=== ksx4system_ is now known as ksx4system === ksx4system_ is now known as ksx4system === ksx4system_ is now known as ksx4system [04:04] is there a signifacant changes in performance running a lower version of server? === rizzy_ is now known as riz0n === rizzy_ is now known as riz0n [10:11] guys.. [10:11] can anyone help me with copy / paste issue between ubuntu vmware and host computer [10:11] thanks in advance [11:38] vmong, read the vmware manual === PaulW2U is now known as pcw [13:11] I'm curious as to why Ubuntu handles bonded interface configurations differently than Debian. http://paste.ubuntu.com/22444516/ [13:13] Well, more specifically, I know that in trusty, this was a consequence of upstart, though I never got under the hood to determine why. With xenial on systemd, I'm only more perplexed. [13:20] both configurations _should_ work on both [13:21] specifyinng bond-master or bond-slaves does operate slightly differently and I usually do the latter config [13:23] I've not verified myself that they do on the current versions, but if they don't, that's a bug [13:24] qman__: I'm going to make sure I'm not a moron (definite possibility), but the first style generally doesn't work correctly in xenial. I'll try it again. [13:25] well, the catch with the first style is that if the slaves aren't up, the bond doesn't come up [13:25] the second style brings the bond up independently of the slaves, then the slaves bring themselves up as they can [13:25] that's why I prefer the second [13:25] qman__: i.e. if the switchports are off? [13:25] yes, or unplugged, or a driver bug or race condition messes things up [13:26] Should I be setting the child interfaces to hotplug instead of auto, then, to take better advantage of that? [13:26] I'm not actually sure on the difference between those two settings, let me check what mine are at [13:28] yeah, mine are allow-hotplug [13:30] As I understand it, allow-hotplug allows the interface to come up or down based on connection events. [13:30] Rather than "it must be there, or die." [13:42] morning. So if I a do nmap to ubuntu 14 server I it shows that there is "25/tcp filtered smtp" open. But when I run netstat in server using root - it don't show any activity in port 25 [13:42] is there any way to found what keeps that port open? [13:49] filtered doesn't mean open. [13:49] filtered means no response at all. [13:49] right [13:49] are you running this scan over the internet, or locally? [13:50] A closed port will still generate a response in the form of a TCP RST. [13:50] A filtered port means that your incoming TCP SYN just got dropped into the ether. Not even a RST response. [13:51] most residential internet providers filter port 25 to prevent spam, and even some business ones do unless you specifically ask for it to be open [13:56] qman__: Thank you for the pointers on lag config, btw. [14:05] w00t [14:06] srill no reply re my concern? [14:06] what concern [14:06] you've just joined - said nothing then said "w00t" [14:06] what do you expect ? [14:08] is there any significant change in speed n n lower server version compared to the latest? [14:08] what ??? [14:08] * sypher just stares blankly. [14:10] say.... 12.0.4 vs 16 (server version) is there performance difference in speed wise [14:10] no [14:10] not really [14:10] Geom`: You also need to be concerned with the fact that support for 12.04 ends in, what, eight months? [14:13] ahh ok. downloading 16 then [14:14] i only have c2d with 4 gb ram. speed is my concern [14:14] thats fine [14:14] it really depends what you are going to do and the load on it [14:14] thats a lot of resource [14:15] file sharing and video conversion [14:15] so thats fine [14:15] you could do that on a raspberry pi [14:15] Great! [14:16] thanks ikonia :) [14:16] Geom`: btw, 16.04 has been GREAT for me so far. [14:16] Geom`: You'll love it. [14:19] i hope sypher... installing now [14:20] will it even run fine on a P4? [14:22] yes, though you can run into bugs with kernel modesetting on some video chips from that era [14:22] it will run on systems as old as the Pentium II [14:23] unfortunately it does not run on my AMD K6, which lacks the i686 CPU extensions [14:23] the last version that had a kernel compatible with it was 10.04 [14:30] i also have the K6. il keep that in mind if ever il try it [14:34] well, it required manually installing the -386 kernel, the standard kernel won't run on it, but 10.04 was the last version where the -386 kernel existed [14:37] im not a hardware guy.. what i have is this http://specsen.com/motherboard-epox/epox-ep-8hda5-/ is this K6? [14:37] im not so sure what the cpu is [14:41] oh its K8 :) [15:35] Geom`: um, in the modern era that's the Athlon 64 chips. (They don't use hte K nomenclature anymore) [15:36] (it's an amd64 arch) [15:36] (I have at least twelve such series' chips lying around heh) [15:39] blah nevermind me :) === codedmart_ is now known as codedmart === pavlushka is now known as Guest31425 === Guest31425 is now known as pavlushka === dzragon^ is now known as dzragon === dzragon^ is now known as dzragon