/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/07/20/#lubuntu-devel.txt

tsimonq2YES! the libfm fix made it in!00:16
wxlyay00:16
* tsimonq2 smoke tests00:16
tsimonq2wxl: think I should poke /win 2000:19
tsimonq2whopps00:19
tsimonq2ahhhhhhhh00:19
tsimonq2wxl: think I should poke slangasek about getting an experimental LXQt image?00:19
wxltsimonq2: not until we have some sense as to what the additional applications would be like00:20
tsimonq2alright wxl00:20
wxlthat's what i think, at least00:20
tsimonq2wxl: well we already have a metapackage, no?00:21
tsimonq2wxl: I mean, would it hurt? :)00:21
wxlpotentially00:22
tsimonq2how so?00:22
wxli'm not sure canonical has the resources to do something "just because"00:22
wxland i'm not sure it would be really useful to the end user since it would be incomplete00:23
tsimonq2oh I see00:23
wxlif they wanted something incomplete, they could also just build their own system with the metapackage00:23
tsimonq2yeah00:23
wxli love the idea but the fact of the matter is we just need to wait00:24
tsimonq2I see00:24
flexiondotorgtsimonq2, o/06:29
flexiondotorgOne of the Ubuntu MATE servers (the one running my ZNC bouncer) failed overnight.06:29
flexiondotorgI've lost some IRC history.06:29
flexiondotorgSo, if you messaged me. I missed it.06:29
tsimonq2I didn't06:46
flexiondotorgtsimonq2, o/07:03
flexiondotorgLooks like Lubuntu testing is going well.07:03
flexiondotorgI'm doing some Ubuntu MATE testing now.07:03
flexiondotorgLooks good enough to me :-)07:03
tsimonq2flexiondotorg: Lubuntu is doing one more respin07:12
flexiondotorgtsimonq2, Because?07:12
tsimonq2flexiondotorg: light-locker-settings is completely broken, a fix is landing very soon07:13
flexiondotorgThanks. Not a thing that I need to worry about :-)07:13
flexiondotorgtsimonq2, Any chance someone in Lubuntu can do a quick install of Ubuntu MATE 16.04.1 on PowerPC?08:51
tsimonq2flexiondotorg: I wish I could help you08:51
tsimonq2unfortunately I don't know who has a PowerPC machine08:52
flexiondotorgOK08:52
tsimonq2wxl: we had one last respin this morning18:46
tsimonq2wxl: but the testing is almost done18:46
redwolfo/ sudodus18:49
sudoduso/18:49
tsimonq2sudodus! :)18:49
tsimonq2sudodus: thanks for helping test 16.04.1 a lot, even after today's respin. I appreciate it. :)18:49
sudodusYou are welcome :-)18:50
tsimonq2sudodus: this morning's respin was due to a fix that made light-locker-settings go from completely unusable to working, all fine now18:51
sudodusI see.18:51
redwolftsimonq2, what happens with mini.iso?18:52
sudodusBut there are still problems with Intel graphics. The cursor is lost after locking. Fix: ctrl+alt+F1, ctrl+alt+F718:53
tsimonq2sudodus: the respin before that (which I also requested) has the libfm fix18:53
tsimonq2yes :(18:53
tsimonq2redwolf: related to sudodus' thread?18:53
sudodusI tested the xenial 32-bit mini.iso today, and it works, both in my Toshiba and in VirtualBox.18:54
redwolfno, mailing lists18:54
redwolfit seems failing in vbox18:54
redwolfbut I tested it on Boxes and it works18:54
redwolf(kvm)18:54
sudodusThere was a report about that, but it works for me.18:54
redwolfyes, same here18:55
redwolfodd18:55
redwolfI  hope the one who reported did a checksum test18:55
redwolf.__.18:55
tsimonq2XD18:55
sudodusThere is a dialogue at the Ubuntu Forums, and the guy seems to have problems with a scsi package now.18:55
tsimonq2oh okay18:56
redwolfah18:56
wxlwho's chairing this thing?18:56
tsimonq2sudodus: keep us posted if it concerns Lubuntu please :)18:56
redwolftsimonq2, I think18:56
tsimonq2I thought wxl would, but if he doesn't want to, I can18:56
redwolf-__-18:57
tsimonq2wxl: your choice18:57
redwolfis the boss finally coming?18:57
wxli'ltsgo for it18:57
wxlugh18:57
sudodusYes,18:57
wxlgo for it i mean18:57
redwolfI see squares again ._.18:57
tsimonq2I really want gilir to come to the meetings :)18:57
redwolfwell, we have something important to say :|18:57
* tsimonq2 finished the sentence so redwolf didn't ;)18:57
tsimonq2wxl: \o/18:58
tsimonq2oh shoot i need to brush up on my meetingology skills /o\18:58
tsimonq2*I18:58
tsimonq2wxl: should we wait for Julien or just go for it?19:00
wxlgo for it19:00
redwolfyer!19:00
tsimonq2#startmeeting Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 201619:00
meetingologyMeeting started Wed Jul 20 19:00:36 2016 UTC.  The chair is tsimonq2. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.19:00
meetingologyAvailable commands: action commands idea info link nick19:00
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic:
sudodusWhile we are waiting, I'd like to say that 16.04.1 is really much improved compared the 16.04. Now it is a nice LTS release :-)19:00
tsimonq2could you show your attendance by saying o/ please ?19:01
tsimonq2o/19:01
redwolfo/19:01
wxlo/19:01
sudoduso/19:01
tsimonq2great, we are just waiting on Julien19:01
tsimonq2Here is our planned meeting agenda: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/IRC%20Meetings/Agenda19:01
tsimonq2#topic https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/IRC%20Meetings/Agenda19:02
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/IRC%20Meetings/Agenda
tsimonq2whoops19:02
tsimonq2#topic Yakkety Alpha 2/16.04.1/14.04.5 and SRU work19:02
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: Yakkety Alpha 2/16.04.1/14.04.5 and SRU work
tsimonq2There19:02
tsimonq2so coming up, we have 16.04.1 that is supposed to be release tomorrow19:02
tsimonq2as sudodus said, we have a lot of nice fixes that really makes it a good release19:03
tsimonq2we had a rebuild yesterday due to a libfm fix19:03
tsimonq2and a rebuild today due to a light-locker-settings fix19:04
tsimonq2buyt we are actually almost covered in testing19:04
tsimonq2*but19:04
tsimonq2http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/363/builds19:04
tsimonq2I'm working on the rest of the amd64 alternate test cases19:04
tsimonq2we're good to go on Desktop19:05
tsimonq2we just need to tackle Alternate i38619:05
sudodusI hope you will be able to do some double-checking tests of Lubuntu 16.04.1 after this meeting :-)19:05
tsimonq2sudodus: did you plan on doing that today or should I?19:05
tsimonq2sudodus: and in what way should I double-check? :)19:05
sudodusDo the same testcase but with your hardware :-)19:06
tsimonq2sudodus: I usually do them in a VM just to smoke test :)19:06
wxlyes, hardware testing is always welcome, especially when it comes to LTS releases19:06
tsimonq2I agree with wxl19:06
gilirhi there, sorry for beeing late :-/19:07
tsimonq2hello gilir! :)19:07
sudodushi gilir19:07
redwolfo/ gilir19:07
wxlno problem. good to see you gilir :)19:07
tsimonq2gilir: we were currently talking about 16.04.1 beingreleased tomorrow19:07
tsimonq2gilir: you aren't that late :)19:07
tsimonq2anyways19:07
tsimonq2so although I can't test with my own hardware as I don't have much to test with, I'm glad sudodus is testing it as well19:08
tsimonq2the release notes are almost done, soon after the meeting they will be on the usual /Draft wiki page19:09
sudodusMaybe someone else can test too, and on hardware19:09
tsimonq2and like I said, I'm working to smoke test19:09
wxlmight want to call out for hardware testing19:09
tsimonq2like on the mailing list?19:09
wxlyeah19:09
wxlcan't hurt19:09
tsimonq2I see, alright19:10
tsimonq2#action tsimonq2: send an email to the lubuntu-devel list asking for hardware testing of 16.04.119:10
meetingologyACTION: tsimonq2: send an email to the lubuntu-devel list asking for hardware testing of 16.04.119:10
tsimonq2there19:10
tsimonq2so let's talk about Yakkety Alpha 219:11
tsimonq2that's next week Thursday19:11
tsimonq2and while there's not much that's exciting (I think, correct me if I'm wrong) we should be aware of it :)19:11
tsimonq2sudodus: will you be able to help test Alpha 2 as well next week? :)19:12
tsimonq2I will19:12
sudoduswhat problems should we look for with yakkety?19:12
redwolfabiword19:12
tsimonq2yes19:12
tsimonq2https://wiki.ubuntu.com/YakketyYak/Alpha1/Lubuntu19:13
tsimonq2that has the known problems ^19:13
tsimonq2ooh, the btrfs/xfs bug?19:13
sudodusOK19:13
redwolfyup19:13
tsimonq2gilir: did you ever get a chance to fix bug 1591851 ?19:13
ubot93bug 1591851 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "The creation of a BTRFS or XFS partition fails during install of Lubuntu Daily Live image" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/159185119:13
tsimonq2(it seems to be a metapackage thing)19:13
giliryou should be fixed, last time I checked the btrfs stuff was on the ISO19:14
giliryou / it19:14
tsimonq2alright, thanks gilir :)19:14
tsimonq2but otherwise I see nothing major19:14
tsimonq214.04.5!19:14
tsimonq2the planned release date for that is August 4th19:15
sudodusIt would be nice if we can SRU usb-creator-gtk 0.3.2 from Xenial to Trusty19:15
wxli am in support of that idea19:15
tsimonq2sudodus: is there a bug filed? I can work to get that good to go19:15
sudodusYes19:16
tsimonq2or gilir if he prefers :)19:16
tsimonq2either way, +1 with me as well19:16
sudodusbut maybe some particular person should be asked to do it (personal contact)19:16
wxlgilir never refuses an opportunity to put more work on his plate ;)19:16
gilirI pass on this one :-)19:17
wxlheheheh19:17
tsimonq2#topic tsimonq2: get usb-creator-gtk 0.3.2 into Trusty19:17
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: tsimonq2: get usb-creator-gtk 0.3.2 into Trusty
tsimonq2oh jeez19:17
tsimonq2gahh meetingbot19:17
tsimonq2#topic Yakkety Alpha 2/16.04.1/14.04.5 and SRU work19:17
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: Yakkety Alpha 2/16.04.1/14.04.5 and SRU work
tsimonq2#agenda tsimonq2: get usb-creator-gtk 0.3.2 into Trusty19:18
tsimonq2noo19:18
tsimonq2#action tsimonq2: get usb-creator-gtk 0.3.2 into Trusty19:18
tsimonq2there :P19:18
meetingologyACTION: tsimonq2: get usb-creator-gtk 0.3.2 into Trusty19:18
tsimonq2also, gilir had some SRUs he submitted to the mailing list19:18
tsimonq2I'll be sure to include fixes in the release notes as well :)19:19
wxloh and we need ppc testing bad.19:19
tsimonq2+119:19
wxlcan't release the untested.19:19
sudodus+119:19
tsimonq2besides that, any other items for this before we move on?19:19
tsimonq2but yes, I don't have a PPC machine to test19:19
wxlas much as it pains me to say this, maybe we should start considering dropping ppc.19:19
tsimonq2wxl: could you send an email to the mailing list to get widespread feedback if you think that it's the best option?19:20
wxloh yeah. i mean it's a case where the users need to be testers or it just can't happen19:21
tsimonq2I garee19:21
tsimonq2*agree19:21
wxlit's not even a choice19:21
wxlif they aren't tested, canonical won't release them19:21
sudodusYes, I think 16.04 LTS can be the last version for PPC. It is getting really hard to get it tested, so probably very few people use it nowadays19:21
tsimonq2yeah19:22
wxlbut i don't just want to make the decision19:22
tsimonq2so could somebody send something to the mailing list then?19:22
wxli'd rather open it up to the community and let them decide19:22
tsimonq2yeah I agree19:22
redwolf+119:22
wxli'll do it19:22
sudodusgood idea19:22
tsimonq2#action wxl: send an email to lubuntu-* about dropping ppc support19:23
meetingologyACTION: wxl: send an email to lubuntu-* about dropping ppc support19:23
tsimonq2so anything else before we move on?19:23
tsimonq2I'd just like to say thanks to sudodus for all of the testing he's been doing :)19:24
tsimonq2let's move on! :)19:24
wxl+119:24
tsimonq2#topic Bug Day19:24
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: Bug Day
tsimonq2Lubuntu is running a Bug Day on the 26th19:24
wxlyay bug day19:25
tsimonq2we are basically going to get help from the community to go through our bugs19:25
tsimonq2I hope we get AbiWord bugs triaged, last I checked we have hundreds of them! :)19:25
wxlew abiword19:25
tsimonq2I agree with wxl :P19:26
redwolf.__.19:26
wxlare we going to focus on a particular segment or prioritize?19:26
wxllike perhaps it might be good to focus on lx components first?19:26
sudodushundreds of bugs on Abiword???19:26
redwolfit's buggy, yes19:26
wxland then move on to apps that we tend to be the primary users of like, um, abiword19:26
tsimonq2well I was going to ask, is there anything that you guys want triages?19:26
redwolfbut we have no replacement19:26
tsimonq2*triages19:27
tsimonq2**triaged19:27
tsimonq2ugh19:27
wxlsure we do, redwolf, it's called vim. :)19:27
* wxl ducks19:27
redwolf:|19:27
tsimonq2but yes, I agree with wxl19:27
tsimonq2ohhhhhhhh XD19:27
* tsimonq2 gives wxl a high-five19:27
tsimonq2anyways19:27
redwolfgilir, about this...19:27
gilirif you want to work on abiword, you probably want to talk to jbicha, he was quite active on it recently19:27
redwolfI told tsimonq2 we were playing with the solution for the last bug19:28
sudodusI think many Lubuntu users install LibreOffice19:28
tsimonq2alright gilir, I'll keep him in the loop :)19:28
gilirredwolf, right, but I don't think it's strickly a bug theme19:28
tsimonq2another thing besides specific bugs, we are having an Ubuntu On Air session on the 25th from 1900 to 2000 UTC19:29
tsimonq2http://ubuntuonair.com/ will have all the details19:29
gilirour theme just "activate" it, see upstream bug here : http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379119:29
ubot93bugzilla.abisource.com bug 13791 in Front End - GTK "constant redraw flicker when document not empty" [Major,New]19:29
redwolfnot really, right19:29
sudodusIs it an option to change to Adwaita - or does it look too bad?19:29
redwolfbut GTK is being buggy lately. they're not XDG compliant19:29
redwolfthey included CSD this month, but that's all19:29
redwolfall themes are going in the opposite direction19:30
gilirswitching to adwaita make a big visual difference between gtk2 and gtk3 apps :-/19:30
redwolfI'm doing tests with Adwaita, that would free us from Light Themes19:30
redwolfindeed19:30
redwolfhere: http://pasteboard.co/dQVgYvcyh.png19:30
redwolfand here: http://pasteboard.co/dQVfzYX7o.png19:30
redwolfspecially the file manager19:30
redwolfbut I wouldn't consider it a problem, yet19:31
tsimonq2redwolf: so I guess my question is, are there fixes coming or are we switching the theme?19:31
redwolfanyway, gilir, aren't we more "gnomized" now?19:31
redwolftsimonq2, this will fix the flickering, but it must be fixed on abiword specifically19:32
tsimonq2I see19:32
tsimonq2but back on the topic of bug day19:32
redwolfanyway, we're "vulnerable" to more GTK problems in the future, unless Canonical gets the right direction19:32
redwolfso this is being held until more tests are done19:32
tsimonq2any packages people want addressed for bug day?19:32
tsimonq2I see19:32
sudodusthose screenshots look good enough :-)19:33
redwolfsudodus, yes, but it doesn't look "lubuntu" :)19:33
wxlredwolf: "right direction" means?19:33
redwolfwxl, XDG compliant, with full Qt support. Light Themes are proved visually incompatible in some apps because they are always late upgrading the widgets19:34
wxlahhhh19:34
wxl:(19:34
redwolfand usually, sudden upgrades appear close to release dates, with ugly outcomes19:34
tsimonq2redwolf: are you in talks with Canonical's design team about this?19:34
wxlare there bugs created for that?19:34
redwolfbut I still trust Design Team guys19:34
redwolfI did, long time ago, about the "sync" between flavours19:35
redwolfbut I was told we're a community and they can't, obviously, think about the repercussion on every theme change19:35
redwolfanyway, if Ubuntu looks good, Lubuntu will too19:35
tsimonq2great :)19:36
redwolfsorry guys, gotta quit19:36
tsimonq2sorry to cut y'all short, this discussion should be continued19:36
tsimonq2o/ redwolf19:36
redwolfthanks everybody19:36
redwolfo/19:36
sudoduso/ rewolf19:37
tsimonq2so let's hand the floor to wxl19:37
tsimonq2#topic QA19:37
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: QA
tsimonq2anything new? :)19:37
wxlwell, i think we pretty much covered it :)19:37
wxljust make sure to show up at Bug Day!19:37
wxland test a lot.19:37
wxlok, love you bye. :)19:37
tsimonq2I agree19:37
tsimonq2XD19:37
tsimonq2#topic Donation Area19:37
tsimonq2wxl still has the floor!19:37
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: Donation Area
wxlpass. haven't done a thing with it.19:38
tsimonq2:P19:38
tsimonq2wxl: what's the status going forward?19:38
wxlultimately we need to start from scratch again.19:38
tsimonq2wxl: would you be able to get that started again?19:38
tsimonq2or do you not want to?19:39
wxli noticed (for the first time) there's an lxde foundation, so i thought maybe i might pick mario's brain about that.19:39
tsimonq2alright :)19:39
tsimonq2#topic Wiki19:39
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: Wiki
tsimonq2last time you have the floor wxl :P19:39
wxloh do i have the floor for the wiki??19:40
tsimonq2yep19:40
wxli think that might have been an old agenda item, unless someonme has a specific question19:40
tsimonq2wxl: that's the status of our documentation?19:40
tsimonq2*what's19:40
wxlwell, we need more help, really. ultimately, we need someone to lead the team.19:41
wxlthat's kind of something we've neeeded for a looooooooooooooong time19:41
tsimonq2wxl: has a call been put out at all? can this be brought up on the mailing list and someone picked?19:41
wxlwithout any sort of vision for what we're doing, it's hard to imagine anything getting done except little additions/changes here and there19:41
tsimonq2I see19:41
wxlit was something we put a call out about a while back19:42
wxlinterest was lukewarm to say the least19:42
tsimonq2so what do you suggest going forward then?19:42
sudodusI don't understand why we have two sets of wiki pages, at the Ubuntu wiki pages and the Ubuntu help pages.19:42
wxlkeep trying. that's about all we can do. maybe also reach out the documentation team19:42
wxlsudodus: i kind of don't either, to be frank19:43
tsimonq2ooh, good idea, maybe some collaboration there, wxl?19:43
wxlhelp.u.c is SUPPOSED to be for official support19:43
wxle.g. the Testing page wouldn't belong there19:43
wxlbut manual pages should be there19:43
wxlbut we have manual pages all over the place, so i don't know19:43
wxlagain, lack of vision19:43
tsimonq2although the Ubuntu Docs team is going through some trouble, so maybe we should wait for them to resolve their issues and then ask them for some help?19:44
tsimonq2s/so//19:44
wxlyeah or maybe perhaps pining the mailing list might pull some people out that would rather work with a smaller team? i don't know19:44
wxli think it would be good to ping the mailing list. we can always try later19:44
wxlgive me a work item19:44
tsimonq2#action wxl: ping the ubuntu-docs mailing list about the Lubuntu documentation19:45
meetingologyACTION: wxl: ping the ubuntu-docs mailing list about the Lubuntu documentation19:45
tsimonq2there19:45
tsimonq2moving on19:45
tsimonq2#topic LXQt19:45
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: LXQt
tsimonq2giving the floor to gilir19:45
tsimonq2gilir: what's been going on in LXQt land? :)19:45
tsimonq2I hear there is a release incoming?19:45
gilirNo progress here, LXQt planned a release some days ago19:46
gilirbut it's not release yet19:46
tsimonq2alright, keep us posted :)19:47
tsimonq2#topic Startup Disk Creator - mkusb19:47
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: Startup Disk Creator - mkusb
tsimonq2sudodus: you have the floor :)19:47
tsimonq2sudodus: anything new?19:48
sudodusWell, tecnically, mkusb is rather stable now19:48
sudodusand the Startup Disk creator alias usb-creator-gtk 0,3.2 is stable too19:48
wxlsudodus: how long before the qt version of mkusb is available? XD19:49
tsimonq2^ XD19:49
sudodusBut there is no progress to get mkusb accepted in a repository. I need help from someone who knows how to do it.19:49
tsimonq2sudodus: I can assist after the meeting if you wish19:50
wxltsimonq2: it needs to go into debian first19:50
tsimonq2wxl: there's a process for that ;)19:51
sudodusI don't know if it is necessary with a particular version of mkusb for LXQt. mkusb works in Kubuntu already (but needs zenity, Would that be be in LXQt?)19:51
sudodusOK, tsimonq2, let talk about that after the meeting19:52
tsimonq2alright :)19:52
tsimonq2#topic Future meetings19:52
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: Future meetings
tsimonq2I have the floor for this one :)19:52
tsimonq2so would we meet on 10 August at the same time?19:53
sudodusI will probably be travel on 10 August.19:53
sudodus*travelling19:54
tsimonq2I wanted to bring this up because I have school coming up, and I don't know if there is a time that I can be here that everyone else can be here as well19:54
tsimonq2sudodus: so maybe the 17th?19:54
sudodusThat's better for me19:54
tsimonq2I guess it's just something that I'd like to keep in mind, that I might not be able to make these meetings19:55
wxlwell i think if we make them much later that makes it hard for gilir and redwolf19:55
tsimonq2when I get my schedule we can probably *see* if there is a different time, but we should be wary19:55
tsimonq2that is what I'm saying wxl19:55
wxlk i guess we'll see19:56
tsimonq2yep19:56
tsimonq2final agenda item19:56
tsimonq2#topic Snappy packages19:56
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies | Lubuntu Team Meeting for July 20, 2016 | Current topic: Snappy packages
tsimonq2I personally love Snappy19:56
tsimonq2I'm a Snapcraft contributor19:57
tsimonq2and although Lubuntu supports installing a snap, it would be nice to have a Lubuntu snap19:57
wxldo you mean a lubuntu snap or an lxde snap?19:57
tsimonq2a Lubuntu snap19:57
tsimonq2I specifically wanted to hear from gilir on this19:58
wxlto make it easier for people to switch between flavors???19:58
sudodusDo you mean containing lubuntu-desktop?19:58
tsimonq2yes19:58
tsimonq2(to both of you)19:58
gilirI played a bit with snap19:58
sudoduswhere can we find how to make snaps?19:58
tsimonq2sudodus: http://snapcraft.io/19:58
gilirlooks like a viable option for individual packages, but not really for an all desktop installation19:59
wxli don't know, the idea of being able to switch flavors so quickly seems rather attractive19:59
sudodusThanks, I'll look at it19:59
tsimonq2sudodus: we also have #snappy on freenode and a repo with a bunch of already snapped packakes: https://github.com/ubuntu/snappy-playpen19:59
tsimonq2*packages19:59
gilirit reminds me binary installation on windows ... copying all .dll in 1 folder ...19:59
wxla common complaint i hear from users is how to get rid of all their non-lubuntu stuff when they install lubuntu-desktop19:59
tsimonq2I've been working on a little proof-of-concept: https://github.com/tsimonq2/lubuntu-distro-snaps20:00
tsimonq2gilir: so is your issue just the fact that it would be a snap of Lubuntu and not individual applications?20:01
sudoduso/ lynorian20:02
tsimonq2because if so, like I said, I would be willing to maintain it20:02
gilirtsimonq2, I can't really see the benefit of this20:02
gilirtsimonq2, if you make 1 snap by apps, the copy of all libraries in all snap wil be insane20:03
tsimonq2gilir: Snaps are fast, they are easy to update, they are secure, and like wxl said, it makes it easy to install Lubuntu and easily remove it if you wish20:04
wxlthe primary pusher of snaps is ubuntu20:04
gilirtsimonq2, if you do 1 big snap wil all the packages, well, that will looks like a big massive horrible binary20:04
tsimonq2well I would be willing to test which is bigger, a Lubuntu snap or the lubuntu-desktop package installed20:04
wxlbut people use ubuntu a little while and they think "wonder what the grass is like on the other side"20:04
wxlif they could just replace ubuntu-desktop with lubuntu-desktop that would be fantastic20:05
gilirtsimonq2, sounds like maketing to me, .deb can do a pretty good job20:05
tsimonq2gilir: yes Debian packages can do a good job, there are just specific advantages that wxl and I are looking at20:06
tsimonq2gilir: and like I said, I would be willing to maintain it20:06
sudodusAre there other differences except the packaging? I've heard about sandbox aspects of snaps.20:06
tsimonq2sudodus: it's similar to mounting an .iso image20:07
tsimonq2sudodus: it's read-only, you mount one image, and it's mounted as a loop device20:07
gilirtsimonq2, it's free software, do what you want :-) But cleary I don't have time to help on another packaging system (I saw some in the past years ...)20:08
sudodusSo a read-only file system20:08
tsimonq2sudodus: yes, although it uses already existing filesystems, it doesn't roll it's own20:08
tsimonq2gilir: alright :)20:08
gilirJust saying, I tested them, I'm not so impress, and I don't think if useable for large scale of packages20:08
tsimonq2alright20:09
tsimonq2well we can talk more afterwards if you all want, but we're over time on our meeting20:09
tsimonq2thanks for coming everyone!20:09
tsimonq2#endmeeting20:09
=== meetingology changed the topic of #lubuntu-devel to: Lubuntu QA/Development | Wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/QA | Support: #lubuntu | Chat: #lubuntu-offtopic | Now Testing: Xenial Xerus 16.04.1 due 21 July, Yakkety Yak 16.10 dailies
meetingologyMeeting ended Wed Jul 20 20:09:59 2016 UTC.20:09
meetingologyMinutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/lubuntu-devel/2016/lubuntu-devel.2016-07-20-19.00.moin.txt20:09
wxlthx all20:10
tsimonq2wxl: could you add 14.04.5 to the topic, maybe? :)20:10
gilirarf, I miss the topic about yakkety seed changes :-/20:10
giliranyway, I'll send a mail about this20:11
tsimonq2alright gilir20:11
gilirtsimonq2, about 14.04.5, it fails to build sometime ago, you probably want to check if lubuntu-desktop is still installable on trusty20:12
sudodusI can test that too (on a mini text system).20:13
gilirI can't stay longer, sorry :-/ thanks tsimonq2 for the meeting :-)20:13
tsimonq2:)20:13
sudodustsimonq2: is it time for a post-meeting talk about mkusb packaging now?20:15
tsimonq2sure :)20:15
tsimonq2sudodus: so you want the mkusb package in Debian/Ubuntu ?20:16
sudodusWell, in what way would it be better than in a Launchpad PPA? - easier for beginners to install ...20:17
tsimonq2sudodus: PPAs are somewhat unsupported20:18
sudodusI have read about the complicated route to an official debian/ubuntu package.20:18
tsimonq2and i can help with that20:18
tsimonq2*I20:18
tsimonq2sudodus: if you tell me where the source code is, I can debianify it, then I'll get it uploaded to Debian Unstable20:19
tsimonq2sudodus: it will then travel down to Ubuntu20:19
sudodusThat's great - I enjoy programming and testing, but I'm not good at getting official or bureaucratic things working.20:19
tsimonq2alright :)20:19
tsimonq2so where is the source code?20:20
sudodusI think you might get it via two sources, ppa:mkusb/ppa and Phill's server20:20
tsimonq2sudodus: I mean, the source code20:21
tsimonq2where is it developerd?20:21
tsimonq2*developed20:21
sudodushttp://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/mkusb/20:21
tsimonq2so that is where it is developed?20:22
sudodusThere is no compiled code, only bash shellscripts - I have my own directories with help scripts in my computer20:23
tsimonq2alright :)20:23
tsimonq2sudodus: you should really think about learning a version control system such as Git :)20:23
sudodusbut the ppa contains the package, I would think in principle like you would use for an official repository20:24
sudodusMaybe that would help :-)20:25
sudodusI mean git.20:25
agaidais mkusb not this special alias cat *.iso > /dev/$foo ? :P20:25
agaidahi sudodus tsimonq220:25
tsimonq2o/ agaida20:26
sudodushi agaida20:26
sudodusOriginally mkusb was only using dd under the hood. The important task is to wrap security around dd. Later on I added tools to wipe drives and create new partition tables and file system, and also a method to create persistent live drives. So it is a big shellscript (but still only bash).20:28
sudodustsimonq2: Anyway, what are the steps that you can help me along?20:30
tsimonq2sudodus: I'll make sure the debian files are compliant with the standards, I'll make sure it builds fine, then I'll ask a Debian Developer to upload it20:30
tsimonq2sudodus: then all you have to do is wait for the package to get down to Yakkety20:31
tsimonq2sudodus: in the meantime, since you have a PPA, I'll give you instructions for getting it into your PPA20:32
* agaida think the release name will begin with a Z20:32
sudodusSounds nice :-) ButI guess you will ask question along the path. I will try to reply and supply what you need.20:32
tsimonq2in fact sudodus, I just applied to be in the mkusb team20:32
tsimonq2sudodus: could you please approve me? :)20:33
sudodusDone20:36
tsimonq2great20:37
lynoriansudodus, does mkusb have a way to say you have an install disk but want to make it back into a mass storage device through new partition table and then putting a partition on it with security?20:37
sudodusIf you have not done it, I suggest that you install mkusb into your Lubuntu system according to this link20:38
sudodushttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/mkusb#Quick_start_manual_and_mkusb_PPA20:38
sudodusand get used to it.20:39
sudodusNo, but it can do it (overwrite whatever is on the drive). It can also fix issues with GPT, and the backup table at the tail end of the drive20:40
sudodustsimonq2: You are silent. Do you need more fast feedback now, or can I leave this chat? We can always send eemails, and when you want, when can start chatting again at this channel.20:46
tsimonq2sudodus: I'm working :)20:46
tsimonq2sudodus: I'll give you feedback via email soon if you wish20:46
sudodusThanks :-)20:47
tsimonq2wxl: aaaaaand we have a hardware tester! \o/21:27
wxlwhoozat?21:28
tsimonq2wxl: look on lubuntu-devel list21:29
wxloh ian? i kind of tend to ignore his emails as i do fritz'. not to be mean, but theere's always so much detail, i'm not sure what the point is half the time.21:29
tsimonq2wxl: well tl;dr he tested and it works fine :P21:30
wxlwell that's ghood21:32
wxltsimonq2: nio got at the issue i have21:36
tsimonq2aha21:37
wxltesting without docuemted results is pretty much useless21:37
wxls/\(documented\)/formally \1/21:38
=== MrBIOS_ is now known as MrBIOS
tsimonq2I see21:38
wxli've sung this same refrain over and over and there are certain folks who just seem to either ignore it or not get it21:38
tsimonq2I see21:40
wxlgoing forward that's an area of potential improvement21:41
wxlwhether it be in how we communicate it or documenation or i don't know what21:41
tsimonq2wxl: trying something over and over expecting different results is insanity21:41
tsimonq2wxl: if you really want it to stop, enforce it21:42
wxlthat's why i said area of potential improvement21:42
tsimonq2I see21:42
wxlthere's nothing to enforce that will result in positive results21:42
wxli can say "you're going to get banned from the list unless your testing ends up documented formally on the tracker as per our instructions"21:42
wxlin which case the response will likely be "ok, well, i'll stop testing then"21:42
wxlwhat we need is to convert the interest and effort into formally documented results21:43
wxlperhaps the task seems too daunting?21:43
wxlinstructions need help?21:43
wxllike i said, i don't knwo21:43
tsimonq2no, I would send them a private email saying something like this, "I really really want you to keep testing, you are a great tester, but could you please report your results in the appropriate place as well as posting on the mailing list?"21:43
tsimonq2why do you assume that enforcement is negative?21:44
wxlwhat you're talking about is encouragement not enforcement21:44
tsimonq2then let's exersize encouragement21:45
tsimonq2I guess, why be negative? why use an iron hammer?21:45
wxlyeah i don't want to be21:45
wxlthat's what i'm saying21:45
wxlit won't help21:45
wxlof course neither will ignoring and that's mostly what i've resolved to do XD21:45
tsimonq2I'll say something to them next time21:47
wxli guess we'll see if he follows nio's advice..21:47
tsimonq2yep21:47
tsimonq2meanwhile I'm packaging mkusb and getting it ready for Debian21:48
wxlwow21:48
wxlso you know the whole process of packaging for Debian and then getting it in Ubuntu?21:48
tsimonq2like the back of my hand21:48
wxlwow could you document it?21:49
tsimonq2well, not really, but I'm close21:49
tsimonq2well there's docs all over21:49
wxlyeah and i think that's the problem21:49
wxlthey're all over21:49
wxlnot in one place21:49
tsimonq2I see21:50
wxlimagine if you had to read the entirety of the rsync manpage across several unlinked manpages21:50
tsimonq2yeah :P21:52
tsimonq2wxl: I'll make a blog post21:52
wxlyes please21:53
tsimonq2wxl: do you know what the check-all-the-things package is?21:53
tsimonq2XD21:53
wxlno but it sounds nice!21:53
tsimonq2it literally goes through and picks your package apart21:54
wxlsee what i'm saying21:54
wxli haven't even seen this mentioned before21:54
wxlalthough it's proabably on SOME page somewhere21:54
tsimonq2yeah21:54
tsimonq2*gasp* git cherry-pick is AWESOME! :D21:57
agaidaits even more awesome with the -n switch22:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!