[02:16] anyone in here able to help me with apt-build? [02:18] irc works better with specific questions :) [02:22] I am looking to build some packages with apt-build but if I do apt-build install I get a message that there must be some 'source' URIs in your sources.list, I've tried adding them but that doesn't work [02:22] did you run apt-get update afterwards? [02:22] I ran apt-build update [02:23] just ran apt-get and i get the same message [02:24] what do your apt sources.list files look like? (paste.ubuntu.com if they're more than three or four lines, please) [02:27] ok, the deb-src lines were still commented out, thought I had fixed it but guess not, its working now, ty [02:27] ls [02:27] woot :) [02:29] on a 4 core system with hyperthreading and 32gb of ram how long should I expect it to take to build world [02:29] yikes, uh, what's in the "world" category? [02:29] all currently installed packages [02:30] ls [02:30] probably a few weeks [02:31] wow, any idea what causes the error ' the value 'apt-build' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources? [02:31] you can find out how long launchpad takes to build specific packages; look up the source package name e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice click a triangle to expose the "builds", amd64 there says libreoffice took five hours, thirty one minutes... [02:33] wow ok [02:33] not interested in rebuilding libreoffice right nwo [02:33] mostly some computational packages [02:33] seeit_: wild-guess, maybe the '--target-release' option might help with the default-release setting http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/man1/apt-build.1.html [02:36] sarnold it was exactly that [02:40] man I love it it when things work as I expect :D [02:45] ok, now for a weird one, I was just doing this all in a VM to test out apt-build, now I copied sources.list over to the host machine and I get the previous error to put some URIs into sources.list [02:45] wait nm [02:58] timing world on my system :P [02:59] how many packages do you have installed? [03:01] 2206 [03:01] the worst ones I can think off the top of my head would be firefox, chromium-browser, libreoffice, mysql... [03:01] owwwwww [03:01] i've got libreoffice and firefox in there [03:01] hope you've got loads of drive space and even more free time :) [03:02] I'm not using the cpu much most of the stuff I need is through citrix and about 500GB of space [03:02] but doing everything through -pipe [03:03] I'll be surprised if the system reboots after this [03:04] then the big question is if this works how do I make a install iso out of all these packages [03:07] I suspect libc won't work with -fstack-protector-strong, at least it hasn't in the past [03:07] webkit2gtk is heavy too [03:08] yeah I've done linux from scratch before in a VM and that one is pretty hefty [03:08] three and ahalf hours there, yeah... [03:10] is there a way to supress the output from the build? I'm sure that would speed it up some, at least it has on other compilations I've done [03:10] > /dev/null maybe? [03:10] it'd probably beb etter to save to a file so that you can figure out why things break, when they inevitably will.. [03:11] grab stderr too [03:12] already failed on apparmor, "Sorry, no package to install" [08:48] jamespage: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-cryptography/1.5-1/+build/10678695 [11:07] huh, the update manager reboot-popup somehow takes 30% cpu on both xorg and compiz (xenial) === skarn_ is now known as giraffe [12:06] doko_, +1 thanks for sorting that out [15:17] jbicha: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/1547395 totem doesn't migrate [15:17] Launchpad bug 1547395 in totem (Ubuntu) "MIR: new dependencies for libquvi-scripts / libquvi" [High,New] [15:25] anyone facing broken icon panel in 16.10 ? [15:28] http://picpaste.com/broken-icon-right-top-panel-yvqAsbg3.png [16:47] doko_: could you demote libquvi to universe? === DzAirmaX_ is now known as DzAirmaX