=== tsimonq2alt is now known as tsimonq2 === maclin1 is now known as maclin [04:56] thanks Laney & co, good that there is a decision wrt to packagekit [06:39] trainguards, can someone please retry those builds for us https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-001/+build/10582957 https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-001/+build/10583028 - it's a flaky test it seems [06:39] now https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-001/+build/10583430 is something completely different - any idea where's libsystem-settings-dev gone ¿? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/22780559/ [06:41] * Saviq → -release [06:41] oh grr, I'm already here... [06:41] so yeah, @all, any idea what's happened with libsystem-settings-dev in proposed amd64? it's there for i386 http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/22780603/ [06:42] https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-073/+build/10540325 says it should be there, so it got lost somewhere ¿? [06:59] Saviq: :D retrying [07:03] Saviq: the log says it's not being installed (due to something), not that it wouldn't be there. the problem is that slangasek deleted https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/amd64/libsystemsettings-dev but did not delete https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/yakkety/amd64/libsystemsettings1 . theory is he was only supposed to remove s390x of each src:ubuntu-system-settings package, but ended up deleting [07:03] libsystemsettings-dev on amd64 too [07:06] Mirv, well, yeah I checked that it's not there... at least apt policy says so, any idea how to fix? do we need to reupload src:ubuntu-system-settings, or will that bring s390x back... [07:07] Saviq: we'd need ubuntu-system-settings with https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/ubuntu-system-settings/stop_s390x_problems_depend_on_upstart/+merge/302143 added [07:08] only where... https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/tickets?active_only&search=ubuntu-system-settings [07:09] biab [07:10] 060 is the priority according to trello logs === jamespag` is now known as jamespage [09:14] apw: hey, can you approve nvidia-367 in yakkety NEW, please? [10:03] cjwatson, FYI we should be good until level 10 [10:03] * LocutusOfBorg haskell side [10:05] so haskell is actually a game ! i knew it seeing all these masses of uploads every cycle !! [10:06] karma factory [10:06] * ogra_ waits to see the haskell-endboos package uploaded [10:06] *endboss [10:06] lol [10:07] the princess in another castle (citation needed) [10:07] s/in/is in/ === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson [10:08] transition tracker tetris === doko_ is now known as doko [10:24] seb128: Laney: so is the ETA for unlocking transition earlier end of this week? I'm pondering whether to explode potential can of GCC6 worms by a qtbase and qtdeclarative updates or whether to do this one transition first. copying those would trigger thousands of autopkgtests again. [10:24] s/earlier/earliest/ [10:24] I would wait if I were you [10:25] Laney: ok then [10:25] there's no hurry with those as such [10:27] there may be a UITK s390x fix now happening, while leaving camitk itksnap jacktrip nifti2dicom nomacs still there (ffmpeg? webp?) plus the lubuntu-qt-desktop/muon/plasma-discover regarding pkg-kit 1.0 [10:32] well the landers will be in a painful situation, but the pain won't stop until the migration is done anyway [10:33] Mirv: If you want to do the packagekit stuff you can, btw [10:40] I can do monkey work, but otherwise not familiar at all with packagekit [10:41] It is monkey work [10:43] I see "upload click to drop the packagekit backend binary" bug #1496292 but it was unclear to me reading yesterday's discussion if that should be done or if need to wait for the Unity 8 feature first [10:43] bug 1496292 in packagekit (Ubuntu) "Needs to be ported to packagekit 1" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1496292 [10:45] Mirv: The decision was to do it, and have a gap before the new feature is ready [10:45] So drop that, find any reverse dependencies and mutilate those until they give in [10:47] * Mirv goes monkeying click, ubuntu-touch seed and unity8-desktop-session [10:47] there's an existing MP for the click stuff [10:47] please use it rather than monkeying independently [10:47] ok [10:47] from February, nice [10:47] (I don't like it much, but it's not wrong in itself) [10:47] https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-api-team/click/drop_packagekit/+merge/285225 === jibel_ is now known as jibel [10:48] my disapprove vote is "I don't like this direction", not "this patch is wrong" [10:49] * cjwatson links the bug [10:50] * Mirv did the same [10:51] Thanks, I was just digging that up [10:52] It would have been better to give it the D-Bus interface that mvo worked on. Not sure why that approach wasn't pursued, but I don't propose to re-open that discussion now. :) [10:53] That's what I wanted too, but you can see my attempt to argue that in the MP above [10:54] And I don't really get to both mostly-abandon the project and control its direction :-) [10:57] https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/unity8-desktop-session/drop_click_packagekit_plugin/+merge/302389 [10:57] https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-touch.yakkety_drop_packagekit_plugin_click/+merge/302390 [10:57] the click seems to build alright [12:44] so the ubuntu-system-settings wrong binaries removal is now starting to hurt, I'm trying to fastlane u-s-s rebuild into archives but without bringing the removed s390x binaries back (ie merge that one MP manually) [14:13] hi, anyone can look at the SRU queue of xenial for network-manager? === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [14:46] Laney: hey! Are you the one working on the libwebp transition? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/auto-libwebp.html [14:47] Or maybe anyone else is tracking it? [14:49] sil2100: a bit, why? [15:42] Laney: was just wondering if maybe some help is needed there [15:43] sil2100: There's 2 KDE/Qtish ones that are left, that I didn't touch yet until I've examined update_output.txt a little bit [17:44] slangasek hi there, can you let that guy in please? ^ [17:45] Mirv, Saviq: ugh; did ubuntu-system-settings get sorted already? it is possible to recover the binaries (sorry, I thought I had ^Ced my wrong deletion in time but apparently not), if that would help [17:45] sergiusens: looking [17:47] sergiusens: can you confirm (on the bug) whether the packaging QA has already been done, or is yet to be done, per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SnapcraftUpdates ? [17:49] slangasek that usually happens with the binary debs that end up built in -proposed [17:49] sergiusens: ok [17:50] slangasek I ask elopio to clarify that part of the wiki [17:50] sergiusens: accepted [17:50] slangasek thanks [18:23] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-ui-toolkit would need to be run with --all-proposed to pick up a fixed unity8 [18:24] slangasek: yes that one is fixed [18:24] same for http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-system-settings [18:28] Mirv: ubuntu-ui-toolkit shows no blocking test failures [18:29] for ubuntu-system-settings, I guess it's the unity8 tests that need rerun? [18:30] (retriggered) [18:33] slangasek: does not? the same unity8 tests are red for ui-toolkit too. http://people.ubuntu.com/~timo-jyrinki/uitk.png [18:34] cjwatson: Laney: sil2100: it seems that the click branch https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-api-team/click/drop_packagekit/+merge/285225 was unfortunately not enough for click's own autopkgtests: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#click [18:34] Mirv: ok, let me hit refresh in my browser and look again ;) [18:34] Mirv: hey, lookie there. ok. [18:35] Mirv: retriggered for both [18:36] slangasek: ok :) thanks, --all-proposed is generally now needed since so much is in proposed. that click issue is one of the remaining blockers, although now landed it fails its own autopkgtests. [18:46] slangasek: Could you have a look at my update-manager upload in the trusty SRU queue? [19:04] bdmurray: looking [19:05] bdmurray: I don't understand the code change; does 'universal_newlines=True' implicitly trigger decode()? [19:06] bdmurray: ok, the documentation tells me that "yes" [19:06] slangasek: yes [19:06] accepted [19:07] bdmurray, hello, when you have a moment can you take a look at releasing python-keystonemiddleware for xenial? bug 1533724 has been verified. [19:07] bug 1533724 in Ubuntu Cloud Archive "[SRU] keystone-signing folders fill /tmp and seriously slow down reboots" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1533724 [19:09] coreycb: done [19:09] bdmurray, thanks [23:58] can someone delete juju-mongodb2.6 from yakkety-proposed? [23:58] the package in release was deleted a couple of days ago [23:59] (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-mongodb2.6/+bug/1610778) [23:59] Launchpad bug 1610778 in juju-mongodb2.6 (Ubuntu) "please remove this package from yakkety" [Undecided,In progress]