=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [10:10] Hi pitti [10:11] hey rhuddie, how are you? [10:11] pitti, I'm great thanks, and you? [10:11] quite well too, thanks; slowly winning over NetworkManager's configuration syntax :) [10:11] oh, well, I hope I don't cause you more problems :) [10:12] I've found an issue using autopkgtest with latest phone images [10:12] the test runs get stuck at "Waiting for desktop to boot" [10:13] see here: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git/tree/ssh-setup/adb#n219 [10:13] it looks that the dbus interface is changed [10:14] The required IsActive property is removed and replaced with com.canonical.Unity.FocusInfo, where isPidFocused method takes required pid and returns bool [10:14] urgh [10:15] yes :) [10:15] how unfriendly [10:16] yes, unfortunately I think this will affect all the automated phone testing [10:16] rhuddie: do you have replacement command? [10:17] not sure how the emulator works these days, if it can still boot phone images I can use that [10:18] pitti, this one seems to work, but I'm not sure that it will do exactly as the old one was: gdbus call --timeout 5 --session --dest com.canonical.Unity.FocusInfo --object-path / --method com.canonical.Unity.FocusInfo.isPidFocused $(pidof unity8) [10:20] rhuddie: but how is that specific to the greeter? [10:20] wouldn't unity8 also be focussed when unlocked? [10:20] oh, that doesn't matter actually [10:20] we just need some indication of "unity is ready" [10:21] pitti, I'm not sure of that. I can give it a try and run locally to see if it waits appropriately [10:33] pitti, the good news is that the command did wait for unity8 to be in running state before proceeding [10:34] pitti, the bad news is that the HideGreeter method is also removed, so it can't unlock the greeter [10:35] rhuddie: hmm; it seems that needs to be put back then [10:35] we must have some noninteractive way to get rid of the gretter.. [10:35] how come that this could even land? I thought we ran tests on MPs [10:36] yes, clearly some hole in the process [10:39] pitti, rhuddie: it was a required landing for a security fix for the osk in xmir apps as it could cross contaminate other x apps apparently [10:40] err [10:40] that sounds wrong [10:40] sorry I mean other xapp could see key presses [10:40] if I can send out arbitrary D-Bus commands, I already 0wn the box, so what's the point of dropping that API? [10:41] pitti: it was trigging osk on xmir not the app inside xmir so it needed locking down [10:43] pitti: so if you had 2 xapps open both of them would see the key presses, now it is done on the active pid which is obviously what is causing this issue :( [10:43] davmor2: but how is that related to removing a d-bus method? [10:44] pitti: I assume it is how they are triggering the osk correctly with the locked down dbus call saviq/mzannetti can possibly help you more with detail [10:45] davmor2: well, SEP :) [10:45] but thanks for the heads-up [10:46] pitti: https://trello.com/c/XFw0bn8O/3386-1595-ubuntu-landing-046-ota12-qtmir-elleo I don't think there is much more info in here to help you === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [13:00] pitti, I've raised a bug about the missing dbus methods, it seems it wasn't an intended change: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1599145 [13:00] Launchpad bug 1599145 in Canonical System Image "com.canonical.UnityGreeter dbus methods removed" [Critical,Triaged] [13:22] rhuddie: oh, thanks! good catch [13:24] pitti, no prob. best thing is there should be no change needed in autopkgtest :) [14:32] wxl: likely your images will implode on install with bug 1599174 , currently it installs but hasn't built *today* yet [14:32] bug 1599174 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "dpkg seg fault warning during install" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1599174 === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [16:11] tsimonq2: what does huh mean? easier to actually ask something ;) [16:12] flocculant: well you said Lubuntu wasn't building, I had to take a second look :) [16:12] or hadn't built yet [16:12] I was just wondering if something was off [16:27] aah [16:28] it hadn't built yet - so installed - suspect it will fail to reboot when it has built today :) [16:32] flocculant: ...why? [16:34] nvm - I left a note for wxl to read [18:49] wxl: as suspected :)