[01:52] <Omnifrog> KEEP IT DOWN IN HERE. IT'S TOO DAMN NOISY
[02:10] <Omnifrog> awwww yeahhhh, all new fresh coils
[04:42]  * cyberanger sets off firecrackers for Omnifrog
[13:11] <aedend> http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/08/15/shadow-brokers-claim-to-be-selling-nsa-malware-in-what-could-be-historic-hack/
[19:31] <netritious> back wrst :)
[19:31] <wrst> wow netritious, that was quick
[19:31] <netritious> Howdy everyone
[19:32] <netritious> breaking records today lol
[19:32] <wrst> how are things going?
[19:33] <netritious> ok, negotiating a raise today. waiting to hear back.
[19:33] <netritious> how about you wrst?
[19:33] <wrst> doing well, hopefully your afternoon will be full of $$$$$$$$
[19:33] <netritious> one can only hope.
[19:36] <netritious> everyday now I am having a lxd/lxc epiphany. like, just figured out what to do with the t2.medium reserved instance that's been just sitting there. maybe lol
[19:37]  * |Ubik| files a frivilous lawsuit against cyberanger
[19:38] <|Ubik|> reserved instances...  good or bad? lol
[19:47] <netritious> it's fine. i use it for utility work mostly. was there before I was.
[19:49] <netritious> the "primary" reserved instance is 24/7 t2.medium. it too works fine. runs 5, maybe 6 services using a container for each, wired as needed.
[19:49] <netritious> I quote primary becasue the second one might as well be "secondary."
[19:54] <netritious> someone purchased use of two t2.mediums for three years up front. still 1.5 years left.
[19:58] <netritious> between backups to s3 and volume snapshots, I really can't justify putting the second one to use for anything other than a hot standby. I mean, the resource is paid for, might as well be hot and ready like a little ceaser's pizza, right?
[20:02] <netritious> |Ubik|: why is something wrong with reserved instances I should know about?
[20:20] <|Ubik|> netritious: Guess it depends... can save money if you're running a lot
[20:20] <|Ubik|> but if you don't need it, and you're stuck with it... lol
[20:20] <|Ubik|> might as well turn it into an ircd? :P
[20:23] <netritious> according to aws reports that one instance with the containers stays at 100% utilization. I'm thinking maybe I could split the load though by distributing between the two. dns, backup mx maybe. idk lol
[20:25] <netritious> top never seems to think the host stays at 100% however, on cpu or ram. it'll peek for a while occassionally, but that's seems  normal.
[20:25] <netritious> *that
[20:26] <netritious> and there is only one S in occasionally :$
[20:27] <|Ubik|> yeah
[20:27] <|Ubik|> I think the two reports differ, not sure why, but I've seen that too
[20:27] <|Ubik|> chances are cyberanger is skewing up your stats
[20:27] <netritious> most likely
[20:32] <netritious> I guess deep down I know it's bad practice to put all your eggs in one basket and want to be proactive about it.
[21:49] <cyberanger> netritious some people love bad eggs
[21:49] <cyberanger> I don't
[22:56] <netritious> Not a fan myself cyberanger