| === ogra_ is now known as ogra | ||
| tjaalton | bdmurray: oops, sorry for missing the xserver-lts-xenial diff, I'll merge it now and upload again | 07:08 |
|---|---|---|
| tjaalton | but not before the sru is released of course | 07:16 |
| === ant_ is now known as Guest84579 | ||
| === Guest84579 is now known as antdillon | ||
| xnox | can gnupg2 triggered libmail-gnupg-perl test use (libmail-gnupg-perl,gnupg) from proposed? | 11:13 |
| xnox | similar with apt | 11:14 |
| xnox | or like hint apt/gnupg2/libmail-gnupg-perl to go in together | 11:14 |
| doko | ginggs_: do you want to look at the shogun ftbfs, or should we just demote it? | 11:17 |
| ginggs_ | doko: please demote it, that looks like debian #835411 | 11:20 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 835411 in src:eigen3 "eigen3: causes FTBFS in other packages" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/835411 | 11:20 |
| xnox | Laney, is there some way to hint gnupg2 to go in together with libmail-gnupg-perl. | 12:49 |
| Laney | hi xnox | 12:50 |
| xnox | apt tests actually passed and it migrated, libmail-gnupg-perl in proposed also passes its tests, and snapd is all good as well. | 12:50 |
| Laney | sure, but that's not much use if the tests are failing | 12:50 |
| Laney | you probably want them re-run? | 12:51 |
| xnox | yes but libmail-gnupg-perl & gnupg2 should be rerun with proposed. | 12:51 |
| xnox | and the retry button doesn't offer me to do that. | 12:52 |
| Laney | ok | 12:53 |
| Laney | 'go in together' means something else to me | 12:53 |
| xnox | as in testing libmail-gnupg-perl from release with gnugp2 from proposed will always fail. | 12:53 |
| xnox | libmail-gnupg-perl from release works with gnupg2 in release; libmail-gnupg-perl from proposed works with gnupg2 in proposed or release; | 12:54 |
| jbicha | xnox: you can manually append &trigger=gnupg2/2.1.15-1ubuntu2 to the url the retry button suggests | 12:55 |
| xnox | that bit is right. | 12:56 |
| xnox | i think i need two triggers.... gnupg2 and libgnupg-interface-perl/$proposed-version | 12:57 |
| Laney | xnox: I did them for you | 13:01 |
| xnox | thanks | 13:01 |
| xnox | is there a magic how-to? granted i don't cause such things often..... | 13:02 |
| Laney | Maybe you can pass &trigger= more than once | 13:02 |
| Laney | I just ran a command on snakefruit | 13:02 |
| xnox | i wonder if my depends are not explicit enough in the libmail-gnupg-perl case | 13:06 |
| xnox | Laney, can gnupg2 be hinted with skiptests and hinted to libgnupg-interface-perl to migrate together with gnupg2? | 16:05 |
| xnox | horum looking at http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libm/libmail-gnupg-perl/yakkety/amd64 triggers are still incorrect | 16:07 |
| * xnox fiddles | 16:07 | |
| xnox | tadah https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=yakkety&arch=amd64&package=libmail-gnupg-perl&trigger=gnupg2%2F2.1.15-1ubuntu2&trigger=libmail-gnupg-perl%2F0.22-1ubuntu2 | 16:08 |
| Laney | xnox: did that work? | 16:34 |
| Laney | I'm not that comfortable forcing gpg-related tests | 16:34 |
| doko | kenvandine: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-007/+sourcepub/6843960/+listing-archive-extra there is no need to drop the java package and the java build-deps | 17:42 |
| kenvandine | doko, why? we don't want to do an MIR for tomcat | 17:42 |
| doko | kenvandine: we did the archive reorg last cycle | 17:42 |
| doko | kenvandine: build-deps from universe are fine | 17:43 |
| kenvandine | oh they are? | 17:44 |
| kenvandine | that's good :) | 17:44 |
| teward | unless they add new runtime deps | 17:44 |
| kenvandine | ok | 17:44 |
| kenvandine | they don't in this case | 17:44 |
| teward | s/new runtime deps/new runtime binary dependencies on something in universe as a result of building with the Universe package(s)/ | 17:44 |
| * teward was imprecise | 17:44 | |
| doko | and I assume the java module will end up in universe anyway | 17:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!