| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| oSoMoN | sil2100, hey, would you mind publishing silo 80 on my behalf? it has (approved) packaging changes, so I won’t be allowed to do it myself | 09:25 |
|---|---|---|
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: let me take a look | 09:33 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: ok, looks good, wanted to ask you (or actually Kaleo) to mention packaging changes in the changelog but! Actually you guys did that, but the train just truncated the commitmessage | 09:36 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: so all good | 09:36 |
| sil2100 | :) | 09:36 |
| sil2100 | (we just need to poke robru about this) | 09:36 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| oSoMoN | sil2100, thanks! | 09:45 |
| sil2100 | yw! | 09:47 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| rvr | lpotter: ping | 13:49 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| rvr | lpotter: jhodapp: Silo 55 approved | 14:59 |
| jhodapp | rvr, nice thanks! | 14:59 |
| jhodapp | sil2100, would you mind publishing: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1533 | 15:01 |
| sil2100 | jhodapp: on it! | 15:05 |
| jhodapp | thanks sil2100 | 15:06 |
| robru | morphis: Hiya. | 15:31 |
| morphis | robru: hey | 15:32 |
| robru | morphis: I see you have a trio ticket with an MP targetted at a branch with 15.04 in the name | 15:32 |
| robru | morphis: that sounds wrong | 15:32 |
| morphis | robru: it failed to build otherwise | 15:33 |
| morphis | look at the changelog in that branch | 15:33 |
| morphis | looks like it was released for yakkety last time too | 15:33 |
| robru | morphis: right. I also saw you fail to build it for just vivid | 15:33 |
| morphis | robru: I tried to build is just for vivid as that is what the branch is for | 15:33 |
| morphis | but actually citrain wasn't happy with that | 15:34 |
| robru | morphis: what you need to do is make sure your vivid target branch has a vivid version number | 15:34 |
| morphis | because of the changelog | 15:34 |
| morphis | robru: ah | 15:34 |
| robru | morphis: then you can build just vivid. It deliberately prevents you from doing a vivid landing on the normal trunk because going backwards with version numbers isn't allowed | 15:35 |
| morphis | right | 15:35 |
| morphis | robru: let me change that | 15:35 |
| robru | morphis: but in this case your vivid target branch is misconfigured | 15:36 |
| morphis | in which way? | 15:36 |
| robru | morphis: I just mean the wrong version is in the changelog so it isn't really a vivid branch at all | 15:40 |
| morphis | ah ok | 15:40 |
| morphis | robru: I think this branch was created from a previously used triple-landing branch and then never correctly setup | 15:41 |
| robru | You just need to change the version on the first line of the changelog to be a vivid one | 15:41 |
| robru | dbarth: same to you. If you want to do a vivid only click landing you need to fork trunk and fix the changelog to have a vivid version. You can't do a vivid landing targetted at trunk because that will break the trunk changelog | 15:43 |
| robru | morphis: dbarth: and when I say fix the changelog I mean you need to commit the fix directly to the target branch, it won't work to include the fix in your MP, I don't think | 15:45 |
| morphis | robru: aye | 15:45 |
| robru | Well it might work in the MP now that I think about it. But it'll definitely work if you fix the target first so that's safer | 15:46 |
| dbarth | robru: ack (just reading the logs) | 16:17 |
| dbarth | alex-abreu: ^^ fyi just in case | 16:18 |
| dbarth | robru: btw, we're preparing that SRU silo with mardy: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1669 | 16:23 |
| dbarth | ie, targetting 16.04 specific branches; hope we're doing that the right way | 16:24 |
| robru | dbarth: well if it's wrong you'll see the same error about failing to add the changelog message | 16:26 |
| robru | So just keep an eye for that | 16:26 |
| dbarth | ok | 16:26 |
| dbarth | robru: well, after spinning around for a bit, i'm trying to do a bileto hook for that click silo; which changes build deps in the control file | 16:26 |
| dbarth | robru: if i do that in a 3-release silo, i assume i can count on the changelog to be updated in one go and be proper, right? | 16:27 |
| robru | dbarth: yes, a trio silo targetting trunk will always work | 16:30 |
| robru | dbarth: the thing is you can't target trunk with vivid because vivid version numbers are lower than yakkety, which is what's in trunk. so you just need a separate lp:click/vivid with a modified changelog for it to work | 16:30 |
| robru | dbarth: but anyways yeah, the hook idea in a trio silo would be better anyway | 16:30 |
| dbarth | ok | 16:31 |
| dobey | robru: i think we have a problem when things want to be SRUs | 17:31 |
| robru | dobey: the PPA dependency you mean? | 17:32 |
| dobey | robru: yeah | 17:32 |
| dobey | things still get built against the overlay | 17:32 |
| robru | dobey: yes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600188 | 17:33 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1600188 in Bileto "PPA assigned for building a SRU should not have a dependency on the stable phone overlay" [Undecided,Triaged] | 17:33 |
| dobey | hmm, and i don't see a good way to solve this, without ephemeral PPAs | 17:35 |
| dobey | because, even Y has the PPA still | 17:36 |
| robru | dobey: yeah but stable overlay shouldn' have any yakkety packages so it doesn't hurt anything | 17:36 |
| robru | dobey: is there a specific ticket you want the PPA dependency changed on? | 17:36 |
| dobey | robru: just saw the backlog and dbarth talking about an SRU silo; and realized that Wellark had one as well for an indicator-power change (but he already ran publish on it, so i'm not sure if it's broken or not) | 17:39 |
| robru | hm | 17:39 |
| robru | well if there's an issue I'm sure they'll find it during SRU verification | 17:40 |
| === fginther` is now known as fginther | ||
| fginther | dobey, did you get your jenkins-launchpad-plugin question resolved? | 19:43 |
| dobey | fginther: not yet. put that issue in the background for now | 19:44 |
| fginther | ok | 19:44 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!