[00:04] wtf [00:04] what does it mean: Expected token `,' [00:15] where does it say that? [00:16] inside qml custom function when i add this: previousButton.enabled: (slidesList.currentIndex > 0) ? true:false; [00:20] rofl inside function i have to use = for assigment not : [00:23] wun wun... have it working ! [07:28] o/ y'all [07:50] clivejo: ping, I want to get Cantor working but I'm stuck [09:22] tsimonq2: stuck how? [09:22] o/ acheronuk [09:23] acheronuk: whenever I try to update the install file, I get complaints about missing libraries [09:23] acheronuk: the bad part is the libraries don't exist and it seems to be hardcoded :( [09:24] what missing libraries exactly? [09:32] libcantorlibs.so.6 etc? [09:36] yeah [09:36] acheronuk: just libcantorlibs.so.6 I think [09:36] * tsimonq2 does it again [09:37] well, look at the build log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/21618686/ [09:38] :< [09:39] stuck pixel on my new monitor... shall I send it to service? [09:39] acheronuk: I'm aware [09:41] well, the .install file is looking for libcantorlibs.so.6 etc to install, but the source build doesn't make that version any more [09:42] so you need to install the new versions instead [09:42] acheronuk: I tried, they don't exist somehow some way [09:42] but they must be in a different file [09:43] is this in your own test build? [09:44] yeah [09:44] what source are you using to test? [09:45] kubuntu_unstable but I modified things so hold on [09:45] * tsimonq2 pastebins it [09:46] no I eman the actual cantor source code, not the kubuntu packaging [09:46] acheronuk: http://paste.ubuntu.com/21619256/ [09:46] I don't know what you're saying then [09:47] here's my git diff: http://paste.ubuntu.com/21619329/ [09:47] acheronuk: that diff is what makes dh_install work [09:48] oh [09:49] that diff says you removed the old libcantorlibs.so.6 from the . install file, but did not replace it with the new libcantorlibs.so.16.. [09:49] let me try that and give you outputs [09:50] moin [09:51] yofel: \o/ [09:51] how are you? [09:51] tsimonq2: even more the source you are using is still building the old libcantorlibs.so.6 [09:51] acheronuk: hwo do I fix that?!? [09:51] *how [09:52] so you are not using the same source KCI did! [09:52] why is it doing that? :( [09:52] really tired for some reason even though I only woke up an hour ago... otherwise ok [09:52] morning yofel :) [09:52] yofel: great, we're solving the big pita that is cantor :P [09:52] (at least for NOW it's a piuta) [09:52] *pita [09:53] where did you take the actual cantor source code from? [09:53] acheronuk: uscan --download-current-version [09:54] cantor-16.04.3.tar.xz [09:54] that's the tar ^ [09:54] well, that;s not going to work as that will just give you the latest released version [09:54] k [09:54] not the upstream git that KCI builds from [09:54] acheronuk: so where do I get it then? [09:55] tsimonq2: https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/unstable/+packages?field.name_filter=cantor&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter= [09:56] oh thanks [09:56] http://i.imgur.com/rAJKMXl.png [09:57] you can download the orig.tax.xz that KCI used from there [09:57] yep :) [09:58] as you'll also need the changelog entry for it to pick that up, I recommend working on the PPA package locally, then copying your changes to git once you're done [09:58] oh? okay [09:58] there's also 2 easy ways to download that: a) 'dget -xu ', b) use pull-ppa-source from lp:kubuntu-dev-tools [09:59] I usually just rename the KCI orig.tar.xz [09:59] yofel: why does the changelog entry need to be changed/ [09:59] that works too [10:00] that's what I did (@ acheronuk) [10:00] then build the soutce without signing, so I can then throw it at pbuilder [10:00] *source [10:00] right, all you need is a matching source and changelog, so either way is fine [10:00] yep, just do it that way so I can stay in the git tree and make changes there [10:01] I've been just cloning from source, git checkout kubuntu_unstable, uscan --download-current-version (which I now know doesn't work 100% of the time), and then make changes and build in a special sbuild I set up [10:02] the sbuild is basically just a yakkety sbuild with the KCI PPA enabled [10:02] with apt-cacher-ng and shm builds, it FLIES! :D [10:03] if you are fixing the CI builds, you need upstream git source, one way or another [10:03] well it seems now I can just grab it from the PPA [10:03] so does that work? [10:03] you can :) [10:04] I have a debiankde: git alias set up when I need it [10:04] hm, how *do* you tell sbuild to build in an shm directory? [10:05] only caveat on that is that it's a snapshot, so if upstream have made new changes since, you won't have them [10:05] yofel: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SimpleSbuild :P [10:05] thanks [10:05] (there's something I can copy/paste here) [10:06] I never got used to pbuilder [10:06] I just use sbuild [10:06] and hey, that's what PPAs use to, so it works out fine :) [10:07] whatever works for you :) [10:07] I have a pbuilder setup that works, but sbuild does a couple things better. So I want to get that to work, but never managed to properly configure it ^^ [10:08] yofel: the same more or less. I tried it but didn't really get it set up properly [10:09] acheronuk, yofel: hope that page helps! :) [10:09] well, it already does, as I *was* looking for those purge settings [10:10] and Launchpad seems to be in work denial mode o.O [10:11] It's having Sunday off [10:12] WOW, this is Cantor's Lintian output: http://paste.ubuntu.com/21620897/ [10:12] oh. 4 hrs to puslish? wtf? [10:13] *publish [10:14] I don't get the 'hardening-no-bindnow' in pbuilder [10:16] tsimonq2: this is what I get http://paste.ubuntu.com/21621129/ [10:17] well I have a more verbose Lintian :P [10:17] acheronuk: https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kubuntu-cantor/+merge/301586 [10:18] \o/ [10:20] tsimonq2: so where are you sending the replacement appstream metainfo file then? [10:21] Missing files of course :p [10:21] grr somewhere that got lost [10:21] hold on [10:21] sorry [10:21] you may find some extra HTML docs as well? think I did [10:23] wtf? there's no metainfo anything in the build log under "Installing" [10:24] nvm [10:24] -- Installing: /build/cantor-16.04.3/debian/tmp/usr/share/metainfo/org.kde.cantor.appdata.xml [10:24] no?? [10:24] acheronuk: I said nvm :P [10:24] lol [10:25] He did say that [10:25] I missed that while I was copying & pasting :P [10:25] acheronuk: good call re: your comment on the PR [10:26] just comparing with what I have [10:29] yay sun rising! \o/ [10:29] :P [10:29] The comment was from allee [10:30] allee? [10:30] acheronuk: why does Cantor still depend on Python 2.7? [10:30] :O [10:30] because it's still a thing? ^^ [10:31] * tsimonq2 runs [10:31] https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kubuntu-cantor/+merge/301586/comments/776924 [10:31] oh, that comment. thought you meant the on here on the channel [10:32] Maybe he did mean that [10:32] oh I wasn't paying *that* much attention [10:32] sorry acheronuk, it was allee :P [10:33] Ok. I'm going to have to go. Sunday lunch and watching people drive very fast round a track in Germany :) [10:33] o/ [10:33] Is not lunch time yet [10:34] It is if you've got to sort it out [10:34] .. first [10:34] What you making? [10:35] Gammon. In cider & mustard [10:35] Oh nice! [10:35] changes pushed [10:35] \o/ [10:36] ok. bbl [10:36] thanks alleehol for looking at my PR :) [10:36] Did you run that in sbuild? [10:37] Clifford: you mean my changes? [10:37] if so, yes [10:38] No HTML files need installed? [10:40] Clifford: We don't have a docs package of any kind, so if I did fix that, that's a different PR [10:40] nice catch though :) [10:40] s/of any kind/of any kind for cantor/ [10:42] * tsimonq2 throws https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/kubuntu-packaging/+git/kubuntu-cantor/+merge/301586 at clivejo [10:42] he was really looking forward to that being fixed :P [10:42] there are already docs installing in the main cantor package. you just have extra files [10:43] oh? [10:43] * tsimonq2 checks that [10:44] acheronuk: should I just change all of the lines that have usr/share/doc/HTML/en/cantor/ to a single usr/share/doc/HTML/en/cantor ? [10:44] that would probably fix it [10:44] Maybe wildcard the en [10:45] as usual, there are several ways. [10:45] So it will work with other languages [10:45] ok. I'm really going now! lol [10:45] https://youtu.be/yG6BzvIDQTE [10:45] Clifford: good idea [10:47] soee: did you fix the slideshow? :O [10:47] not bad :D [10:48] the main problem is i cant set list item wo inherit width from list view component [10:48] *list item width [10:48] this looks like a crap atm. but when i finish will be nice :D [10:48] great soee :D [10:48] I'm looking forward to it :) [10:55] there, PR should be good [11:02] Woooooooooooooooo ! [11:02] what my eyes see [11:02] when I said wildcard the en, I meant usr/share/doc/HTML/*/cantor/ [11:05] tsimonq2: when you make changes do you make a new commit? [11:28] go away okteta and take your symbols with you ^^^ [11:28] * acheronuk goes back to the gammon [11:29] clivejo: yeah why? do you want me to squash them? [11:29] clivejo: and alright [11:29] clivejo: are you Clifford? who's Clifford? :O [11:29] yes, Clifford is mobile me [11:30] oh cool :D [11:30] on Telegram [11:30] yeah [11:30] and the bridge posts my messages here [11:30] clivejo: so what about commits? [11:30] I see :) [11:31] just wondered if you had tried git commit ammend [11:31] not sure if it works with personal git repo [11:31] nope, but I can squash them into one commit if you would like [11:32] Ive pushed it already so no issue [11:32] alright :) [11:32] just wondered if ammend is possible on private git repo [11:32] *shrug* [11:33] clivejo: can you add me to Telegram please? I'm tsimonq2 on there as well [11:33] I wanted clivejo but someone else registered it :( [11:33] https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ci/+archive/ubuntu/unstable/+build/10542071 [11:34] \o/ [11:34] waiting here for family to arrive [11:34] awww acheronuk, you spoiled the surprise [11:34] I did it! :D [11:34] clivejo: sorry ;? [11:34] its much better seeing it pop up in green! [11:34] clivejo: I've never been that patient! [11:37] seems fixing Marble will be hard^Wa lot of fun! :D [11:41] to fix marble we will need to put down of of the devel [11:41] huh? [11:41] one of the devel keeps changing stuff [11:42] acheronuk has fixed it twice now and the devel broke it again! [11:42] clivejo: who? /me takes out sword [11:42] :P [11:42] * tsimonq2 answers that question himself and looks at git logs [11:43] clivejo: you talking about a Kubuntu dev or Debian dev? [11:43] KDE [11:44] hes been slaughter symbols [11:44] where's the Git for that? :O [11:44] quickgi [11:44] * tsimonq2 thinks I can answer my own question again [11:45] https://quickgit.kde.org [11:45] hmm ok [11:45] https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=marble.git&a=commit&h=b5dc725832839986048f64ced12c6491cdb954a1 [11:45] this one broke his fix [11:46] LOL HIS NAME IS DENNIS [11:47] (inside joke) [11:47] clivejo: what do I do about all the #MISSING lines? [11:47] * tsimonq2 forgot [11:48] determine if its safe to remove them [11:48] how do I do that? [11:48] LOL its hard to know in this case, as the devel has killed so many [11:49] clivejo: how do I determine if it's safe to fix? [11:49] does it have a process or do I kinda need to guess [11:50] usually if the symbols is marked optional or private its safe to delete [11:50] or theres been a so bump [11:50] how do I determine if it's any of those? [11:51] oh handbags 80% off [11:51] hm? [11:51] we usually look at git commits to see what happened [11:53] commit message "Only export symbols from the libraries that should be exported " [11:53] that suggests to me that the symbols that are not missing shouldnt have been exported [11:53] and would be safe to remove [11:53] but Im not sure on that [11:54] KDE devels throw some curve balls when it comes to symbols and Debian is very strict [11:56] clivejo: would you be willing to walk me through this particular case or do you want to look at it? [11:56] actually need yofel's input on it [11:57] yofel? [11:57] under my current knowledge, such a large removal of symbols would need a so bump [11:57] yeah [11:58] I left it as I was pondering... [11:59] If my niece and nephew don't hurry up, I'm going to start on the Sunday roast without them [12:00] * clivejo wonders how you hide IMAP folders in Trojitá [12:06] wth? [12:06] Could not find a configuration file for package "Qt5" that is compatible [12:06] with requested version "5.7.0". [12:06] The following configuration files were considered but not accepted: [12:06] /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Qt5/Qt5Config.cmake, version: 5.6.1 [12:07] that's for minuet [12:25] Yup [12:25] Needs Qt5.7 [12:25] So its not getting released; [12:25] alright, so we can leave it? [12:26] Hey folks [12:28] o/ BluesKaj [12:33] hi tsimonq2 [12:36] BluesKaj: how are you? [12:43] tsimonq2, fine here, having kwin problems on yakkety and xenial , crashing...how about you ? [12:45] thinking of reinstalling trusty 14.04 just for stability ...tired of these problems, can't watch a movie all the way thru without crashes or freezes [12:45] on xenial [12:47] maybe I should connect my outboard media drive to the rpi3 and use that for media [12:56] BBL... other things to do [12:58] mmm I'm not getting that many crashes [13:01] crashes in what? [13:02] * yofel wonders if cherry picking qt 5.7 builds from neon would make sense [13:02] blueskaj said they are getting crashes in xenial and yakkety [13:02] just for the ci [13:03] oh, I missed that he left [13:03] yea [13:03] still, I run xenial, and it's ~mostly stable [13:03] it's alright for the most part [13:03] only when dealing with dual monitors and opengl sometime [13:03] s [13:04] dual monitor hotplug that is, static dual on my desktop runs fine [13:04] same at work [13:04] it could be better [13:04] hotplug could, certainly [13:29] Im running Yakkety and its stable [13:33] You have changes then the official does not [13:45] I'm also running Yakkety and BOTH staging PPAs [13:45] works totally fine [13:45] that's what I'm saying [13:45] ppa's [13:45] normal yakkety is broken when upgrading [13:45] well I upgraded the day 16.04 came out :P [13:46] now it is broken for Kubuntu anyway [13:46] * clivejo doesnt do normal Yakkety [13:47] clivejo: how so? [13:48] Ive all the new stuff on it [13:48] from staging PPA's [13:50] clivejo: so you enabled the PPAs like me? [13:53] when Im reasonablely sure they are working! [13:53] but the point is, you enabled the PPAs? [13:55] yes [13:55] oh okay :) [13:55] yeah they work on my end lol [14:00] how nice [14:08] I sense sarcasm! [14:08] you do [14:28] I'm going to sleep, bai o/ [14:29] do you sleep during the day? [14:30] yeah [14:30] I'm a night ow; [14:30] *owl [14:30] so 9:30 AM, time for bed until like 5 PM :P [14:30] o/ [14:34] eakk [14:39] He's a night owl till school starts back [14:41] Yep, external monitor hotplug is a mess. [14:42] Makes me wonder if KDE guys ever used this feature before. [14:43] Or maybe... they're running XFCE :) [15:56] ahoneybun: on YY most of FW 24 and plasma 5.7.2 is there but in proposed, and app/translations still need to upload. when that's done I think it should unbreak the YY upgrade without ppas [15:56] but it's very WIP at the moment [15:57] Yea but we need a MOTU from what I hear [16:50] possibly. a YY upgrade with the ppas pre-enabled worked quite nicely here the other day, so will hopefully be good when everything lands and migrates [16:52] acheronuk: did you ever try building Qt5.7 from Neon's packaging? [16:52] But ppas get disabled during the upgrade process [16:53] clivejo: nope. not yet. suppose I could if there is a semi-good reason [16:55] for the craic! [16:56] ahoneybun: shoudl have said. I dis that the old fashioned way of swapping to YY sources and dist-upgrade. as I knew I would have issues if not. plus wnated to test what it would be like when all the stuff in the ppas made it to the archive [16:56] Mm [16:57] clivejo: that is Irish for 'for the hell of it'? [16:58] yeah [16:59] as much as I enjoy doing this, Qt 5.7 is probably a little way down on my 'for the craic' list. :P [17:00] clivejo: if you think it beneficial to do this soon, then I'll gladly have a go [17:21] acheronuk: is there a way to do an upgrade without ppas being disabled? [17:22] I'm guessing you could odo the upgrade, enable the ppas back, then do a full-upgrade [17:25] blaze: I disabled ones I wasn't sure of. changed the sources.list and PPA deb lines to YY for what I had left. and added the YY staging PPAs I wanted [17:26] blaze: then simply did 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get dist-upgrade' [17:27] old school way to to upgrade, and depends on you knowing and being careful on what you leave enabled and add as sources [17:28] yep, that's pretty oldschool [17:30] blaze: no probs so far [17:37] can be potentially disastrous in case of epochs removal [17:45] you do need to inspect v carefully what the upgrade proposes to do [19:38] uhm, this is some extra work for us http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Ubuntu-1610-Closer-Systemd ? [21:32] Looks hopeful https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/qt/qtwebengine.git/ [21:40] indeed === Guest86980 is now known as pavlushka