[01:44] bjf: could you run 'sudo grub-install --verbose /dev/sda1' on that system where you saw the failure? it may tell us more about why it's unhappy [03:22] cyphermox, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23083835/ [08:28] Do we have a finger-in-the-air estimate of when 4.6 will land? (Days or weeks?) [08:36] Odd_Bloke, i think that is in negative territory atm, it actually tried once, but i'd say 1 week not 3 weeks [08:49] apw: Cool, thanks. :) [09:25] is there a command to clean up old kernels? [09:26] tjaalton, if they are installed "normally" then apt-get remove --purge should be killing them off [09:26] normal yeah, if you mean autoremove that only removed one of them [09:27] on this machine there are still 43 left :) [09:27] tjaalton, if you have been "naughty" and installed things by hand, you can give the manual ones back to autoremove with: sudo apt-mark auto `apt-mark showmanual '^linux-(headers|image|image-extra|cloud-tools|tools)-[0-9]'` [09:28] this is my sisters' machine, so normal upgrades.. I'll give that a go thanks [09:28] tjaalton, i wonder then how they ended up manual, which they i think must be to avoid the new autoremove magic, well unless it is precise or something [09:29] trusty [09:29] that should definatly work correctly (in theory :)) [09:30] yeah, I've seen this elsewhere too [09:35] yeah i think it may well be that we added it in trusty and it did not do anything to grandfather in old kernels or something [12:31] well, looks like on my xenial install only linux-image-extra-* are getting autoremoved [12:54] tjaalton, hrm, cat /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove-kernels [12:54] can you pastebin that [13:00] apw: http://pastebin.com/xggDPuL5 [13:00] I removed them by hand [13:14] tjaalton: purge-old-kernels :D [13:14] oh [13:15] it'll happily remove linux-generic tho [13:15] and other metapackages, and the kernel I haven't booted into yet [13:15] so, seems kinda broken :) [16:48] smb, hi, will there be a 4.4.19 based xenial kernel-ppa-build available this week? === davmor2_ is now known as davmor2 [16:49] ricotz, rather no as that will be part of the next cycle which starts next week [16:52] smb, hmm, I see === sakrecoer is now known as sakrecoer_