| michi_ | cjwatson: ping | 04:00 |
|---|---|---|
| === NCommander is now known as mcasadevall | ||
| === mcasadevall is now known as NCommander | ||
| apw | michi, always best to include some details for when the pingee does appear | 08:40 |
| michi | Ah, yes, sorry! | 08:45 |
| cjwatson | michi: ? | 09:34 |
| michi | cjwatson: Hi | 09:35 |
| michi | Just wanted to check about the process for getting failed autopkg tests restarted. | 09:35 |
| michi | It seems really awkward for me to have to bother a core dev once a day until it finally works again. | 09:35 |
| cjwatson | sorry, I don't know about the process, I'm just a user of it. | 09:35 |
| michi | Right. | 09:36 |
| apw | (now if you had said that originally someone would likely have already answered) | 09:36 |
| michi | Well, I’m stuck on this one: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/ticket-1670/landing-016-vivid/excuses.html | 09:36 |
| cjwatson | you might also try finding someone in your timezone rather than somebody as far away from your timezone as it's possible to be ... | 09:36 |
| michi | :) | 09:36 |
| michi | I don’t know where all the core devs are. I guess I can trawl through the launchpad team. | 09:36 |
| cjwatson | michi: retried | 09:36 |
| michi | Thank you! | 09:36 |
| apw | michi, i take it you don't have upload rights for that package then ? i think that is the gating factor. | 09:37 |
| michi | What, for thumbnailer? | 09:37 |
| apw | right for that | 09:37 |
| michi | We own the project, but we can only release via CI train. | 09:38 |
| apw | right but if you have upload rights for it, that gates retry button access | 09:38 |
| cjwatson | for person in lp.people['ubuntu-core-dev'].members: print(person.name, person.time_zone) | 09:38 |
| michi | I tried the retry button and was told that I’m not allowed to :) | 09:38 |
| apw | you don't have to use them | 09:38 |
| michi | cjwatson: thanks! | 09:38 |
| michi | Don’t have to use core devs, you mean? | 09:39 |
| seb128 | you also don't need to ping individuals | 09:39 |
| michi | The retry button is definitely off limits to me, I tried it yesterday. | 09:39 |
| seb128 | just ask on this channel? | 09:39 |
| apw | michi, don't have to directly use the upload rights | 09:39 |
| michi | How so? | 09:39 |
| apw | right ... if you had asked for that a 5am, i am sure pitti would have done it :) | 09:39 |
| michi | Sorry, I don’t know how this stuff hangs together. | 09:39 |
| michi | Ah | 09:40 |
| michi | Well, I was wondering whether it would be possible to distinguish a failed autopkg test because of a broken dependency vs an actual test failure. | 09:40 |
| michi | If the former, we could re-start the test once every 24 hours automatically. | 09:40 |
| michi | That way, I wouldn’t have to get on someone’s nerves every day until the problem is fixed. | 09:41 |
| apw | that cirtainly sounds like something which could be reasonably filed as a bug against the tests, against the autopkgtest project i would guess | 09:42 |
| michi | OK, I’ll give that a shot. Thanks! | 09:42 |
| pitti | michi: well, "the problem" is that repowerd is broken -- getting on someone's nerves to fix *that* might be more fruitful :) | 10:08 |
| michi | pitti: :) | 10:09 |
| michi | I had a look for it in ci train. | 10:09 |
| michi | Apparently, it’s landed. | 10:09 |
| michi | pitti: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1487 | 10:10 |
| michi | pitti: Just spotted the email from Lukasz | 10:11 |
| michi | Very timely... | 10:11 |
| pitti | hah | 10:11 |
| rbasak | infinity: even with no known CVEs, and a bunch of bugfixes? I'd prefer for users following xenial-proposed for SRU verification. Not sure ~ubuntu-security-proposed has the same number of testers. Shall I split the SRU then - bugfixes first through updates pocket, "MRE" later through security pocket? | 10:28 |
| cjwatson | slangasek: FYI you really need to work in dependency order for Haskell - http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ghc.html | 11:45 |
| cjwatson | slangasek: I'm working my way up that now | 11:45 |
| cjwatson | (or down. whatever) | 11:48 |
| slangasek | cjwatson: right, I knew the packages wouldn't all build on the first go, but find it efficient to batch-trigger the uploads this way and sort out the failures in -proposed afterwards | 14:24 |
| cjwatson | slangasek: IME this can end up having to do duplicated uploads as everything settles | 14:29 |
| cjwatson | also you missed some :-) | 14:29 |
| slangasek | :) | 14:29 |
| infinity | rbasak: ubuntu-security-proposed then feeds into series-proposed. The only difference is that it's not built against updates/proposed. | 14:37 |
| infinity | rbasak: But splitting packaging fixes from upstream updates is probably right anyway. | 14:37 |
| seb128 | hey there | 14:53 |
| infinity | Hi. | 14:53 |
| seb128 | is LTS .1 on track? could somebody reply to my email on ubuntu-devel@ | 14:53 |
| seb128 | until when can we get proposed packages moved to updates for .1? | 14:53 |
| infinity | seb128: I'll probably respin on Monday to let more packages in. But things accepted today don't stand a good chance of making it unless the regression potential is low. | 14:55 |
| seb128 | but things in proposed for a week and verified can be copied over to updates on monday and still be in then? | 14:56 |
| seb128 | when you say accepted today it's thing that are let in proposed and are not aged yet? | 14:56 |
| infinity | seb128: Right. | 14:57 |
| seb128 | good | 14:57 |
| seb128 | thanks | 14:57 |
| * infinity notes a new unity above... | 14:58 | |
| seb128 | I guess the compiz/unity stack update needs more discussion/consideration | 14:58 |
| seb128 | right, that's a bit tricker | 14:58 |
| seb128 | that would be good to get in .1 but it's getting tight | 14:58 |
| infinity | If arguments can be made for them being boot/install critical, and a good regression test shown, they can happen, but they don't need to be on the media if they don't really fit that. | 14:59 |
| seb128 | if somebody could approved the unity in the queue? | 14:59 |
| willcooke | Trevinho, ^^ | 14:59 |
| seb128 | that would be a first step | 14:59 |
| seb128 | it revert a change from the current proposed version which was creating a regression | 14:59 |
| seb128 | I think the case for behind on the media is that they make unity much nicer to use in software rendering | 15:00 |
| seb128 | which means in vms | 15:00 |
| seb128 | and often the image is what users boot/interact with in the vm | 15:00 |
| infinity | Oh, if it's just a revert, that should be fine. | 15:00 |
| willcooke | there is also a commercial OEM reasons for getting it in to the image | 15:00 |
| Laney | It's a revert of part of the SRU | 15:00 |
| Laney | which is in -proposed currently | 15:01 |
| slangasek | infinity: I'm happy to review the unity upload (my SRU day) | 15:01 |
| infinity | slangasek: Ta. | 15:01 |
| willcooke | thanks slangasek | 15:02 |
| Trevinho | good | 15:02 |
| Trevinho | Unity bugs were all already verified... There's just this regression which was part of the only bug not verified. | 15:03 |
| Laney | Rushing it out is scary, as that's the second regression in this series | 15:03 |
| Trevinho | Then we can easily have the things checked | 15:03 |
| Laney | but, as was said above, there are some extenuating circumstances | 15:03 |
| Trevinho | I would have preferrede more relaexed times too... | 15:04 |
| slangasek | is there meant to be another compiz upload also, or does the compiz bug go green once the new unity is in? | 15:04 |
| slangasek | (I see that it's the same bug) | 15:04 |
| Trevinho | slangasek: no, unity and compiz are related there.. No need for a new upload for compiz | 15:05 |
| Trevinho | we already did it yesterday to fix a crash in lowgfx mode | 15:05 |
| infinity | slangasek: I assume you test-built that binutils upload and the result appeared sane? | 15:14 |
| slangasek | infinity: I test-built the yakkety one, yes | 15:15 |
| rbasak | infinity: can you reject mysql-5.7 from xenial then please, and I'll upload a replacement that does not bump the upstream version? | 15:20 |
| * rbasak is running a build test now, and will do a local dep8 test after, before uploading. | 15:21 | |
| rbasak | Thanks. A build+dep8 test will take about an hour. | 15:24 |
| infinity | rbasak: Kay. I'm heading to the doctor, so you'll be done before I'm back (probably). | 15:27 |
| Trevinho | slangasek: any blocker for the unity dequeue? | 15:57 |
| slangasek | Trevinho: it took quite a while for the download from the queue to finish (since it's a sync and has to download all the binaries, gee it would be nice to have diffs in the queue for syncs) | 15:58 |
| slangasek | Trevinho: reviewing the very small delta now | 15:58 |
| Trevinho | slangasek: ah, nice. Thanks | 15:59 |
| slangasek | Trevinho: accepted | 16:00 |
| Trevinho | Thanks | 16:00 |
| Trevinho | slangasek: there's no need to re-do the verification in all the other bugs I think | 16:01 |
| slangasek | Trevinho: I think that's fair, the sru scripts may mean you have to reset some tags manually | 16:01 |
| Trevinho | ok, I'll do that | 16:01 |
| === maxb_ is now known as maxb | ||
| rbasak | infinity: well, it failed, for inexplicable reasons. I'm trying again to see if it's deterministic. | 16:38 |
| jbicha | anyone know why today's xenial daily iso still has gnome-maps when it includes ubuntu-gnome-desktop 0.58.1 which does not recommend it any more? | 17:03 |
| jbicha | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-gnome/xenial/daily-live/current/xenial-desktop-i386.manifest | 17:03 |
| Trevinho | slangasek: all bugs are green now, so... Feel free to put things in proposed | 17:03 |
| jbicha | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu-gnome.xenial/desktop | 17:03 |
| infinity | jbicha: Because it's installing using tasks, not metapackages. | 17:11 |
| infinity | jbicha: I might have to fix that today. | 17:12 |
| * infinity didn't notice that slangasek switched ubuntu to metapackages, but left the rest. | 17:13 | |
| jbicha | infinity: thanks, it did work for yakkety though | 17:21 |
| infinity | jbicha: Sure, because the tasks in yakkety were updated. | 17:21 |
| infinity | jbicha: The release pocket in xenial is static, so the gnome-maps package still has the 'Task: ubuntu-gnome-desktop' header. | 17:22 |
| rbasak | infinity: ^ finally got a dep8 pass. I had to bump the RAM being given to qemu. Oddly, this isn't necessary with 5.7.13. | 17:32 |
| jderose | infinity: any way for me to know which xenial packages in http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html are expected to land before the final 16.04.1 ISO? also, in testing today's xenial daily, everything seems shiny so far | 17:47 |
| infinity | jderose: Likely most of the verified ones. | 18:15 |
| * infinity goes to find breakfast. | 18:17 | |
| jderose | infinity: okay, thanks | 18:51 |
| infinity | ^-- self-accepting, just a kernel ABI bump. | 19:10 |
| === pietroalbini_ is now known as pietroalbini | ||
| slangasek | cjwatson: race ya ;-P | 19:55 |
| cjwatson | slangasek: heh | 20:22 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!