[07:46] <flocculant> the trouble with having 'support' stuff at a blog is why should someone have to go to 2 places? 
[07:47] <flocculant> depends what you anticipate being not in docs - but how would you get that so people can read it offline
[08:08] <knome> flocculant, the content i was thinking about is more of a "deeper insight to xubuntu" -like
[08:08] <knome> not a support question purely
[08:09] <flocculant> ok - wasn't sure from reading backlog 
[08:09] <knome> of course anything that answers technical questions should be in the docs...
[08:09] <knome> yeah, could have been less ambiguous
[08:09] <knome> i guess in a way a bit similar than the small details article
[08:09] <flocculant> right
[08:10] <knome> not that tiny bits, but explaining things on a larger scale
[08:10] <knome> i guess i should try to give an example :P
[08:10] <flocculant> not really necessary :)
[08:10] <knome> oki :P
[08:10] <knome> but yeah, it's not clear in my mind either
[08:10] <flocculant> I'll let you off of that hook :p
[08:11] <knome> i mean i was thinking something like explaining the different themes
[08:11] <flocculant> just so long as it's not a wholesale destruction of docs :D
[08:11] <knome> and how they work (or don't) together
[08:11] <knome> and could be something about gtk2/gtk3/qt
[08:11] <flocculant> right
[08:11] <flocculant> that makes sense then :)
[08:11] <knome> so once you've read "this is how you change your GTK, WM and icon theme"
[08:12] <knome> you might want to read why there are different kind of themes..
[08:12] <knome> or types
[08:12] <flocculant> you then need to read the 'why qt screws things up, and how to make it a bit better' :p
[08:12] <flocculant> though it doesn't now afaik
[08:13] <knome> can do that
[08:13] <knome> and i don't think THAT really belongs to the docs anyway...
[08:15] <flocculant> I'd agree
[08:15] <flocculant> imo docs should only cover what we supply 
[09:14] <knome> that, and the scope should stay technical
[13:39] <bluesabre> knome, Unit193: from what I've seen, other themes have multiple distributor logos and the ideal one for the desktop is symlinked
[13:40] <knome> right, that's one possibility
[13:40] <knome> otoh, we could have a xfce specific logo as the distributor for upstream
[13:40] <knome> as it's a theme specifically targeted at xfce users
[13:40] <knome> (hence the name and all)
[13:40] <bluesabre> yup
[13:41] <knome> anyway, i got to run pretty much
[13:41] <knome> will be back later today
[13:41] <knome> hf
[13:41] <bluesabre> have fun pretty much running (walking briskly?)