[00:50] <jbicha> please accept libreoffice/yakkety, it's needed for Ubuntu GNOME, bug 1592572 (it's more broken than just scrollbars)
[04:15] <slangasek> jbicha: done
[04:26] <jbicha> thanks, now we just need the LO autopkgtests to work…
[07:21] <sakrecoer> hi.. our ISO failed again..
[07:21] <sakrecoer> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/yakkety/ubuntustudio The ubuntustudio-meta update that fixes this is stuck in yakkety-proposed. Could someone unblock it please?
[07:35] <sakrecoer> Laney, jbicha anyone?
[08:05] <Laney> sakrecoer: hi, I unblocked it for you, you can trigger a rebuild when rmadison shows you it has migrated
[08:06] <sakrecoer> Laney: \o/
[08:07] <sakrecoer> Laney: it is here right? http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/360/builds check the bockes and press the "Update rebuild status"..
[08:07] <sakrecoer> s/bockes/boxes
[08:08] <sakrecoer> oh no... wait.. my eager eyes missed the second line of your chat..
[08:08] <Laney> at the bottom there is a table which has the title 'Rebuilds'
[08:09] <Laney> do the thing there
[08:09] <Laney> oh, well that's going to fail then :)
[08:09] <sakrecoer> ok.. i canceled the request while waiting for rmadison's signal
[08:10] <sakrecoer> ..sorry...
[08:27] <sakrecoer> Laney: ok.. rmadison isn't a user :D i'm looking at man page, but still pretty lost..
[08:34] <apw> sakrecoer, rmadison -a source ubuntustudio-meta
[08:34] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks pitti for the removal :)
[08:34] <LocutusOfBorg> I did some retry for pysam, lets see if I can make it migrate or we have to run against proposed again
[08:34] <sakrecoer> thanks apw ! :)
[08:35] <apw> sakrecoer, np, you'll see currently two lines for yakkety ... when the 0.160 moves up a line it is published
[08:37] <sakrecoer> apw: awesome! thank you for anticipating my question! :)
[08:46] <Laney> sakrecoer: Although, actually, I think you need to wait for "apt-cache show krita" to stop saying "Task: ubuntustudio-graphics" too
[08:46] <Laney> Which should happen a little bit after the rmadison output changes
[08:49] <sakrecoer> Laney: i can't do that from a xenial install right? i haven't been able to get my hands on a studio yakket iso that wouldn't fail at install yet...
[08:50] <sakrecoer> ..well not since i removed the partition to test 14.04.5 that is...
[08:55] <Laney> You can keep an eye on http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/yakkety/universe/binary-amd64/Packages.xz, as one way to do it
[08:55] <Laney> for example curl -s http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/yakkety/universe/binary-amd64/Packages.xz | xzcat | grep-dctrl -X -FPackage -sPackage,Task krita
[08:56] <Laney> grep-dctrl living in the dctrl-tools package
[08:56] <Laney> (No need to do that more than once every 30 minutes or so)
[08:56] <Laney> Back shortly.
[08:56] <sakrecoer> thank you Laney ! :)
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> how can a testsuite run against a package not in Ubuntu? WTH?
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> autopkgtest for pbsuite/15.8.24+dfsg-1: amd64: Pass, armhf: Always failed, i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Test in progress, s390x: Always failed
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm in proposed :(
[11:28] <Laney> sakrecoer: You could try a rebuild now
[11:44] <flocculant> sakrecoer: I triggered it for you
[11:45]  * Laney crosses fingers and toes and tongue
[11:46] <flocculant> :p
[11:49] <sakrecoer> flocculant, Laney oh.. i triggered it at 01.05 pm CEST..
[11:49] <sakrecoer> thank you guys anyways!!!
[11:50] <sakrecoer> forgot to mention it here, sorry
[12:12] <sakrecoer> flocculant, Laney: once the build is done, shoudl i mark them for testing?
[12:24] <Laney> sakrecoer: It'll happen automatically
[12:25] <sakrecoer> Laney: nice :) thanks!... last minutes now...
[12:25]  * sakrecoer touches wood
[12:52] <sakrecoer> i386 is build \o/ but amd64 status in launchpad is amibuous... https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/yakkety/ubuntustudio
[12:53] <sakrecoer> says "currently building" but "when complete" states: "28 minutes ago (estimated)"
[12:53] <sakrecoer> ah well... i'm too anxious lol :D
[12:54] <sakrecoer> now!!! "1 minute ago" \o/
[12:55] <sakrecoer> thank you everyone! flocculant, Laney jbicha and everyone i've been nagging on for this! i'll save the rest of my joy-tears for the release party! :D
[13:28] <flocculant> :)
[13:29] <flocculant> sakrecoer: don't forget to test them now :p
[13:55] <flocculant> jbicha: do you know if there's a ubuntu gnome dev channel?
[14:32] <jbicha> flocculant: there's #ubuntu-gnome and there's gnome-devel on ubuntu.slack.com
[14:41] <jbicha> Laney: please unblock ubiquity
[14:45] <Laney> okay
[14:45] <Laney> what about libreoffice?
[14:46] <davmor2> Laney: well it's an open source office suite compatible to microsoft office is that enough info ;)
[14:47]  * Laney covers davmor2 in syrup and releases the wasps
[14:47] <jbicha> yes, please unblock LO too, I just installed it from -proposed and the -gtk3 version is much better
[14:47] <Laney> ok
[14:48]  * Sweet5hark doesnt know the topic but looks at davmor2 s statement with suspicion.
[14:48] <davmor2> Laney: what I thought that was a fairly accurate description
[14:48] <jbicha> (*better than the gtk3 version in regular yakkety at least)
[14:48] <davmor2> Sweet5hark: Laney said What about libreoffice
[14:48] <davmor2> Sweet5hark: so I answered
[14:49] <davmor2> Sweet5hark: I thought it was a pretty good description myself
[14:50] <Sweet5hark> Laney: Missing context from before I joined, I'd like to request libreoffice 5.2.0-0ubuntu2 to be on the images to save me from an angry mob on non-english speakers.
[14:50] <Sweet5hark> Laney: also I owe you (and a lot of other people) beer. :/
[14:51] <Laney> Sweet5hark: Yeah, I did it, thanks
[14:51] <Sweet5hark> Laney: thank you.
[14:51] <Laney> Maybe someone could tell the flavours they're getting a free respin
[14:52]  * Laney is crying at gettext
[14:54] <flocculant> jbicha: mmk - not that worried tbh, just did some smoketesting for them - no mouse at login screen (kvm) no idea if that's normal  *shrug*
[14:54]  * flocculant laughs at Laney crying
[14:56] <Laney> I want to just say "please just use this .mo file"
[14:59] <xnox> Laney, Nein!
[15:00] <Laney> python has a nice function for this :-)
[15:04] <xnox> Laney, except:
[15:04] <xnox>          pass
[15:04] <xnox> ?
[15:06] <Laney> https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/gettext.html#gettext.find
[15:06] <xnox> nice =)
[15:07] <Laney> if only I were using python
[15:07]  * xnox goes back to encoding yaml, in text, in json
[15:07] <Laney> they wrote their own .mo parser, so the implementation isn't liftable either
[15:08] <Laney> ho hum
[15:19] <ginggs_> Laney: there
[15:19] <ginggs_> Laney: there is a libreoffice-dictionaries as well
[15:22] <jbicha> Laney: and could you unblock gnome-maps too? the new version is has noticeably less lag
[15:24] <Laney> ok
[15:30] <jbicha> Laney: juliank in #ubuntu-devel thinks we should unblock apt as well
[15:31] <Laney> fine
[15:31] <Laney> can that be it please?
[15:42] <xnox> Laney, oh, json is subset of yaml, so i can just encode json in json. Simples =)
[15:56] <Laney> oh right, I need to generate the locales don't I
[15:56] <Laney> there must be a better way than this
[16:18] <zyga> arges: hello, I'd like to ask about the SRU of snap-confine, is there anything required to publish it left?
[16:26] <arges> zyga: which version?
[16:34] <zyga> arges: I see that 1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.9 now needs to be verified
[16:34] <ogra> whats up with the amd64 buildds ? seems half of them are disabled ?
[16:34] <zyga> arges: there was an earlier version earlier today that had three issues, all verified, I guess that one went in
[16:35] <ogra> (and my last PPA build wants to wait for 30min before starting)
[16:35] <arges> zyga: yea i accepted 16.04.8, but 16.04.9 just got into proposed today
[16:35] <zyga> arges: understood, so it has to sit there for two days and get verified
[16:35] <arges> zyga: yup
[16:53] <Laney> respin going
[16:53] <Laney> apt is held up by autopkgtests
[16:53]  * ogra taps foot
[16:55] <ogra> (glaring at amd64 on https://launchpad.net/builders )
[17:04] <ogra> grrr ... now the ETA for starting my build just jumped to 44min ...
[17:04] <ogra> can someone please bump the score on https://launchpad.net/~snappy-dev/+archive/ubuntu/image/+build/10659573
[17:05] <ogra> ah, back to 9 min ... it seems ot be really unsure :P
[17:13] <slangasek> ogra: bumped
[17:13] <ogra> slangasek, thx (i hope it actually builds :) )  ... any idea why the majority of amd64 builders seems disabled ?
[17:14] <slangasek> no, you'd have to ask lp team
[17:17] <sakrecoer> "16:51 < Laney> Maybe someone could tell the flavours they're getting a free respin" want me to adress the list about it? anything specific to point at?
[17:17] <sakrecoer> or rather: antyhing specific to communicate...
[17:21] <sakrecoer> ah.. food just landed. i'll be back in an hour.
[17:24] <cjwatson> ogra: I gather lgw01 has been a bit sad lately.  I've kicked off a mass-reset, will see how that goes
[17:24] <cjwatson> Seems networking-related
[17:24] <ogra> thx !!
[17:37] <bdmurray> arges: Could you have a look at that whoopsie upload?
[17:37] <arges> bdmurray: sutre
[17:37] <arges> sure
[17:39] <arges> bdmurray: did the yakkety fix go through already?
[17:40] <arges> for 1616517
[17:40] <arges> bug 1616517
[17:40] <bdmurray> arges: not yet for bug 1616517, but its just adding strings
[17:40] <bdmurray> https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~daisy-pluckers/whoopsie/trunk/revision/680
[17:42] <bdmurray> arges: this should help sort out https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/fc13839a8f16399991b1e1907d410c7f161d7fc9 which is the number 1 error at the moment
[17:43] <arges> bdmurray: ok accepted for trusty
[17:43] <bdmurray> arges: thanks
[19:19] <tsimonq2> Laney: what was fixed in the recent rebuild?
[19:33]  * slangasek hrms, wondering why liborcus, libixion, mdds got demoted
[22:00] <wxl> hey release team. looks like d-i is having trouble with networking. i know server is not participating in beta 1, but this affects them, too. any chance we can get this fixed for beta 1? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1616400