[15:48] <slangasek> jbicha: why did you force-sync a version of fso-frameworkd that builds on no Ubuntu archs?
[15:49] <jbicha> slangasek: well I filed bug 1602263 for it
[15:53] <infinity> I assume it's also meant to build arch:all?
[15:53]  * infinity looks.
[15:54] <infinity> So, you could "fix" it by declaring XS-Build-Indep-Architecture: amd64
[15:55] <infinity> Which is a much smaller diff than dropping binaries from control.
[15:56] <infinity> Alternately, one could submit a patch to Debian to make the armel packages arch:all and cross-build them.
[15:56] <infinity> Which, if they're firmware meant to run on other devices, could be the right answer.
[15:58] <jbicha> I don't know how to do your 2nd option
[15:58] <cjwatson> I think XS-Build-Indep-Architecture: amd64 would be best.
[15:58] <jbicha> ok I'll try that, thanks
[16:30] <rbasak> ^^ this fixes a bunch of upgrade path issues. Probably too late for 16.04.1, but it'd be nice to get SRU verification done before the masses start upgrading because .1 is out.
[16:30] <rbasak> (sorry it's a couple of weeks later than ideal)
[17:52] <Trevinho> bdmurray: hey, could you (or pitti if available) publish this compiz change in queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=compiz ?
[17:52] <Trevinho> We had to reiterate the SRU because of a crash that is now fixed there.
[17:58] <bdmurray> Trevinho: I'll have a look shortly
[18:06] <Trevinho> bdmurray: thanks, as it would be nice to have it in 16.04.1
[18:17] <bdmurray> Trevinho: 00_remove_scalefilter_in_unity_session.py is that an unsupported plugin?
[19:28] <Trevinho> bdmurray: yes, is unsupported. It's done inside unity itself since long time
[19:43] <slangasek>         make CFLAGS=$(CLFAGS) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS)
[19:43] <slangasek> nope.
[19:44] <nacc> heh
[19:59] <infinity> rbasak: Are there no CVEs fixed in 5.7.13?
[19:59] <infinity> rbasak: Cause usually mysql point releases go through security for that reason.
[20:41] <rbasak> infinity: there might be, but we'll have to wait for the quarterly (?) announcement to find out.
[20:41] <rbasak> infinity: when MREs were a thing, we got an exception on the basis that it was done in the security pocket already anyway, and it would be no different.
[21:08] <jderose> infinity: when will the 16.04.1 daily ISOs stop having proposed enabled by default?
[21:39] <infinity> jderose: Tomorrow.
[21:39] <infinity> rbasak: Yes, but it should still be done through security.
[21:40] <jderose> infinity: awesome, thanks!