| eylul | sakrecoer, astraljava, and anybody else who actually works in packaging side: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/krita_1:3.0.1+dfsg-1.html krytarik just dug this up | 12:29 |
|---|---|---|
| eylul | so I guess we can have krita in yakkety after all? | 12:29 |
| * eylul is more than a little excited | 12:30 | |
| Chamois | geirdal I just uploaded the video with the different animation for the "workflows" texts, you can find it here: https://youtu.be/9VRcOn_kh6c . I didn't render the entire video to avoid wasting time rendering. | 13:11 |
| cfhowlett | looking pretty sweet, Chamois | 13:12 |
| Chamois | geirdal I got a question. Is it a problem if the US Logo and Wordmark are in 3d? | 13:12 |
| Chamois | I just noticed that there's a little bug when the Texts change.. I'll fix it. | 13:14 |
| eylul | ok further updates on the krita situation: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntustudio.yakkety/revision/1499 krytarik added krita back to the seed, because it looks like the dependency issue seems to be fixed. (not clear if we will get 3.0.1 in time) | 13:18 |
| eylul | chamois could you maybe tint the screenshots a bit, and, well this latter might go either way but shift the text a bit up? | 13:18 |
| eylul | and as I said in the email, this looks great overall :) | 13:20 |
| Chamois | eylul I rendered this video after I read the email you sent. The next thing I'll do is to work on the background screenshots ;) | 14:28 |
| sakrecoer | Chamois: 3D is ok, but it _must_ be the files i linked you to on the list. in the best of worlds, when the logo zooms to frame, logo and woodmark are in 2D with no alteration | 14:42 |
| sakrecoer | glad to read about krita, eylul and krytarik :) | 14:52 |
| sakrecoer | Chamois: 'when logo zooms to frame' = the last seconds, where the full logo is visible :) would be good if the extrusion flattened at that point as in no 3D on the logo. | 14:54 |
| Chamois | sakrecoer: ok :) | 15:21 |
| Chamois | ( sakrecoer eylul ) I gave to the background a blurred effect and modified the settings for opacity and brightness (also shifted the text a little bit up) : http://pasteall.org/pic/index.php?id=106607 | 15:52 |
| eylul | Chamois: I like it better | 16:21 |
| eylul | perhaps a tiny bit darker? | 16:21 |
| eylul | btw sakrecoer are you back, or still traveling? | 16:22 |
| eylul | and blur was a good idea! | 16:24 |
| eylul | I forgot to say | 16:24 |
| sakrecoer | i am back :) | 16:25 |
| eylul | awesome | 16:28 |
| eylul | heh sorry | 16:44 |
| eylul | here you are 10 minutes back from vacation | 16:44 |
| eylul | and I am talking your ear off | 16:44 |
| eylul | ;D | 16:44 |
| eylul | mt | 16:44 |
| eylul | (that was to sakrecoer) | 16:44 |
| sakrecoer | :D | 16:45 |
| eylul | :D | 16:50 |
| eylul | btw astraljava: zequence mentioned you do packaging? | 16:53 |
| Chamois | I just came back from suspend mode and it doesn't show me the mouse cursor. Is it the same for you? | 17:11 |
| Chamois | http://pasteall.org/pic/index.php?id=106611 | 17:17 |
| krytarik | Chamois: Did you update your system recently? LP bug 1568604 should be fixed. | 17:32 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1568604 in xf86-video-intel "Mouse cursor lost when unlocking with Intel graphics" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1568604 | 17:32 |
| eylul | Chamois: that background brightness with text in front looks very good to me | 18:11 |
| eylul | I have no further commentary on that. :) | 18:12 |
| eylul | ok one more nitpick: maybe no dots where the text is? | 18:12 |
| eylul | or no dots (more transparent dots) all over? so that it doesn't mix with the text? | 18:13 |
| * eylul begins feeling bad with so many nitpicks! | 18:13 | |
| chamois | it didn't send messages. thanks! and I have version 16.04 and I've never updated it (I installed the os in July) | 18:33 |
| eylul | wb chamois | 18:34 |
| eylul | reposting from earlier: that background brightness with text in front looks very good to me. one more nitpick: maybe no dots where the text is?, no dots (more transparent dots) all over? so that it doesn't mix with the text where they overlap? | 18:35 |
| chamois | I can make them transparent where the texts are and make them all transparent when there's a screenshot on the background to avoid making the scene to messy.. how does it sound? | 18:43 |
| eylul | could try either | 18:48 |
| eylul | (chamois if you put my name in the reply on IRC, btw, I might notice it faster because my client highlights it, even if I am alt tabbed) | 18:48 |
| eylul | :) | 18:49 |
| chamois | ok | 18:49 |
| eylul | chamois: actually on second thought, making them all transparent might be better, since text size changes in animation | 18:49 |
| eylul | as you add lines? | 18:49 |
| chamois | eylul "as you add lines"? | 19:09 |
| eylul | chamois: sorry bad phrasing. I meant the text area (where dots would need to be removed) changes as the lines get added on each section, so you will either end up with blank areas with no dots at first, or have to animate the area where dots are removed, which might end up complicated | 19:10 |
| eylul | (or visually distracting) | 19:10 |
| eylul | so I was saying maybe just making dots transparent overall, will be the option with less hassle | 19:10 |
| chamois | Ok I'm going now see you tomorrow! | 19:26 |
| eylul | bye chamois | 19:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!