | 16:08 |
=== JanC is now known as Guest28478 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
xnox | yeah =) | 22:37 |
xnox | juliank, well done | 22:37 |
infinity | pitti: After fallout in several other packages was sorted, you have a dpkg. Cheers. | 23:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!