[09:22] <popey> jibel: I have an urgent unav click incoming soon. the upstream map tile provider has changed its terms of service (many open source projects are affected by this including GNOME Maps), will someone be able to test it this week?
[09:23] <jibel> popey, yes, it shouldn't be a problem this week
[09:23] <popey> great, thanks
[09:36] <jibel> oSoMoN, silo 79 approved
[09:54] <sil2100> dbarth, jibel: should I publish the xenial-only arm64-only oxide-qt landing as is?
[09:54] <sil2100> Not sure if there's much more we can test besides 'just do it'
[10:01] <jibel> sil2100, there is nothing we can test until there is an image
[10:03] <sil2100> jibel, dbarth: ok, published, will publish webbrowser-app in a moment
[10:03] <oSoMoN> jibel, thanks!
[10:05] <pete-woods> trainguards: hey folks, could someone restart the failed PPC job in (https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-025/+packages)
[10:05] <pete-woods> it's the usual doxygen crashes every now and again for no known reason
[10:05] <sil2100> pete-woods: done
[10:05] <pete-woods> sil2100: thanks!
[10:05] <sil2100> yw!
[10:11] <oSoMoN> sil2100, would you mind publishing silo 79 on my behalf?
[10:11] <sil2100> oSoMoN: sure
[15:44] <Saviq> robru, does bileto check for source-only uploads where determining the built status? https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1634 says it's built, but https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-012/+packages says it's still pending publishing
[16:10] <robru> Saviq: what do you mean source only? As opposed to what? It checks whatever lplib reports about the status of the builds
[16:10] <Saviq> robru, ones that don't have MPs
[16:10] <Saviq> robru, right, so it doesn't differentiate between MP-based or direct uploads
[16:12] <robru> Saviq: lp itself can't distinguish between an MP build or a manual source, they're all just source packages. Only bileto tracks the MPs that went into it
[16:13] <Saviq> robru, ok so the problem seems to be that lplib lies about the status of packages then
[16:13] <Saviq> wonder why it would show the right status on web and not report it on lplib
[16:13] <Saviq> *liblp
[16:13] <Saviq> *whatever
[16:16] <robru> Saviq: how long has it been like this? Keep in mind bileto just polls every 15 minutes so you're probably just seeing race conditions where bileto has stale info
[16:26] <Saviq> robru, hmm, that may be
[16:32] <Saviq> robru, but I'd say no, since https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-012-0-status/19508/consoleFull it said building, in https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-012-0-status/19509/consoleFull it said built, and I mentioned the issue a good 20mins later
[16:32] <Saviq> when it was still not published
[16:34] <robru> Saviq: must be some delay in the publisher then? Bileto doesn't actually check if it's published or pending, only checks the build states
[16:34] <Saviq> robru, oh right, it was built
[16:35] <Saviq> just not published
[16:39] <rvr> pete-woods: Silo 25 is approved