=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
dbarth | cjwatson: ping? how can i help about silo 26 ? trying to resync since last thursday | 09:34 |
---|---|---|
cjwatson | dbarth: Don't know, sorry | 09:35 |
cjwatson | dbarth: I was just driving by with advice; click is not my responsibility ... | 09:36 |
dbarth | cjwatson: hi | 09:40 |
dbarth | cjwatson: ah ok nw; i'll sort out build issues with trainguards then maybe | 09:40 |
dbarth | i'll also need to update one of the branches to clean all of the trust dbs, not just the location one | 09:41 |
Saviq | sil2100, hey, can you please recycle https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1525/landing-076-vivid/excuses.html thanks | 10:12 |
Saviq | seb128, or you, if you're quicker to it ↑ :) | 10:17 |
morphis | sil2100: can we published https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1579 ? | 10:20 |
sil2100 | Saviq: done | 10:52 |
Saviq | tx | 10:52 |
sil2100 | morphis: it's published, isn't it? | 10:53 |
sil2100 | morphis: I published it in the morning | 10:53 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
rvr | chihchun_afk: Silo 0 approved | 11:44 |
sil2100 | seb128: hey! Did you do, by any chance, a preNEW review of repowerd in https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1487 ? | 11:49 |
sil2100 | seb128: I checked the package briefly and have a few comments, but don't think any of my issues would be blocking - if you find a moment, could you take a look at it too? | 11:56 |
sil2100 | seb128: it would get to the usual yakkety UNAPPROVED queue but for all the others it goes straight to the overlays | 11:57 |
sil2100 | s/UNAPPROVED/NEW | 11:57 |
morphis | sil2100: ah, it in proposed for yakkety that is why the ticket is still open | 12:14 |
=== fginther` is now known as fginther | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
dbarth | sil2100, jibel: hey, apparently you guys took part of silo 26 in an image already | 14:41 |
dbarth | we're doing a build update; how should we proceed? | 14:42 |
jibel | dbarth, what do you mean, which part in particular? | 14:43 |
dbarth | jibel: the click module | 14:44 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
Saviq | robru, hmm what's going on here https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1525 - it says britney failed (there was a regression before - was restarted and passed) even though everything's a valid candidate? | 16:25 |
Saviq | oh hmm not true | 16:26 |
Saviq | it wants qtubuntu >= 0.63, but that's there in the same silo | 16:26 |
robru | Saviq: looking | 16:27 |
Saviq | robru, ok I can see what's going on, we've lost some architectures :/ | 16:28 |
robru | ah | 16:28 |
robru | Saviq: if there's an arch that regressed though the ticket status should say 'Failed to build' not 'Successfully bult' | 16:29 |
Saviq | robru, indeed, we'd have noticed that issue earlier | 16:29 |
robru | Saviq: was qtubuntu ever available for arm64, powerpc, and ppc64el? | 16:30 |
Saviq | robru, it wasn't, but it's a new dep :/ | 16:30 |
robru | Saviq: it seems in your ubuntu-keyboard packaging you need to make the >0.63 dep specify not those arches | 16:30 |
Saviq | trying to find out whether it's a real dep now | 16:30 |
Saviq | robru, or that, yeah | 16:30 |
robru | Saviq: right, or depending on how real that dep is, you may want to stop building ubuntu-keyboard on those arches. | 16:31 |
robru | brb | 16:31 |
Saviq | robru, yup, thanks | 16:31 |
dbarth_ | hey trainguards | 17:11 |
robru | dbarth_: hi | 17:11 |
dbarth_ | we're re-targetting silo 26 to just have a trust-store branch | 17:11 |
dbarth_ | hey robru | 17:11 |
dbarth_ | could you empty the 026 ppa of the click packages please? | 17:11 |
dbarth_ | this way the silo can land fine on 3 releases at once | 17:11 |
robru | dbarth_: sure can | 17:11 |
dbarth_ | and we're (unfortunately) splitting the click part to land separately on Y, and v+x on the other side | 17:12 |
dbarth_ | robru: while we're at it, if there is a special combo key to get v+x in one go ? ;) | 17:12 |
dbarth_ | we mostly need to give sil2100 a vivid build update for midori asap | 17:13 |
robru | dbarth_: hmmmm, we had to remove xenial+vivid so that people would stop using it. | 17:13 |
robru | dbarth_: can you just do the vivid one first and then xenial after? | 17:14 |
robru | dbarth_: actually if you're forking the code anyway, why even bother with xenial? why not just do yakkety and vivid? | 17:14 |
robru | I guess because we'll eventually switch to xenial | 17:14 |
robru | dbarth_: are you sure there's no way to trio land it? there are hooks available to be able to manage control file changes for yakkety/xenial/vivid all in the same source tree | 17:15 |
robru | dbarth_: like if it's just a simple delta between yakkety and vivid, it's possible to have bileto apply a patch to the source tree before building the vivid package. | 17:16 |
dbarth_ | robru: yp no worry, can do 2 landngs in a row | 17:17 |
dbarth_ | robru: yeah, we'll need xenial/arm64 as well | 17:17 |
dbarth_ | ah with the hooks maybe | 17:17 |
dbarth_ | but really we re looking for a fast way for vivid and unblock that part | 17:18 |
dbarth_ | what i'd rather have is V packages for sil2000 asap | 17:19 |
dbarth_ | once he has that, i can look into the hooks (there's one already for trust-store) and make the silo proper | 17:19 |
dbarth_ | robru: like this, right? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/trust-store/trunk/view/head:/debian/bileto_pre_release_hook | 17:21 |
dobey | woah what | 17:34 |
robru | dobey: what? | 17:42 |
dobey | oh i just saw the backlog and got frightened for a minute about splitting landings up in new branches | 17:44 |
robru | dobey: apparently click needs to fork for yakkety? I don't follow click development | 17:45 |
dobey | robru: well, doesn't need to fork exactly, but needs a lot of work to get rid of packagekit | 17:45 |
dobey | if only we had something to replace it with... | 17:46 |
robru | alex-abreu: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/log/1659/build/2/info/ when targetting just vivid, you need to fork lp:click and replace the version on the first line of the changelog with a vivid version (so s/16.10/15.04/). You can't target trunk with a vivid landing that would cause the version numbers to go backwards. | 17:50 |
alex-abreu | robru, yes that's what I doing now | 17:50 |
robru | alex-abreu: ok, just saw the failure. carry on | 17:50 |
alex-abreu | robru, thx for the heads up | 17:50 |
robru | you're welcome! | 17:51 |
robru | alex-abreu: also I just pushed some new build code, shouldn't be an issue, but if anything explodes do ping me right away | 17:52 |
alex-abreu | ok thx | 17:54 |
Saviq | mterry, can you please recycle https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1378/landing-054-vivid/excuses.html for bfiller, thanks | 17:54 |
mterry | Saviq, bfiller: done | 17:55 |
bfiller | mterry: thanks, might need for xenial and yakety as well https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1378/landing-054-xenial/excuses.html https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1378/landing-054-yakkety/excuses.html | 17:56 |
mterry | bfiller, only xenial needed it, and has now been retried | 17:57 |
bfiller | mterry: thanks | 17:58 |
robru | sil2100: slangasek: meeting? | 17:59 |
sil2100 | robru: on it | 17:59 |
sil2100 | hm, ok, browser problems, need a few more moments | 18:00 |
dobey | robru: i guess an "overlay" option in bileto that only went to xenial and vivid in the overlay would be a good idea for cases like this | 18:21 |
robru | dobey: yeah it might, would take a bit of doing though because by default if I just put x+v back it would be xenial archive and vivid overlay. I'll have to come up with a general solution for this | 18:23 |
robru | Like its currently hard coded that the first series is always archive and all subsequent are overlay | 18:25 |
dobey | oh and there's no way to manually enter the PPA any more | 18:31 |
robru | dobey: even when the manual PPA field was there, it only ever worked for single-series silos. dual/trio were *always* hard-coded as first series archive, subsequent series overlay. the field was ignored | 18:46 |
dobey | oh :( | 18:47 |
alex-abreu | cjwatson, ping | 18:47 |
=== DanChapman is now known as DanChapman__ | ||
=== DanChapman_ is now known as DanChapman | ||
cjwatson | alex-abreu: contentless pong | 20:58 |
boiko | robru: hi, I have a very trivial landing to make in history-service: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1662 | 21:07 |
boiko | robru: but it says no silos available | 21:08 |
boiko | robru: is there a express way to land that? It doesn't need QA validation, doesn't even need building to be honest :) | 21:09 |
robru | boiko: it doesn't need building? Why not just push the commit to trunk? | 21:09 |
boiko | robru: that's actually an option, indeed :) | 21:10 |
boiko | robru: I think I'll just do that then, thanks | 21:10 |
robru | boiko: you're welcome. I'll still free a couple silos anyway | 21:11 |
=== robru changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known issues: britney temporarily offline due to botched update. will revert if I can't resolve it soon | ||
=== robru changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known issues: - |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!