[10:42] <pkern> Why do we enforce the MOTU/core-dev split on backports?
[12:35] <ari-tczew> hello
[12:35] <ari-tczew> can we drop in yakkety the changes such like: "Rename library packages for g++5 ABI transition." ?
[12:56] <ricotz> happyaron, hi, this gcc-6 problem with sunpinyin might interest you https://paste.debian.net/plain/787187
[13:08] <happyaron> ricotz: got it
[13:08] <happyaron> ty
[13:09] <ricotz> happyaron, alright -- https://launchpadlibrarian.net/277433622/sunpinyin_2.0.3+git20140127-4_2.0.3+git20140127-4+elementary0.5.1.diff.gz
[13:13] <happyaron> even better, thanks again!
[14:50] <ScottK> pkern: IIRC because of the way LP permissions work.
[15:06] <happyaron> ricotz: uploaded to Debian
[17:11] <pkern> ScottK: It's pretty frustrating. I'm not sure what the proper way would be except subscribing -sponsors and hope. Is there a patch pilot for -sponsors? Or would they just ignore -backports?
[17:39] <ScottK> They'd probably ignore backports.
[17:39] <ScottK> I'm really not involved in Ubuntu anymore, so I don't have any suggestions.