[04:24] who keeps demoting the dependencies of the new licensecheck in yakkety-proposed? :) === hyperair is now known as Guest68547 [10:57] pitti, hi, if possile please run ignition-transport testsuite against proposed protobuf, thanks [12:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset) [12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset) [12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset) [12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset) [12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset) [12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset) [12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset) [12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1] [12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1] [12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1] [12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1] [12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [arm64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1] [12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1] [12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1] [12:48] jbicha: seems that nothing is published even though built "lockfile: Sorry, giving up on "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/etc/.lock-archive-sync" [13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: android-platform-build [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1:6.0.1+r55-2] (no packageset) [13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: android-platform-build [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1:6.0.1+r55-2] (no packageset) [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset) [16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset) [16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset) [16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset) [17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset) [18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [18:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [19:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calendar (xenial-proposed/main) [3.20.2-0ubuntu0.1 => 3.20.3-0ubuntu0.1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) [23:39] jbicha, tsimonq2: regarding lubuntu and gnome daily yakkety didn't publish is because of an error with the archive sync lock, e.g. http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-gnome/yakkety/daily-live-20160911.log and http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/lubuntu/yakkety/daily-20160911.log [23:40] wxl: thanks, that's what flocculant said too [23:41] the error on lubuntu desktop today is a little bit different, although my guess is that the 504 time out on iso.qa.ubuntu.com (just a few minutes ago was running slow) is obscuring the issue hiding behind it http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/lubuntu/yakkety/daily-live-20160911.log [23:41] jbicha: oh yeah i guess i didn't pay attention to the last line of the lastlog derp [23:44] jbicha: and actually, it looks like it affects all images on further inspection [23:45] yes, I think UG was one of the first to hit it [23:45] things wait until the weekend to break! [23:45] …except for ubuntu-base