Trevinho | RAOF: hey | 00:22 |
---|---|---|
Trevinho | RAOF: could you please review the unity7 xenial SRU that is in queue? | 00:22 |
RAOF | Trevinho: Sure! | 00:22 |
Trevinho | RAOF: related silo is https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1843 | 00:22 |
Trevinho | RAOF: thanks a lot | 00:22 |
* RAOF dislikes reviewing SRU syncs. :( | 00:23 | |
Trevinho | Eh, i'm sorry about that... We should really have some scripts which produces debdiff for these | 00:24 |
RAOF | Yeah, I could totally improve some of the scripts in ubuntu-archive-tools to do this. | 00:24 |
RAOF | Not your fault! | 00:24 |
Trevinho | RAOF: what would be the best way for helping SRU team in that? debdiffs attached to bugs, or what else? | 00:24 |
Trevinho | eh, I know.. I've heard about some difficulties about that, but I'm not much into that work to understand what's missing :-) | 00:25 |
RAOF | Trevinho: Make sru-review in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools handle syncs. | 00:25 |
cjwatson | It's really an LP bug, but quite a hard one to fix. | 00:25 |
cjwatson | (https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/851562, specifically) | 00:26 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 851562 in Launchpad itself "Diffs not available for syncs on +queue page like for regular uploads" [High,Triaged] | 00:26 |
RAOF | It would not be *that* hard to make sru-review DTRT; it'd just need to follow the sync link, then hope that the PPA has the regular stuff. | 00:26 |
RAOF | Trevinho: Presumably you need bamf, compiz, and unity all done at once? | 00:27 |
Trevinho | RAOF: yeah... I mean, there are no interdependencies... So you can actually land these in the order you want | 00:27 |
RAOF | Trevinho: Cool. | 00:27 |
Trevinho | RAOF: I see there's a from_ppa option in the review script, is that helpful? | 00:29 |
RAOF | Actually just checking that out :) | 00:29 |
RAOF | No dice, but --no-diff is helpful. | 00:31 |
RAOF | Heh. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/913880 is clearly not fix-released in xenial :) | 00:31 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 913880 in compiz (Ubuntu) "mouse scroll down over sound indicator while expo is active selects previous desktop" [Low,Fix released] | 00:31 |
* RAOF wishes PPAs built their debdiff against -updates | 00:34 | |
Trevinho | ah, that's annoying... | 00:39 |
Trevinho | using options -p ci-train-ppa-service/landing-085 didn't give me anything though, but maybe it's just something else | 00:39 |
Trevinho | anyway... if there's any problem, let me know... time for bed now :-) | 00:39 |
RAOF | Trevinho: Do any of your bugs have xenial tasks? :) | 00:42 |
Trevinho | RAOF: no.... Cause I'm not an Ubuntu driver and I can't add these without confirmation it seems 😢 | 00:45 |
RAOF | Trevinho: You can nominate them, at least. But I'm happy to do so while processing, too. Just for future reference :) | 00:46 |
RAOF | Wow. That unity upload is all that and a bag of potato chips. | 00:54 |
RAOF | Trevinho: (For when you wake up) Is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1616031 actually fixed in the uploaded unity and/or Yakkety? | 01:43 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1616031 in unity (Ubuntu) "Problems with restoring window size/position after half-maximizing" [Medium,Triaged] | 01:43 |
RAOF | Trevinho: Also, a *lot* of those bugs are pretty borderline SRUs. | 01:49 |
RAOF | Trevinho: Accepted the bamf and compiz SRUs, as they're good and correct. | 01:52 |
RAOF | Trevinho: Once you've checked that bug 1616031 is actually fixed in yakkety and the package, unity can (with some reservations) go through. | 01:54 |
ubottu | bug 1616031 in unity (Ubuntu) "Problems with restoring window size/position after half-maximizing" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1616031 | 01:54 |
pitti | RAOF: urgh, seriously? that should take a few minutes, not a day.. | 05:09 |
RAOF | IPv6 snafu, it seems. | 05:09 |
RAOF | Each package tried to resolve over IPv6 with a 1min timeout, failed, then tried again for the next package. | 05:14 |
RAOF | pitti: Anyway, ping! | 05:14 |
pitti | RAOF: aye! | 05:15 |
pitti | RAOF: "yakkety" → "unstable" in changelog, s'il te plaît | 05:16 |
RAOF | Ahem. | 05:16 |
=== King_InuYasha is now known as Son_Goku | ||
RAOF | pitti: Done. | 05:20 |
pitti | RAOF: and built/uploaded | 05:29 |
cpaelzer | good morning | 05:46 |
RAOF | Oh, kfreebsd. Hush. | 06:35 |
pitti | RAOF: heh, --fail-missing FTW: ) | 06:36 |
RAOF | touch debian/not-installed.linux; echo "/lib/udev/..." > debian/not-installed | 06:37 |
pitti | RAOF: oh, is debian/not-installed a thing? I wasn't aware of that | 06:37 |
RAOF | New in compat 9, I think? | 06:37 |
pitti | RAOF: I usually use some -X*.rules fu (conditionalized) | 06:37 |
RAOF | I think I'll go the not-installed route. | 06:39 |
RAOF | Aaargh. Git! When I push I want to push the signed tags, damnit. | 06:42 |
RAOF | pitti: I can't seem to push to colord git anymore, but the permissions on the repository seem fine? I was hoping to have another go at building on kfreebsd/hurd :/ | 07:16 |
pitti | RAOF: uh, what happened since this morning? you still pushed the changed debian/changelog release target? | 07:17 |
RAOF | Yes! I don't know. I went to push 1.3.3-2 (that should build on kfreebsd/hurd, hopefully), and git is complaining about insufficient permissions on ./objects | 07:17 |
pitti | RAOF: some chmod -R on git.debian.org? | 07:30 |
RAOF | pitti: Everything seems to be 775, owned by mpitt:scm_collab-maint | 07:42 |
pitti | RAOF: uh, did I set up the colord.git? I don't remember that at all | 07:42 |
RAOF | pitti: Would you be able to pull from github.com:raof/colord.git ? | 07:44 |
pitti | RAOF: sure | 07:44 |
pitti | RAOF: there are a few files owned by raof-guest:raof-guest which should probably have group scm_collab-maint, but that shouldn't stop pushing for you.. | 07:45 |
pitti | RAOF: oh, I do see a few files which are 444 | 07:46 |
pitti | RAOF: perhaps do try a chgrp -R scm_collab-maint and chmod -R ug+w ? | 07:47 |
pitti | I just did that, but I cannot change the raof-owned ones | 07:48 |
RAOF | Nope | 07:49 |
pitti | RAOF: hmm, then I guess moving the whole colord.git/ dir away and re-creating/pushing it? I'm out of ideas | 07:49 |
RAOF | Oh, hello! | 07:50 |
RAOF | There are 3 files in objects/; two owned by mpitt:mpitt one by biebl:biebl. | 07:51 |
RAOF | Are you able to remove those final ones? | 07:52 |
pitti | RAOF: done | 07:52 |
pitti | RAOF: (pulled/building from github in the meantime) | 07:52 |
RAOF | And collab-maint/colord.git is now updated. | 07:53 |
pitti | RAOF: pulling works indeed, thanks | 07:55 |
pitti | RAOF: -2 uplaoded | 08:00 |
pitti | (which is better than uploading, obviously!) | 08:01 |
RAOF | It's more ladder-like. | 08:01 |
Trevinho | RAOF: so... We used to be pretty flexible in unty SRUs to keep the delta with trunk to the minimum | 08:21 |
Trevinho | So... Yes, there are bigger changes, but still all fixes | 08:21 |
Trevinho | RAOF: as for that bug, I thought I removed it from the changelog, didn't I? | 08:22 |
Trevinho | Since it wasn't fixed here | 08:22 |
Laney | what's this "Stale file handle" business that's going on with sbuild? | 09:47 |
Laney | anyone else seen that? | 09:47 |
pitti | Laney: oh, you got it too? xnox and me too | 09:55 |
pitti | I tried to apt-get clean/-f etc. in src:sid, but didn't help, so I just rebuilt it from scratch (easier than wasting time) | 09:56 |
Laney | pitti: first saw it yesterday and though it was some freak occurrence, but now I get it on other schroots too | 09:56 |
pitti | I only got it in my sid schroot; either because it was sid, or becasue that was my only schroot that used an overlay (the others are tarballs) | 09:56 |
xnox | Laney, pitti - you shall not use overlayfs and dpkg | 09:56 |
xnox | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1620525 our bug | 09:57 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1620525 in linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) "sbuild with overlayfs fails in yakkety" [Critical,New] | 09:57 |
pitti | it has worked for many years, but since all my others are tarballs I just use a tarball too now | 09:57 |
xnox | debian bug is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=836211 | 09:57 |
ubottu | Debian bug 836211 in dpkg "dpkg: Cannot upgrade some packages on overlayfs: Invalid cross-device link" [Normal,Open] | 09:57 |
pitti | and live with the 2 s unpack time | 09:57 |
xnox | pitti, use older kernel? | 09:57 |
Laney | xnox: do you know what changed? | 09:58 |
xnox | or newer.... | 09:58 |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
Laney | this has always been the case on overlayfs hasn't it? | 09:58 |
xnox | Laney, something rather fixed in overlayfs. Re-creating chroots with new enough apt pre-installed should work too, because then the subdir move is not needed. | 09:58 |
Laney | I get it on loads of random stuff | 09:59 |
Laney | Updating certificates in /etc/ssl/certs... | 09:59 |
Laney | mv: cannot move '/tmp/ca-certificates.crt.tmp.OgRoXw' to 'ca-certificates.crt': Stale file handle | 09:59 |
xnox | excellante. | 09:59 |
xnox | i bet all the live images are busted too | 09:59 |
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
=== hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
tjaalton | looks like a xenial server of mine has had an unattended-upgrade in limbo since june | 11:36 |
seb128 | tjaalton, like a stucked job? any error? | 11:37 |
tjaalton | yeah kernel install stuck | 11:38 |
tjaalton | nothing in dpkg.log | 11:38 |
seb128 | urg | 11:38 |
seb128 | do you know where it's stucked? | 11:39 |
tjaalton | grub-mount | 11:39 |
seb128 | I guess that's worth at least a bug report | 11:39 |
tjaalton | then again this has zfs-on-root | 11:39 |
seb128 | oh... | 11:40 |
tjaalton | eldon# LANG=C grub-mount /dev/sda1 /var/lib/os-prober/mount | 11:40 |
tjaalton | error: unknown filesystem. | 11:40 |
tjaalton | guess that's it | 11:40 |
seb128 | well, it should handle the case better | 11:41 |
tjaalton | I'll file it against os-prober | 11:41 |
seb128 | thanks | 11:42 |
=== pavlushka is now known as Guest70016 | ||
tjaalton | hmm or grub2 actually | 11:49 |
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
pitti | juliank: there is no way to get a .dsc or diff for the synced apt 1.2.14 in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=apt | 12:43 |
juliank | pitti: Why? | 12:44 |
juliank | I just ran syncpackage for it :/ | 12:44 |
pitti | juliank: this makes it extremely hard to review for SRU; normal uploads are a lot simpler | 12:44 |
pitti | juliank: this might also explain why nobody reviewed it yet | 12:44 |
Mirv | I seem to have many problems with "Finished" builds not really finishing like https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-1916/+build/10713715 (this is retry number two) | 12:45 |
pitti | oh, I can get it from here: https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/apt/1.2.14 | 12:45 |
juliank | pitti: Yeah | 12:45 |
Mirv | maybe it's a test failure in content-hub though showing off as unkilled thread | 12:45 |
pitti | but this takes creativity (no click-through path), downloading two packages, running debdiff, etc. | 12:45 |
brendand | this feels like a dumb question, but i want to be able to ssh to the autopkgtest host from the testbed, without being prompted for a password - what are my options? | 12:46 |
pitti | brendand: scp your host's key to ~/.ssh/authorized_keys once? | 12:46 |
juliank | pitti: Right. I can upload (the next release) 1.2.15 as a .dsc for the next upload. infinity sort of wanted that to be in a PPA and then synced from the PPA, but if it's easier to look at, I can just re-upload the .dsc from the PPA then. | 12:47 |
pitti | juliank: got a diff now; I'm ok with accepting into -proposed, but for verifying (for -updates) I'd like to see an actual test plan such as testing a dist-upgrade with that apt, to see how it performs in big scenarios which the test suite doesn't cover | 12:49 |
brendand | pitti, i still get prompted for the password... maybe something i need to change in the hosts ssh configuration? | 12:49 |
pitti | brendand: no, this is determined by the guest, and this generally allows key-based auth (I do that often) | 12:50 |
pitti | brendand: maybe you forgot to say ubuntu@ ? | 12:50 |
pitti | brendand: the scp itself (for copying id_rsa.pub) will ask for the password of course, but after that it should work | 12:50 |
brendand | pitti, no i definitely did do that | 12:51 |
brendand | pitti, ah i think i know a way. i can set up the access in the base image | 12:52 |
pitti | brendand: please run ssh with -vv to see what it doesn't like about your key | 12:52 |
juliank | pitti: There were no changes at all to the installation code in 1.2.14 since 1.2.12(~ubuntu16.04.1) - don't you have some automated update testing tools in some QA thing somewhere? | 12:52 |
pitti | brendand: if this is lxc, lxd, or qemu, you can also funnel it in through the side channels like lxc-attach or ttyS1 | 12:53 |
pitti | juliank: we have the autopkgtests, but AFAIK no automatic upgrade tests against -proposed | 12:53 |
pitti | we used to have some, or still have -- if so, running those is fine of course | 12:53 |
=== herb_ is now known as herb | ||
xnox | cjwatson, gimock fails to spawn things that are supposed to be executed in the subprocess as far as I can figure out. There is no stdin/stdout and the pipe that should unpickle things raised EOF. Who is the current maintainer of click/gimock? | 12:56 |
xnox | it's probably something changed in gi and/or python. | 12:56 |
cjwatson | xnox: already fixed in a silo awaiting QA approval | 12:56 |
xnox | ah excellent! | 12:56 |
cjwatson | https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1878 | 12:56 |
cjwatson | xnox: (but I think it's waiting until after OTA13 - that's still in adequate time for yakkety so I'm not worrying about it too much) | 12:57 |
juliank | pitti: In the worst case, starting with a 16.04 image, install apt 1.2.14 and then upgrading to updates+proposed should be a good test | 12:57 |
cjwatson | xnox: there were quite a few little details wrong, I had a "fun" bit of weekend work sorting it all out | 12:57 |
juliank | 1.2.15 is going to be awful, I have queued 46 cherry-picked commits so far: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/1.2.14...julian-klode:1.2.y - one changes the cache format in order to fix a buffer overflow, and another one changes the main MarkRequired() algorithm to allow kernels to be autoremoved again in the presence of (zfs) virtual deps | 12:59 |
xnox | cjwatson, /o\ ok. So i'll grab that ppa, and retest that things don't regress with new python-debian / gpg -> because those trigger click tests. If all is good, I'll ask Laney to skiptest click on those packages. | 13:00 |
xnox | because gnupg2 transition is possibly stuck with click failure now. | 13:01 |
xnox | or possibly partially release above silo into yakkety only? | 13:01 |
juliank | Oddly enough, I did not reserve any space in the cache version, so both 1.3 and 1.2.15 have 10.6. That works now as they are the same format, but I should invent a better way to allow for independent changes in multiple branches of apt | 13:01 |
pitti | xnox: oh, I just force-badtest'ed the current click version as I thought it got broken by some apparmor thing, not the new gnupg2? | 13:03 |
xnox | pitti, no it's broken all by itself. the gnupg2 impact is unknown. It does use debsigs-verify thing, which uses gpgv, which should be fine.... but i want to test that. | 13:13 |
kgunn | flexiondotorg: ping | 13:15 |
cjwatson | xnox: I don't really want to think about doing a partial release, no idea how bileto would cope | 13:21 |
cjwatson | (hopefully it would be fine, but I don't know) | 13:21 |
Laney | xnox: are you winning? | 13:58 |
xnox | Laney, i am working on making more win | 13:59 |
Laney | k | 14:00 |
xnox | trying to fix parcimonie on our infra, it passes locally... | 14:00 |
Laney | well done for taking it on | 14:00 |
Laney | xnox: can provide you with access to a machine if you want | 14:02 |
xnox | nah it's all good. i create citrain thingy and it gives me access to our infra for adt | 14:02 |
Laney | you can operate it interactively then | 14:02 |
Laney | but ok | 14:02 |
doko_ | tvoss: any update on unity-scopes-api and thumbnailer? | 14:04 |
Laney | xnox: reproduces for me with an adt-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud thingy btw | 14:13 |
=== tyhicks` is now known as tyhicks | ||
xnox | Laney, i use lxc locally. | 14:15 |
Laney | well you also couldn't reproduce it | 14:15 |
Laney | just saying :) | 14:16 |
xnox | right. it's building in bileto, and should fix things there ( i did a blind patch ) in the mean time porting buildroot | 14:16 |
=== zigo is now known as Guest39147 | ||
Laney | ahh | 14:39 |
=== zigo_ is now known as zigo | ||
Laney | xnox: add-apt-repository doesn't work out of the box due to dirmngr not getting installed | 15:25 |
xnox | muahaaaaaa | 15:25 |
* xnox ponders why it needs dirmngr all of the sudden.... | 15:26 | |
* Laney knows nothing | 15:27 | |
doko_ | Laney: please could you just attach the D file that triggers the issue? #1620681 | 16:08 |
Laney | if you want | 16:09 |
doko_ | ta | 16:09 |
doko_ | Laney: I want the command line too ;p | 16:19 |
Laney | I doubt you can build those things alone | 16:20 |
bdmurray | pitti: the ubuntu-release-upgrader package tests started failing recently and I wonder if its related to the server change - http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/ubuntu-release-upgrader | 17:00 |
bdmurray | pitti: the same failure happens if changelogs.ubuntu.com is not accessible when running test_dist_upgrade_fetcher_core.py | 17:03 |
Laney | doko_: got a reasonably minimal reproducer now | 17:12 |
=== JanC is now known as Guest18007 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
pitti | bdmurray: which server change? was changelogs.u.c. changed recently and the test needs updating? | 19:07 |
bdmurray | pitti: I mean the autopkg test server | 19:10 |
pitti | bdmurray: I'm not aware of any change there; IS changed the firewall the other day, but the proxy should still behave as it used to | 19:13 |
bdmurray | pitti: is there anyway to test the firewall manually? | 19:28 |
pitti | bdmurray: sure, I can run things in a scalingstack instance | 19:29 |
pitti | bdmurray: indeed wget -O- http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/last_check.txt hangs now | 19:30 |
pitti | it seems our proxy stopped allowing changelogs.u.c. | 19:30 |
* pitti adds it to $no_proxy | 19:32 | |
bdmurray | pitti: thanks | 19:33 |
bdmurray | pitti: also, the link back to the package here is broken http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/ubuntu-release-upgrader/trusty/amd64 | 19:34 |
pitti | bdmurray: I rolled out the proxy config update, so a retry ought to work now | 19:41 |
pitti | bdmurray: link fixed, thanks for pointing out | 19:44 |
nacc | smoser: thanks for the importer bugs and MRs, I'll try and get to them this week! | 19:58 |
smoser | nacc, cool. thanks. | 19:59 |
=== chiluk_ is now known as chiluk | ||
jbicha | sakrecoer: where did you get numix-blue from? | 20:25 |
jbicha | numix-blue should really be a separate source package (I can't tell what version it claims to be or where it came from or who wrote it) | 20:29 |
krytarik | jbicha: We are planning to get it in via Debian - but it was too late for this release. | 20:49 |
jbicha | krytarik: ok, I understand UI freeze | 20:52 |
Unit193 | LocutusOfBorg: ...Feel like sponsoring something super simple to Debian? | 20:56 |
flexiondotorg | kgunn, Hi | 20:58 |
kgunn | flexiondotorg hey :) | 20:59 |
flexiondotorg | I was busy at work today so not on IRC. | 20:59 |
flexiondotorg | But, evening now :-) | 20:59 |
flexiondotorg | kgunn, How you doing? | 20:59 |
kgunn | good, you? i wanted to pick your brain, as mine got fuzzy, but I was wondering about those gpu drivers... | 20:59 |
flexiondotorg | OK | 21:00 |
kgunn | i couldn't recall were those closed source? or are those in some way realted to the freedesktop project here | 21:00 |
kgunn | https://github.com/anholt/mesa/wiki/VC4 | 21:00 |
flexiondotorg | Those are the drivers. | 21:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | Unit193, yes | 21:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | but I guess you will have to send a mail :) | 21:04 |
Unit193 | LocutusOfBorg: Git or dch? | 21:05 |
kgunn | flexiondotorg awesome, so do you know the story on those? e.g. is that a broadcom supported project? | 21:07 |
flexiondotorg | kgunn, My understanding is Eric used to work for ARM (maybe Broadcom) but is now in the employee of the Raspberry Pi Foundation working specifically on those drivers. | 21:09 |
kgunn | flexiondotorg ah, that's great... | 21:09 |
kgunn | flexiondotorg and our guys recently enabled gallium as part of the archive build... | 21:09 |
kgunn | so these should "just be there" | 21:09 |
flexiondotorg | Yes. | 21:10 |
flexiondotorg | They are in the 4.4 Ubuntu Kernel. At least a version of them. | 21:10 |
flexiondotorg | And the corresponding mesa and xserver pieces. | 21:10 |
flexiondotorg | In 16.04. | 21:11 |
kgunn | flexiondotorg cool, better story than i thot | 21:11 |
kgunn | time to get a pi3 i gues | 21:11 |
flexiondotorg | But I'm using the Raspberry Pi Foundation kernel on those demos I showed you. | 21:11 |
flexiondotorg | The Ubuntu kernel needs some more Pi 3 hardware enablement. | 21:12 |
flexiondotorg | Last time I checked. | 21:12 |
kgunn | flexiondotorg missing gpu firmware? or kernel modules for things? | 21:13 |
flexiondotorg | https://github.com/gohai/vc4-buildbot | 21:13 |
flexiondotorg | I think missing device tree for VC4. | 21:14 |
LocutusOfBorg | Unit193, I prefer mentors | 21:14 |
flexiondotorg | And firmware for wifi (I think). | 21:14 |
Unit193 | LocutusOfBorg: Oh dang, I was going to link you to https://sigma.unit193.net/source/inxi_2.3.1-1.dsc or ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/inxi.git :3 | 21:15 |
Unit193 | I can do that too. | 21:15 |
flexiondotorg | kgunn, Eric was at Intel previously. | 21:15 |
kgunn | thanks flexiondotorg | 21:15 |
kgunn | will help a discussion i'm having tomorrow | 21:15 |
flexiondotorg | Great. I'd love to see for Pi 2/3 is the Ubuntu raspi2 kernel. | 21:16 |
flexiondotorg | There are several million of those devices out there now. | 21:16 |
LocutusOfBorg | Unit193, . | 21:16 |
flexiondotorg | So worth targeting. | 21:16 |
Unit193 | LocutusOfBorg: Oh wow, thanks. Had just uploaded to mentors! | 21:20 |
LocutusOfBorg | oops, sorry | 21:22 |
Unit193 | Nono, totally fine. Thanks. :) | 21:23 |
LocutusOfBorg | :) | 21:23 |
doko_ | jamespage: I filed rt#95411 for the porter box updates :-/ | 21:32 |
Unit193 | nacc: Oh, never said because you were offline. Congrats! | 23:37 |
nacc | Unit193: thanks! | 23:37 |
sarnold | oh! | 23:37 |
sarnold | nacc: congratulations :) | 23:37 |
nacc | sarnold: thanks! | 23:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!