[20:12] <pleia2> nice work again this week on the summaries!
[20:12] <pleia2> adding a few more from planet and news over the weekend
[21:16] <tsimonq2> pleia2: hey, I just thought I'd note something common I'm seeing in the summaries. I'm seeing something like this "... from omgubuntu.co.uk ..." instead of "... from OMG! Ubuntu! ..."
[21:16] <tsimonq2> pleia2: first of all, am I right to correct it to the latter?
[21:17] <tsimonq2> pleia2: also, I wonder if it's on the wiki as something not to do
[21:22] <pleia2> tsimonq2: you can correct them whenever
[21:22] <pleia2> and yeah, we can add it to the style guidelines
[21:22] <tsimonq2> pleia2: alright, I'll do that
[21:23] <pleia2> we want the proper name of the publication, not just the URL (unless the URL is the proper name)
[21:23] <tsimonq2> pleia2: I'm a little against adding https://www.maketecheasier.com/snap-packages-vs-flatpacks/ in the newsletter, it has some wrong information, saying, "...and the technology is hard-coded to use the Snap package store. Some may be nervous of this, as Ubuntu has total control, and in fact in order to make a Snap package you’ll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (something that some peopl
[21:24] <tsimonq2> e are very much against)." which if I remember correctly was proven wrong by http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2016/06/howto-host-your-own-snap-store.html
[21:24] <tsimonq2> pleia2: thoughts?
[21:24] <pleia2> tsimonq2: I was under the impression that you still needed to sign the CLA
[21:25] <pleia2> tsimonq2: the article by dustin is about hosting you own whole store, outside of Ubuntu's ecosystem
[21:25] <pleia2> so the author of the article is conflating some things
[21:25] <tsimonq2> pleia2: hmm, I didn't think you needed to sign the CLA o upload to your own store
[21:26] <tsimonq2> pleia2: but besides that point, it says that you need to use Ubuntu's store
[21:26] <tsimonq2> pleia2: which is wrong
[21:26] <pleia2> well, realistically speaking there aren't any third party snap stores
[21:26] <pleia2> dustin's article speaks in hypotheticals as a response to criticism
[21:27] <pleia2> we can leave an editorial disclaimer in our summary, but I think the article still has a lot of valuable points
[21:28] <tsimonq2> pleia2: alright
[21:32] <tsimonq2> pleia2: wow, including me and you, we had seven contributors to the newsletter this week!
[21:32] <pleia2> yeah :D
[21:32] <pleia2> after the epic fail that was pleia2-writes-everything there has been an uptick
[21:32] <tsimonq2> pleia2: \o/
[21:33] <tsimonq2> pleia2: I would link to Dustin's article in the editorial note
[21:33] <pleia2> I'll think about it, that makes it a bit longer than I'd like, and we've already reported on his article
[21:34] <tsimonq2> pleia2: ruh roh, register wall: http://www.infoworld.com/article/3091884/linux/review-ubuntu-server-16-04-lts-shines.html
[21:34] <tsimonq2> alright
[21:34] <tsimonq2> pleia2: similar to the paywall :P
[21:34] <pleia2> sigh, we'll have to delete it
[21:34] <pleia2> it was free earlier this week, but I guess it expired
[21:34] <tsimonq2> pleia2: done
[21:34] <tsimonq2> or maybe you registered? ;)
[21:34] <pleia2> nope
[21:35] <pleia2> a lot of these pay/register wall things have a free period
[21:35] <pleia2> it's hit is a few times
[21:35] <tsimonq2> oh really? huh
[21:37] <pleia2> yeah, usually 5 to 7 days
[21:37] <tsimonq2> pleia2: other than that, it has a 👍 from me, all the summaries are done! (not an editorial 👍, it's just that the summaries are a  all done :P)
[21:38] <pleia2> M?
[21:38] <tsimonq2> pleia2: that's a thumbs up unicode symbol
[21:38] <pleia2> oh, haha
[21:42] <tsimonq2> grrr wiki
[21:43] <tsimonq2> pleia2: I was going to edit those style guidelines but the wiki doesn't like me right now :(
[21:57] <tsimonq2> pleia2: edited, how does it look?
[21:59] <pleia2> lgtm
[22:03] <tsimonq2> pleia2: \o/