[02:21] <Longd900> Does anyone know to fix fsck error
[18:16] <Gnjurac> hi any GUI encription softwere for lubuntu?
[18:17] <wxl> Gnjurac: to just encrypt files?
[18:18] <Gnjurac> yep
[18:18] <Gnjurac> wxl:  i can use terminal but my sister wants it and she is tarded
[18:18] <Gnjurac> needs GUI
[18:18] <wxl> you just need a front end for gpg. there's plenty
[18:18] <wxl> of course, *I* don't use one
[18:18]  * wxl searches
[18:20] <Gnjurac> yep but i cant find any good for lxde
[18:21] <wxl> seahorse maybe?
[18:21] <wxl> yeah seahorse
[18:21] <Gnjurac> it uses nautilus and on lxde its pcmanfm
[18:21] <wxl> it doesn't require nautilus from what i can see
[20:32] <egegw> why does lubuntu homepage provide 16.04 and not 16.04.1 ?
[20:33] <wxl> egegw: lubuntu.me provides the right release
[20:35] <egegw> wxl: lubuntu.me ? The regular page is lubuntu.net
[20:39] <egegw> by the way, https is also not working on https://lubuntu.me
[20:39] <egegw> please have a look at https://letsencrypt.org/
[20:47] <wxl> egegw: you should see no reference to lubuntu.net in any of the official references to lubuntu
[20:51] <egegw> i see on wikipedia: (cur | prev) 19:02, 24 April 2016‎ Pinportal (talk | contribs)‎ . . (65,902 bytes) (+32)‎ . . (Added another official Lubuntu website: Lubuntu.net is a legacy site and Lubuntu.me is the 'live' one.) (undo)
[20:51] <wxl> egegw: Legacy being the key word.
[20:52] <egegw> any plans to shut down .net ? this is confusing at the moment
[20:52] <egegw> and please enable https
[20:52] <wxl> .net is run by the original creator of lubuntu who really isn't involved in the project anymore. we have no control over it.
[20:53] <genii> It expires in 6 months anyways
[20:53] <egegw> is there a reason for not beein involved any more in the project?
[20:53] <egegw> genii: what does expire in 6 months?
[20:54] <wxl> he's been doing other things
[20:54]  * wxl shrugs
[20:54] <genii> egegw: The lubuntu.net domain
[20:54] <wxl> he'll probably renew it i imagine
[20:54] <genii> ( according to WHOIS )
[20:54] <wxl> it's been on my mind to have a discussion about this
[20:54] <egegw> genii: in regular you have automatic repayment enabled and it stops when they cant pull any more money from your bank accout...
[20:55] <wxl> egegw: would you be so kind as to send an email to the mailing list about your concerns on the website? it will serve as my reminder to get this taken care of
[20:56] <egegw> wxl: i cant send you a mail with a .onion address
[20:56] <wxl> egegw: not me, the mailing list.
[20:56] <egegw> same
[20:57] <fenris_kcf> [eo] saluton. kio povus esti la kauxzo ke Lubuntu aliigas la ret-agordojn kelkaj minutoj post lancxigado? [en] hy. what could be the reason that Lubuntu alters the network settings several minutes after boot?
[20:57] <wxl> egegw: https://securemail.hidemyass.com/#!
[20:58] <genii> heh, "hidemyass"
[20:58] <wxl> yuuup
[20:59] <egegw> did i have to be registered to the mailing list to send a mail to it?
[20:59] <wxl> technically, no
[20:59] <wxl> you just need someone (ahem, me) to approve it
[21:02] <egegw> a some kind of political question: When i report to the mailing list (libuntu) a bug that is a upstream problem, did you (developers) try to fix this bug and send the fix upstream or did you say that i should report upstream?
[21:02] <wxl> it depends
[21:03] <wxl> abiword, for example, is something we'll likely send upstream. but having a downstream bug is still a good thing to have. we won't just delete your bug and tell you re-file upstream.
[21:04] <wxl> if it's, say, lubuntu software center (which we're actually not really using), there is no upstream and we'll likely fix it.
[21:04] <wxl> there are occassionally lxde things that we'll fix ourselves, but most generally we'll fix them upstream and let them trickle down.
[21:04] <wxl> unless it's an ubuntu-specific sort of thing
[21:04] <fenris_kcf> [eo] mi malsxaltis na NetworkManager, sed tamen la agordojn aliigatas [en] i deactivated NetworkManager, but nevertheless the settings get changed
[21:04] <wxl> tl;dr, file all bugs in launchpad. we appreciate it.
[21:05] <wxl> however, the proper way to send a bug is not via the mailing list, but through a bug report
[21:05] <wxl> !bugs | egegw
[21:05] <wxl> !en | fenris_kcf
[21:05] <fenris_kcf> read again, wxl
[21:05] <egegw> wxl: how did i write a mail with hidemyass ?? i cant find any functionality to write a mail
[21:05] <wxl> fenris_kcf: i see the english at the end
[21:05] <fenris_kcf> so what?
[21:06] <wxl> egegw: never used it. just know about it.
[21:06] <wxl> fenris_kcf: your question is not clear.
[21:06] <egegw> wxl: you cant write emails with it...
[21:06] <fenris_kcf> ok, how can i make it clear, wxl?
[21:06] <wxl> fenris_kcf: restate the entire thing in english.
[21:06] <fenris_kcf> i did
[21:07] <wxl> egegw: oh, i guess i was wrong. you can't.
[21:07] <fenris_kcf> just read
[21:08] <wxl> fenris_kcf: you're making this hard than it needs to be. i can't make out your question, so i can't help. if you'd like to restate, that'd be great.
[21:08] <fenris_kcf> [en] hy. what could be the reason that Lubuntu alters the network settings several minutes after boot? [en] i deactivated NetworkManager, but nevertheless the settings get changed
[21:09] <fenris_kcf> ... and please let's not start any "speek fckyng Inglish!11!"-debate
[21:10] <wxl> egegw: just nevermind. i got it.
[21:10] <wxl> egegw: still you'll find it hard to participate in the community without the ability to send emails.
[21:10] <wxl> fenris_kcf: i don't know why you think the network settings changed
[21:11] <fenris_kcf> i edited /etc/network/interfaces
[21:11] <fenris_kcf> assigned a static ip
[21:11] <fenris_kcf> and made the if "auto"
[21:11] <fenris_kcf> the network comes up correctly after boot
[21:11] <fenris_kcf> the system has the correct settings
[21:11] <fenris_kcf> after ~5min the settings get lost and the ip changes
[21:12] <fenris_kcf> apparently, i admit
[21:12] <fenris_kcf> i can't ping the system any longer
[21:12] <wxl> yeah well, id' make sure first
[21:12] <fenris_kcf> (while the settings at the pinging system are persistent)
[21:12] <wxl> [i'd also check the logs
[21:12] <wxl> if it did change, there's a reason. finding the culprit will be the first step
[21:13] <fenris_kcf> well, that's my question
[21:13] <wxl> check the logs
[21:13] <fenris_kcf> is in the syslog?
[21:13] <fenris_kcf> *is it
[21:13] <wxl> i have lubuntu systems with static ips that don't change. ti's certainly possible.
[21:14] <wxl> syslog, dmesg are the most likely possibilities, but ultimately you just need to look
[21:15] <wxl> it's possible there could have been a conflict with another device and your router gave priority to the other one
[21:15] <fenris_kcf> no router involved currently
[21:15] <wxl> you're using a null modem cable?
[21:15] <fenris_kcf> ethernet cable
[21:16] <wxl> crossover cable. thbat's what i meant
[21:16] <wxl> god i'm old
[21:16] <fenris_kcf> yes
[21:16] <fenris_kcf> (about "crossover", dunno if you're old :))
[21:17] <wxl> they're both a similar concept, except null modem cables are used for rs232 which is, as i said, old :)
[21:18] <fenris_kcf> syslog says that from time to time DHCPDISCOVER is doing something
[21:18] <fenris_kcf> ubuntu dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.0 port 67 interval <number>
[21:19] <wxl> https://askubuntu.com/questions/327412/is-there-a-safe-way-to-disable-dhcp-from-command-line
[21:19] <wxl> https://askubuntu.com/questions/459140/why-dhclient-is-still-running-when-i-choose-static-ip
[21:26] <fenris_kcf> i killed dhclient now. let's see if that suffices
[21:27] <fenris_kcf> syslog doesn't get flooded anymore
[21:27] <fenris_kcf> looks good
[21:27] <fenris_kcf> well, gmac_adjust_link still spams around
[21:39] <fenris_kcf> did the trick. thx, wxl
[21:39] <wxl> np fenris_kcf
[22:03] <Drtro> How do I add more "themes" to the widgets tab of the look and feel settings? I don't really like any of them because they don't match my old 90s retro theme.
[23:20] <ilo123> I am having trouble with nvidia-settings. I have two monitors, one is DVI-I (has the right resolution) and the other is DVI-D (has the wrong resolution). I can't get nvidia-settings to display the right resolution (1600x900) for the secondary monitor.
[23:26] <ilo123> wxl I thought I had it lol
[23:26] <wxl> aw jeez
[23:26] <wxl> not having an nvidia card i'm not sure i can be of much help. you actually might try #ubuntu
[23:28] <ilo123> I'm tring #nvidia, but no response.
[23:29] <wxl> usually with IRC, it's best to leave a message and wait. sometimes hours. :)
[23:30] <ilo123>  Yep
[23:46] <ilo123> I sent a couple messages on #ubuntu