[04:24] <slangasek> who keeps demoting the dependencies of the new licensecheck in yakkety-proposed? :)
[10:57] <LocutusOfBorg> pitti, hi, if possile please run ignition-transport testsuite against proposed protobuf, thanks
[12:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset)
[12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset)
[12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset)
[12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset)
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mahimahi [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.93-1] (no packageset)
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1]
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1]
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1]
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1]
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [arm64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1]
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1]
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mahimahi [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [0.93-1]
[12:48] <flocculant> jbicha: seems that nothing is published even though built "lockfile: Sorry, giving up on "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/etc/.lock-archive-sync"
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: android-platform-build [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1:6.0.1+r55-2] (no packageset)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: android-platform-build [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1:6.0.1+r55-2] (no packageset)
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2] (no packageset)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mia [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.4.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calendar (xenial-proposed/main) [3.20.2-0ubuntu0.1 => 3.20.3-0ubuntu0.1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:39] <wxl> jbicha, tsimonq2: regarding lubuntu and gnome daily yakkety didn't publish is because of an error with the archive sync lock, e.g. http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-gnome/yakkety/daily-live-20160911.log and http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/lubuntu/yakkety/daily-20160911.log
[23:40] <jbicha> wxl: thanks, that's what flocculant said too
[23:41] <wxl> the error on lubuntu desktop today is a little bit different, although my guess is that the 504 time out on iso.qa.ubuntu.com (just a few minutes ago was running slow) is obscuring the issue hiding behind it http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/lubuntu/yakkety/daily-live-20160911.log
[23:41] <wxl> jbicha: oh yeah i guess i didn't pay attention to the last line of the lastlog derp
[23:44] <wxl> jbicha: and actually, it looks like it affects all images on further inspection
[23:45] <jbicha> yes, I think UG was one of the first to hit it
[23:45] <jbicha> things wait until the weekend to break!
[23:45] <wxl> …except for ubuntu-base