| seeit_ | anyone in here able to help me with apt-build? | 02:16 |
|---|---|---|
| sarnold | irc works better with specific questions :) | 02:18 |
| seeit_ | I am looking to build some packages with apt-build but if I do apt-build install <pkgname> I get a message that there must be some 'source' URIs in your sources.list, I've tried adding them but that doesn't work | 02:22 |
| sarnold | did you run apt-get update afterwards? | 02:22 |
| seeit_ | I ran apt-build update | 02:22 |
| seeit_ | just ran apt-get and i get the same message | 02:23 |
| sarnold | what do your apt sources.list files look like? (paste.ubuntu.com if they're more than three or four lines, please) | 02:24 |
| seeit_ | ok, the deb-src lines were still commented out, thought I had fixed it but guess not, its working now, ty | 02:27 |
| seeit_ | ls | 02:27 |
| sarnold | woot :) | 02:27 |
| seeit_ | on a 4 core system with hyperthreading and 32gb of ram how long should I expect it to take to build world | 02:29 |
| sarnold | yikes, uh, what's in the "world" category? | 02:29 |
| seeit_ | all currently installed packages | 02:29 |
| seeit_ | ls | 02:30 |
| sarnold | probably a few weeks | 02:30 |
| seeit_ | wow, any idea what causes the error ' the value 'apt-build' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources? | 02:31 |
| sarnold | you can find out how long launchpad takes to build specific packages; look up the source package name e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice click a triangle to expose the "builds", amd64 there says libreoffice took five hours, thirty one minutes... | 02:31 |
| seeit_ | wow ok | 02:33 |
| seeit_ | not interested in rebuilding libreoffice right nwo | 02:33 |
| seeit_ | mostly some computational packages | 02:33 |
| sarnold | seeit_: wild-guess, maybe the '--target-release' option might help with the default-release setting http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/man1/apt-build.1.html | 02:33 |
| seeit_ | sarnold it was exactly that | 02:36 |
| sarnold | man I love it it when things work as I expect :D | 02:40 |
| seeit_ | ok, now for a weird one, I was just doing this all in a VM to test out apt-build, now I copied sources.list over to the host machine and I get the previous error to put some URIs into sources.list | 02:45 |
| seeit_ | wait nm | 02:45 |
| seeit_ | timing world on my system :P | 02:58 |
| sarnold | how many packages do you have installed? | 02:59 |
| seeit_ | 2206 | 03:01 |
| sarnold | the worst ones I can think off the top of my head would be firefox, chromium-browser, libreoffice, mysql... | 03:01 |
| sarnold | owwwwww | 03:01 |
| seeit_ | i've got libreoffice and firefox in there | 03:01 |
| sarnold | hope you've got loads of drive space and even more free time :) | 03:01 |
| seeit_ | I'm not using the cpu much most of the stuff I need is through citrix and about 500GB of space | 03:02 |
| seeit_ | but doing everything through -pipe | 03:02 |
| seeit_ | I'll be surprised if the system reboots after this | 03:03 |
| seeit_ | then the big question is if this works how do I make a install iso out of all these packages | 03:04 |
| seeit_ | I suspect libc won't work with -fstack-protector-strong, at least it hasn't in the past | 03:07 |
| jbicha | webkit2gtk is heavy too | 03:07 |
| seeit_ | yeah I've done linux from scratch before in a VM and that one is pretty hefty | 03:08 |
| sarnold | three and ahalf hours there, yeah... | 03:08 |
| seeit_ | is there a way to supress the output from the build? I'm sure that would speed it up some, at least it has on other compilations I've done | 03:10 |
| seeit_ | > /dev/null maybe? | 03:10 |
| sarnold | it'd probably beb etter to save to a file so that you can figure out why things break, when they inevitably will.. | 03:10 |
| sarnold | grab stderr too | 03:11 |
| seeit_ | already failed on apparmor, "Sorry, no package to install" | 03:12 |
| doko_ | jamespage: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-cryptography/1.5-1/+build/10678695 | 08:48 |
| tjaalton | huh, the update manager reboot-popup somehow takes 30% cpu on both xorg and compiz (xenial) | 11:07 |
| === skarn_ is now known as giraffe | ||
| jamespage | doko_, +1 thanks for sorting that out | 12:06 |
| doko_ | jbicha: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1547395 totem doesn't migrate | 15:17 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1547395 in totem (Ubuntu) "MIR: new dependencies for libquvi-scripts / libquvi" [High,New] | 15:17 |
| ejat | anyone facing broken icon panel in 16.10 ? | 15:25 |
| ejat | http://picpaste.com/broken-icon-right-top-panel-yvqAsbg3.png | 15:28 |
| jbicha | doko_: could you demote libquvi to universe? | 16:47 |
| === DzAirmaX_ is now known as DzAirmaX | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
