[07:22] <jancoow> Hi there. When i want to install owncloud i get this error
[07:22] <jancoow> https://jancokock.me/f/855cd
[07:39] <ducasse> i've noticed a weird thing with an lxc container on 16.04. inside the container 'free -m' reports 350mb used, while lxc-info reports "memory use" as 25gb. for other containers the numbers match. what could cause this?
[11:28] <Tahvok> Hello!
[11:29] <Tahvok> I'm trying to understand the following list: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/linux-lts-trusty.html
[11:29] <Tahvok> According to the list none of the cve are applicable if I use the lts-trusty kernel?
[11:29] <Tahvok> Or am I misunderstanding something?
[11:33] <mdeslaur> Tahvok: if you use linux-lts-trusty, the first column applies to you
[11:34] <mdeslaur> so everything in orange, yellow, and red
[11:34] <mdeslaur> (though it appears old stuff isn't triaged properly)
[11:34] <Tahvok> So what are the other columns? There is even one that says 'trusty'?
[11:34] <mdeslaur> that's for the trusty release
[11:34] <mdeslaur> you're running precise
[11:35] <Tahvok> Nope, I'm on trusty
[11:35] <mdeslaur> if you're on trusty, then you're definitely not running the linux-lts-trusty kernel
[11:35] <mdeslaur> you're running the "linux" kernel
[11:35] <mdeslaur> which is here: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/linux.html
[11:35] <Tahvok> Oh, so I was checking the wrong package..
[11:35] <mdeslaur> the "linux-lts-trusty" package is the trusty kernel backported to precise
[11:36] <Tahvok> Got it. Thank you!
[11:36] <mdeslaur> yw
[12:53] <admin0> hi .. can  anyone help me understand what caused this kernel bug ? http://pastebin.com/MPza7mbJ
[14:25] <eatingthenight> hello, I am trying to figure out if this is possible at all. can i through the use of unionfs or something similar have a process that writes to a directory but then at some given time later set the directory back to it's original state?
[14:48] <xnox> eatingthenight, you mean git?
[15:43] <Ussat> REally ? installing into a VM, "can not install bootloader into /dev/sda5
[15:43] <Ussat> sigh
[15:43] <Ussat> its Monday
[15:50] <soahccc> Hello everyone! What could cause two identical servers (same hardware, same configs, same settings overall) to behave different in regard to ipv4/ipv6? When I update packages or when I just curl google.com... One server uses ipv4 and one uses ipv6, times out and falls back to ipv4. Where do I have to look? I guess I should fix ipv6 but this is really annoying at the moment.
[15:55] <Odd_Bloke> soahccc: If they're doing DHCP then they'll be getting (at least some) networking config from the DHCP server.
[15:56] <soahccc> Odd_Bloke: there is no DHCP involved, I'm wondering though why ipv6 doesn't work. We have other working servers and the v6 setup is the same :/ I can't currently find it anymore but we don't have "proper" v6 addresses but use some mapping from v4 to v6.
[16:03] <soahccc> I think it's called address embedding but I can't for the love of laziness find a converter anymore
[16:08] <soahccc> Odd_Bloke: I'm just wondering where I have to look if not in /etc/network/interfaces why one prefers v6 while the other prefers v4 despite having the same config except the IP's of course
[16:09] <Odd_Bloke> soahccc: I don't really know, I'm afraid
[16:10] <soahccc> Thanks anyway :) I'll try to fix v6 if I can manage to find a converter again. I only find code or descriptions which I can't work with :/
[16:13] <soahccc> Oh nevermind, we actually use the assigned block from our provider. weird, maybe it's a problem on their side as 5 out of 7 have working v6 with the exact same setup
[16:32] <eatingthenight> xnox: yes essentially git for an entire directory such as /tmp
[16:33] <xnox> eatingthenight, use ... git?
[16:34] <xnox> that's what etckeeper is essentially.
[16:34] <xnox> or any other backup/restore.
[16:34] <xnox> why use directory? why not use e.g. a database with a transactions and a rollback.
[16:36] <eatingthenight> i'll test it out, for some reason it seems like the wrong approach or that something else such as union fs should handle it better but we will see.
[18:02] <tammy5> how often are releases done on ubuntu
[18:09] <macskay> hi guys, got a question regarding vhosts. A mate got a domain running and I got a server running. At the moment I have multiple domains running on it, which are registered with the server. however I want to add the domain of my mate to my server as well. Can I do that, when his domain is from another provider and registered with my server?
[18:10] <macskay> *not registered
[18:11] <centaur5> tammy5, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
[19:23] <dr4c4n> hi there, does anyone have a couple minutes? I'm having issues with openldap over ssl connecting to phpldapadmin. I get an error ldap_connect: cannot create session handle
[20:13] <dasjoe> kirkland: nice seeing you doing the OpenZFS summit keynote :)
[20:31] <tomreyn> dr4c4n_: your ldap connection uri is probably wrong
[20:32] <tomreyn> or rather not in the format php expects
[20:46] <tammy5> is it possible to add my name to the list of triaging daily? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase#triager
[20:46] <tammy5> I would like to have sunday
[21:03] <nacc> tammy5: I don't believe that list is current
[22:24] <DexDeadly> what is the easiest way to share a directory via samba so that I can write files to it
[22:52] <supraleposeur> Hi - I just upgraded my server from 14.04.5 to 16.04.1 and my RAID1 array is now empty. I'm very new at using mdadm and I don't want to destroy my data inadvertently. Is anyone available to help?