[00:47] <ahoneybun> mm the SDK's cache must be stuck
[00:47] <ahoneybun> I'm removing components but they are still there
[01:09] <mhall119> renatu: what arch?
[09:49] <mcphail> brunch875: I think bzoltan and zbenjamin are the best people to ask about QtCreator issues
[09:50] <mcphail> Certainly, they've helped me out of some messes ;)
[09:51] <brunch875> what I'm trying to do is setting up qt to develop both android and utouch (possibly ios in the future)
[09:52] <brunch875> If I'm understanding this correctly, the ubuntu sdk lacks "qt version" for android right now, or at least that's how it differs from a downloaded-from-qt-website creator
[09:52] <mcphail> brunch875: is it vital you use the same version of QtC for all development?
[09:53] <brunch875> Well, I guess I can jump from one to the other, but I suspect projects will give me conflicts
[09:53] <brunch875> I'd rather develop from the same one
[09:54] <brunch875> I'm unsure if I can use the same code for both platforms
[09:54] <mcphail> brunch875: so you plan to do cross-platform development from the same codebase?
[09:54] <brunch875> yeah, that's what I'm trying to do
[09:54] <mcphail> brunch875: to be honest, I'd use separate versions of QtC and point them both towards a local git repo
[09:55] <brunch875> I was thinking about using cordova but I've just read QML should be cross-platform
[09:55] <mcphail> brunch875: QML is cross platfor, but the Ubuntu QML components only exist for Ubuntu just now, as far as I know
[09:56] <brunch875> so importing the ubuntu components for android isn't to work?
[09:56] <mcphail> brunch875: not without endless swearing and profanity, I would expect
[09:57] <brunch875> can I not use the qt components for ubuntu then?
[09:57] <brunch875> as in, developing a qt application for android and then compiling for ubuntu without its components
[09:59] <mcphail> brunch875: you'll probably be able to get so far with the more generic components. Anything more complex will become difficult (but not impossible) to package. There is at least one app on the store which uses generic components (? QtQuick). "Petals" by ogra
[09:59] <mcphail> (I think...)
[10:01] <brunch875> that's good news!
[11:34] <kalikiana> t1mp: Easy review? https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-team/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/fatFocus/+merge/300042
[12:37] <t1mp> kalikiana: approved
[13:11] <kalikiana> Thanks!
[14:10] <bzoltan> zbenjamin: 22 minutes
[14:12] <zbenjamin> bzoltan: ? the images?
[14:12] <bzoltan> zbenjamin: yes
[17:03] <renatu> mhall119, Who can review this? https://code.launchpad.net/~renatofilho/ubuntu-filemanager-app/import-contact/+merge/300087
[18:14] <renatu> mhall119, are you around?
[18:43] <mhall119> renatu: I am, and looking at the diff
[18:43] <mhall119> renatu: so is this for saving files via the file-manager?
[18:44] <renatu> mhall119, the current diff only saves vcards. but bfiller asked me to save any kind of file
[18:44] <renatu> I will update the diff
[18:44] <mhall119> ok, I was trying to figure out what "contacts" specific thing it was doing :)
[18:45] <mhall119> and +1000 on saving any kind of file, I've been wanting that for a while
[18:46] <bfiller> renatu: kenvandine can review the MR
[18:46] <renatu> mhall119, ok let me push my latest changes
[18:47] <mhall119> renatu: is "share" a valid content-hub action for file-manager?
[18:48] <renatu> mhall119, yes, some apps uses share
[18:48] <mhall119> right, but share is supposed to me "You give it to me so I can give it to someone else"
[18:49] <mhall119> IIRC, the content should be ephemeral in the app doing the sharing
[19:02] <renatu> mhall119, pushed the changes to accept any kind of file
[20:21] <mhall119> renatu: could you just use "all" or something for the content type?
[20:21] <mhall119> https://developer.ubuntu.com/api/apps/qml/sdk-15.04.5/Ubuntu.Content.ContentType/
[20:21] <mhall119> kenvandine should be able to tell us for sure
[20:22] <mhall119> though I suppose it wouldn't make sense for text or links
[20:37] <renatu> mhall119, yes, text and links will break the app
[21:10] <mhall119> renatu: bfiller: is kenvandine still going ot do the actual review?
[21:11] <renatu> mhall119, I think kenvandine is off already. Probably he will take a look tomorrow. And bfiller want to test it too
[21:11] <renatu> mhall119, did you have a change to test it?
[21:26] <mhall119> renatu: not yet, but file-manager is pretty busted on my laptop anyway