=== maclin1 is now known as maclin === maclin1 is now known as maclin === hypera1r is now known as hyperair === maclin1 is now known as maclin [15:48] jbicha: why did you force-sync a version of fso-frameworkd that builds on no Ubuntu archs? [15:49] slangasek: well I filed bug 1602263 for it [15:49] bug 1602263 in fso-frameworkd (Ubuntu) "source package doesn't build when it contains binary package for armel only" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1602263 [15:53] I assume it's also meant to build arch:all? [15:53] * infinity looks. [15:54] So, you could "fix" it by declaring XS-Build-Indep-Architecture: amd64 [15:55] Which is a much smaller diff than dropping binaries from control. [15:56] Alternately, one could submit a patch to Debian to make the armel packages arch:all and cross-build them. [15:56] Which, if they're firmware meant to run on other devices, could be the right answer. [15:58] I don't know how to do your 2nd option [15:58] I think XS-Build-Indep-Architecture: amd64 would be best. [15:58] ok I'll try that, thanks [16:30] ^^ this fixes a bunch of upgrade path issues. Probably too late for 16.04.1, but it'd be nice to get SRU verification done before the masses start upgrading because .1 is out. [16:30] (sorry it's a couple of weeks later than ideal) [17:52] bdmurray: hey, could you (or pitti if available) publish this compiz change in queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=compiz ? [17:52] We had to reiterate the SRU because of a crash that is now fixed there. [17:58] Trevinho: I'll have a look shortly [18:06] bdmurray: thanks, as it would be nice to have it in 16.04.1 [18:17] Trevinho: 00_remove_scalefilter_in_unity_session.py is that an unsupported plugin? [19:28] bdmurray: yes, is unsupported. It's done inside unity itself since long time [19:43] make CFLAGS=$(CLFAGS) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS) [19:43] nope. [19:44] heh [19:59] rbasak: Are there no CVEs fixed in 5.7.13? [19:59] rbasak: Cause usually mysql point releases go through security for that reason. [20:41] infinity: there might be, but we'll have to wait for the quarterly (?) announcement to find out. [20:41] infinity: when MREs were a thing, we got an exception on the basis that it was done in the security pocket already anyway, and it would be no different. [21:08] infinity: when will the 16.04.1 daily ISOs stop having proposed enabled by default? [21:39] jderose: Tomorrow. [21:39] rbasak: Yes, but it should still be done through security. [21:40] infinity: awesome, thanks!