[07:46] the trouble with having 'support' stuff at a blog is why should someone have to go to 2 places? [07:47] depends what you anticipate being not in docs - but how would you get that so people can read it offline [08:08] flocculant, the content i was thinking about is more of a "deeper insight to xubuntu" -like [08:08] not a support question purely [08:09] ok - wasn't sure from reading backlog [08:09] of course anything that answers technical questions should be in the docs... [08:09] yeah, could have been less ambiguous [08:09] i guess in a way a bit similar than the small details article [08:09] right [08:10] not that tiny bits, but explaining things on a larger scale [08:10] i guess i should try to give an example :P [08:10] not really necessary :) [08:10] oki :P [08:10] but yeah, it's not clear in my mind either [08:10] I'll let you off of that hook :p [08:11] i mean i was thinking something like explaining the different themes [08:11] just so long as it's not a wholesale destruction of docs :D [08:11] and how they work (or don't) together [08:11] and could be something about gtk2/gtk3/qt [08:11] right [08:11] that makes sense then :) [08:11] so once you've read "this is how you change your GTK, WM and icon theme" [08:12] you might want to read why there are different kind of themes.. [08:12] or types [08:12] you then need to read the 'why qt screws things up, and how to make it a bit better' :p [08:12] though it doesn't now afaik [08:13] can do that [08:13] and i don't think THAT really belongs to the docs anyway... [08:15] I'd agree [08:15] imo docs should only cover what we supply [09:14] that, and the scope should stay technical [13:39] knome, Unit193: from what I've seen, other themes have multiple distributor logos and the ideal one for the desktop is symlinked [13:40] right, that's one possibility [13:40] otoh, we could have a xfce specific logo as the distributor for upstream [13:40] as it's a theme specifically targeted at xfce users [13:40] (hence the name and all) [13:40] yup [13:41] anyway, i got to run pretty much [13:41] will be back later today [13:41] hf [13:41] have fun pretty much running (walking briskly?)