=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === salem_ is now known as _salem === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [09:34] cjwatson: ping? how can i help about silo 26 ? trying to resync since last thursday [09:35] dbarth: Don't know, sorry [09:36] dbarth: I was just driving by with advice; click is not my responsibility ... [09:40] cjwatson: hi [09:40] cjwatson: ah ok nw; i'll sort out build issues with trainguards then maybe [09:41] i'll also need to update one of the branches to clean all of the trust dbs, not just the location one [10:12] sil2100, hey, can you please recycle https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1525/landing-076-vivid/excuses.html thanks [10:17] seb128, or you, if you're quicker to it ↑ :) [10:20] sil2100: can we published https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1579 ? [10:52] Saviq: done [10:52] tx [10:53] morphis: it's published, isn't it? [10:53] morphis: I published it in the morning === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [11:44] chihchun_afk: Silo 0 approved [11:49] seb128: hey! Did you do, by any chance, a preNEW review of repowerd in https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1487 ? [11:56] seb128: I checked the package briefly and have a few comments, but don't think any of my issues would be blocking - if you find a moment, could you take a look at it too? [11:57] seb128: it would get to the usual yakkety UNAPPROVED queue but for all the others it goes straight to the overlays [11:57] s/UNAPPROVED/NEW [12:14] sil2100: ah, it in proposed for yakkety that is why the ticket is still open === fginther` is now known as fginther === _salem is now known as salem_ === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [14:41] sil2100, jibel: hey, apparently you guys took part of silo 26 in an image already [14:42] we're doing a build update; how should we proceed? [14:43] dbarth, what do you mean, which part in particular? [14:44] jibel: the click module === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [16:25] robru, hmm what's going on here https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1525 - it says britney failed (there was a regression before - was restarted and passed) even though everything's a valid candidate? [16:26] oh hmm not true [16:26] it wants qtubuntu >= 0.63, but that's there in the same silo [16:27] Saviq: looking [16:28] robru, ok I can see what's going on, we've lost some architectures :/ [16:28] ah [16:29] Saviq: if there's an arch that regressed though the ticket status should say 'Failed to build' not 'Successfully bult' [16:29] robru, indeed, we'd have noticed that issue earlier [16:30] Saviq: was qtubuntu ever available for arm64, powerpc, and ppc64el? [16:30] robru, it wasn't, but it's a new dep :/ [16:30] Saviq: it seems in your ubuntu-keyboard packaging you need to make the >0.63 dep specify not those arches [16:30] trying to find out whether it's a real dep now [16:30] robru, or that, yeah [16:31] Saviq: right, or depending on how real that dep is, you may want to stop building ubuntu-keyboard on those arches. [16:31] brb [16:31] robru, yup, thanks [17:11] hey trainguards [17:11] dbarth_: hi [17:11] we're re-targetting silo 26 to just have a trust-store branch [17:11] hey robru [17:11] could you empty the 026 ppa of the click packages please? [17:11] this way the silo can land fine on 3 releases at once [17:11] dbarth_: sure can [17:12] and we're (unfortunately) splitting the click part to land separately on Y, and v+x on the other side [17:12] robru: while we're at it, if there is a special combo key to get v+x in one go ? ;) [17:13] we mostly need to give sil2100 a vivid build update for midori asap [17:13] dbarth_: hmmmm, we had to remove xenial+vivid so that people would stop using it. [17:14] dbarth_: can you just do the vivid one first and then xenial after? [17:14] dbarth_: actually if you're forking the code anyway, why even bother with xenial? why not just do yakkety and vivid? [17:14] I guess because we'll eventually switch to xenial [17:15] dbarth_: are you sure there's no way to trio land it? there are hooks available to be able to manage control file changes for yakkety/xenial/vivid all in the same source tree [17:16] dbarth_: like if it's just a simple delta between yakkety and vivid, it's possible to have bileto apply a patch to the source tree before building the vivid package. [17:17] robru: yp no worry, can do 2 landngs in a row [17:17] robru: yeah, we'll need xenial/arm64 as well [17:17] ah with the hooks maybe [17:18] but really we re looking for a fast way for vivid and unblock that part [17:19] what i'd rather have is V packages for sil2000 asap [17:19] once he has that, i can look into the hooks (there's one already for trust-store) and make the silo proper [17:21] robru: like this, right? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/trust-store/trunk/view/head:/debian/bileto_pre_release_hook [17:34] woah what [17:42] dobey: what? [17:44] oh i just saw the backlog and got frightened for a minute about splitting landings up in new branches [17:45] dobey: apparently click needs to fork for yakkety? I don't follow click development [17:45] robru: well, doesn't need to fork exactly, but needs a lot of work to get rid of packagekit [17:46] if only we had something to replace it with... [17:50] alex-abreu: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/log/1659/build/2/info/ when targetting just vivid, you need to fork lp:click and replace the version on the first line of the changelog with a vivid version (so s/16.10/15.04/). You can't target trunk with a vivid landing that would cause the version numbers to go backwards. [17:50] robru, yes that's what I doing now [17:50] alex-abreu: ok, just saw the failure. carry on [17:50] robru, thx for the heads up [17:51] you're welcome! [17:52] alex-abreu: also I just pushed some new build code, shouldn't be an issue, but if anything explodes do ping me right away [17:54] ok thx [17:54] mterry, can you please recycle https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1378/landing-054-vivid/excuses.html for bfiller, thanks [17:55] Saviq, bfiller: done [17:56] mterry: thanks, might need for xenial and yakety as well https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1378/landing-054-xenial/excuses.html https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1378/landing-054-yakkety/excuses.html [17:57] bfiller, only xenial needed it, and has now been retried [17:58] mterry: thanks [17:59] sil2100: slangasek: meeting? [17:59] robru: on it [18:00] hm, ok, browser problems, need a few more moments [18:21] robru: i guess an "overlay" option in bileto that only went to xenial and vivid in the overlay would be a good idea for cases like this [18:23] dobey: yeah it might, would take a bit of doing though because by default if I just put x+v back it would be xenial archive and vivid overlay. I'll have to come up with a general solution for this [18:25] Like its currently hard coded that the first series is always archive and all subsequent are overlay [18:31] oh and there's no way to manually enter the PPA any more [18:46] dobey: even when the manual PPA field was there, it only ever worked for single-series silos. dual/trio were *always* hard-coded as first series archive, subsequent series overlay. the field was ignored [18:47] oh :( [18:47] cjwatson, ping === DanChapman is now known as DanChapman__ === DanChapman_ is now known as DanChapman [20:58] alex-abreu: contentless pong [21:07] robru: hi, I have a very trivial landing to make in history-service: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1662 [21:08] robru: but it says no silos available [21:09] robru: is there a express way to land that? It doesn't need QA validation, doesn't even need building to be honest :) [21:09] boiko: it doesn't need building? Why not just push the commit to trunk? [21:10] robru: that's actually an option, indeed :) [21:10] robru: I think I'll just do that then, thanks [21:11] boiko: you're welcome. I'll still free a couple silos anyway === robru changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known issues: britney temporarily offline due to botched update. will revert if I can't resolve it soon === robru changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? Use JenkaaS: http://bit.ly/jenkins-docs | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known issues: -