[07:18] <plashenkov> RAOF: Hello, Chris, there is a “verification-done” issue here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1574693 Please could you release it to updates? Or, if it is currently not possible, when it could be released?
[07:19] <RAOF> plashenkov: That's been in -proposed for 4 days; standard proceedure is to let it bake in -proposed for 7 days before it's a candidate for promotion to -updates.
[07:20] <RAOF> plashenkov: (See also: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure )
[07:22] <RAOF> plashenkov: The 7-day baking period can be waived if there's an “obviously-safe” (HAH) patch and/or the bug fixed is super-important. It doesn't look like this bug qualifies for that?
[07:24] <plashenkov> RAOF: I.e. it will take longer period?
[07:24] <RAOF> plashenkov: Yeah. Unless there's some particular reason why it should be pushed out quicker it'll become a valid candidate to promote to -updates in 3 days.
[07:26] <plashenkov> RAOF: Well, okay. I look forward :)
[07:33] <lordievader> Good morning
[07:45] <jamespage> pitti, hey - can we move forward on the sru under bug 1585660 now?
[07:45] <jamespage>  I'd like to get that rolling through the process
[07:45] <jamespage> (apologies if that duped - bad network connection)
[10:18] <jamiebennett> Can someone give me feedback on the SRU for ubuntu-core-launcher 1.0.34 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-core-launcher/+bug/1593396 ? There are a number of fixes that we are waiting on so I'm keen to see it progress.
[10:26] <mwhudson> jamiebennett: it's a tangent but is there a plan to start uploading that as a non-native package?
[10:27] <mwhudson> jamiebennett: i'm probably going to upload that as 1.0.34-1 to debian tomorrow and as there's no ubuntu in the package version i think autosync will try to copy it over your package...
[10:31] <jamiebennett> mwhudson: For non-native, it is something we are planning for later, yes
[10:45] <mwhudson> jamiebennett: also you're probably not the person to complain to about this, but where did the tarball for the package in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/+queue come from? it doesn't seem to match the release on https://github.com/snapcore/snap-confine/releases
[10:46] <mwhudson> (i think maybe the one in the upload queue is a straight git export and the one on github is the output of some 'make dist' type thing?)
[10:49] <jamiebennett> mwhudson: I'm not sure. You could ping mvo if you need an answer.
[10:49] <mwhudson> jamiebennett: yeah, i thought the same and just did in #snappy :-)
[14:22] <flocculant> infinity: now that balloons wandered off I'm never really sure who to mention things to, but I've confirmed this in us and Ubuntu, not confirmed in lubuntu but I think they've not built latest yet > bug 1599174
[14:23]  * balloons would say "floated"
[14:23] <flocculant> ha ha
[14:24] <infinity> flocculant: Lovely. :/
[14:24] <flocculant> yup
[14:24] <flocculant> thought I'd best tell someone ;)
[14:25] <infinity> Wish you hadn't, since it's likely my fault. :P
[14:25] <flocculant> infinity: ha ha
[14:26] <flocculant> though I can at least tell you that dpkg doesn't appear to affect installed systems - as I got it ~6 hours ago locally and have installed/updated *things* since
[14:26] <flocculant> *that* dpkg
[14:50] <seb128> willcooke, ^ that looks like the issue you hit earlier trying the daily
[14:50]  * willcooke reads
[14:50] <willcooke> yeah, looks like it
[14:51] <seb128> good, I was about to download a daily to see if I had the issue/confirm it was one thing we need to look at, seems I don't
[14:51] <seb128> need to
[14:51] <willcooke> same deal, ok in lubuntu not ok in Ubuntu
[14:52] <flocculant> willcooke: lubuntu hasn't built yet *today*
[14:52] <willcooke> h
[14:52] <willcooke> ha
[16:02] <tsimonq2> flocculant: huh?