[03:20] ENODOKO === salem_ is now known as _salem [04:38] Good morning [04:49] o/ pitti [05:01] hey tsimonq2, how are you? [05:05] great pitti, you? [05:06] quite fine, thanks === pete-woods[fail] is now known as pete-woods [10:37] anybody willing to bootstrap fpc on powerpc? [10:37] the issue that prevented installation seems fixed, but I have no knowledge/access to machines to test it [10:37] infinity, ^^ :) [10:37] BTW the fixed version is already in yakkety-proposed (in some seconds) === hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln [10:57] Does "Error in `/usr/bin/python': double free or corruption (out): 0x00003fff9c373c70" ring a bell? Seen on i386 and ppc64el autopkgtests (yade) after a successfull test run.. === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson [11:17] Now we are in feature freeze for yakkety is syncing with Debian now stopped? [11:26] flexiondotorg: yes, we are in debian-import-freeze as well, use 'requestsync' [11:26] ginggs_, Yeah, I was just read the docs :-) [11:27] Mirv: probably a bug in some extension or other [11:28] @pilot in === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Xenial (16.04.1) Released! | Archive: feature freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-xenial | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: mdeslaur === hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko [11:34] TheMuso: Hi, I wanted to hear if you wanted to test pulseaudio (bluetooth) with me? I haven't heard from you on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1574324 - You can also email me: joakimkoed@gmail.com if you want :) [11:34] Launchpad bug 1574324 in pulseaudio (Ubuntu) "pulseaudio crashes when connecting to bluetooth headphones (due to ubuntu changes?)" [High,In progress] [11:36] pitti, i see your name https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809740 when digging on my related issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1615751 [11:36] Debian bug 809740 in src:initramfs-tools "initramfs-tools: Completely ignores rootdelay" [Important,Fixed] [11:36] Launchpad bug 1615751 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Yakkety) "ROOTDELAY= causes unnecessary delay in boot" [High,Confirmed] [11:37] it seems now that ROOTDELAY=300 means "please do 'sleep 300' in initramfs". Where before, it meant to do 'wait-for-udev 300', which waited up to 300 seconds until the necessary device appeared. [11:38] azure images have this rootdelay=300 cooked into them as it sometimes takes quite a while for azure disks to appear. it used to mean that this worked well, now it means we sleep 300. [12:11] Laney, now that I have PPU for a package set can I action my own sync requests for those packages? [12:11] yes [12:11] Excellent. [12:12] Laney, So requestsync without -s will do the business? [12:14] smoser: ah, I remember -- indeed, this rootdelay= thing is FUBAR; TBH I don't see how to salvage it to anything remotely useful [12:15] smoser: IIRC, the problem was to define what "the necessary device" actually is [12:15] i. e. not just waiting for the root device, which we've done with udev's wait-for-root since 2006 or so [12:16] so if someone actually wants to use it, it's just a plain sleep(given_number) in the initramfs ATM, as there is no other definition of what it should do [12:19] flexiondotorg: you should be able to use 'syncpackage' for packages you can upload [12:19] ginggs_, Thanks. I'll read the man page now. [12:20] smoser: anyway, if you want to kill that sleep from initramfs-tools again, you have my full blessing :) [12:34] ginggs_, Thanks for the pointer. That was easy :-) [12:35] flexiondotorg: yw === _salem is now known as salem_ [12:52] Is there a convention for where documentation about a package's packaging should live within the package? [12:55] debian/README.source, I think [12:57] Ah, yeah, that looks like it. [12:57] mgedmin: Thanks. :) [13:34] pitti, right.. [13:34] pitti, can you please run htslib testsuite of version 1.3.1-2ubuntu1 against python-pysam/proposed? thanks [13:34] i dont understand why we dont use 'wait-for-root' [13:34] and why debian doesnt use 'wait-for-root' [13:35] do you know that answer to that ? [13:36] juliank: hey; have you seen bug 1611010? I think there's an issue in apt in the pmstatus output, related to the changes to setting the locale [13:36] bug 1611010 in apt (Ubuntu) "yakkety desktop - non-english installation crashes with /plugininstall.py: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: ''" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1611010 [13:37] cyphermox: Alright, I'll forward this to DonKult, he's tackling these locale bugs [13:37] cyphermox: Or well, maybe the APT was too old. Need to check [13:38] thanks [13:42] I really hate locales [13:42] The fault is probably the strprintf(status, "pmstatus:dpkg-exec:%.4f:%s\n", [13:43] that's awkward [13:43] * juliank wants locale free sprintf() [13:44] Anyway, should be easy to fix [13:50] arges, bdmurray: hello, we could use a review of the openstack SRUs for bug 1614131 if you have a moment this week [13:50] bug 1614131 in nova (Ubuntu Xenial) "[SRU] OpenStack Mitaka point releases" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1614131 [13:55] smoser: we *do* use wait-for-root [13:55] well, sort of [13:55] we use a '10' now [13:55] we used to use ROOTDELAY [13:55] smoser: Debian> presumably because it's linux specific and thus it wouldn't work under BSD; although ISTR that i-t has a shell polling loop for it which should roughly behave the same [13:55] http://paste.ubuntu.com/23081737/ <-- thats what i think to get it back to properly [13:56] pitti, right. it has a shell polling loop [13:56] and then (or before, i think actually) it does sleep $ROOTDELAY [13:56] why? no clue. [13:56] LocutusOfBorg: I think you mean the other way around; done [13:57] LocutusOfBorg: but note that http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#python-pysam is depwait on i386, so that won't help on at least i386 === JanC is now known as Guest58470 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [14:16] coreycb: i can get to it tomorrow if tha'ts alwa6ys [14:16] alright [14:21] pitti, not sure why archive admins didn't remove it yet [14:24] LocutusOfBorg: why remove? [14:24] python-pysam NBS/i386? [14:25] LocutusOfBorg: why would it be removed? its depwait needs to be resolved [14:27] arges, that'd be great, thanks [14:28] pitti, remove all the reverse-deps on i386 too? Debian seems to have done that AFAICS [14:28] LocutusOfBorg: hm, that's not quite obvious; mind filing a bug for it? (sorry, meeting now) [14:29] yep thanks === dgadomski_ is now known as dgadomski [15:36] @pilot out === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Xenial (16.04.1) Released! | Archive: feature freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-xenial | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: === Laney changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Xenial (16.04.1) Released! | Archive: feature freeze, beta 1 freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-xenial | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: [16:46] LocutusOfBorg: Oh, nice. [16:47] LocutusOfBorg: I'll rebootstrap in a bit. [16:49] * tsimonq2 silently grumbles about the lack of capitalization in the topic [16:50] infinity, I hope it is *really* fixed [16:51] you might want to wait for elbrus to bootstrap it in Debian [16:51] as you wish [16:51] I don't want to have you loose time [16:51] LocutusOfBorg: It'll be trivial to do. Also, lose, not loose. :P [16:51] true ;) [16:51] (pet peeve) [16:51] what is "trivial" for you, is impossible for me [16:52] and I would like to learn/have access to machines [16:52] debian porterboxes don't allow to install stuff as root [16:54] Installing as root wouldn't be strictly necessary for this. [16:54] mmm how? fpc needs fpc [16:54] or you want to cross compile it? [16:54] Sure, but you start with a chroot that has a glibc that doesn't break fpc. [16:54] and how do you test the built binaries on a real powerpc machine? [16:54] Then build the new one. [16:54] ok but debian has pre-built chroots [16:55] Yeah, use jessie. [16:55] mmm ok [16:55] and then upgrade the chroot to stretch? [16:56] or save the built binaries, unpack them and run ./fpcmk whatever fails [16:56] I did that when debugging it [16:59] thanks for trying it then [17:00] I trust more your checks rather than mine ;) [17:06] * LocutusOfBorg leaves [17:12] pitti, barry, mvo: Do you know enough about aptdaemon to figure out what's going wrong here? https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/fc13839a8f16399991b1e1907d410c7f161d7fc9 [17:14] bdmurray: i don't but i did notice a warning about xenial hwe eol on a server of mine [17:15] barry: I added that stuff to Trusty and update-manager is crashing with the above a lot. [17:16] bdmurray: offhand, no idea, sorry [17:16] barry: okay, thanks [17:18] it would appear that the yakkety virt-viewer has decided that it should, by damn, take focus every time there's a change in the screen. Any clues on how to correct this utterly antisocial and stupid behavior on its part, other than "close the window"? [17:19] My PowerStation just decided it doesn't have a root filesystem. That's not ideal. [17:20] infinity: you win on the suckitude scale [17:21] bdmurray: it smeels like a package dependencies problem, maybe something with libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-xenial: on trusty, e.g. if universe is missing or somesuch [17:23] mvo: universe missing - that sounds like a good lead. Is there any way to get more information out of aptdaemon? [17:23] bdmurray: hm, in a trusty chroot I get a similar error "# apt install xserver-xorg-lts-xenial" [17:24] bdmurray: that is even with universe [17:24] bdmurray: so maybe something broken in the backport? [17:25] mvo: hmm, I did lots of HWE upgrade testing w/o a problem. [17:26] bdmurray: no idea, I just did a pbuilder-dist xenial login and sudo apt update; sudo apt install xserver-xorg-lts-xenial === sarnold_ is now known as sarnold [17:32] xnox: -updates should be fixed on mirrors in a couple of hours. [17:44] infinity, \o/ [17:44] you are full of win =) [17:44] I'm full of something. [18:10] arges, when you do the openstack review for me, can you reject the older uploads of nova/keystone/cinder from the review queue? I just re-uploaded with the correct bug #. [18:10] coreycb: ok [18:10] arges, thanks [18:16] coreycb: ok all set [19:04] xnox: [19:04] sower@z13-001:~$ apt-cache show s390-tools | grep ^Support [19:04] Supported: 5y [19:04] Supported: 9m [19:04] xnox: So, updates fixed, I'll worry about release later. === elbrus_ is now known as elbrus [21:15] juliank: What did you do to python-apt? [21:15] juliank: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23083200/ [21:15] Or is that internal to apt-listchanges? Hrm. [21:16] We never had a read_changelog [21:16] Yeah, maybe I should blame doko's last apt-listchanges upload. :P [21:16] I hit that too, but not in Debian. >_> [21:18] http://paste.ubuntu.com/23083202/ definitely looks to be the culprit. [21:20] Might have been renamed to _read_changelog [21:20] Because reasons. [21:20] * infinity tests. [21:21] sigh pitti , seems cython autopkgtestsuite has the same issues [21:21] autopkgtest for python-pysam/0.7.7-1ubuntu1: amd64: Test in progress, i386: Test in progress, ppc64el: Regression ♻ [21:21] maybe we can just ignore them? [21:22] juliank: Right, I blamed the wrong person, sorry. ;) [21:26] infinity, how did the fpc bootstrap go? [21:27] LocutusOfBorg: Not started yet. [21:28] oh... ok :) I sent a mail to Paul, in case he has something to share [21:28] I'll try now [21:36] Unit193: Fixes uploaded. [21:36] infinity: Thanks very much, sir! [21:36] Unit193: We may be in the short list of people who use apt-listchanges. :P [21:37] This is very true, I don't even have it prompt me after displaying, like you have. [21:38] Unit193: I rarely need to say no, but when I do, it's quite valuable. [21:38] Unit193: But such is the life of a core-dev in a devel series, I guess. Sometimes, I see a changelog and go "wait, they did WHAT?!" and investigate (and maybe fix) before upgrading. [21:39] infinity: Yeah I'm just a lowly flavor Dev, so can't fix things first. Best I can do is hold it a bit. :P === salem_ is now known as _salem === bschaefer_ is now known as bschaefer === bschaefer_ is now known as bschaefer