| tsimonq2 | agaida: I don't touch Lubuntu code, talk to Julien about that :P :) | 00:06 |
|---|---|---|
| agaida | tsimonq2: a) it isn't funny b) you guy captured the false not finished packaging - so it's your problem. c) Please be so kind and in case of LXQt never ever get packages from d/experimental | 08:05 |
| agaida | tsimonq2: and you should really fix it before the new LXQt release hit sid - without changes many (in other words - all) LXQt Packages will cause problems | 08:05 |
| agaida | tsimonq2: and thank you for you clarification - i'm not here to do your work, this is your project, so the ball is in your field. | 08:08 |
| tsimonq2 | agaida: yes I said that intending to be joking a little bit, sorry | 17:57 |
| tsimonq2 | agaida: so liblxqt needs to be fixed before the new LXQt release lands? what about it is broken? | 17:57 |
| tsimonq2 | agaida: I'll be happy to make sure that if I don't fix it myself, it goes to the right person | 17:58 |
| === pavlushka_ is now known as pavlushka | ||
| tsimonq2 | agaida: and what do you mean by "b) you guy captured the false not finished packaging - so it's your problem." ? | 17:58 |
| agaida | fixing is easy - get the current debian sources - you guys was a little bit to fast, after long discussions we integrated a virtual abi in the symbols file. Doing so make us independent from upstream if abi-bumps are needed - we use a new virtual abi instead of renaming the package | 18:26 |
| agaida | without this mechanism the new release would be installed and break existing packages without warning | 18:27 |
| agaida | mostly segfaults as usual - if you remember the xenial packages right from the start | 18:28 |
| agaida | tsimonq2: there are reasons putting packages into experimental - a) not production ready, b) pre-releases, really experimental stuff c) preparing releases, if uploading directly to sid would create a lot of havoc - and the packages that will be uploaded to experimental right now are c) | 18:31 |
| agaida | they will create a lot of fallout, if uploaded to sid | 18:31 |
| tsimonq2 | agaida: so what you are saying is that the liblxqt package just needs to be updated to the current version? | 18:32 |
| tsimonq2 | I see | 18:32 |
| agaida | use meld or bcompare to compare the debian dirs | 18:32 |
| tsimonq2 | alright | 18:32 |
| agaida | i'm sure you will find the differences | 18:33 |
| agaida | :) | 18:33 |
| agaida | it's a little bit tricky - but cool. And it works reliable | 18:33 |
| agaida | thats why we discussed this strategy so long | 18:34 |
| tsimonq2 | agaida: so which packages am I comparing? from GitHub and Yakkety? could you be a little bit more specific at what I'm supposed to compare the Yakkety package to? | 18:34 |
| agaida | you can apt source liblxqt0/yak and apt source liblxqt0/sid | 18:35 |
| tsimonq2 | agaida: oh so from sid, okay | 18:35 |
| agaida | it make no difference if sid or testing | 18:36 |
| agaida | i would clone the whole thing from git | 18:36 |
| tsimonq2 | agaida: GitHub or Debian's Git system? | 18:36 |
| agaida | debian | 18:36 |
| tsimonq2 | alright | 18:37 |
| agaida | they should™ be the same - but debian is official | 18:37 |
| agaida | i only mirror the debian stuff to github in case that one will send us a pull request | 18:37 |
| tsimonq2 | agaida: so I should make them the same? what am I fixing here? | 18:41 |
| agaida | erm - i think i should have a quick look at the current packaging - but basicly: yes | 18:41 |
| tsimonq2 | agaida: alright I'll play with it | 18:42 |
| redwolf | o/ | 20:16 |
| redwolf | o.o | 21:54 |
| tsimonq2 | o/ redwolf | 22:03 |
| redwolf | ø | 22:09 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!