| pitti | Good morning | 05:14 |
|---|---|---|
| pitti | Laney, infinity: I just installed firefox from -proposed and scrollbars are back, thanks! | 06:23 |
| zzarr | hello! I'm trying to play a mp3 file in a project built with Qt 5.7 but it says that it's missing a plugin for gstreamer | 07:33 |
| zzarr | I'm on Ubuntu 16.04 | 07:34 |
| Mirv | zzarr: you'll most likely indeed lack a plugin, as mp3 is patent encumbered format. for example gstreamer1.0-fluendo-mp3 package has a licensed decoder. | 09:49 |
| zzarr | thanks Mirv | 09:50 |
| zzarr | Mirv it's already the latest | 09:51 |
| Mirv | hmm then I don't know | 10:01 |
| xnox | something odd is going on. packages that just build in local yakkety sbuild fail on launchpad. | 10:56 |
| * xnox rebuilds my chroots | 10:57 | |
| === hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
| happyaron | seb128: need to work on that on Monday, hands were full today... | 11:47 |
| === King_InuYasha is now known as Son_Goku | ||
| Mirv | does anyone else have hanging builds in LP? https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/ubuntu/qt5-beta2/+build/10632384 at the end of the build | 11:49 |
| Mirv | I've had one since yesterday, and still happens | 11:50 |
| cjwatson | can happen if you leave test processes hanging around | 11:53 |
| cjwatson | just cancel it | 11:53 |
| Mirv | ok | 11:58 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| seb128 | happyaron, shrug, ok, always a reason to delay those :-/ | 12:06 |
| === hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| happyaron | seb128: hey, appears most fixes were included for the 1.2.2 version, but the wwan icon patch has something not upstreamed, thus not picked... | 13:43 |
| happyaron | cyphermox: ^ | 13:43 |
| jbicha | mdeslaur: are you planning to use gnupg1 soon instead of gnupg like Debian did? | 15:58 |
| jbicha | because I saw you merged gnupg 1.4.20-6 but not gnupg1 1.4.20-7 | 15:58 |
| mdeslaur | jbicha: huh, wasn't aware of that | 15:59 |
| jbicha | mdeslaur: https://debian-administration.org/users/dkg/weblog/116 | 15:59 |
| mdeslaur | gnupg1 is in yakkety already | 16:00 |
| jbicha | yes but it's in universe and the gnupg source package should probably be removed if we're going to follow Debian's example for yakkety | 16:01 |
| mdeslaur | yeah, someone who cares can do that | 16:01 |
| mdeslaur | doesn't look like they've actually replaces gnupg though | 16:01 |
| mdeslaur | (yet) | 16:03 |
| jbicha | well except for providing transitional packages and removing the old source I think they have https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-gnupg/gnupg1.git/tree/debian/control | 16:04 |
| xnox | mdeslaur, well it needs gnupg2 merge | 16:07 |
| xnox | and on debian it is claimed to break things (the RC bug report) | 16:07 |
| xnox | i would want to for this to happen, but I am biased. | 16:07 |
| xnox | Laney, shall we try to squeeze in gnupg2 by default? | 16:07 |
| xnox | and see how much stuff breaks? | 16:07 |
| xnox | i think the rest of stuff is merged / working by now...... | 16:08 |
| jbicha | well a transitional package would help with some of the breakage | 16:08 |
| pitti | oh, please let's move to gpg2, this is overdue | 16:08 |
| Laney | xnox: abstain | 16:10 |
| ricotz | pitti, +1 | 16:11 |
| xnox | i shall file FFe request | 16:14 |
| xnox | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnupg1/+bug/1615039 | 16:15 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1615039 in gnupg2 (Ubuntu) "[FFe] /usr/bin/gnupg --version should be 2.1" [Undecided,New] | 16:15 |
| === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Xenial (16.04.1) Released! | Archive: feature freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-xenial | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
| mdeslaur | xnox, jbicha: I don't mind helping a bit with the gpg transition, but I don't have time to properly take care of it | 16:24 |
| mdeslaur | xnox: thanks for volunteering :) | 16:24 |
| mdeslaur | xnox: let me know if there's something you'd like me to do | 16:25 |
| jbicha | mdeslaur: I thought *you* volunteered by touching gnupg last! | 16:25 |
| mdeslaur | see, the problem with that is the security team touches everything last :) | 16:25 |
| mdeslaur | xnox: I can merge our stuff into the gnupg1 package if you'd like | 16:26 |
| xnox | mdeslaur, i'm punting this till next week. cause i do want to make it happen, but it needs to be done right. And i can't just toss it over the wall on friday evening =) | 16:29 |
| xnox | i'm sure some things will break and/or need testing - e.g. user session gpg-agent and the like. | 16:30 |
| mdeslaur | xnox: ok, just let me know | 16:30 |
| jbicha | yeah, maybe after Beta | 16:30 |
| rbasak | barry: you might be interested in bug 1613880. We can't be sure, but it sounds like he changed /usr/bin/python to point to python3.5. I wonder if there's a way for apport to tell us for sure, so we can explain and Invalidate these bugs immediately? | 16:49 |
| ubottu | bug 1613880 in six (Ubuntu) "package python-six 1.10.0-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1613880 | 16:49 |
| pitti | rbasak: Dependencies: should tell, but that field is empty (!?) | 16:50 |
| barry | rbasak: looking | 16:50 |
| rbasak | Not urgent at all - just pondering the bigger picture. Maybe these are rare. | 16:51 |
| pitti | i. e. apport mentions modified files in packages, i. e. it should have told us that python-minimal has a modified /usr/bin/python | 16:51 |
| barry | rbasak: changing /usr/bin/python is definitely not a supported option on ubuntu (or debian) so we should detect that and exit | 16:52 |
| rbasak | barry: would you like a bug for that somewhere? | 16:54 |
| barry | rbasak: i think it should be rare, and it's something that someone would have to go out of their way to do. or i suppose they could have installed python3.5 from source into /usr/local/bin and made that first on their $PATH? in any case, i think we can just handle this on a case-by-case basis. pitti what do you think? | 16:55 |
| pitti | barry: yeah, WFM; I'm mostly interested in why this bug has an empty Dependencies: field | 16:55 |
| barry | pitti: yeah ;) | 16:56 |
| pitti | barry: oh -- apport is python too, it wouldn't surprise me if that was broken by that change | 16:56 |
| barry | patient: "dr. it hurts when i do this". doctor: "don't do that!" | 16:56 |
| pitti | well, Friday evening, debugging a weird regression, and that ^ isn't a "want to think about it" problem right now, sorry | 16:57 |
| barry | not likely to change over a nice weekend :) | 16:57 |
| rbasak | I just thought it was interesting that 1) someone did that and then reported a bug; but also 2) apport didn't tell me why. But that he broke apport itself by doing that is interesting. Also ironic that he reported it against python-six! | 17:04 |
| ahoneybun | anyone know if we can expect a startup sound change? | 17:12 |
| === Elimin8r is now known as Elimin8er | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!