=== pavlushka_ is now known as pavlushka [17:56] supposedly 16.04.1 releases next week [17:58] bluesabre: ^^, so even though we know we've got the 2 main issues (thunar and the intel/lock thing) I guess we've got no choice but to say yes there [18:23] flocculant, i guess we can say no, but i'm not sure if that'd block the upgrade route for xubuntu... most likely not [18:23] hardly worth bothering then in that case ;) [18:23] yeah [18:24] just checking where we stand with the intel thingy [18:54] bluesabre: so this isn't right ... flocculant dons his positivity hat [18:54] I happened to see a fleeting glimpse short while ago to an update for xorg-server-intel (or close) [18:54] yakkety - suspend or lock > no cursor loss here [18:55] updated xenial - still have an issue [18:56] It's not been SRU'd. [18:56] I know that Unit193 [18:56] So, that's a good sign. The changelog really doesn't show it though. :P [18:56] just checking something else out [18:57] Unit193: yea I know that too - I did check when I saw the update :) [18:57] just haven't had time to physically do anything here [19:08] bluesabre: so installing xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20160706-1ubuntu1 from yakkety on the xenial and suspend and work as expected, no cursor loss (at least here) [19:08] \o/ [19:09] what do we want to do about that - I can put an urgent call out for testing that - but don't want to do so if we're not actually going to be able to do more than say 'well it works' [19:10] Unit193: indeed :) [19:13] if I don't here anything overnight I'll go ahead with a tentative shout out I guess :) [19:15] ochosi might want to read that ^^ [19:31] Unit193: and how long would an SRU take - I'm really wanting to read no more than a week :p [19:32] Would be best to file it now and state that we want it in for the point release. [19:35] well I don't think I'd want to file it - bound to get something wrong there [19:35] perhaps it's best if I at least get a call out to test it now [19:35] bluesabre, bluesabre, bluesabre! We need a SRU filed! :3 [19:36] ha ha [19:36] Done. [19:36] flocculant: I'd test it if I hit it, but... [19:36] yea - I only just manage to - laptop is in an advanced state of disrepair ... [19:43] Unit193: does this make sense? http://paste.ubuntu.com/19106931/ [19:44] flocculant: FWIW, you can have them just apt-get install xserver-xorg-video-intel/xenial to restore. [19:45] actually that syntax? [19:45] if so - I'll do that rather than get them download from packages twice [19:47] could they apt-get install package/yakkety? [19:47] that's all new to me - learned todays thing now :) [19:49] No, because people won't have that repo. And yes that exact syntax. [20:00] flocculant: sounds like a plan to me [20:00] and also good to hear there's a tentative fix [20:00] i think i read about some git version of the intel driver having fixed the issue for someone before [20:14] Unit193: ack [20:15] ochosi: yep - all we can do is test it I guess [20:18] yeah, that plus filing the SRU as early as possible (agreed with Unit193 that bluesabre shall do that :p) [20:21] well mail's off now [20:38] night all [20:45] night! [20:45] and thanks [20:47] Are live-build and the other live-* scripts used to build the xubuntu iso images? [22:06] evening all [22:06] I see highlights! [22:07] :) [22:13] evening bluesabre [22:13] hey ochosi [22:13] hi knome [22:13] o/ [22:13] cooking dinner :) === sakrecoer_ is now known as sakrecoer