plashenkovinfinity: Hello, Adam! Could you please tell when https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1574693 will be available in updates?07:34
ubot5Launchpad bug 1574693 in gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Xenial) "No shadows under menus on Unity." [Undecided,Fix committed]07:34
=== ant_ is now known as Guest70775
jamespageplease could a member of the SRU team look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/158566008:39
ubot5Launchpad bug 1585660 in ceph (Ubuntu Xenial) "[SRU] ceph 10.2.2" [High,New]08:39
jamespageI really want to get the latest point release into Xenial before we get to many people using the 10.2.0 from release ...08:40
=== ant_ is now known as Guest33019
infinityplashenkov: Now.09:14
tsimonq2infinity: thanks a lot for getting those fixes approved, that splash screen one has been annoying ;)09:23
tsimonq2(teh bug, not the fix)09:23
Trevinhopitti: hey, could you check the SRU packages that are waiting in SRU queue as per ticket https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1614 ?10:37
pittiTrevinho: can you please try to ping some other SRU team members today? I've been doing pretty much all the SRU work recently, and it's taking up too much time, to be brutally honest11:11
pitti(or I might do some stuff in the evening, but please start with the roster at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Publishing)11:12
Trevinhopitti: yeah, I undestand... Thanks11:19
Trevinhobdmurray: hey, can you check the SRU queue for unity7 stack? It's quite important for .1. Changes are in ticket https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/161411:21
sergiusensslangasek pitti our snapcraft adt tests on yakkety are being hit by https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1599799 is there a way to tag/comment on update_excuses about this and let it in?13:48
ubot5Launchpad bug 1599799 in snapd (Ubuntu) "snapd > 2.0.2 fails on yakkety" [High,Triaged]13:48
pittisergiusens: technically yes, but we don't actually know yet what is broken13:49
pittisergiusens: 2.0.2's tests still succeed, and there has not been any investigation yet whether it's the tests that regressed or snapd itself13:50
pittiand the error suggests the latter, i. e. we should not let a broken version in13:50
sergiusenspitti yeah, I am sad to be affected by taking the extra mile wrt testing :-P13:50
sergiusenspitti oh, I don't want snapd in, just snapcraft, one of the adt tests fail on a part of the test where we `snap install/remove`13:51
pittisergiusens: oh! so this actually confirms that bug 1599799 is not a test issue, but an actual bug13:52
ubot5bug 1599799 in snapd (Ubuntu) "snapd > 2.0.2 fails on yakkety" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/159979913:52
pittisergiusens: OTP, back in 1013:53
pittisergiusens: will hint that13:53
pittisergiusens: done13:55
jbichainfinity: if you're doing sru work today, could you look into accepting drupal7 from unapproved?14:13
apwjbicha, i believe he is travelling14:29
jbichaoh, makes sense14:30
* apw hands pitti a gold star to put on ADTs wall14:30
pittisergiusens: it landed14:30
pittiapw: oh, thanks :)14:30
xnoxrtg, thank you! you are amazing =)14:31
rtgxnox, for what ?14:32
pittiis it "say thanks to the developer next to you" day or something such? :-)14:32
xnoxrtg, for linux bug updates about qeth driver removal.14:36
davmor2apw: don't flash shiny things in front of pitti he won't be able to concentrate on anything else for the rest of the day14:37
rtgxnox, I just did 'qeth: delete napi struct when removing a qeth device'. Is that what you are talking about ?14:37
xnoxyeah =)14:38
pittidavmor2: you mean like that big yellow hot plasma ball on the sky that has been burning my brains for two weeks now? :-)_14:38
* davmor2 looks outside nope nothing but grey up there I think pitti is obviously at an amusement park and not working at all14:40
pittidavmor2: I see my prejudices about British weather confirmed :)14:41
ogra_pitti, the german weather isnt better ...  northern of the weisswurstgrenze at least14:45
davmor2pitti: http://dailypicksandflicks.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/In-the-Bible-it-rained-for-40-days-they-called-it-a-disaster.-In-England-we-call-it-summer..jpg14:45
ogra_you are just lucky to have that little hole in the clouds sitting above you for a few more hours14:46
davmor2pitti: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r35NSTwOxw4 head for about 2 minutes in :)15:36
bdmurrayTrevinho: so bamf, compiz, libunity, nux, unity, unity-control-center, and unity-lens-applications in the xenial queue?17:32
bdmurrayTrevinho: oh its in the ticket to which you linked17:35
sergiusensbdmurray mind letting snapcraft into xenial-proposed while at it?17:51
bdmurraysergiusens: I'll add it to the list17:59
sergiusensbdmurray ty18:02
bdmurrayTrevinho: bug 1304388 is missing proper SRU information, I'll still let unity-control-center in but would like to see the bug fixed up.18:36
ubot5bug 1304388 in unity-control-center (Ubuntu) "unity-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in default_app_changed()" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/130438818:36
jbichabdmurray: if you have time today, could you look into letting drupal7 in for xenial?18:39
jbichato be more specific, drupal7 is already in -proposed but I uploaded a new version a few weeks ago with an extra dependency it needs18:41
slangasekvsearch excuses make no sense; vsearch-data isn't listed in the source package for vsearch in -proposed, it's only present in the yakkety version.  what's going on? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#vsearch20:02
nacc_slangasek: maybe i've always misinterpreted that style of output, but i thought it meant there was a binary package in 1.1.3+dfgs-1 but that is no longer present in 2.0.0-1?20:05
slangaseknacc_: that should certainly not be the meaning; it's valid for a new version of a source package to drop a binary package, it's only an error if a) the dropped binary package is still present in -proposed at an older version, or b) the maintainer did something wrong in debian/control to imply the package *should* still be built but isn't being built20:07
slangasekin this case I'll trick proposed-migration by removing vsearch-data early from yakkety, since it has no revdeps20:09
slangasekbut that should not be required20:09
nacc_slangasek: hrm, your points make sense to me, I've just only seen it for cases like I described -- i defer to your knowledge in this case :)20:09
slangasekthere are other weird things in update_output that I think I need a pitti to help diagnose20:10
slangasekpitti: ignoring test failures on s390x for something as critical as nova is a false optimization; please escalate this issue to xnox instead of overriding20:31
slangasekah, so vsearch has a test dep on vsearch-data, I wonder if that could be it20:34
=== sakrecoer_ is now known as sakrecoer
xnoxslangasek, pitti - wait what where how?23:18
xnoxwe are like telling a few people that it is all good and dandy.23:18
xnox(nova and openstack in general)23:18
slangasekxnox: nova autopkgtests are flaky (at best) on s390x23:18
slangasekxnox: so, please fix so that pitti doesn't ignore failures ;)23:19
xnoxi wonder if they are there because of lxd vs kvm runner.23:20
xnoxor because they are indeed flaky23:20
slangasekthey have sometimes succeeded23:20
xnoxnot tonight however, as i am about to hit the bed, and only got distracted by the l1cc email =)23:21
xnox(which imho i should have written whilst in cape town)23:21

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!