hikiko | hi | 04:47 |
---|---|---|
pitti | Good morning | 06:09 |
=== dgadomski_ is now known as dgadomski | ||
willcooke | pip pip | 07:59 |
RAOF | Tally ho! | 08:01 |
Laney | COME ON BARBIE LET'S GO PARTY | 08:03 |
willcooke | :D | 08:04 |
seb128 | hey willcooke Laney RAOF | 08:14 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|AFK | ||
willcooke | morning seb128 | 08:15 |
pitti | hey Laney! | 08:19 |
pitti | bonjour seb128 | 08:19 |
pitti | hello willcooke | 08:19 |
seb128 | salut pitti, ça va ? | 08:19 |
pitti | seb128: ça va bien, merci ! et toi ? | 08:20 |
seb128 | pitti, ça va bien aussi merci ! | 08:20 |
Laney | hi seb128 pitti & willcooke | 08:20 |
Laney | how are you all? | 08:20 |
seb128 | good! you? | 08:21 |
Laney | it's september | 08:21 |
Laney | back to school | 08:21 |
seb128 | seems so | 08:21 |
seb128 | haha | 08:21 |
Laney | do they have that in france? | 08:21 |
Laney | 6 week summer holiday | 08:21 |
seb128 | I think it's more than that | 08:26 |
Laney | :-o | 08:26 |
seb128 | it starts like on july 8th | 08:27 |
seb128 | and resume on septembre 1st | 08:27 |
Laney | we should have that | 08:27 |
* Laney emails some people to get it arranged | 08:27 | |
seb128 | :-) | 08:28 |
seb128 | k, need to reboot | 08:28 |
seb128 | why is intel becoming so crappy :-/ | 08:28 |
Laney | :( | 08:29 |
seb128 | better | 08:30 |
seb128 | that laptop used to work perfectly fine in trusty times :-/ | 08:31 |
seb128 | now on xenial I can't switch to a vt | 08:31 |
seb128 | they are missing to start with (systemd issue?) | 08:31 |
seb128 | then when I switch back to my session I get corruption and missing textures | 08:31 |
seb128 | like launchpad icons are empty | 08:31 |
seb128 | icons are missing in random gtk uis etc | 08:31 |
seb128 | ups | 08:31 |
seb128 | launchpad->unity launcher | 08:31 |
Laney | is there an upstream bug? | 08:33 |
Laney | if not maybe tjaalt_on could help you file one | 08:33 |
seb128 | there is https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88584 open since 2015-01 with a stack of users from different distro commenting | 08:35 |
ubot5 | Freedesktop bug 88584 in Driver/intel "[ilk] Font and screen corruption in GTK+ applications" [Major,New] | 08:35 |
seb128 | but no upstream traction :-/ | 08:35 |
seb128 | the missing vt prompts is newer though | 08:37 |
seb128 | so likely another issue but I don't even know where to start to determine if that's systemd or something else | 08:38 |
seb128 | I guess I could try to switch back to upstart to compare | 08:38 |
seb128 | that upstream bug has a patch attached since april but that's not getting reviewed ... | 08:40 |
seb128 | tjaalton, ^ do you know anything you could nudge about getting it reviewed maybe? | 08:40 |
tjaalton | seb128: distros are moving away from -intel | 08:47 |
seb128 | shrug | 08:47 |
seb128 | that feels like standard answer nowadays | 08:47 |
seb128 | "the code you are using is being replaced, get the new stuff when you can, meanwhile sucks to be you" | 08:48 |
tjaalton | there hasn't been even a snapshot release in almost two years | 08:48 |
seb128 | :-( | 08:49 |
tjaalton | everyone running a random git snapshot instead | 08:49 |
seb128 | is there still a company who cares about their users? | 08:49 |
tjaalton | until recently | 08:49 |
tjaalton | they do, just not on -intel | 08:49 |
tjaalton | which is a one-man show | 08:50 |
seb128 | that's ridiculous | 08:50 |
tjaalton | not really | 08:50 |
tjaalton | they're testing everything on modesetting now | 08:50 |
Trevinho | Hello | 08:50 |
seb128 | right, still reality is most of their linux users are on -intel | 08:51 |
tjaalton | for a while | 08:51 |
seb128 | it's like Apple saying that they stop supporting iphone < 7 next weeks | 08:51 |
seb128 | see how it would fly with people who just bought a 6 | 08:51 |
seb128 | anyway | 08:51 |
seb128 | bottom line is that I'm going to be stucked with non working video driver if I understand correctly? | 08:52 |
tjaalton | with iphone there are no options | 08:52 |
seb128 | I wonder if I should buy ati or nvidia for my next laptop | 08:53 |
tjaalton | are you on xenial? | 08:53 |
seb128 | yes | 08:53 |
tjaalton | so try modesetting | 08:53 |
tjaalton | uninstall intel | 08:53 |
seb128 | I'm not "trying" anything | 08:53 |
tjaalton | easiest way | 08:53 |
tjaalton | then don't | 08:53 |
seb128 | I'm using whatever we ship to our users | 08:53 |
tjaalton | 16.04.2 users will get modesetting | 08:53 |
seb128 | it's not a solution to ship a non working driver by default and tell technical enough users to go install something else and let normal user stucked on buggy software | 08:54 |
tjaalton | and newer | 08:54 |
seb128 | k | 08:54 |
seb128 | so I'm waiting for that ;-) | 08:54 |
tjaalton | sounds like it's not a critical issue then :) | 08:54 |
seb128 | well it's really annoying | 08:55 |
seb128 | but it's too easy to do hacks and forget about our users | 08:55 |
seb128 | I'm not doing that, I'm not hacking my box and claiming it's fixed/not an issue | 08:55 |
tjaalton | so is there a lp bug? | 08:55 |
seb128 | sure | 08:56 |
seb128 | bug #1573959 for example | 08:57 |
ubot5 | bug 1573959 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "On-screen text disappears after suspend" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1573959 | 08:57 |
tjaalton | how is that related? | 08:57 |
tjaalton | I know there are bugs | 08:57 |
seb128 | related to what? | 08:58 |
tjaalton | to ilk screen corruption | 08:58 |
seb128 | I don't know | 08:58 |
=== Saviq_ is now known as Saviq | ||
seb128 | there is a bug but my awesome bar doesn't seem to have it | 08:58 |
seb128 | tjaalton, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/freedesktop-bugs/88584 | 09:01 |
ubot5 | Error: Could not gather data from Launchpad for bug #88584 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/88584). The error has been logged | 09:02 |
seb128 | some of those are probably different issues | 09:02 |
seb128 | but there is a class of similar user visible problems | 09:02 |
tjaalton | it's been like that in every release | 09:04 |
tjaalton | just for different set of users | 09:04 |
seb128 | :-/ | 09:05 |
seb128 | well when I try to vt switch I get those | 09:05 |
seb128 | Sep 1 11:04:24 localhost kernel: [ 2112.025344] dell_wmi: Unknown WMI event type 0x11: 0xffd1 | 09:05 |
seb128 | Sep 1 11:04:29 localhost kernel: [ 2117.261620] [drm] stuck on render ring | 09:05 |
seb128 | Sep 1 11:04:29 localhost kernel: [ 2117.268160] [drm] GPU HANG: ecode 5:0:0x87e6fff8, in Xorg [2190], reason: Ring hung, action: reset | 09:05 |
tjaalton | that's kernel or mera | 09:05 |
tjaalton | mesa | 09:06 |
seb128 | k, so modesettings is not going to help? | 09:06 |
tjaalton | no | 09:06 |
seb128 | :-/ | 09:06 |
seb128 | seems similar to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94002 | 09:07 |
ubot5 | Freedesktop bug 94002 in DRM/Intel "[drm] GPU HANG: ecode 9:0:0x85dfbfff, in firefox [881], reason: Ring hung, action: reset" [Major,New] | 09:07 |
tjaalton | you have skylake? | 09:08 |
seb128 | "Intel® Ironlake Mobile x86/MMX/SSE2" | 09:09 |
tjaalton | not that then | 09:09 |
seb128 | https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93311 then | 09:10 |
ubot5 | Freedesktop bug 93311 in DRM/Intel "[drm] GPU HANG: ecode 5:1:0x01000000, reason: Ring hung, action: reset after resume from hibernate" [Normal,New] | 09:10 |
tjaalton | dunno | 09:11 |
tjaalton | try latest kernel, and if it goes away start bisecting ;) | 09:12 |
seb128 | haha | 09:12 |
tjaalton | or ignore it | 09:12 |
seb128 | well, I would like to get some vt back | 09:12 |
seb128 | and being able to switch session without having to reboot after | 09:12 |
tjaalton | you're asking too much ;) | 09:13 |
seb128 | I'm going to end up being one of those people buying a mac | 09:13 |
seb128 | or installing win10 and using the ubuntu command line there | 09:13 |
seb128 | :-( | 09:13 |
tjaalton | that's a solid plan | 09:13 |
seb128 | wtf intel really | 09:13 |
seb128 | I wonder if nvidia or ati is any better | 09:14 |
tjaalton | none of my friends run linux anymore | 09:14 |
seb128 | :-( | 09:14 |
tjaalton | just the way it is | 09:14 |
seb128 | it's sad | 09:14 |
tjaalton | not that the desktop is much better | 09:14 |
tjaalton | sorry :) | 09:14 |
seb128 | no your fault | 09:15 |
seb128 | tjaalton, thanks and sorry for the ranting | 09:15 |
* larsu cheers seb128 up | 09:16 | |
tjaalton | it's getting better even on the intel side | 09:16 |
seb128 | anyway let's reboot and try that i915.enable_rc6=0 in case that makes a difference | 09:16 |
seb128 | hey larsu ;-) | 09:16 |
seb128 | brb | 09:16 |
Trevinho | Laney: hey.... So, i was wondering: is there a way to figure if systemd is running in the session or not? | 09:17 |
Trevinho | cause we've some upstart stuff running which I'd like to disable | 09:18 |
Trevinho | in that case | 09:18 |
Laney | yeeeessssssssss | 09:18 |
Laney | let me try to remember what the way we used elsewhere is | 09:18 |
Trevinho | as upstart has an env var... I don't see much in systemd | 09:18 |
Laney | I think it's [ -d "${XDG_RUNTIME_DIR}/systemd" ] | 09:18 |
Laney | pitti: ^? | 09:18 |
Trevinho | m | 09:19 |
pitti | define "in the session' | 09:19 |
pitti | what's easy is "running for current user" | 09:19 |
Trevinho | pitti: user session | 09:19 |
Trevinho | yeah | 09:19 |
pitti | which is by and large a constant "yes" | 09:19 |
larsu | [ /bin/true ] | 09:20 |
seb128 | better | 09:20 |
pitti | what Laney said (${XDG_RUNTIME_DIR}/systemd) | 09:20 |
Trevinho | of course there would be also a systemd dbus proxy.... which... we use, but | 09:20 |
larsu | hi everyone! | 09:20 |
seb128 | I've vts back | 09:20 |
Trevinho | ok thanks | 09:20 |
Trevinho | hi larsu | 09:20 |
seb128 | and no gpu hang on vt switch | 09:20 |
Laney | or if you care about whether you are running, then ask systemd over dbus | 09:20 |
Laney | hey larsu! | 09:20 |
pitti | Trevinho: but "is it being used to bring up the session", we are currently in the middle of that -- it brings up half of the session | 09:20 |
larsu | seb128: but... that't not the linux experience™ | 09:20 |
seb128 | tjaalton, i915.enable_rc6=0 ftw :p | 09:20 |
pitti | Trevinho: what's the actual concrete question that you want to answer? | 09:20 |
Laney | seb128: you hacked your laptop! | 09:21 |
tjaalton | seb128: works? | 09:21 |
seb128 | larsu, you are wrong, it's exactly the linux experience | 09:21 |
larsu | haha, indeed | 09:21 |
tjaalton | cool | 09:21 |
seb128 | larsu, get non working crap, need to ressort to command line hacks to get something working | 09:21 |
Trevinho | pitti: i want to understand who has run unity... and so behave consequently | 09:21 |
larsu | seb128: I only saw what you did after I wrote that ;) | 09:21 |
seb128 | Laney, yeah :-( | 09:21 |
Laney | might as well try that other driver if you're going to do that | 09:21 |
pitti | Trevinho: "systemctl --user is-active unity7.service", I'd say (or the equivalent D-Bus call) | 09:21 |
Trevinho | since for the lockscreen we're running a different version of the panel service... And I'd love to decide what method to use to start it... | 09:22 |
seb128 | Laney, except that tjaalton said the driver wouldn't help with gpu hangs that it's kernel | 09:22 |
Laney | larsu: how's it going? | 09:22 |
Laney | O RLY | 09:22 |
larsu | Laney: great! Visiting Faina in Dubai right now :) | 09:23 |
larsu | how are you? | 09:23 |
seb128 | Dubai, fancy! | 09:23 |
Laney | feelin' fine | 09:23 |
Laney | I can see a lot of chemtrails | 09:23 |
larsu | uh oh | 09:23 |
Laney | so probably won't be feeling fine for long | 09:23 |
larsu | watch out | 09:23 |
Laney | reading the documentation for meson too | 09:24 |
* Laney misses jussi | 09:24 | |
Laney | what's dubai like? | 09:24 |
larsu | it was quite popular at GUADEC | 09:24 |
Laney | ya, seems to be getting some attention | 09:25 |
larsu | Laney: I just got here last night and am sitting in a hotel room working | 09:25 |
Laney | want to find out how to build a git submodule and then link that into the outer project | 09:25 |
larsu | Laney: but then, my laptop and phone both still knew the wifi... yeah, it's ok. Hot. Tall buildings. A tad boring | 09:25 |
Laney | might leave this task up to ximion ... | 09:26 |
larsu | did he talk to jussi at guadec? | 09:26 |
Laney | dunno | 09:26 |
Laney | there's a meson file in this project though | 09:26 |
larsu | I saw both of them | 09:26 |
larsu | but I don't know if together | 09:26 |
Laney | you know | 09:27 |
Laney | i've never seen them in the same room at the same time | 09:27 |
larsu | oh! I've never thought about that | 09:27 |
larsu | I've also never seen them type into irc at the same time | 09:27 |
Laney | oh man | 09:27 |
seb128 | jbicha, hey, I fixed versions, it was stucked on an error about diverging branch, did you uncommit/push --overwrite a different version of your most recent commit? | 09:28 |
Laney | https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/wiki/Wrap%20dependency%20system%20manual | 09:28 |
seb128 | jbicha, I forced it back to the current trunk | 09:28 |
Laney | I guess that I should write a meson build file for the other project to make this easy then ... | 09:28 |
seb128 | jbicha, should work on the next cron | 09:28 |
* Laney is being forced to learn too much stuff! | 09:28 | |
larsu | Laney: by the chemtrails? | 09:29 |
Laney | they do look like they spell out "Satoris" | 09:30 |
larsu | haha | 09:30 |
=== alan_g|AFK is now known as alan_g | ||
Trevinho | pitti: there could be still a case where an user disabled systemd in session, and then we want things to work as it used to be in upstart? | 09:55 |
Trevinho | like... disabling the xdg_data dirs not to include the systemd upstart or... | 09:57 |
Trevinho | I don't know... | 09:57 |
pitti | Trevinho: yes, it should work with upstart or just plain gnome-session too, if possible | 09:58 |
Trevinho | mhmh... | 09:58 |
pitti | Trevinho: oh, is that for deciding whether you send an initctl emit or systemctl start for triggering screensaver or similar? | 09:58 |
Trevinho | pitti: ok since I've the situation where I would like to manage things with the proper runnner | 09:58 |
Trevinho | pitti: yes, for example.. | 09:58 |
Trevinho | pitti: or... the unity script | 09:58 |
Trevinho | which right now allows to restar unity manually or with upstart... | 09:59 |
pitti | Trevinho: if you want a cheaper way, you can check /proc/self/cgroup | 09:59 |
Trevinho | in teh case someone started unity manually and wanted to restart it with systemd, the script support starting it... but what should I pick? Upstart or systemd? | 09:59 |
pitti | if "unity7.service" appears in the name=systemd line (or really, anywhere in the file), it's managed inside a unit | 10:00 |
pitti | Trevinho: in that caes, why would that someone not just run systemctl --user start unity7 ? | 10:01 |
Trevinho | mh, not bad... if it's in upstart instead... there's not much other way | 10:01 |
Trevinho | pitti: since there are so many people which use the "unity" script to restart... So, in that case I want to use the proper runner | 10:01 |
Trevinho | pitti: however I think that parsing the XDG dirs for the systemd is enough at script level, isn't it? | 10:01 |
Trevinho | or... that would change eventuall? | 10:01 |
Trevinho | y* | 10:01 |
pitti | Trevinho: if that's just for the script, then performance doesn't matter, and you can certainly use systemctl --is-active? | 10:02 |
pitti | Trevinho: you mean testing for XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/systemd? that's pretty much a constant yes, so that won't tell you much | 10:02 |
pitti | (since vivid) | 10:02 |
Trevinho | pitti: mh ok... So if that is there, then we're sure that the user has enabled systemd in session... and thus we consider it the primary choice... right? | 10:03 |
pitti | Trevinho: so I'd say, start it with systemd if "systemctl --user is-enabled unity7.service", otherwise the old way | 10:03 |
Trevinho | (since unity has support for it) | 10:03 |
pitti | err, wait, we might not explicitly enable it but pull it in via ubuntu-session.service | 10:03 |
Trevinho | yeah, that's the thing :-) | 10:03 |
pitti | Trevinho: can you even stop unity7? I thought you wanted to make it a Requires=, not just a Wants= | 10:03 |
Trevinho | but, well having the xdg dir is enough | 10:03 |
pitti | then, if you stop unity, your entire session will stop | 10:03 |
pitti | (so maybe a Wants= is better after all, if you want to support restarting; and I think it's usually sufficient too) | 10:04 |
Trevinho | pitti: that's not happening on crash, right? | 10:04 |
Trevinho | pitti: yeah, right now it's a requires btw | 10:04 |
pitti | Trevinho: what is "right now"? | 10:04 |
Trevinho | restarting has to be suported, yeah... | 10:04 |
pitti | it's not unit-ified in yakkety, and in our staging git it's a wants | 10:04 |
Trevinho | right now.. means what's I'm landing :) | 10:04 |
pitti | a | 10:04 |
pitti | "ah" | 10:04 |
pitti | Trevinho: so yes, I'd say make it a wants, then you can stop and restart it | 10:05 |
pitti | gnome-session, terminals etc. will continue to run | 10:05 |
pitti | and Restart=on-failure will make it auto-restart on a crash | 10:05 |
Trevinho | I mean, it's fine if it would crash the session on manual crash, but I want it to restart too | 10:05 |
pitti | (while still allowing you to stop it cleanly) | 10:05 |
Trevinho | yeah, I think that's better... people uses to restart unity sometimes... So I'd prefer not to kill the session in that case | 10:06 |
pitti | agreed | 10:06 |
Trevinho | although... it would be nice to crash in case this happens during lockscreen :-) | 10:07 |
Trevinho | but... not sure I can achieve that | 10:07 |
pitti | Trevinho: pretty much the only thing that should be "required" IMHO is gnome-session.service | 10:07 |
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
Trevinho | I mean when unity-screen-locked.target is active, it would be nice that if unity gets killed, the whole session crashes | 10:08 |
pitti | Trevinho: I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but if you mean "kill the session if unity crashes while being locked" -> units can have an OnFailure= action which could check the state and do stuff | 10:08 |
pitti | Trevinho: ah, that can be done | 10:08 |
Trevinho | maybe that needs some more units | 10:08 |
pitti | Trevinho: unity-screen-locked.target Requires=unity7.service, and make graphical-session.target go down if unity-screen-locked.target stops (need to think about how this looks like) | 10:09 |
Trevinho | pitti: ah, good.... I'm understanding how to do the first two parts, less in how to make graphical session go down | 10:10 |
pitti | yeah, the latter is a bit tricky | 10:11 |
pitti | Trevinho: I think what we can do is to make unity-screen-locked.target Requires=Requires=unity7.service and OnFailure=unity-crash.service which Conflicts=graphical-session.target | 10:12 |
pitti | Trevinho: but this needs some experimentatino first, maybe let's land this in a separate step | 10:12 |
Trevinho | pitti: yeah, sure | 10:13 |
Trevinho | unity-screen-locked.target Requires=Requires=unity7.service can still be done now thoug, right? There's no problem with this | 10:13 |
pitti | except the obvious duplicate Requires= :) | 10:13 |
Trevinho | sure | 10:13 |
pitti | Trevinho: yes, I think that's semantically correct by itself | 10:14 |
pitti | if the screen lock is implemented in unity7 | 10:14 |
Trevinho | also wondering if the panel-service in locked mode is a requirements or a wants | 10:14 |
Trevinho | pitti: yeah, it is.. | 10:14 |
Trevinho | or.......... well, sometimes it fallback to gnome screensaver, but this won't affect this side of things | 10:15 |
Sweet5hark1 | hmmm, I wonder "libreoffice-core" has "Breaks: libreoffice-gnome (<< ${binary:Version})" (but no Conflicts: ) and libreoffice-gnome has "Depends: libreoffice-core (= ${binary-Version)". the upgrade failed with "errors encountered while processing libreoffice-gnome", however a follow-up "apt-get upgrade" complains about the relations mentions above, however "apt-get upgrade -f" is fine and upgrades libreoffice-gnome just fine. | 10:56 |
ricotz | Sweet5hark1, there are some things missing on libreoffice-gnome | 10:59 |
=== hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
Sweet5hark1 | term.log just has "will deconfig libreoffice-gnome, would be broken by libreoffice-core", which isnt a problem per se. Id assume adding a "Conflicts: libreoffice-core (<= 1:5.2.0-0ubuntu2)" would help (as would having a C/R: libreoffice-gtk (<= 1:5.2.0-0ubuntu2) instead of << -- but Im still not entirely clear what goes wrong here. | 11:04 |
* Sweet5hark1 grumbles something about libreoffice-core just doing a "break" instead of a C/R with earlier versions of any binary falling out of the libreoffice is just a maintainer circlejerk. there is absolutely no point in ever allowing binaries from different builds on the same system. | 11:13 | |
ricotz | Sweet5hark1, mumbling around is not asking | 11:57 |
ricotz | Sweet5hark1, in case you want to ignore more suggestions https://paste.debian.net/plain/800852 | 11:59 |
Sweet5hark1 | ricotz: im not aware I ignored that, but maybe sending patches by mail is preferable as things get lost on IRC anyway? | 12:06 |
Sweet5hark1 | ricotz: also that patch it pretty useless without context (no line count for patching a 3000? line control file) ... | 12:07 |
ricotz | Sweet5hark1, haven't sent your this, but I guess I was pretty clear regarding the packagekit stuff | 12:08 |
ricotz | in control.in at libreoffice-gnome | 12:08 |
ricotz | I can't provide you a properly authored patch with a packaging repo | 12:09 |
Sweet5hark1 | ricotz: yeah so is the nature of merge conflicts. | 12:14 |
jbicha | seb128: yes, I had a typo in a commit so I rewrote history (for versions) :( | 12:15 |
seb128 | jbicha, k, well that's what make it stop working ... to know for next time, the auto-updater doesn't use --force so it was hitting an error | 12:15 |
ricotz | Sweet5hark1, I didn't argued about the merge conflict | 12:15 |
seb128 | what made it* | 12:16 |
seb128 | it's fixed now | 12:16 |
=== JanC is now known as Guest23252 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
desrt | good morning, team! | 12:54 |
seb128 | hey desrt! | 13:03 |
qengho | Ugh. Updating w->y yesterday was a mistake. | 14:01 |
desrt | lol. | 14:04 |
desrt | at least you're not travelling :) | 14:04 |
seb128 | that's not a supported upgrade path | 14:07 |
seb128 | you should go through xenial | 14:07 |
seb128 | what error did you get? | 14:08 |
seb128 | happyaron, hey, is there any news from those nm/nma updates? | 14:08 |
desrt | that's the nice thing about debian: there are never any upgrades :D | 14:08 |
seb128 | lol | 14:08 |
willcooke | seb128, report from happyaron this morning was that sponsorship should be up today | 14:13 |
qengho | I meant x->y. Sorry. tetex-doc and tetex-math-extra, apt and apt-utils file collisions. libboost-dev depending on nonexistant virtual pkg. libaccount and ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts some problems. some libmedia conflict. | 14:14 |
qengho | Others that scrolled off top of buffer. | 14:14 |
seb128 | urg | 14:15 |
seb128 | did you report those bugs? | 14:15 |
seb128 | willcooke, k, thanks | 14:15 |
seb128 | qengho, willcooke, and what's the status of the new api keys? | 14:15 |
qengho | At the apt failure, I didn't trust state. | 14:15 |
qengho | seb128: I'll see what I can reproduce from /var/log/apt/ | 14:16 |
seb128 | k | 14:16 |
seb128 | bah, intel bug is back, can't see any text, brb | 14:16 |
seb128 | tjaalton, where do I find that new intel driver replacement? | 14:18 |
tjaalton | seb128: what do you mean? it's built with the server | 14:19 |
seb128 | should I just uninstall intel then? | 14:19 |
seb128 | to try it | 14:19 |
tjaalton | just uninstall intel and it'll get used | 14:19 |
seb128 | k | 14:19 |
seb128 | thanks | 14:19 |
tjaalton | in yakkety the server is patched to not load intel except very old gpus | 14:20 |
tjaalton | +on | 14:20 |
seb128 | I'm on xenial | 14:21 |
tjaalton | right, just saying | 14:21 |
mhall119 | willcooke: I just added you to the call, but we're meeting with Saviq and kgunn on https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/michael-hall? | 14:32 |
willcooke | mhall119, erm. k. One moment, I'm in the middle of some stuff | 14:32 |
happyaron | seb128: please have a look at xenial branch of nma for SRU when you have time, :) | 15:39 |
seb128 | happyaron, k, yakkety as well? (that needs to be updated first before a SRU) | 15:40 |
happyaron | yakkety is already uploaded | 15:40 |
happyaron | gotta merge 1.2.4 very soon, though | 15:41 |
seb128 | hum | 15:44 |
seb128 | let me look to git | 15:44 |
seb128 | I though we would go directly for 1.2.4 | 15:44 |
happyaron | ok, then would be next morning | 15:45 |
seb128 | do you think we should not go for the new version directly for some reason? | 15:46 |
seb128 | it's only some more segfault fixes | 15:46 |
seb128 | no other changes | 15:46 |
happyaron | no, just meant 1.2.4 can be done quicker for xenial | 15:47 |
seb128 | I'm asking because you updated git to SRU the previous version | 15:49 |
seb128 | so maybe you prefer that to going to the current one for some reason? | 15:49 |
happyaron | just because it's tested, but I agree 1.2.4 is safe | 15:52 |
happyaron | so updating to it now (looks easy enough | 15:52 |
happyaron | seb128: mind to check again? both x- and y- this time, :) | 16:08 |
seb128 | happyaron, looks good, going to review a bit more before uploading ... can you update the bug tomorrow to link to some of the segfaults in should fix? like a few e.u.c urls maybe as testcase, also need to update the version referenced in the description | 16:11 |
seb128 | no need to do that today, it's already late for you | 16:11 |
seb128 | the SRU team is probably not going to review that today anyway | 16:11 |
happyaron | ok | 16:11 |
seb128 | thanks | 16:12 |
seb128 | happyaron, would be nice to reference some of the bugs in the changelog as well | 16:17 |
mhall119 | is the ubiquity slideshow broken in the 16.10 images? | 16:58 |
mhall119 | I'm installing in a virtualmachine and it's not showing anything | 16:59 |
Laney | indeed | 17:09 |
Laney | it looks like it broke with the new webkit2gtk | 17:09 |
Laney | which jbicha synced, so hopefully he can look | 17:09 |
jbicha | hmm? I lost power from tropical storm hermine | 17:10 |
Laney | slideshow in ubiquity is broken with new webkit | 17:10 |
Laney | you can test it by installing ubiquity and moving the start_slideshow() Gtk.main() block up below self.live_installer_show() in gtk_ui.py and then running 'ubiquity gtk_ui' | 17:11 |
Laney | got to go, see you later | 17:11 |
seb128 | happyaron, uploaded to yakkety after tweaking the changelog to include some bugs references | 17:15 |
willcooke | thanks seb128 happyaron | 17:30 |
willcooke | off now, night all | 17:30 |
xnox | seb128, sil2100, robru - any idea why ubuntu-touch depends on particular python-gnupg? | 17:49 |
xnox | known gnupg 2.1 breaks? | 17:50 |
robru | i have no idea | 17:50 |
sil2100 | xnox: not sure, possibly anyway it's no longer valid | 18:13 |
=== sabdfl_ is now known as sabdfl | ||
chrisccoulson | ricotz, any idea what's going on with https://launchpadlibrarian.net/281964460/buildlog_ubuntu-yakkety-amd64.firefox_50.0~a2~hg20160831r332986-0ubuntu1~umd1_BUILDING.txt.gz ? | 19:20 |
ricotz | chrisccoulson, I would assume the "he" translation contains an invalid string? | 19:29 |
ricotz | chrisccoulson, I would assume the "he" translation contains an invalid string? | 19:32 |
jbicha | desrt: GTK 3.22 is the start of the last stable 3.x series? | 20:34 |
jbicha | I wish we had known that a few weeks ago, might have done GTK 3.22 for yakkety | 20:34 |
desrt | I doubt it? | 20:51 |
xnox | desrt, was the proposed numbering scheme approved? | 21:07 |
xnox | sil2100, i don't think python-gnupg is at all at fault here. At the moment in yakkety chroot "apt install ubuntu-touch" fails on amd64 | 21:10 |
sil2100 | xnox: I have a fix for that already | 22:30 |
sil2100 | xnox: no worries | 22:31 |
sil2100 | Let me give you the silo number | 22:31 |
xnox | ah | 22:31 |
sil2100 | xnox: don't worry about touch images, I keep looking at the failures when I have a moment | 22:31 |
sil2100 | xnox: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1895 <- the address-book-app change here | 22:31 |
sil2100 | xnox: I already told slangasek I'm working on it so that no one duplicates work | 22:32 |
xnox | sil2100, not concerned about touch, or touch images per-se. | 22:32 |
sil2100 | Will land tomorrowish :) | 22:32 |
xnox | proposed-migration, globally cares about # of uninstallable packages | 22:32 |
xnox | and at the moment that count goes up because of ubuntu-touch-meta/amd64 | 22:32 |
xnox | which is bad =( | 22:32 |
xnox | one shall not have meta's uninstallable is a rule of thumb =) | 22:33 |
sil2100 | hah, indeed! ;) | 22:33 |
xnox | sil2100, right, i'll enable that silo tomorrow, and will check if things are better with it. | 22:33 |
sil2100 | Will get that releases asap, wanted to give a quick spin of the packages before I land this | 22:33 |
sil2100 | Thanks! I checked in a yakkety-amd64 chroot and it helped | 22:34 |
xnox | i don't think that is enough to resolve bug #1619468 however | 22:34 |
ubot5 | bug 1619468 in ubuntu-touch-meta (Ubuntu Yakkety) "Uninstallable ubuntu-touch-meta" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1619468 | 22:34 |
xnox | but we shall see. | 22:34 |
sil2100 | Of course, I was testing it for touch image builds per se | 22:34 |
sil2100 | And in livecd-rootfs when installing ubuntu-touch for amd64/i386 we install additional hints | 22:34 |
sil2100 | So that the deps are satisfied (don't ask why, I didn't make it so) | 22:35 |
sil2100 | But yeah, let's look into that in more detail tomorrow :) | 22:35 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!