[00:50] please accept libreoffice/yakkety, it's needed for Ubuntu GNOME, bug 1592572 (it's more broken than just scrollbars) [00:50] bug 1592572 in Ubuntu GNOME "[gtk320] No horizontal or vertical scroll bars" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1592572 [04:15] jbicha: done [04:26] thanks, now we just need the LO autopkgtests to work… [07:21] hi.. our ISO failed again.. [07:21] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/yakkety/ubuntustudio The ubuntustudio-meta update that fixes this is stuck in yakkety-proposed. Could someone unblock it please? [07:35] Laney, jbicha anyone? [08:05] sakrecoer: hi, I unblocked it for you, you can trigger a rebuild when rmadison shows you it has migrated [08:06] Laney: \o/ [08:07] Laney: it is here right? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/360/builds check the bockes and press the "Update rebuild status".. [08:07] s/bockes/boxes [08:08] oh no... wait.. my eager eyes missed the second line of your chat.. [08:08] at the bottom there is a table which has the title 'Rebuilds' [08:09] do the thing there [08:09] oh, well that's going to fail then :) [08:09] ok.. i canceled the request while waiting for rmadison's signal [08:10] ..sorry... [08:27] Laney: ok.. rmadison isn't a user :D i'm looking at man page, but still pretty lost.. [08:34] sakrecoer, rmadison -a source ubuntustudio-meta [08:34] thanks pitti for the removal :) [08:34] I did some retry for pysam, lets see if I can make it migrate or we have to run against proposed again [08:34] thanks apw ! :) [08:35] sakrecoer, np, you'll see currently two lines for yakkety ... when the 0.160 moves up a line it is published [08:37] apw: awesome! thank you for anticipating my question! :) [08:46] sakrecoer: Although, actually, I think you need to wait for "apt-cache show krita" to stop saying "Task: ubuntustudio-graphics" too [08:46] Which should happen a little bit after the rmadison output changes [08:49] Laney: i can't do that from a xenial install right? i haven't been able to get my hands on a studio yakket iso that wouldn't fail at install yet... [08:50] ..well not since i removed the partition to test 14.04.5 that is... [08:55] You can keep an eye on http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/yakkety/universe/binary-amd64/Packages.xz, as one way to do it [08:55] for example curl -s http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/yakkety/universe/binary-amd64/Packages.xz | xzcat | grep-dctrl -X -FPackage -sPackage,Task krita [08:56] grep-dctrl living in the dctrl-tools package [08:56] (No need to do that more than once every 30 minutes or so) [08:56] Back shortly. [08:56] thank you Laney ! :) [09:03] how can a testsuite run against a package not in Ubuntu? WTH? [09:03] autopkgtest for pbsuite/15.8.24+dfsg-1: amd64: Pass, armhf: Always failed, i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Test in progress, s390x: Always failed [09:04] mmm in proposed :( [11:28] sakrecoer: You could try a rebuild now [11:44] sakrecoer: I triggered it for you [11:45] * Laney crosses fingers and toes and tongue [11:46] :p [11:49] flocculant, Laney oh.. i triggered it at 01.05 pm CEST.. [11:49] thank you guys anyways!!! [11:50] forgot to mention it here, sorry [12:12] flocculant, Laney: once the build is done, shoudl i mark them for testing? [12:24] sakrecoer: It'll happen automatically [12:25] Laney: nice :) thanks!... last minutes now... [12:25] * sakrecoer touches wood [12:52] i386 is build \o/ but amd64 status in launchpad is amibuous... https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/yakkety/ubuntustudio [12:53] says "currently building" but "when complete" states: "28 minutes ago (estimated)" [12:53] ah well... i'm too anxious lol :D [12:54] now!!! "1 minute ago" \o/ [12:55] thank you everyone! flocculant, Laney jbicha and everyone i've been nagging on for this! i'll save the rest of my joy-tears for the release party! :D [13:28] :) [13:29] sakrecoer: don't forget to test them now :p [13:55] jbicha: do you know if there's a ubuntu gnome dev channel? [14:32] flocculant: there's #ubuntu-gnome and there's gnome-devel on ubuntu.slack.com [14:41] Laney: please unblock ubiquity [14:45] okay [14:45] what about libreoffice? [14:46] Laney: well it's an open source office suite compatible to microsoft office is that enough info ;) [14:47] * Laney covers davmor2 in syrup and releases the wasps [14:47] yes, please unblock LO too, I just installed it from -proposed and the -gtk3 version is much better [14:47] ok [14:48] * Sweet5hark doesnt know the topic but looks at davmor2 s statement with suspicion. [14:48] Laney: what I thought that was a fairly accurate description [14:48] (*better than the gtk3 version in regular yakkety at least) [14:48] Sweet5hark: Laney said What about libreoffice [14:48] Sweet5hark: so I answered [14:49] Sweet5hark: I thought it was a pretty good description myself [14:50] Laney: Missing context from before I joined, I'd like to request libreoffice 5.2.0-0ubuntu2 to be on the images to save me from an angry mob on non-english speakers. [14:50] Laney: also I owe you (and a lot of other people) beer. :/ [14:51] Sweet5hark: Yeah, I did it, thanks [14:51] Laney: thank you. [14:51] Maybe someone could tell the flavours they're getting a free respin [14:52] * Laney is crying at gettext [14:54] jbicha: mmk - not that worried tbh, just did some smoketesting for them - no mouse at login screen (kvm) no idea if that's normal *shrug* [14:54] * flocculant laughs at Laney crying [14:56] I want to just say "please just use this .mo file" [14:59] Laney, Nein! [15:00] python has a nice function for this :-) [15:04] Laney, except: [15:04] pass [15:04] ? [15:06] https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/gettext.html#gettext.find [15:06] nice =) [15:07] if only I were using python [15:07] * xnox goes back to encoding yaml, in text, in json [15:07] they wrote their own .mo parser, so the implementation isn't liftable either [15:08] ho hum [15:19] Laney: there [15:19] Laney: there is a libreoffice-dictionaries as well [15:22] Laney: and could you unblock gnome-maps too? the new version is has noticeably less lag [15:24] ok [15:30] Laney: juliank in #ubuntu-devel thinks we should unblock apt as well [15:31] fine [15:31] can that be it please? [15:42] Laney, oh, json is subset of yaml, so i can just encode json in json. Simples =) [15:56] oh right, I need to generate the locales don't I [15:56] there must be a better way than this [16:18] arges: hello, I'd like to ask about the SRU of snap-confine, is there anything required to publish it left? [16:26] zyga: which version? [16:34] arges: I see that 1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.9 now needs to be verified [16:34] whats up with the amd64 buildds ? seems half of them are disabled ? [16:34] arges: there was an earlier version earlier today that had three issues, all verified, I guess that one went in [16:35] (and my last PPA build wants to wait for 30min before starting) [16:35] zyga: yea i accepted 16.04.8, but 16.04.9 just got into proposed today [16:35] arges: understood, so it has to sit there for two days and get verified [16:35] zyga: yup === davmor2_ is now known as davmor2 [16:53] respin going [16:53] apt is held up by autopkgtests [16:53] * ogra taps foot [16:55] (glaring at amd64 on https://launchpad.net/builders ) [17:04] grrr ... now the ETA for starting my build just jumped to 44min ... [17:04] can someone please bump the score on https://launchpad.net/~snappy-dev/+archive/ubuntu/image/+build/10659573 [17:05] ah, back to 9 min ... it seems ot be really unsure :P [17:13] ogra: bumped [17:13] slangasek, thx (i hope it actually builds :) ) ... any idea why the majority of amd64 builders seems disabled ? [17:14] no, you'd have to ask lp team [17:17] "16:51 < Laney> Maybe someone could tell the flavours they're getting a free respin" want me to adress the list about it? anything specific to point at? [17:17] or rather: antyhing specific to communicate... [17:21] ah.. food just landed. i'll be back in an hour. [17:24] ogra: I gather lgw01 has been a bit sad lately. I've kicked off a mass-reset, will see how that goes [17:24] Seems networking-related [17:24] thx !! [17:37] arges: Could you have a look at that whoopsie upload? [17:37] bdmurray: sutre [17:37] sure [17:39] bdmurray: did the yakkety fix go through already? [17:40] for 1616517 [17:40] bug 1616517 [17:40] arges: not yet for bug 1616517, but its just adding strings [17:40] bug 1616517 in whoopsie (Ubuntu Trusty) "whoopsie does not send fields from some package management application crashes" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1616517 [17:40] https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~daisy-pluckers/whoopsie/trunk/revision/680 [17:42] arges: this should help sort out https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/fc13839a8f16399991b1e1907d410c7f161d7fc9 which is the number 1 error at the moment [17:43] bdmurray: ok accepted for trusty [17:43] arges: thanks [19:19] Laney: what was fixed in the recent rebuild? [19:33] * slangasek hrms, wondering why liborcus, libixion, mdds got demoted === sakrecoer is now known as sakrecoer_ [22:00] hey release team. looks like d-i is having trouble with networking. i know server is not participating in beta 1, but this affects them, too. any chance we can get this fixed for beta 1? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1616400 [22:00] Launchpad bug 1616400 in debian-installer (Ubuntu) "Lubuntu's alternate i386 installer cannot connect to a network" [Undecided,Confirmed]