hikiko | hello | 05:10 |
---|---|---|
duflu | Oh hello hikiko | 05:40 |
=== faenil is now known as faenil_ | ||
seb128 | good morning desktopers | 07:27 |
seb128 | xnox, seems like those firefox ppa builds are still unhappy :-( | 07:28 |
xnox | yeah, i know =( | 07:29 |
seb128 | oh, and hey xnox ;-) | 07:29 |
xnox | i'm not sure what i'm doing right or wrong. will be doing "interactive" build on s390x to see what's happening, becuase it looks like it's not doing what i thought it was going to =) | 07:29 |
seb128 | chrisccoulson might be able to help you maybe? he knows the build system at least | 07:30 |
chrisccoulson | The build system has changed a lot since I last worked on firefox | 07:31 |
chrisccoulson | You can ask me anything about the chromium one though ;) | 07:31 |
xnox | chrisccoulson, which one of the two is a more complete linux distribution? | 07:31 |
chrisccoulson | heh | 07:33 |
chrisccoulson | The chromium one is a lot simpler | 07:33 |
jibel | morning, currently upgrade to Yakkety fails with bug 1611256, could someone have a look? | 07:35 |
ubot5 | bug 1611256 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "X to Y upgrade fails with gconf2 depends on python3:any; however: Package python3 is not configured yet." [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1611256 | 07:35 |
seb128 | cyphermox, doko, ^ | 07:37 |
seb128 | hey jibel | 07:37 |
jibel | Salut seb128 | 07:37 |
Trevinho | morning guys | 07:43 |
xnox | chrisccoulson, so even though i have patched icu.m4, the *b.dat is not getting picked up | 07:43 |
xnox | so i'm guessing that moz.build is not actually using that.... | 07:43 |
seb128 | hey Trevinho | 07:48 |
Trevinho | hey seb128 ... | 07:52 |
Trevinho | wow, I'm at my parents' these days... And... no electricity for three hours today --- | 07:52 |
Trevinho | :-/ | 07:52 |
seb128 | urg | 07:52 |
seb128 | how come?! | 07:52 |
Trevinho | works... | 07:53 |
duflu | or doesn't | 07:53 |
Trevinho | thank god I've a mobile 4g modem, so I can have high(er) speed connection anyway | 07:53 |
Trevinho | I just hope batteries would last, but they should | 07:53 |
Trevinho | or... I'd just move to somewhere else :) | 07:54 |
xnox | chrisccoulson, or maybe i should not use autoconf2.69 manual when building with autoconf2.13.... | 07:56 |
desrt | o hai everyone! | 07:57 |
desrt | forgot to mention in the meeting yesterday: GUADEC starts tomorrow! | 07:57 |
seb128 | hey desrt, I guess you are going? is anybody else from the team going? | 08:00 |
desrt | uh... larsu? :) | 08:00 |
seb128 | haha | 08:01 |
* larsu smiles | 08:01 | |
desrt | we're kickin' it oldschool. sharing a hotel room and everything. | 08:01 |
Trevinho | oh... guadec! | 08:01 |
seb128 | nice | 08:03 |
seb128 | how big is GUADEC this year? | 08:03 |
desrt | no idea. | 08:03 |
desrt | "not as big as the universala kongreso" | 08:03 |
seb128 | well at least 2 people going we can say ;-) | 08:03 |
Laney | guten morgen | 08:04 |
desrt | reminds me i need to do my duolingo1 | 08:04 |
desrt | morning, laney :) | 08:04 |
desrt | you're not on the guadec train, are you? | 08:04 |
Laney | nein | 08:04 |
Laney | i'm going to be at the seaside | 08:04 |
desrt | too bad. | 08:04 |
seb128 | hey Laney | 08:04 |
Laney | hey seb128 | 08:05 |
Laney | how's it hanging? | 08:05 |
larsu | probably much smaller even than in recent years :( | 08:05 |
didrocks | seb128: 4 people from Lyon going! :) | 08:05 |
larsu | hi Laney and seb128 and Trevinho and desrt and didrocks | 08:05 |
didrocks | hey larsu! | 08:05 |
Laney | hey larsk | 08:05 |
seb128 | didrocks, #gnomefr is Lyon based indeed | 08:06 |
seb128 | jbicha, can you email ubuntu-desktop@ asking for your ubuntu-desktop membership to be reactivated? ;-) | 08:06 |
larsu | Laney: oh, who is that? The person you hired to replace me? | 08:07 |
Laney | the evolved form | 08:08 |
Laney | (too much pokemon) | 08:08 |
didrocks | btw, I stumbled again upon this yesterday: http://aruiz.synaptia.net/siliconisland/2012/08/why-cant-we-be-friends.html | 08:09 |
didrocks | see how larsu looks young! :) | 08:09 |
didrocks | or rather "looked" | 08:09 |
Laney | haha | 08:10 |
Laney | I don't see any difference | 08:10 |
larsu | haha awesome! | 08:10 |
larsu | we all look young on there | 08:10 |
larsu | Laney hadn't been born at that time | 08:11 |
didrocks | true facts! :) | 08:11 |
Laney | maybe I was conceived there | 08:11 |
* Laney shudders | 08:11 | |
larsu | oh and where is desrt? | 08:12 |
larsu | lol | 08:12 |
desrt | :( | 08:12 |
didrocks | yeah, unsure… | 08:13 |
desrt | i think i was dreaming up the dbus protocol for GMenuModel or something | 08:13 |
desrt | actually, more likely thinking about action muxers | 08:13 |
Laney | rock and roll | 08:13 |
Laney | wtf | 08:16 |
Laney | someone just retried the failed build of ffmpeg so fast that by the time I clicked the link from the email it was already gone | 08:16 |
Laney | that was the second failure too | 08:17 |
Laney | third time's the charm | 08:17 |
seb128 | somebody who just joined IRC? ;-) | 08:17 |
* Laney has joins off | 08:17 | |
Laney | but I uploaded it, so only I would have had the email | 08:18 |
* Laney confuse | 08:18 | |
larsu | Laney: don't worry, it's Wednesday | 08:21 |
* larsu hopes to add to the confusion | 08:21 | |
* Laney goes back into the cave | 08:24 | |
desrt | so.... it's fivethirtyeight season again | 08:24 |
desrt | i'm really going to enjoy opening this page every morning for the next couple of months | 08:25 |
xnox | chrisccoulson, any pointers as to how to pass --disable-ion on powerpc & s390x as a.... configure flag? | 08:40 |
xnox | ./debian/rules is madness in firefox package | 08:41 |
chrisccoulson | xnox, debian/config/mozconfig.in | 08:41 |
chrisccoulson | if we're passing things like that, we should really be turning off the official branding too | 08:41 |
xnox | well. | 08:42 |
xnox | upstream has no ion support for powerpc & s390x, so they should be doing the right thing by default. | 08:42 |
xnox | i might submit upstream patch to their mozconfig too. | 08:43 |
xnox | i'm not uploading this, just trying to make it build. | 08:43 |
xnox | however, imho ion jit should just use gcc atomics and stop pretending they don't work on powerpc & s390x | 08:43 |
xnox | chrisccoulson, most of our ports arches are not supported upstream and are tier-3 | 08:57 |
xnox | the littleendian ones have atomics support implemented upstream, e.g. for ion jit support | 08:57 |
xnox | however there are no atomics support upstream committed for powerpc (32bit) nor for s390x. | 08:57 |
xnox | however fedora do build s390x firefox.... http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/kojifiles/packages/firefox/48.0/5.fc26/data/logs/s390x/build.log | 08:58 |
xnox | with-system-icu | 08:59 |
xnox | yet with official branding | 09:00 |
seb128 | doookoooo | 09:03 |
seb128 | grrr, just got an update + sru rejected because of an upload not commited to the package vcs | 09:03 |
willcooke | morning from London | 09:30 |
willcooke | urgh, lag | 09:30 |
seb128 | hey willcooke! | 09:31 |
seb128 | new wifi card or still experiencing grumpy nm at the office? ;-) | 09:31 |
willcooke | made good time this morning 1hr 15mins | 09:31 |
willcooke | I've got an ethernet cable :) | 09:31 |
willcooke | it's the future | 09:31 |
seb128 | :-) | 09:35 |
seb128 | errands and lunch, bbl | 09:38 |
willcooke | seb128, waaaiit | 09:38 |
seb128 | yes? | 09:39 |
doko | well, seb127 could better tell what exactly is wrong | 09:40 |
seb128 | doko, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vino/3.8.1-0ubuntu9 was not commited to lp:~ubuntu-desktop/vino/ubuntu (which is the vcs referenced in debian/control), so I did bzr pull/change/commit/push/dput -> got rejected email because the version was existing in the archive with different content | 09:41 |
seb128 | yes I could have checked the archive first | 09:42 |
seb128 | but ideally the vcs is uptodate and we avoid those issues | 09:42 |
doko | I was told to leave vino alone, and this one just is a no-change upload ... | 09:42 |
seb128 | unsure what you mean leave it alone | 09:43 |
seb128 | but if you do an upload please update the vcs | 09:43 |
seb128 | even in no change uploads | 09:43 |
seb128 | because otherwise we hit cases like I just described | 09:43 |
seb128 | I had to uncommit, merge your work, do mine back and push overwrite | 09:43 |
seb128 | anyway lunch time | 09:43 |
seb128 | bbl | 09:43 |
doko | no way, if this can't be automated | 09:44 |
xnox | chrisccoulson, seb128 - i give up on s390x/powerpc for now. It builds in fedora, doesn't build in debian. | 09:48 |
xnox | need to dig more into what is borked. | 09:48 |
ricotz | hey desktoper | 10:16 |
ricotz | s | 10:16 |
Trevinho | ouch, no electrictity till 14:00... What bastards! :/ | 10:16 |
ricotz | building against cups 2.2~rc1-1 seems broken "/usr/include/cups/ppd.h:40:22: fatal error: raster.h: No such file or directory" | 10:17 |
=== davidcalle is now known as davidcalle|afk | ||
chrisccoulson | xnox, thanks | 10:50 |
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
Trevinho | main laptop power is over... Well, lunch time anyway... Hope to get electricity back in a bit | 11:18 |
Laney | good luck! | 11:18 |
seb128 | Trevinho, enjoy lunch! | 11:33 |
seb128 | ricotz, hey, that's worth mentioning to tkamppeter when he gets online | 11:36 |
seb128 | ricotz, do you have a build log showing the issue or a bug report? | 11:38 |
ricotz | seb128, I see, not anymore since I retried the builds without -proposed enabled | 11:40 |
seb128 | k, what source was it? | 11:40 |
ricotz | gtk+3.0 | 11:40 |
seb128 | let me try in a pbuilder | 11:41 |
ricotz | it was 3.21.4 but I assume 3.20.6 will fail as well | 11:41 |
seb128 | likely if it's a cups bug | 11:42 |
Sweet5hark | willcooke: http://www8.hp.com/us/en/products/proliant-servers/product-detail.html?oid=7152904#!tab=features <- requesting this as next hardware replacement | 11:53 |
Sweet5hark | willcooke: (including the private power plant needed for it) | 11:53 |
willcooke | Sweet5hark, :DD | 11:55 |
=== hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
* Laney cries | 12:07 | |
jbicha | seb128: ricotz: see https://bugs.debian.org/833889 (I accidentally filed against the wrong pkg yesterday!) | 12:16 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 833889 in libcups2-dev "libcups2-dev: Missing dependency on libcupsimage-2-dev" [Serious,Open] | 12:16 |
ricotz | jbicha, thx | 12:18 |
seb128 | jbicha, k, I had the same conclusion ... | 12:26 |
seb128 | Laney, what's the issue? :-( | 12:26 |
seb128 | jbicha, do we really need to make gnome-session depends on the new gnome-shell? | 12:28 |
seb128 | that blocks gnome-session gnome-keyring etc in proposed | 12:28 |
Laney | can't fix ffmpeg | 12:28 |
seb128 | :-( | 12:28 |
jbicha | seb128: I haven't tried yet but https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/g/gnome-session/changelog-3.20.0-1 | 12:30 |
seb128 | if it's only a .desktop name that's easy to patch | 12:31 |
jbicha | yes or we can try to fix gjs | 12:39 |
Trevinho | .... and FUIT LUX! | 12:40 |
jbicha | last week, I triggered an autopkgtest.u.c from my PPA, I saw the test on running.html but I have no idea where PPA tests results go… | 12:40 |
Laney | you have to explore swift yourself | 12:41 |
Laney | AFAIK | 12:41 |
Laney | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration/AutopkgtestInfrastructure#Example_queries | 12:41 |
* Laney is running gjs tests locally now | 12:41 | |
jbicha | Laney: thanks, found my test result | 12:44 |
jbicha | gjs passes its tests on my computer :| | 12:45 |
Laney | here too | 12:53 |
Laney | although I rebuilt it | 12:54 |
Laney | let's try with the binaries in the archive | 12:54 |
* Laney goes off to mooch around the library while that grinds away | 12:54 | |
Laney | this new office is good | 12:55 |
seb128 | is that the one with pants wifi? ;-) | 13:00 |
Laney | better today | 13:04 |
Laney | huh | 13:04 |
Laney | so gjs passed when I rebuilt the source, but it failed when I used the archive binaries | 13:04 |
=== mterry_ is now known as mterry | ||
jbicha | Laney: ok, how about we retry rebuilding gjs then, since gjs was built we got gobject-introspection 1.48 | 13:06 |
Laney | worth a try | 13:07 |
Laney | you want to do that upload? | 13:07 |
jbicha | sure, I'll do it now | 13:07 |
Laney | cool | 13:07 |
Laney | would be nice to understand this interaction enough to know what's making it fail | 13:08 |
Laney | ho hum | 13:08 |
Laney | i'll be back in a bit | 13:09 |
seb128 | jbicha, your evolution merge request is in the sponsoring queue but you should have access to merge/upload that one (upload is blocked on eds but you can probably already merge in the vcs) | 13:27 |
jbicha | oops, I didn't intend to propose that for merging since I can upload myself | 13:29 |
jbicha | but no, I can't push to ~ubuntu-desktop branches yet | 13:29 |
seb128 | oh, right, vcs doesn't match upload acls | 13:31 |
seb128 | I overlooked that | 13:31 |
seb128 | you can upload but not commit | 13:31 |
seb128 | :-/ | 13:31 |
Sweet5hark | first half of august, suposedly the hottest time of the year. | 13:53 |
Sweet5hark | outside: hail | 13:53 |
ogra_ | Sweet5hark, yeah, but hot hail ... | 13:56 |
Laney | jbicha: seb128: It's probably a good idea to push the branch under ~motu if it's moved to universe, and fix Vcs-Bzr in the package | 13:57 |
Sweet5hark | pzzt! eis und heiss | 13:59 |
jbicha | Laney: I don't think ~motu is a good place for it, see how empty https://code.launchpad.net/~motu is | 13:59 |
Laney | I doubt anybody browses that to find branches | 13:59 |
Laney | There's history to keep here, and you might as well make it so that the branch is writable by those who can upload | 14:00 |
jbicha | will merge proposals spam all of ~motu? | 14:00 |
Laney | There's an email address set for that team, so nope | 14:00 |
Laney | just like I never get emails for ubuntu-desktop | 14:00 |
Laney | jbicha: sorry, can't +1 your ubuntu-desktop application because I can't type my passphrase | 14:04 |
* Laney has failed 9 times now | 14:04 | |
Laney | 12th time is a charm | 14:04 |
* Sweet5hark hums "Im going slightly mad". | 14:06 | |
tedg | Can unity7 skip the unity8 autopkg tests here? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/yakkety/update_excuses.html#unity | 14:15 |
tedg | Sweet5hark: That's because global warming is a lie, told by big hail to distract you. | 14:16 |
seb128 | tedg, Laney might be able to help you (or anyone who has upload right might but I never remember if that's the case and how) | 14:18 |
Trevinho | tedg: I'd love to... But.... no. At least unless someone would push a button | 14:19 |
Trevinho | Laney: can maybe? ^ | 14:19 |
=== davmor2_ is now known as davmor2 | ||
Laney | It's the release team, but I don't want to | 14:20 |
Laney | Get the Unity 8 team to fix the test | 14:21 |
seb128 | Saviq, ^ | 14:21 |
Laney | I said last time I did it that I wasn't going to do it again | 14:21 |
Trevinho | Laney: I've been told they've been fixed in some silo for long time... but | 14:21 |
Trevinho | Laney: the thing is that is blocking unity7 too.. :-( | 14:21 |
Laney | It needs to be a priority | 14:21 |
Trevinho | which... blocks other works.. | 14:22 |
Laney | Trevinho: Sorry that you have to feel the pain, but it's better in the long run | 14:22 |
Trevinho | so you want us to annoy u8 people? | 14:22 |
seb128 | the issue is that it put the annoyance on the wrong people | 14:22 |
Trevinho | Laney: I mean, I agree... but it's just we're affected by something which they aren't... | 14:22 |
seb128 | u8 team doesn't care about u7 being blocked | 14:22 |
Laney | They do now | 14:22 |
Trevinho | that's thet thing.. how seb128 said. | 14:22 |
seb128 | how do they do? | 14:23 |
Laney | go direct the pressure at them instead of the release team | 14:23 |
Laney | then they will care | 14:23 |
seb128 | I pinged Saviq yesterday | 14:23 |
Saviq | yay, /me getting bashed | 14:23 |
Trevinho | not that I couldn't try to fix them too, but maybe it would take more time | 14:23 |
Laney | it's always easier to disable, skip or ignore tests | 14:23 |
Laney | but it's not often the right thing to do | 14:23 |
seb128 | in an ideal world we sure would fix every issue | 14:23 |
Saviq | guys, if it was *easy*, we'd have fixed them long ago, but most of those failures only happen, intermittently, on britney, not even in our CI | 14:24 |
Saviq | any case, OK, I will put more pressure on getting those to be more stable | 14:24 |
seb128 | Saviq, thanks | 14:25 |
tedg | We've also see tests that only fail intermittently on britney and no where else. It seems that environment is different somehow. Causing people to disable autopkgtests :-/ | 14:26 |
Laney | Trevinho: You should do what you said yesterday and split the dependency | 14:26 |
seb128 | Trevinho, meanwhile what work does it block? | 14:26 |
Laney | thanks | 14:26 |
Laney | I'll retry the tests meanwhile, maybe they work this time | 14:26 |
seb128 | Laney, that's cheating as much as skipping the test :p | 14:26 |
seb128 | you are virtual skipping the test by another mean | 14:26 |
seb128 | virtually | 14:26 |
Laney | Sort of | 14:27 |
Laney | if they go green you know they aren't totally broken | 14:27 |
seb128 | right | 14:27 |
seb128 | I meant the package split | 14:27 |
seb128 | not the retry | 14:27 |
Laney | well | 14:27 |
seb128 | that just let unity7 in an remove the insensitive to fix unity8 | 14:28 |
Laney | the point of testing unity8 when unity7 gets uploaded is that there's a relationship there | 14:28 |
Laney | a unity 7 upload could break unity 8 | 14:28 |
Laney | but if you remove the relationship then that can't happen | 14:28 |
seb128 | right, though in the current case it's not the unity7 schemas breaking the test | 14:28 |
Laney | I know! | 14:29 |
seb128 | your point was that not skipping is putting incensitive to fix unity8 | 14:29 |
tedg | seb128: Is it possible to get someone from desktop/foundations to look into britney's test environment. I know it's a bit of a science experiment, but it seems like the reliability could be improved. | 14:29 |
seb128 | but splitting is removing that | 14:29 |
seb128 | anyway just pointing it out | 14:29 |
seb128 | the separate schemas thing is still good imho | 14:29 |
Laney | It'll remove it from unity 7 | 14:29 |
Laney | but other projects will still have it | 14:29 |
seb128 | which is not much different from forcing the current unity7 upload in | 14:29 |
Laney | It's not an argument which says that random packages should block on random other ones | 14:30 |
Laney | Just to spread the pain around | 14:30 |
Laney | It's not pain for pain's sake | 14:30 |
seb128 | right | 14:31 |
seb128 | well I think we each understand each others position | 14:31 |
seb128 | so no point arguing here | 14:31 |
seb128 | Trevinho, why is the migration blocking more work? | 14:31 |
seb128 | you could force merge the silo and do another landing in proposed no? | 14:31 |
tedg | seb128: I am trying to rebuild the systemd unit silo, which has Unity in it. | 14:32 |
Trevinho | seb128: ah, if I can force-merge the silo is fine... it was more blocking the SRU maybe | 14:33 |
seb128 | tedg, I doubt you are going to get anyone working on infra before ff, especially with pitti on holidays | 14:33 |
seb128 | Trevinho, I told you yesterday that SRU team doesn't care about migration | 14:33 |
seb128 | having it in yakkety-proposed is good enough | 14:33 |
seb128 | the rule is about making sure things land | 14:33 |
seb128 | once they are in proposed they are in the pipe | 14:33 |
seb128 | there is no way they are not going on | 14:34 |
Sweet5hark | hmmm, /me went from "it doesnt work and I dont know why" to "it works and I dont know why" #notsureifimprovement | 14:34 |
seb128 | (well except if we delete the proposed version, but we usually don't) | 14:34 |
tedg | seb128: Yeah, I'm more interested in getting it on the TODO list long term. Not the first time it has been an issue. | 14:34 |
Trevinho | seb128: yeah, i remember that... It was just that pitti asked why the fixes weren't released in yakekty yet... So... | 14:34 |
seb128 | tedg, yeah, maybe talk to Steve... | 14:34 |
tedg | seb128: K, will do. | 14:34 |
Saviq | just for you guys, Albert just found out why at least one of our tests was flaky https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1610165 | 14:34 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1610165 in ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) "qmltestrunner::DashContent::test_mainNavigation() does not always pass" [Undecided,New] | 14:34 |
seb128 | Trevinho, I don't think he said that for things that were in yakkety-proposed but not migrated | 14:34 |
seb128 | Saviq, thanks! | 14:35 |
jbicha | Sweet5hark: as long as it keeps working, I don't see a problem there :) | 14:35 |
Trevinho | seb128: ok, I can ping sru team again | 14:35 |
seb128 | Sweet5hark, working is always an improvement ;-) | 14:35 |
Saviq | seb128, that said, for a long time now our autopkgtests in yakkety because of migration issues and that they are built with proposed but tested without it | 14:37 |
Trevinho | seb128: as for finalizing the silo, I'm getting error 401... Unauthorized | 14:37 |
Trevinho | seb128: should i ask trainguards? | 14:38 |
Saviq | looking at http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/unity8/yakkety/amd64/ we've had a ~good track record before 07.21 or so | 14:38 |
seb128 | Trevinho, yes please | 14:39 |
Laney | I feel bad now | 14:40 |
Laney | Maybe a force-skiptest for unity7 wouldn't be so bad | 14:40 |
Laney | ... | 14:40 |
Sweet5hark | sooo, how does gtk handle precedence if a style context has multiple classes added? | 14:41 |
seb128 | Laney, don't, you have a defendable position and you said previous time you wouldn't skip it again so fair enough | 14:41 |
Laney | Sweet5hark: Add a provider with a higher priority if you want it to win | 14:42 |
seb128 | Laney, I don't think it's blocking the world, like if it had been blocking the gtk update to land I would have argued more in favor of unblocking | 14:42 |
Laney | seb128: You made me doubt myself! | 14:42 |
seb128 | :-( | 14:42 |
seb128 | sorry man! | 14:42 |
Laney | I did skip loads of stuff for the qt migration | 14:42 |
Sweet5hark | Laney: whats a provider and what is it doing in my gtk? | 14:42 |
Laney | kubuntu tests are a whole new world | 14:42 |
seb128 | I can image | 14:42 |
seb128 | that one is almost impossible to get in | 14:43 |
seb128 | and that's without being strict | 14:43 |
seb128 | it would have been impossible by sticking to the "no workaround/exception" | 14:43 |
Laney | Sweet5hark: It's a way of giving style information to a context | 14:43 |
Laney | for example there are CSS style providers | 14:44 |
Laney | which you can create in code | 14:44 |
Laney | speaking of qt | 14:45 |
* Laney goes to look at ffmpeg again | 14:45 | |
Sweet5hark | Laney: well, I just wanted to give the toolbar context in libreoffice another class, so that I can override the theming for libreoffice to be a bit different than for others. So I found the place where the context sets the "primary-toolbar" and "toolbar" classes to the context, and wanted to add a "libreoffice-toolbar" and I wonder if order matters in this. | 14:47 |
Laney | Sweet5hark: Oh right, I should think that the priority only matters if you have conflicting selectors and rules within them | 14:48 |
Laney | You should be able to just add the class | 14:49 |
Saviq | seb128, Trevinho, Laney, ok so the plot thickens - I assume what you're fighting is http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#unity? in that case it won't pass, courtesy of gcc6 I believe - we need a newer unity8 to be tested there (it's trying to test one from almost a month ago) | 14:50 |
Saviq | we've fixed the build issue (yes, I know, we shouldn't be building anything in autopkgtests, we're getting there) | 14:52 |
Laney | hah | 14:52 |
Laney | I'm working on the migration :-/ | 14:52 |
Saviq | but it never got into release pocket, so britney's trying to test the old one | 14:52 |
Saviq | yeah that will improve things for sure | 14:52 |
Saviq | nothing flaky (that we can see) or broken there then | 14:53 |
Sweet5hark | Laney: right. so I now have a context that has "primary-toolbar" as class (so that other themes work as expected) and added a "libreoffice-toolbar" class so I can fix it for Ambience. Now I wonder how I write a selector that triggers on the "libreoffice-toolbar" class in Ambience and how to make sure it takes precedence over any selector on the generic "primary-toolbar" class in ambience ... | 14:54 |
Sweet5hark | and so far I havent figured that out yet ... | 14:55 |
Laney | Sweet5hark: Make your rule more specific (such as .primary-toolbar.libreoffice-toolbar), then it will be used | 15:03 |
Laney | But the other one will match too - that's how CSS works - so you need to set any properties you care about in the more specific one | 15:04 |
Sweet5hark | Laney: so how does that work for e.g. when one sets "background-image:something;" and the other one sets "background-image:none;"? is something "more specific" than "none"? | 15:05 |
Laney | "To determine the effective style for a widget, all the matching rule sets are merged. As in CSS, rules apply by specificity, so the rules whose selectors more closely match a node will take precedence over the others." | 15:06 |
* Sweet5hark suspects he sees heisenbehavior here, and the changes in theming he sees are results of the RNG doing a different throw, not because of code changes | 15:13 | |
Sweet5hark | *sigh* | 15:13 |
Saviq | Laney, seb128, can you guys ACK https://code.launchpad.net/~vanvugt/gsettings-ubuntu-touch-schemas/fix-1607240/+merge/301605 please? thanks | 15:38 |
Laney | sure | 15:39 |
Laney | done! | 15:40 |
GunnarHj | seb128: Objection re bug #1607937! There is an upload proposal in a PPA. | 15:52 |
ubot5 | bug 1607937 in gnome-font-viewer (Ubuntu Xenial) "font viewer starred from dash: Unknown option --gapplication-service" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1607937 | 15:52 |
seb128 | GunnarHj, the bug could be a bit more explicit about that, also I doubt we want a 3.16->3.20 update as a SRU | 15:53 |
GunnarHj | seb128: Sorry if it was 'hidden' in the middle of the description. As regards 3.16 -> 3.20, I argued for it. Few and small changes. | 15:54 |
GunnarHj | seb128: With that said, I can try to use a patch instead, if you prefer that. | 15:55 |
seb128 | GunnarHj, the changelog is misleading in this case, the update has new features (support for TTC fonts) | 15:56 |
seb128 | e.g Support TTC fonts | 15:56 |
seb128 | ups | 15:56 |
seb128 | https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-font-viewer/commit/?id=e512b0bd53636ebad6ce2428c44bfb02816ed7f2 | 15:56 |
seb128 | so you at least need a bug with a testcase for that changeset if you want to do the update | 15:56 |
seb128 | otherwise I would suggest just backportinghttps://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-font-viewer/commit/?id=acf919c43cf0e7700aaf05931f424843ce4b29dd | 15:57 |
GunnarHj | seb128: Then I'll backport that commit. Getting back on the topic. | 15:57 |
seb128 | GunnarHj, thanks | 15:59 |
GunnarHj | seb128: Np. Your response was a calculated risk. ;) | 16:00 |
seb128 | :-) | 16:00 |
jbicha | GunnarHj: it's not impossible to argue that that update is bug fixes but it takes more work to be able to persuade the sru team | 16:05 |
seb128 | well the bug being fixes is fine | 16:06 |
seb128 | it's just that the upload has more changes | 16:06 |
seb128 | so those should be documented/explained why they are useful and how to test them | 16:06 |
GunnarHj | jbicha, seb128: Let's focus on the main issue. Patch coming soon. | 16:08 |
jbicha | GunnarHj: yeah, that's a lot less time and effort :) | 16:08 |
seb128 | k, time for sport and dinner | 16:29 |
seb128 | have a nice evening desktopers | 16:29 |
seb128 | see you tomorrow | 16:29 |
Laney | bye seb128! | 16:30 |
willcooke | cya seb128 | 16:31 |
* Trevinho finally killed a tiger mosquito and it's probably the best way to close the day too | 16:34 | |
Trevinho | going for a run... have a nice evening folks. | 16:35 |
GunnarHj | jbicha: Wrote a patch and confirmed that it fixes the issue. | 17:07 |
jbicha | Laney: gjs autopkgtest apparently works since gjs and gnome-shell 3.20 migrated | 17:35 |
Laney | nice | 17:57 |
bschaefer | Trevinho, hey, have you seen the crazyness thats happening with yakkety + U7? | 19:05 |
bschaefer | compiz is like freaking out (the main UI keeps moving around/flashing?) As if its attempting to move a workspace but doesnt | 19:05 |
=== davmor2 is now known as davmor2_Hols | ||
ochosi | hm, has anything changed in compiz in 16.10? i just received a bugreport against my theme that it suddenly has square corners instead of rounded ones... | 20:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!