[12:57] <mterry> josharenson, I just rebooted (with silo 32 installed) and when the unity8-greeter came up, it was prompting me for the "lightdm" user (as the only user) -- know what might have caused that?
[12:57] <mterry> josharenson isn't here...
[13:27] <mterry> dandrader, updated greeter-focus with some of your fixes, thanks.  I like your FocusScope.focusedItem idea  :)  I have had a hard time grokking qml focus
[13:28] <dandrader> mterry, thanks
[13:28] <dandrader> mterry, found a problem with one of its prerequisites though
[13:28] <mterry> dandrader, oh yeah slim_greeter?  I think I saw your comment
[13:29] <mterry> dandrader, ah yeah NO_TESTS, which I didn't even know we had -- we should set that if nocheck is in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
[13:49] <Saviq> +1
[14:30] <mterry> josharenson,  I just rebooted (with silo 32 installed) and when the unity8-greeter came up, it was prompting me for the "lightdm" user (as the only user) -- know what might have caused that?
[14:30] <mterry> josharenson, also I filed an MP against your slim_greeter branch to fix a review comment
[14:31] <josharenson> mterry: can you send me the logs? usually a unity8 issue
[14:31] <josharenson> mterry: and ill review/merge it
[14:38] <mterry> josharenson, ok let me try to reproduce with latest from silo, I see it has an update for me
[14:39] <mterry> josharenson, my greeter-focus branch got approved (thanks dandrader_), so once the split and focus branches land, the u8-greeter should be very dog-foodable
[14:39] <mterry> Saviq, do we have another u8 silo going?
[14:39] <josharenson> mterry: :-D
[14:40] <Saviq> mterry, we're trying small ones
[14:40] <Saviq> mterry, so https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1525 is next in queue
[14:40] <Saviq> mterry, then split greeter (should we pop lightdm from there?) https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1060
[14:40] <mterry> Saviq, hrm
[14:40] <dandrader>  \o/
[14:41] <mterry> Saviq, josharenson: I don't know where you are on the gui side of things, but I might not want to block the rest of those fixes on the session gui being done?
[14:41] <Saviq> mterry, you tell me
[14:41] <mterry> Saviq, I'd also like to add the just-approved greeter-focus to the split greeter silo then.  It makes it usable
[14:41] <Saviq> mterry, +1
[14:42] <Saviq> mterry, we'll have another general-purpose silo just after I suppose
[14:42] <mterry> Saviq, as for lightdm, I think we need those fixes, but we do want to at some point grab latest yakkety lightdm wholesale (especially once the in-session greeter support is finalized)
[14:42] <Saviq> mterry, we only care about them on xenial+o I suppose?
[14:42] <Saviq> (apart from yakkety)
[14:43] <mterry> Saviq, actually just on vivid+o I think.  robert backported yakkety lightdm to xenial-updates
[14:43] <Saviq> mterry, do we care about them on phones? we prolly will for multi user and such?
[14:44] <mterry> Saviq, sorry, care about what on phones?
[14:44] <Saviq> mterry, those lightdm fixes
[14:45] <mterry> Saviq: yeah....  I guess you're right.  We only need them for testing split greeter on phone I think.  Right, josharenson?
[14:45] <mterry> Saviq, and we'll get them with my in-progress in-session lightdm branch, which will involve a full backport anyway
[14:46] <Saviq> mterry, so I *think* we could skip lightdm in that landing (or just pull the xenial-updates one into vivid-overlay?)
[14:47] <mterry> Saviq, we could pull, yeah.  Might warrant testing, just to confirm nothing else in there breaks us  :)   But I think it's safe to skip.  But I'd want josharenson's confirmation on that, he's closer
[14:47] <Saviq> mzanetti, dandrader, what are we missing to mark https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1525 Lander-Approved?
[14:47] <Saviq> apart from Elleo ;p
[14:48] <josharenson> mterry: yeah that makes sense
[14:48] <Saviq> ah he's just not here
[14:48] <mzanetti> IMO good to go (not sure if the issue you were talking about yday was related to this silo)
[14:48] <Saviq> mterry, train would get confused anyway as those MPs are marked merged
[14:48] <mterry> Saviq, ok dropping them
[14:48] <dandrader> Saviq, a lander marking it "lander-approved"
[14:49] <dandrader> :)
[14:49] <Saviq> mzanetti, I wasn't testing that silo at all
[14:49] <dandrader> sounds like mzanetti is the one to do the honors
[14:49] <Saviq> sounds like nobody wants their fingerprints on that button ;)
[14:49] <mterry> josharenson, Saviq: focus branch added (with tiny pre-req, that I *could* un-pre-req, but it's a tiny and good fix anyway).  And dropped lightdm branches
[14:50] <mzanetti> man, I tested it from a unity8 point of view. have no idea what's going in the lower OSK layers :D
[14:50] <mzanetti> but ok, it did work quite well for me
[14:50] <dandrader> Saviq, mzanetti, I can mark it but it would be a conflict of interests I guess
[14:50] <mterry> I left gui in there...  But if we're ready to go with silo, I'm fine with pushing it off.  Though josharenson may feel differently
[14:50] <Saviq> mterry, drop packages from the PPA please, I'll drop from source package names
[14:50] <mterry> Saviq, got it
[14:50] <josharenson> mterry: I'd rather land the first 2 and delay the gui if necessary
[14:51] <mterry> josharenson, yeah no reason to put pressure on it
[14:51] <mzanetti> dandrader, Saviq, I approved it...
[14:51] <Saviq> BOOM
[14:51] <mzanetti> lets see what britney says
[14:51] <dandrader> mzanetti, thanks
[14:51] <josharenson> mterry: its close to being done (should be totally done actually), but since the deisgn totally changed and it never received much scrutiny compared to the other 2, I could live with it being landed later
[14:52] <mterry> josharenson, we'll have a big silo coming after it sounds like
[14:58] <ltinkl> mterry, been trying to hide my secret keyboard indicator silo from Saviq's eyes :) psst
[14:58] <mterry> :)
[14:59] <mterry> josharenson, Saviq: OK, dropped gui branch from silo, dropped lightdm packages from ppa, and rebuilt for the fun of it (though we'll have to rebuild again once other silo lands)
[14:59] <josharenson> mterry: and once I merge your branch
[14:59] <mterry> josharenson, oh!  whoops  :P
[15:00] <mterry> josharenson, didn't think of that
[15:00] <josharenson> mterry: it looks fine, I'm just trying a clean build w/ no tests real quick
[15:00] <mterry> josharenson, do you know why that wasn't a problem before?
[15:00] <mterry> even with tests?
[15:00] <mterry> josharenson, did it pick up the moc file from one of the test directories?   (how?)
[15:01] <josharenson> mterry: i'm not entirely sure.. I'm wondering if it was picking them up from an old build w/ tests enabled?
[15:01] <mterry> josharenson, you'll like my in-session greeter branch.  Reduces a lot of the complexity of our lightdm plugins.  We even can do away with a mock lightdm plugin entirely, just one simpler mock liblightdm library
[15:01] <josharenson> mterry: sounds nice :-)
[15:02] <mterry> now if only it worked...  :)
[15:03] <josharenson> mterry: details...
[17:03] <mterry> ltinkl, ok looking at keyboardIndicator branch for realz now
[17:03] <mterry> :)
[17:05] <mterry> ltinkl, what's the story with using QSettings here...  is that the first time we're using unity8's QSettings location?
[17:06] <mterry> ltinkl, do we not have a better place?  Like we use gsettings elsewhere for this sort of thing, right?
[17:32] <ltinkl> mterry, yeah it's gsettings for the storage, this one is just for the one-time check
[17:33] <mterry> ltinkl, I'm working on a quick dh-migrations script for ya, per my latest comment
[17:33] <ltinkl> mterry, alright, will have a look later, thanks! kinda EOD here
[17:33] <mterry> ltinkl, ok go away  :)  I'll have a present on monday morning
[17:33] <ltinkl> mterry, thx, o/
[18:50] <mterry> Poor vivid.  It just wants to retire.