=== ogra_ is now known as ogra [07:08] bdmurray: oops, sorry for missing the xserver-lts-xenial diff, I'll merge it now and upload again [07:16] but not before the sru is released of course === ant_ is now known as Guest84579 === Guest84579 is now known as antdillon [11:13] can gnupg2 triggered libmail-gnupg-perl test use (libmail-gnupg-perl,gnupg) from proposed? [11:14] similar with apt [11:14] or like hint apt/gnupg2/libmail-gnupg-perl to go in together [11:17] ginggs_: do you want to look at the shogun ftbfs, or should we just demote it? [11:20] doko: please demote it, that looks like debian #835411 [11:20] Debian bug 835411 in src:eigen3 "eigen3: causes FTBFS in other packages" [Serious,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/835411 [12:49] Laney, is there some way to hint gnupg2 to go in together with libmail-gnupg-perl. [12:50] hi xnox [12:50] apt tests actually passed and it migrated, libmail-gnupg-perl in proposed also passes its tests, and snapd is all good as well. [12:50] sure, but that's not much use if the tests are failing [12:51] you probably want them re-run? [12:51] yes but libmail-gnupg-perl & gnupg2 should be rerun with proposed. [12:52] and the retry button doesn't offer me to do that. [12:53] ok [12:53] 'go in together' means something else to me [12:53] as in testing libmail-gnupg-perl from release with gnugp2 from proposed will always fail. [12:54] libmail-gnupg-perl from release works with gnupg2 in release; libmail-gnupg-perl from proposed works with gnupg2 in proposed or release; [12:55] xnox: you can manually append &trigger=gnupg2/2.1.15-1ubuntu2 to the url the retry button suggests [12:56] that bit is right. [12:57] i think i need two triggers.... gnupg2 and libgnupg-interface-perl/$proposed-version [13:01] xnox: I did them for you [13:01] thanks [13:02] is there a magic how-to? granted i don't cause such things often..... [13:02] Maybe you can pass &trigger= more than once [13:02] I just ran a command on snakefruit [13:06] i wonder if my depends are not explicit enough in the libmail-gnupg-perl case [16:05] Laney, can gnupg2 be hinted with skiptests and hinted to libgnupg-interface-perl to migrate together with gnupg2? [16:07] horum looking at http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libm/libmail-gnupg-perl/yakkety/amd64 triggers are still incorrect [16:07] * xnox fiddles [16:08] tadah https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=yakkety&arch=amd64&package=libmail-gnupg-perl&trigger=gnupg2%2F2.1.15-1ubuntu2&trigger=libmail-gnupg-perl%2F0.22-1ubuntu2 [16:34] xnox: did that work? [16:34] I'm not that comfortable forcing gpg-related tests [17:42] kenvandine: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-007/+sourcepub/6843960/+listing-archive-extra there is no need to drop the java package and the java build-deps [17:42] doko, why? we don't want to do an MIR for tomcat [17:42] kenvandine: we did the archive reorg last cycle [17:43] kenvandine: build-deps from universe are fine [17:44] oh they are? [17:44] that's good :) [17:44] unless they add new runtime deps [17:44] ok [17:44] they don't in this case [17:44] s/new runtime deps/new runtime binary dependencies on something in universe as a result of building with the Universe package(s)/ [17:44] * teward was imprecise [17:45] and I assume the java module will end up in universe anyway