[09:28] <zzarr> hello! the "Porting to a new device | Ubuntu developer portal" page has not been updated in a very long time, is there a new one?
[09:29] <zzarr> the instructions don't work on a operating system more modern then 14.04
[09:29] <zzarr> (not for me on 16.04 in any way)
[09:31] <zzarr> I tried with Ubuntu Phablet Teams ppa
[09:39] <davmor2> zzarr: I believe mhall119 and mariogrip are working on one
[09:46] <zzarr> nice
[11:22] <nani> hi can someone tell me how to enable adb at boot up to get kernel messages?
[12:44] <mterry> alex-abreu: I'm on yakkety-proposed and after updating this morning (last update on Friday), webbrowser-app seems busted.  Only shows "the rendering process has been closed for this tab" and reloading does nothing
[12:45] <alex-abreu> mterry, I am not sure what landed recently in the webbrowser-app, I am just back from holidays now, ... I'll upgrade & check
[12:46] <mterry> alex-abreu: there was a webbrowser-app update, but its changelog didn't seem drastic enough to cause this.  But maybe
[12:47] <mterry> alex-abreu: welcome back  :)
[12:47] <alex-abreu> mterry, thanks ;) ... I'll get back to you on this
[12:50] <mterry> alex-abreu: separately....  I didn't seem to have sound on webbrowser-app on the desktop (before this problem).  Is that a known issue?
[12:50] <alex-abreu> mterry, not afaik, ... on which website? any?
[12:51] <mterry> alex-abreu: I didn't test widely, I just noticed on irccloud, I wasn't getting the audio cues that someone had pinged me.  I'd go and test youtube, but the rendering issue is stopping me  :)
[12:55] <cwayne> mariogrip: hey, did you ever get gps working on oneplus one?
[12:56] <mariogrip> cwayne: not yet, haven't looked much into gps yet, have been busy with getting it more stable
[12:57] <cwayne> ah, ok
[12:58] <cwayne> that's my main blocker to stealing my wife's opo and using it as a daily driver :)
[14:58] <dfiloni> @pmcgowan: Hi, I replied to the messaging-app MR, I'm here for any clarification
[15:00] <dfiloni> (my english is not very good :) )
[15:04] <pmcgowan> dfiloni, for the old and new code I always see text like "... leading spaces"
[15:05] <dfiloni> @pmcgown: ohh, I think you're referring to keyboard, when I tried to send myself that sms my phone keyboard was always replacing leading spaces with dots
[15:06] <pmcgowan> dfiloni, how did you test them?
[15:06] <pmcgowan> I ssumed it was the textarea not the osk doing the replacement
[15:06] <dfiloni> I wrote "a a a a a a a test" and removed all "a" chars
[15:07] <pmcgowan> the ... is annoying as well, wonder why that is happening
[15:07] <pmcgowan> so white space form other phones wil work properly let me test again
[15:08] <dfiloni> I this it's related to auto-correction, my branch only fixes the viewing
[15:08] <pmcgowan> dfiloni, ok will try again and comment
[15:09] <dfiloni> thank you! can I please ask you what's supposed to be the band aids status after a MR? I've not found any documentation :(
[15:10] <pmcgowan> I think once the MR is approved it can be fixed committed, then once a silo lands with the fix it can be marked released
[15:11] <dfiloni> ok, I'll use In progress then, thank you
[15:27] <dobey> pmcgowan: no, once silo lands (the change is committed to trunk) then the bug status is changed to fix committed, and then once released in ota, it's fix released
[15:27] <pmcgowan> dobey, yeah that sounds right thanks dfiloni ^^
[15:28] <dobey> oh, for the band aids project they might do something a little different though
[15:29] <dobey> la_juyis: ^^ can you clarify? :)
[15:29] <dfiloni> dobey: my question was motivated by the following: how can you know when an aids is in review and when no one is working on it? (supposing the status is Confirmed in both)
[15:30] <dobey> dfiloni: if someone is working on it, it should be assigned and "in progress"
[15:30] <dfiloni> so I supposed Fix committed was the right one as the bug is also triaged in package
[15:30] <dobey> dfiloni: if it's "in review" there should be a branch linked to the bug (bzr commit --fixes=lp:XXXXXX to link a bug when committing), and a merge proposal of that branch made
[15:31] <dfiloni> it was "In progress", then I requested a merge, so the status should still be "In progress"?
[15:31] <dobey> yes
[15:31] <dobey> it is still in progress
[15:31] <dfiloni> ok
[15:32] <dfiloni> this was unclear to me
[15:32] <dfiloni> thank you!
[15:32] <dobey> "fix committed" generally means the fix has been committed to the upstream branch or such, not that you've committed a fix to a branch you're proposing
[15:36] <dobey> ganeshi4u: please don't randomly PM people
[15:36] <dobey> ganeshi4u: sorry, but no, I can't help you. i don't know much about porting
[15:38] <ganeshi4u> @dobey ok sorry,my bad i'll try to search more for the issue
[16:24] <mterry> pete-woods: why does libusermetrics use a django library for its database in the first place?  Seems like an oddly web-centric choice
[16:29] <gb_mks> did someone install the ubuntu-sdk in ubuntu 14.04. I´m having some trouble
[16:29] <gb_mks> çççççç'
[16:29] <gb_mks> ?
[16:32] <gb_mks> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/schroot/+bug/1398569
[16:45] <javier4_> Guys, I think I found out why my /external/openssl/ build fails with this error:
0:3: error: expected identifier or '(' before numeric constant external/openssl/crypto/bn/bn_gcd.c:212:19: note: in expansion of macro 'Y'  BIGNUM *A,*B,*X,*Y,*M,*D,*T,*R=NULL;
[16:47] <javier4_> it seems to me that some file previously set the Y variable, and now the preprocessor try to expand it. I put an #undef Y at the beginning of that function, and actually the file gets built. Build fails later on another file with the same error.
[16:47] <javier4_> How could I find which file defines the variable?
[16:50] <mariogrip> tsimonq2: ping
[17:37] <mariogrip> mhall119: ping
[17:37] <mhall119> mariogrip: pong, you ready?
[17:37] <mariogrip> yes
[18:03] <tsimonq2> mariogrip: ping
[18:03] <tsimonq2> or rather, pong :P
[21:43] <javier4_> I think I need to set __STDC_VERSION__ for my compiler. Anybody knows what's the smoothest way to do it in the ubuntu tree?
[21:59] <mcphail> javier4_: no idea about your specific situation, but for most compiles, you set the C version from the compiler command line (e.g. "-std=gnu99")
[22:01] <cwayne> whats the best way to debug why location-service is failing to start?
[22:01] <cwayne> tvoss: ^
[22:03] <javier4_> mcphail, thanks for your reply. my tree makes some check on that variable, but my compiler doesn't set it, and this make fail some build. I know that I could set it on commandline, but I want to know what's the best way to include it cleanly inside the tree: adding a flag in a makefile? defining it in a c source file?
[22:04] <mcphail> javier4_: generally, you pass it as a CFLAG variable to the ./configure script or the makefile
[22:06] <mcphail> javier4_: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFLAGS
[22:06] <SebthreeBQM10HD> hi
[22:07] <javier4_> mcphail, thanks again. But I know a little about cflags. My doubt are in regards of the ubuntu tree. Should I set it in the toplevel makefile? Or somewhere else?
[22:08] <mcphail> javier4_: I haven't ever tried to compile the ubuntu tree, so I wouldn't be able to help
[22:08] <SebthreeBQM10HD> is there a link for ota 13
[22:08] <SebthreeBQM10HD> the features
[22:08] <SebthreeBQM10HD> I guess so
[22:08] <SebthreeBQM10HD> been trying to find that before, but no luck
[22:10] <mcphail> javier4_: it is odd that this isn't set by default, although I think recent versions of GCC have switched from using C90 to C11 by default
[22:10] <mcphail> javier4_: you "never" set __STDC_VERSION__ directly yourself, of course
[22:12] <javier4_> mcphail, I use a mediatek customized toolchain (they patched gcc, too...), it seems to be left unset, and in a clang sourcefile I found this directive
[22:12] <javier4_> mcphail, // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -E -dM < /dev/null | FileCheck -check-prefix C99 %s
[22:12] <javier4_> /
[22:12] <javier4_> / C99:#define __STDC_VERSION__ 199901L
[22:13] <javier4_> but clang is not built by ubuntu code. It's instead built by my android tree, and in fact aosp build without problems.
[22:17] <mcphail> javier4_: without knowing the code and the build process I'm not goin to be of any help, I'm afraid
[22:21] <javier4_> mcphail, thanks anyway.