/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/08/19/#ubuntu-community-team.txt

Kiloso/06:44
popeyMorning07:53
ahoneybuno/09:44
Kiloso/09:47
popeyo/09:47
ahoneybunheyo Kilos and popey09:49
Kiloshi ahoneybun popey09:49
Kilospopey you having any success with spreadubuntu11:56
popeyno11:56
Kilosoh my11:56
Kilosrecruit helpers11:56
popeyit would be somewhat easier if the person hosting the actual site looked at this11:56
popeyas it's hard to replicate11:57
Kiloscan you mail a request to him or even via me, just explain what you need done11:57
Kilosmainly so i can understand as well11:58
popeyWell, it's not what I need done.11:58
Kiloshehe11:58
popeyWhoever has access to the box which has the site on needs to debug what's going on11:58
popeylook at logs etc11:58
Kilosok explain what he needs to do in the mail11:58
Kilosis that ok?11:58
Kilosi cant get into rt.ubuntu.com either so i have no idea whats wrong11:59
popeyok, but I'm kinda surprised this hasn't been done already11:59
popeyadding me into the mix to just say "hey, have you actually looked at the logs" seems a bit late11:59
popeybut sure12:01
Kiloshe told me once he has no time to do much of anything anymore,12:01
Kiloslife seems to have taken control of him12:01
Kilosi didnt want to dig too deep in his hassles12:02
popeyok12:03
popeymail sent12:03
Kilosty sir12:03
popeynp12:08
ahoneybunmhall119, who do I talk to about stickers with the Kubuntu logo?18:08
mhall119ahoneybun: somebody who makes stickers18:45
mhall119ahoneybun: try the unixstickers.com folks18:47
knomeahoneybun, ^ they are our officially endorsed vendor for stickers18:48
ahoneybunknome, well now they are18:48
ahoneybunmhall119, I don't want to hit legal issues18:49
knomeahoneybun, "now"?18:49
knomeahoneybun, they've been for a while, we specifically mention them on our website as well18:49
knomein return for that, they basically give us free stickers for every N purchases18:49
knomeyou need to talk with pleia2 about the details as she's the one who's worked with them18:49
ahoneybunthanks knome they had been talking to Canonical for a while to make them though18:50
mhall119ahoneybun: I think they assumed they couldn't at some point, but after talking with Canonical they were given the green light18:50
knomeok, time to go do something else18:51
knomehave a nice evening!18:51
ahoneybunpleia2, Kubuntu stickers from unixstickers?18:52
ahoneybunmhall119, I know the logos have legal hoops over them to use18:57
mhall119ahoneybun: only if you're doing something outside the existing trademark grand19:05
mhall119grant19:05
ahoneybunmhall119, which I don't know what it is19:08
mhall119ahoneybun: http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy Section 719:10
mhall119IIRC, unixsticker.com was concerned about whether or not their selling of stickers would be a commercial use or not19:10
ahoneybunmhall119, Canonical's legal decisions are odd to be nice19:10
mhall119either way, the've been given the okay to use the marks in stickers, so there shouldn't be any problem with them using Kubuntu19:10
mhall119ahoneybun: oh I know it, the only clear lines would be "nobody else can use it, ever" and "anybody can use it for anything", Canonical is trying to navigate a reasonable path between those two extremes19:12
ahoneybunI know it is very tough to be fair when it comes to keeping a bottom line19:12
mhall119this isn't even about money, it's about reputation19:13
mhall119you wouldn't want some company selling "Kubuntu" that they had modified to include backdoors and keyloggers19:13
mhall119we can't stop them from doing that with the code, but we can stop them from telling people that their monstrosity is "Kubuntu"19:14
tsimonq2mhall119: (CC wxl) speaking of http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy , Section 4 states a few different flavors. So the flavors not listed are not covered? How's that work?21:57
wxltsimonq2: from what i know from redwolf, he had to ask canonical legal for the right to use lubuntu on lubuntu.me.21:58
mhall119tsimonq2: probably those were all the official once when the policy was drafted21:58
tsimonq2mhall119: what kind of makes me confused is this statement: "Canonical’s Trademarks (registered in word and logo form) include:"21:59
tsimonq2mhall119: I'm no lawyer, but shouldn't that be s/include/include but are not limited to/ ?22:00
mhall119what confuses you about that?22:00
tsimonq2¯\_(ツ)_/¯22:00
mhall119meh, that's lawyer-level details22:00
tsimonq2I mean, if they cite specific flavors, it might be worth it to update to remove the specific flavors and add an umbrella statement such as, "All flavors officiall recognized by the Ubuntu Community" (maybe add "Council" on the end of that)22:02
tsimonq2mhall119: what about Snappy?22:02
mhall119file a bug against lp:ubuntu-website-content if you'd like22:02
mhall119"snappy" isn't really the official name of anything22:03
mhall119"snapd", "snapcraft", "snap-confine", etc are22:03
wxls/snappy/ubuntu core/22:03
tsimonq2mhall119: is there any way that bug report can be brought to the attention of the legal team? (subscribing)22:03
tsimonq2good point wxl22:03
mhall119tsimonq2: the web team will most likely bring it up with them when they triage the bug22:04
tsimonq2ok, thanks mhall11922:04

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!