[00:22] <jbicha> hmm, kactivities shows up on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/nbs.html
[00:25] <jbicha> ok I asked for it to be removed
[00:25] <acheronuk> jbicha: okular was one culprit I think as it had an optional build depend on kactivities. merged in debian git to ours the other day but needs an applications update
[05:36] <jbicha> the kactivities binary has been removed, do you want to try an iso rebuild?
[05:37] <jbicha> it looks like the automatic daily iso build for Kubuntu isn't working? https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/yakkety/kubuntu
[06:49] <acheronuk> still on the iso then....
[06:49] <acheronuk> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[06:49] <acheronuk>  kactivitymanagerd : Breaks: kactivities (< 5.20~) but 5.18.0-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
[06:49] <acheronuk>  plasma-desktop : Breaks: kactivities (< 5.21) but 5.18.0-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
[06:49] <acheronuk>  plasma-desktop-data : Breaks: kactivities (< 5.21) but 5.18.0-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
[06:49] <acheronuk> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
[07:23] <acheronuk> oh, those iso build logs are from a few days ago, before yofl dropped the recommends and and okular from the seeds
[07:35] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: is there a way that I could disable the password prompt when debsign runs?
[07:36] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: wanting to still sign it with your key though?
[07:36] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: yeah
[07:37] <acheronuk> gpg-agent set with a long timeout then
[07:37] <tsimonq2> because don't I need to do that to upload to a PPA?
[07:37] <tsimonq2> how do I do that?
[07:38] <acheronuk> 'use-agent' in gpg.conf
[07:39] <acheronuk> and a long 'default-cache-ttl' & 'max-cache-ttl' in gpg-agent.conf
[07:40] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: where are those files?
[07:40] <acheronuk> then it will ask you once, then not on subsequent signinng withing the timeout
[07:40] <tsimonq2> OH cool! :D
[07:40] <tsimonq2> VERY useful
[07:40] <acheronuk> in you ~/.gnupg/ folder
[07:40] <tsimonq2> ok
[07:41] <tsimonq2> what do you have your values set at?
[07:41] <acheronuk> you might need something in your bashrc as well
[07:42] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: what? :)
[07:43] <acheronuk> might need http://paste.ubuntu.com/23096560/
[07:44] <tsimonq2> ok cool
[07:44] <acheronuk> when I was trying to set it up, it wouldn't connect to the agent until I found that on google and added it to bashrc
[07:46] <tsimonq2> oh ok
[07:46] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: uploading things to the PPA, FTBFS? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/281216883/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-amd64.qttools-opensource-src_5.7.0-1~yakkety1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[07:46]  * tsimonq2 scratches his head
[07:46] <tsimonq2> oh that's right
[07:46] <tsimonq2> I might just be stupid :P
[07:47] <tsimonq2> ah nvm
[07:47] <tsimonq2> that's righht
[07:47] <tsimonq2> I'm stupid :P
[07:48] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: so with Qt 5.7 we're at the point that we're almost ready for second iteration
[07:48] <tsimonq2> I want to learn, so I'd be great if I can finish up after sleeping :)
[07:49] <tsimonq2> but could you please rebuild qtquickcontrols-opensource-src after qtgraphicaleffects-opensource-src is published?
[07:49] <tsimonq2> it's a dep thing
[07:49] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: ^
[07:49] <acheronuk> ok
[07:49] <tsimonq2> otherwise we wait! \o/
[07:49] <acheronuk> I will prod the rebuild
[07:50] <tsimonq2> alright, night :)
[07:50] <acheronuk> night 
[08:43] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-52681
[11:44] <BluesKaj> Hiyas all
[14:45] <clivejo> what package contains this file - KF5CompactDiscConfig.cmake?
 I could see K3b having that or amarok
[14:57] <ahoneybun> heyo clem_l
[14:58] <clem_l> hi ahoneybun 
[14:59] <ahoneybun> clem from linux mint right?
[15:00] <clem_l> yes :)
[15:00] <ahoneybun> thanks for coming in :)
[15:00] <clem_l> you're welcome, thanks for reaching out to us
[15:00] <clem_l> I can't stay long, I need to go to town but I'll be here in this channel all week
[15:01] <ahoneybun> thanks a ton for popping in
[15:01] <clem_l> I commented on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1615799
[15:01] <ahoneybun> one of our users has started the port: https://code.launchpad.net/~blaze/+junk/ubiquity
[15:02] <ahoneybun> but I know a lot of Mint tools are in python so you might have a  lot of info about it
[15:02] <clem_l> we use python a lot, but not Qt
[15:02] <clem_l> I was wondering if you could tap into webkit via gir though
[15:02] <ahoneybun> gtk?
[15:03] <ahoneybun> all the other flavors use it and we are the only one who use qt for it
[15:04] <clem_l> well we usually use gi from python/gtk projects yes, I didn't realize it was tied to gtk though
[15:04] <clem_l> I'm not sure it's possible
[15:04] <ahoneybun> I think the main issue is a lot of the jobs from QtGui got moved to QtWidgets in PyQt5 
[15:04] <ahoneybun> I don't think it would be 'tied' to it
[15:05] <clem_l> gir1.2-webkit-3.0 might only provide GTKWebkit though
[15:05] <ahoneybun> hopefully blaze will be around
[15:05] <ahoneybun> I don't know how well gtk and qt mix in that way
[15:05] <ahoneybun> I know they work fine on the desktop with apps
[15:06] <clem_l> I'm not entirely sure, but assuming gi worked from python/qt
[15:06] <clem_l> it looks like the webkit gir only gives you GTK classes
[15:07] <clem_l> what I'm trying to say is: I think my idea isn't a good one :)
[15:07] <ahoneybun> I think at that point you might as well force the installer to take the gtk_ui.py over the kde one
[15:07] <ahoneybun> it's still an idea though
[15:08] <clem_l> on our side we're not impacted, I think the issue starts with 16.10?
[15:08] <ahoneybun> I know qtwebkit gets dropped in yakkety for sure
[15:09] <clem_l> from past experience I remember issues when using the GTK ubiquity frontend with the KDE edition though
[15:09] <ahoneybun> I think clivejo said it was in xenial as well
[15:09] <ahoneybun> not sure
[15:09] <clem_l> I can't remember where, but there were places which assumed certain things depending on the frontend being used
[15:09] <ahoneybun> when I tried porting it, it failed to load the UI anymore
[15:10] <ahoneybun> and Ubiquity stoped loading up at all lol
[15:10] <clem_l> but you released 16.04 already and the slideshow worked there
[15:10] <clem_l> same thing for us with 18 BETA, it renders ok
[15:10] <ahoneybun> but the point releases maybe?
[15:10] <clem_l> I don't think so
[15:11] <clem_l> we actually rebased for the KDE edition
[15:11] <ahoneybun> Neon?
[15:11] <acheronuk> it's because debian dropped support for webkit in their pyqt4
[15:11] <ahoneybun> thanks acheronuk
[15:11] <acheronuk> and that pacakage got synced to yakkety
[15:11] <clem_l> no, I mean up to date xenial, as opposed to what it was months ago
[15:11] <ahoneybun> so xenial is fine?
[15:12] <acheronuk> so it's ONLY yakkety so far that has the problem, as will probably not impact xenial
[15:12] <clem_l> ok
[15:12] <acheronuk> yes, xenial is ok
[15:13] <acheronuk> pyqt still has webkit support, so ideally the whole kde front end to the install should be ported to that
[15:13] <acheronuk> *pyqt5 I mean
[15:13] <ahoneybun> PyQt5?
[15:13] <ahoneybun> right
[15:13] <clem_l> will debian keep support there?
[15:13] <clem_l> what was the reason to drop it in pyqt4?
[15:14] <acheronuk> ScottK: do you know the reason for webkit being dropped in pyqt4?
[15:15]  * ahoneybun tries to find coffee
[15:15] <clem_l> ah there we go https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830903
[15:16] <clem_l> Scott actually answers at the bottom
[15:16] <acheronuk> "It was removed intentionally because QtWebKit 4.x is dead upstream"
[15:16] <clem_l> so -> PyQt5 it is then :)
[15:17] <acheronuk> I did find a script the other day, but no idea if it works.
[15:17] <clem_l> a migration script?
[15:17] <acheronuk> conversion script -> https://github.com/rferrazz/pyqt4topyqt5
[15:19] <clem_l> I've got to go ahoneybun, I'll be here in the coming days if you need me though
[15:19] <clem_l> I'm not good with Qt but I can help with python if needs be
[15:19] <acheronuk> worked on by animation devs at Walt Disney no less https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/vfx-platform-discuss/LzGEKXdXp6w
 Thanks clem_l
[15:23] <lisandro> sitter: just applied your qttools's patch. Thanks for the bug+patch!
[16:15] <BluesKaj> it seems network manager isn't seeing the NIC on YY Beta 1
[17:16] <blaze> hi
 heyo blaze
[17:20] <BluesKaj> hi blaze ahoneybun 
[17:20] <BluesKaj> sure has been quiet in here since the freeze
[17:46] <acheronuk> BluesKaj: seems that way :/
[17:52] <BluesKaj> Yakkety Beta 1 network manager does't see the NIC/etherenet card here 
[17:56] <BluesKaj> have to use the termianl to connect like I used to before I started using a vpn. Now I'm thinking I no longer need NM since I figured out how to connect to my vpn server via the cli
[19:20] <clivejo> ahoneybun: did you test the code blaze posted?
 I don't see a way to
[19:21] <clivejo> build it and create an iso, run the iso and test it?
 You say it like it is easy
 I have not made a iso before
 I just used a daily image before
[19:22] <clivejo> though thats how you were testing your code?
 Plus was not sure if he was finished
 It just said init
[19:23] <clivejo> he needs feedback
 I was not told that
[19:26] <ahoneybun> crap I forgot that command to get some files it needs
[19:29] <ahoneybun> he needs to remove PyQt5.GtGui when it is not used
[19:29] <ahoneybun> blaze: ^
[19:30] <blaze> yeah, I know
[19:31] <ahoneybun> doing that now to try to build it local then have LP do the rest
[19:32] <ahoneybun> oh right that PEP errors....
[19:33] <ahoneybun> ubiquity/frontend/kde_ui.py:205:51: E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
[19:33] <ahoneybun> I fixed those in my copy
[19:36] <ahoneybun> building source
[19:43] <acheronuk> are you fixing just the slideshow, or porting the whole kde_ui.py pyqt5 as well?
[19:43] <acheronuk> *to pyqt5
[19:43] <ahoneybun> well the kde_ui loads the slideshow 
[19:45] <ahoneybun> I like how all the test scripts are broken
[19:46] <acheronuk> I know. I just recalled at one point you were trying to avoid porting more that strictly necessary to get that launch to work. i.e. leave the majority of it qt4
[19:47] <ahoneybun> well there is a 'def _create_webview
[19:47] <ahoneybun> so I'm guessing that is the sldeshow part
[19:47] <ahoneybun> well the start of it
[19:47] <ahoneybun> then 'def start_slideshow'
[19:48] <ahoneybun> 12 errors and they are all "ImportError: No module named 'ubiquity'"
[19:55] <ahoneybun> blaze: did you make those changes with a script then?
[19:56] <ahoneybun> since QtGui was still in there
[19:56] <acheronuk> clivejo: where are the iso build scripts?
[19:56] <ahoneybun> now to wait on LP to build
[20:07]  * acheronuk contemplates a glass or 3 of Jack Daniels
[20:08] <clivejo> wish I could too
[20:26] <blaze> ahoneybun: have you seen the full diff?
[20:26] <ahoneybun> no I have not
[20:26] <ahoneybun> yakkety iso seems to be missing  python3-pyqt5.qtwebkit
[20:33] <tsimonq2> $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:yakkety
[20:33] <tsimonq2> Creating master-kid
[20:33] <tsimonq2> Starting master-kid
[20:33] <tsimonq2> HAH
[20:35] <ahoneybun> why is my internet crap in the VM...
[20:35] <ahoneybun> or in general it seems
[20:35] <ahoneybun> even GPM is skipping
[20:37] <blaze> virtualbox with kvm or just kvm?
[20:37] <blaze> switching network on and off in virtualbox can help
 Its all over the place
[21:15] <ScottK> acheronuk: We'e removing Qt4 QtWebKit from Debian before the next Debian release.  Dropping it from PyQt4 is part of that.
 Do we have any plans to package kdevelop 5?
 User on g+ asked
 I know about that
 your welcome to start it Marcin
 Neos has it so maybe we grab it somehow?
 *Neon
 "we" ?
 Kubuntu community :)
 right...
 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided looks like it may be getting a Linux
 If that is true I will by PC for it :0
[21:44] <clivejo> !info kdevelop
[21:46] <ahoneybun> I've gotten the same error as before 
[21:46] <ahoneybun> acheronuk: ^
[21:47] <ahoneybun> AttributeError: No frontend available; tried kde_ui
[21:53] <acheronuk> :( Maybe I'll take a look sometime if it remains stuck, but I very much doubt I would get very far with it.
[21:53] <ahoneybun> it's for sure something I did
[21:53] <ahoneybun> as Ubiquity laucnhed before with a base iso
[21:54] <ahoneybun> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23099622