[05:11] <hikiko> hi
[07:30] <Trevinho> Good morning gents du bureau...
[07:57] <willcooke> happy Friday gang!
[07:58]  * willcooke checks
[07:58] <willcooke> yeah, Friday
[07:59] <hikiko|afk> heh
[07:59] <hikiko|afk> happy Friday willcooke and Trevinho and all
[07:59] <hikiko|afk> bbl
[08:11] <seb128> hey hikiko|afk willcooke Trevinho
[08:52] <andyrock> good morning
[09:05] <willcooke> morning andyrock
[09:05] <seb128> hey andyrock, happy friday! how are you?
[09:06] <andyrock> hey seb128 willcooke
[09:16] <seb128> happyaron, hey, can you help the submitter to test the patch on bug #1579246?
[09:17] <happyaron> seb128: sure
[09:17] <seb128> thanks
[09:17] <happyaron> seb128: but I'm confused cuz I can't reproduce it...
[09:17] <seb128> I think ppa or local build and adding a deb to the bug should work
[09:17] <happyaron> yep
[09:17] <seb128> do you have a 802.1x config?
[09:18] <happyaron> yes, I've set up a PEAP/MSCHAPv2+LDAP Wi-Fi at home to this it
[09:19] <seb128> unsure, maybe it has to do with specific options
[09:19] <happyaron> ok
[09:19] <seb128> do you have a file generated in your /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/
[09:19] <seb128> does it look like the one in the bug description?
[09:21] <happyaron> seb128: I don't have a ca-cert field, cuz I'm using a letencrypt issued cert which is trusted by the system
[09:21] <seb128> that might be the difference who knows ... anyway we have reported wanted to test a patch so let's just do that ;-)
[09:22] <happyaron> ok
[09:22] <seb128> thanks!
[10:17] <cimi> seb128, hi seb, sorry to bother you for that :) I think that after updating recently my yakkety something doesn't work well with the keyring... it asks my ssh password in the terminal everytime I use bzr, you know how to fix those issues?
[10:27] <cimi> I solved running the keyring daemon in ~/.profile but that looks more like a workaround
[11:15] <ochosi> Trevinho: right, i guess i need to port over the unity theming i had in my theme before. forgot about the UnityDecoration stuff. thanks for the hint!
[11:15] <Trevinho> yw
[11:53] <seb128> cimi, try asking La_ney next week (he's on vac today), that has to do with systemd user session and he looked at those issues
[12:04] <Sweet5hark1> ricotz: urgh, seeing the sd_exports_test fail on 5.2.0/yakkety too now.
[12:05] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: ^^ so no weekend upload, as something updated in yakkety-proposed broke libreoffice this week (it build fine against -proposed last friday)
[12:05] <Sweet5hark1> :?
[12:05] <Sweet5hark1> :/
[12:10] <ochosi> Sweet5hark1: did you manage to resolve your theming issues yet?
[12:11] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, :-( do you have any idea what?
[12:11] <Sweet5hark1> ochosi: not against 5.2 unfortunately. what i did on libreoffice master didnt work there.
[12:12] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: nope, the test seems to be looping (see the session is being killed).
[12:13] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: two options: disable the test for now, care for it later. or do a local build and try to debug it before uploading.
[12:15] <Sweet5hark1> seb128: if I were a betting man, Id think some gcc or boost stuff caued the break. but thats just shooting into the dark right now.
[12:15] <seb128> try asking doko if he knows about any recent toolchain change that could impact you?
[12:15] <seb128> but better to fix than workaround
[12:15] <seb128> so yeah, probably better to debug...
[12:21] <Sweet5hark1> yeah, right now there isnt much info to throw at doko and I would understand a grumpy reply to "do you think there were changes that might have broken something" ;)
[12:25] <Sweet5hark1> OTOH this is possibly currently still broken in -proposed only and stopping the presses might prevent promoting something kaputt that causes trouble elsewhere to main ...
[12:25] <ricotz> Sweet5hark1, ok :\ -- btw, make sure to *fix* and double-check the versioned Conflicts/Replaces for libreoffice-impress
[12:26] <ricotz> and of course push your packaging changes to git
[12:28] <ricotz> Sweet5hark1, might be worth trying to build it with internal libixion/orcus
[12:28] <seb128> that would be a workaround even if it worked
[12:29] <ricotz> seb128, yes, until those libs are built against boost1.61
[12:29] <ricotz> but it would (nearly) exclude boost as a problem
[12:32] <Sweet5hark1> ricotz: what about renes libreoffice-impress C/Rs?
[12:33] <ricotz> they don't work with your ubuntu version
[12:43] <Sweet5hark1> ricotz: urgh, yeah. fixed and pushed.
[14:04] <Trevinho> tedg: in ci-train the systemd unit-tests fail...
[14:05] <Trevinho> tedg: see https://launchpadlibrarian.net/278558119/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-amd64.unity_7.5.0+16.10.20160812.1-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[14:05] <Trevinho> [[14:05] <Trevinho> [  PASSED  ] 1637 tests.
[14:05] <Trevinho> [  FAILED  ] 2 tests, listed below:
[14:05] <Trevinho> [  FAILED  ] TestSystemdWrapper.Start
[14:05] <Trevinho> [  FAILED  ] TestSystemdWrapper.Stop
[14:05] <tedg> Trevinho: Uhg, okay. Let me see.
[14:05] <Trevinho> tedg: try to run make check-headless in a non-x session
[14:08] <tedg> Trevinho: Okay, spinning up the CPU fan :-)
[14:08] <Trevinho> tedg: it's always a great melody when it compiles unity7 :)
[14:09] <Trevinho> Mozart would be jealous
[14:55] <Sweet5hark1> aaahhh fridays. I just tried to install the daily image yakkety amd64 from today. the installer crashed :/
[14:58] <willcooke> :(
[15:07] <seb128> Sweet5hark1, cyphermox knows about it I think
[15:14] <cyphermox> yeah, I'm working on figuring out why
[15:15] <cyphermox> looks like something is now caring more about localization than it used to
[15:24] <doko> Sweet5hark1, seb128: when in doubt, blame glibc ;) (and if it just broke yesterday or today)
[15:25] <chrisccoulson> doko, can I blame all of my problems on glibc too?
[15:26] <doko> it's called glibc, not eliza
[15:26] <chrisccoulson> heh
[15:41] <tedg> Trevinho: The connection check broke the tests. I pushed a fix.
[15:41] <Trevinho> thanks
[15:42] <Trevinho> ah, yeah.. wait for it I guess would work
[16:01]  * Trevinho leaves for some running... Have nice weekend everyone!
[16:08] <Sweet5hark1> doko: yesterday/today sounds about right. ricotz reported breakage yesterday, i had a good build earlier in the week.
[16:10] <flocculant> cyphermox: just fyi - xubuntu installed ok here
[16:13] <infinity> Hey desktop people.
[16:13] <infinity> My laptop has become dangerously close to unusable since an upgrade and reboot yesterday, and I'm trying to sort out where to lay blame.
[16:14] <infinity> I get full-screen redraw flickers on window focus changes and sometimes just on keypress, and the frequency of that goes up and up until it's just flickering non-stop and needs a reboot to calm itself.
[16:15] <infinity> Trevinho, seb128, Laney:  ^--- Any ideas?
[16:15] <infinity> (And this was before I updated my local glibc, so the blame isn't on me :P)
[16:15] <Trevinho> mhmh
[16:15] <Trevinho> infinity: reverting unity/compiz changes anything for you?
[16:15] <seb128> infinity, xenial or yakkety?
[16:15] <infinity> seb128: Yakkety.
[16:16] <seb128> tried to boot an older kernel?
[16:16] <infinity> Trevinho: Maybe.  I haven't gotten to package level bisection yet, just decided to get angry and ask first, in case someone was aware of an issue and could talk me off the ledge. ;)
[16:16] <seb128> does it do it on the greeter?
[16:16] <seb128> but not known no
[16:16] <Trevinho> infinity: nothing known.. Something changed in rendering though, so..
[16:16] <infinity> seb128: Hard to say if it does it on the greeter, since it's very intermittent until it gets going.
[16:17] <seb128> when it gets going does a session restart fixes it?
[16:17] <infinity> Alright.  I'll get to reverting packages then, if no one has any current blame to pass around, and I'll get back to you.
[16:17] <seb128> or do you need a reboot?
[16:18] <infinity> seb128: Unsure, the last couple of times I just rebooted.  The reason I opted for the reboot was that even my VCs were doing the non-stop flickering once it was in that state.
[16:18] <seb128> sounds lower level than the desktop shell then
[16:18] <seb128> would blame the video driver/kernel
[16:18] <seb128> but that's just a guess ;-)
[16:19] <infinity> It certainly sounds mesa/drm/dri, but it could equally be something higher level started perturbing a previously un-tickled bug in the lower layers.
[16:20] <infinity> Anyhow, I'll play with package level reverts later today and see if I can nail down what package change caused it.
[16:20] <infinity> Which, indeed, might not be the package responsible for the bug, but might point at the bug.
[16:21] <infinity> Oh, the other (much less dire) bug I've seen since the mess of updates over the last week is a thin white line appearing on the right edge of any desktop after the first app is launched.
[16:21] <infinity> Not sure who to blame that on either. :P
[16:22] <infinity> (Also a bunch of GTK+ theme bugs, but I'm pretty sure I know who to blame those on)
[16:27] <seb128> hehe
[16:27] <seb128> the line could be unity or nautilus
[16:28] <seb128> Trevinho, ^ is that known?
[16:28] <infinity> I'd bet unity, based on it being tied to having a window on the desktop.  I close the window, and the line goes away again.
[16:28] <infinity> So, perhaps a misplaced attempt to apply a shadow or something.
[16:29] <infinity> Though, it is definitely "on the desktop", ie: you can't see it if the window is maximized.
[16:30] <infinity> Holy crap.  In testing that, I just noticed that the gnome-terminal unmaximize bug was fixed!
[16:30] <seb128> but yeah sounds likely to be unity
[16:30] <infinity> !!!
[16:30] <infinity> Yay!
[16:30] <infinity> Anyone know how/where that was fixed, so it can be SRUed to xenial?
[16:32] <seb128> Trevinho would know, but there was a fix SRUed to xenial a while ago, are you sure it's still an issue?
[16:33] <infinity> Oh, it was fixed in xenial according to the bug.
[16:33] <infinity> Huzzah.
[16:33] <infinity> seb128: Wasn't sure, since I don't run xenial, but I'll trust the bug state. :)
[16:33] <seb128> those italians are good ;-)
[16:34]  * Trevinho celebrates
[16:34] <Trevinho> anyway....
[16:34] <Trevinho> Which line? did I miss a screenshot?
[16:34] <cyphermox> flocculant: thanks but it's directly related to the language you used to install, too
[16:35] <cyphermox> ie those languages that delimit fractions with something other than a dot are affected
[16:35] <flocculant> cyphermox: that'd be why ubuntu worked as well then :p
[16:35] <cyphermox> yeah
[16:35] <cyphermox> there's an easy dumb fix I could apply but I think some other language could do things differently, I would rather really understand
[16:36] <cyphermox> but it looks like maybe I'll force LANG=C and be done with it
[16:36] <infinity> seb128: Oh, while I'm whining, and related to gnome-terminal, we've lose the "LP: #123456" right-click highlighting in gnome-terminal.
[16:36] <infinity> ubot5: NOT HELPFUL.
[16:36] <infinity> cyphermox: LANG=C.UTF-8 please.
[16:36] <seb128> infinity, try with Tre_vinho or La_ney
[16:37] <seb128> Trevinho, no screenshot that I know but I'm sure infinity can provide one
[16:37] <flocculant> cyphermox: while I have you're eye - what would I report against for (probably some gtk3 thing) with the installer?
[16:37] <Trevinho> seb128: ah, I read the description though... But I didn't notice that personally I think andrea fixed it
[16:38] <flocculant> cyphermox: don't know if you noticed but the 'skip' button isn't fixed at right side now - but wanders back and forwards depending on string length ...
[16:39] <infinity> Trevinho: http://lucifer.0c3.net/~adconrad/no-app-no-line.png http://lucifer.0c3.net/~adconrad/app-and-line.png
[16:39] <infinity> Trevinho: See the far right edge of the desktop.
[16:40] <Trevinho> ah, that one.. mh no...
[16:40] <Trevinho> never saw it
[16:41] <cyphermox> flocculant: not sure what you mean with the skip button... do you mean during the slideshow?
[16:42] <cyphermox> infinity: of course, it was just shorthand. if I say anything LC, expect a .UTF-8 tacked onto it, unless otherwise specified
[16:46] <flocculant> cyphermox: this button > http://imgur.com/T9Uz42l
[16:50] <ricotz> Sweet5hark1, I don't think the lo failure is caused by new glibc since it wasn't there when it first failed
[17:09] <willcooke> happy weekend all
[17:09] <willcooke> night
[20:51] <ahoneybun> anyone who works on the ubiquity installer?
[20:52] <ahoneybun> I'm trying to update the kde frontend to Qt5 since Qt4 dropped Webview
[20:54] <ahoneybun> I'm testing building it with debuild but I'm geting errors from wpa
[21:14] <jbicha> ahoneybun: building ubiquity? what's wpa?
[21:15] <ahoneybun> https://paste.kde.org/pogda6jrr
[21:15] <ahoneybun> since ubuntu pastebin is down
[21:15] <ahoneybun> error: this ‘if’ clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
[21:16] <ahoneybun> that seems to be the mean issue