[11:59] <sakredot> dot release looking good so far... tho these seem to remain: #1527314 
[11:59] <sakredot> #1550186
[11:59] <sakredot> bug#1550210
[12:00] <sakredot> bug 1527314
[12:00] <sakredot> thank you ubottu :) bug 1550186
[12:00] <sakredot> bug 1550210
[12:01] <sakredot> at least in the live session... installing to disk as i type...
[12:02] <sakredot> also, hi guys!
[13:42] <sakrecoer> is there no test-case for upgrade from 14.04 to 16.04.1? 
[13:44] <sakrecoer> i think i understood it would be rolling out once .1 was released..
[13:44] <sakrecoer> zequence, OvenWerks, any idea..?
[13:55] <sakrecoer> i have to log out for the day, i'll be back later tonight so check if there was any rebuild that needs to be rechecked...
[13:55] <sakrecoer> *to check if there was any rebuild
[13:58] <sakrecoer> i tried 32 and 64 bit and it looks good to me... but i reckon we need a few more tests... ping: astraljava1, autumna, cyphermox, DalekSec, luisbg, Noskcaj, OvenWerks, zequence. pong: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/363/builds
[14:02] <zequence> sakrecoer: The upgrade tests are usually in another section, but I usually don't bother with them, since the support for them from our side is pretty much non existent.
[14:03] <zequence> An upgrade should work, but it will most probably cause some form of duplicity of systems in between changes that we've done
[14:03] <zequence> Or, as a result of the changes that we've done, I mean
[14:04] <zequence> In some cases I'm sure this is solved by debian packaging, where one package will "Replace" another.
[14:48] <luisbg> sakrecoer: very cool
[23:57] <sakrecoer> thanks zequence.
[23:59] <sakrecoer> luisbg: what can we do, except stay cool?.. awesome would be many tests, forward is participation.