[20:12] nice work again this week on the summaries! [20:12] adding a few more from planet and news over the weekend [21:16] pleia2: hey, I just thought I'd note something common I'm seeing in the summaries. I'm seeing something like this "... from omgubuntu.co.uk ..." instead of "... from OMG! Ubuntu! ..." [21:16] pleia2: first of all, am I right to correct it to the latter? [21:17] pleia2: also, I wonder if it's on the wiki as something not to do [21:22] tsimonq2: you can correct them whenever [21:22] and yeah, we can add it to the style guidelines [21:22] pleia2: alright, I'll do that [21:23] we want the proper name of the publication, not just the URL (unless the URL is the proper name) [21:23] pleia2: I'm a little against adding https://www.maketecheasier.com/snap-packages-vs-flatpacks/ in the newsletter, it has some wrong information, saying, "...and the technology is hard-coded to use the Snap package store. Some may be nervous of this, as Ubuntu has total control, and in fact in order to make a Snap package you’ll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (something that some peopl [21:24] e are very much against)." which if I remember correctly was proven wrong by http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2016/06/howto-host-your-own-snap-store.html [21:24] pleia2: thoughts? [21:24] tsimonq2: I was under the impression that you still needed to sign the CLA [21:25] tsimonq2: the article by dustin is about hosting you own whole store, outside of Ubuntu's ecosystem [21:25] so the author of the article is conflating some things [21:25] pleia2: hmm, I didn't think you needed to sign the CLA o upload to your own store [21:26] pleia2: but besides that point, it says that you need to use Ubuntu's store [21:26] pleia2: which is wrong [21:26] well, realistically speaking there aren't any third party snap stores [21:26] dustin's article speaks in hypotheticals as a response to criticism [21:27] we can leave an editorial disclaimer in our summary, but I think the article still has a lot of valuable points [21:28] pleia2: alright [21:32] pleia2: wow, including me and you, we had seven contributors to the newsletter this week! [21:32] yeah :D [21:32] after the epic fail that was pleia2-writes-everything there has been an uptick [21:32] pleia2: \o/ [21:33] pleia2: I would link to Dustin's article in the editorial note [21:33] I'll think about it, that makes it a bit longer than I'd like, and we've already reported on his article [21:34] pleia2: ruh roh, register wall: http://www.infoworld.com/article/3091884/linux/review-ubuntu-server-16-04-lts-shines.html [21:34] alright [21:34] pleia2: similar to the paywall :P [21:34] sigh, we'll have to delete it [21:34] it was free earlier this week, but I guess it expired [21:34] pleia2: done [21:34] or maybe you registered? ;) [21:34] nope [21:35] a lot of these pay/register wall things have a free period [21:35] it's hit is a few times [21:35] oh really? huh [21:37] yeah, usually 5 to 7 days [21:37] pleia2: other than that, it has a 👍 from me, all the summaries are done! (not an editorial 👍, it's just that the summaries are a all done :P) [21:38] M? [21:38] pleia2: that's a thumbs up unicode symbol [21:38] oh, haha [21:42] grrr wiki [21:43] pleia2: I was going to edit those style guidelines but the wiki doesn't like me right now :( [21:57] pleia2: edited, how does it look? [21:59] lgtm [22:03] pleia2: \o/