[07:16] reporting the desktop fail against xorg *shrug* [07:16] though I've got apport file to report against linux too [07:42] bluesabre: bug 1615338 [07:42] bug 1615338 in xorg (Ubuntu) "Yakkety fails to start desktop" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1615338 [07:42] added what I could to that [07:43] flocculant: Could edit /usr/share/xsessions/xubuntu.desktop so it launches it like it used to, not in a systemd session. [07:43] never had to ssh into a livesession nor a kvm guest - so that was fun and the thing I learnt today - makes the rest of the day easy \o/ [07:43] Unit193: you mean for my dead install? [07:44] I assume you mean change Exec=/usr/share/xfce4/scripts/run-systemd-session xubuntu-session.target to something else that I don't know :D [07:45] Exec=startxfce4 [07:45] it's quite refreshing being in a system that doesn't need 100's Mb of updates twice a day :D [07:47] ok - biab [07:48] well I got in ok :) [07:51] Knew xorg wasn't right since that one works, figured it was systemd. [07:51] Unit193: do you mean report bug against systemd? [07:52] Eh, time to poke pitti and tell him what you discovered? :P [07:52] well I'll start with a bug report then :D [07:53] "pitti - I discovered that if I did what ukikie said I've got a working desktop" :p [07:54] Hah. :P [07:54] Well he's Canonical so he'll be back Monday. [07:54] just set up the desktop again ... [07:54] yea - I'll leave him a message in -release :) [07:55] then hassle him when I wake up [08:00] Unit193: thanks :) [08:00] Sure thing, I suppose. [08:04] well then - I'm hardly likely to not thank you am I :p [08:13] bug 1615341 [08:13] bug 1615341 in systemd (Ubuntu) "Yakkety desktop fails to start" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1615341 [09:08] knome: Can you auto-discard *.bid and *.stream? [09:44] Unit193, sure [09:45] i just came here to thank whoever cleared the moderation queue anyways :P [09:45] 'Welcome, it had a toooon of .stream ones. [09:45] yup [09:46] 23 to be exact. [09:48] now blocking them from both -devel and -users [09:48] and synced the other wildcards between the two too [09:49] Great. [09:49] fwiw, http://paste.ubuntu.com/23075033/ [09:53] I have a log of emails and actions if you want it. :P [10:04] rather just a diff for the blocklist :P [10:04] but basically, if you see a pattern, always feel free to ping me here or send an email, and i'll happily edit the lists [10:04] makes it easier for us all [10:04] but, time to go [10:04] ttyl [10:05] and have a nice.. night? [10:05] :) [13:04] bluesabre: laney is on the case it seems === pavlushka_ is now known as Guest8546 === Guest8546 is now known as pavlushka [16:31] flocculant: thats good news [16:34] bluesabre: yup :) [16:35] guessing because he's running b1 from canonical side he knew it would cause mate issues :) [16:45] bluesabre: grabbed it from proposed, restored original xubuntu.desktop, rebooted fine :) [16:45] Unit193: thanks for pointing in the right direction :) [17:25] \o/ [17:52] akxwi-dave: if you've not read backlog - network is fixed, something else broke - possibly won't land before our images build early tomorrow - so if they're still fubar - should be ok Tuesday [17:52] bbl [18:38] flocculant: cheers bud.. will keep an ee one em [18:51] greetins, may i ask if your latest daily iso installs? i tried ours today and it failed again [18:51] sakrecoer: nope [18:51] bug 1615341 [18:51] bug 1615341 in systemd (Ubuntu) "Yakkety desktop fails to start" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1615341 [18:52] flocculant: ok... but at least, it finishes installation? [18:52] sakrecoer: assuming you are impacted same as us - it installs but then the desktop fails on reboot [18:53] ok, well here the install doesn't even finish.. [18:53] sakrecoer: oh hang on though - you've got issues anyway with iso builds failing [18:55] flocculant: yeah, lets hope that will do... [18:55] thank you anyways flocculant :) [18:56] you need to find out what's causing your issue - then get that sorted for your iso to build - afaik ross is aware of all that [18:58] thanks, yes.. lets hope he is available too :) [18:59] (note that he tends to be available... don't get me wrong :) ) === sorinello is now known as BalcoraWRT === BalcoraWRT is now known as sorinello