[00:02] nairwolf - all good thanks, none of those appear to be xubuntu issues though :) [00:02] all you can hope is someone somewhere cares [07:13] good day [07:58] Hi, why there is no build for 20160911 ? [07:58] Usually, it happens on the morning [08:11] no idea - rebuilding now [08:21] okay [08:21] the build is automatic, right ? [08:21] yep - unless someone triggers it manually - like I just did :) [08:22] okay [08:23] If the build couldn't be done this morning, does it mean there is an issue with the build ? [08:24] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/xubuntu/yakkety/ [08:24] https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/yakkety/xubuntu [08:26] thank you for the links [08:26] I'm going to bookmarks them [08:26] so, I have time to have a breakfast during the build [08:27] oh yea - be a while till they get to the tracker [08:36] ok [08:38] flocculant: do you have some issues when you try to come back from "sleep mode" with yakkety ? [08:38] In fact, I have this issue on my actual computer, and I've verified that yesterday with the test computer [08:38] I should test it more precisely to write a bug report [08:47] no issues here - never suspend [08:47] but I can try :) [08:48] maybe it happens only with real hardware [08:48] I never tried on a VM [08:49] nairwolf: so what issues do you see? [08:54] A black screen. It's simple, I can't recover from the sleep mode [08:54] yup [08:54] but, I will test it more accurately to try to understand what happens [08:54] can confirm that [08:55] I don't wnat to do it on my actual computer [08:55] I got unlock screen, then got a lock screen I couldn't escape from [08:55] * flocculant blames power manager and bluesabre today :p [08:56] I should have said that earlier [08:56] because I've seen that since I've installed yakkety on my actual computer (and we talked about my installation few days ago) [08:56] right [08:57] I wanted to confirm that on a second computer, but I forget to do it [08:57] this is exactly why I've been trying to get people to run the dev install :) [09:00] it's not suspend - it's an issue with locking [09:02] nairwolf: you can see the same thing just by locking screen [09:04] the fact is my computer has sometimes his own problem related to hardware... [09:05] sorry ^^ [09:05] by the way, I have also something weird when I boot [09:05] It's really really slow [09:05] and there is a message which says "check partitions" [09:05] but maybe it's related to my dual-boot [09:15] bluesabre: bug 1622303 [09:15] bug 1622303 in xfce4-power-manager (Ubuntu) "Fails to unlock/ resume to black screen" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1622303 [09:21] thank you [09:59] hey flocculant [09:59] I just saw that bug and tested it out... seems related to light-locker [10:00] bluesabre: so you see it too I assume [10:00] yea - did think afterwards should have been light locker :) [10:06] debhelper 10 uploaded. [10:06] flocculant, can you switch to VT1 and run "killall light-locker", then back to VT8 and try to unlock and see if that works for you? [10:06] poor old debhelper 9 - no-one cares :( [10:06] bluesabre: yep - trying now [10:09] bluesabre: yup killing light-locker does it [10:09] however [10:10] had music playing when I locked - when I 'unlocked' could hear music again, so it appears to be unlocking [10:14] so, it gets you back to the desktop fine? [10:14] killall does yes [10:15] what I'm trying to say is that while there's no desktop without - it appears to have unlocked as the music is back [10:16] what happens for me is that I am unable to unlock from the login screen even after, but I can switch back to vt7 manually fine [10:16] I can't manually switch (without killall) to vt7 - it's blank screen [10:16] right [10:17] I think there's bugs with light-locker and lightdm [10:17] I think that too :p [10:18] I'll look into that bug further [10:18] okey doke [10:39] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-docs:: [yakkety] r617 Launchpad automatic translations update. (by Launchpad Translations on behalf of ubuntu-core-doc) [10:54] the daily build is still not available ? [11:26] nope - looks like something up with archive [11:26] won't get looked at today [11:30] nothing is getting finished - not just us [11:34] hum.. [11:35] by the way, I will be afk during the beta test... [12:31] flocculant: Someone said that last night-ish. [12:44] Unit193: image build fails? [12:45] oh yea - see it in -release now [12:46] The "built but didn't publish to cdimage.ubuntu.com" remark. [12:47] yea [13:15] That's weird [13:15] Does it happen often ? [13:16] Is it because, it's sunday, and servers decided to not to work ? [13:19] doesn't happen often - but because it's Sunday then people who can do anything are not working [13:21] nairwolf: just going to see if I can confirm your "Editable box is too small" bug [13:22] I'll be a while though - want to confirm on ubuntu as well [13:25] ok ;) [13:26] hopefully it'll show in ubuntu - then it's not greybird :) [13:34] what I don't understand is I can't confirm on my actual machine [13:40] nairwolf: can't confirm the partition size issues? [13:53] ochosi: please don't shoot me - I'm just the messenger here ... nairwolf found another greybird/ubiquity issue bug 1622258 [13:53] bug 1622258 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Editable box is too small to display all content inside" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1622258 [13:53] basically the box for you to enter a partition size during install when you're creating a new partition is too small [13:57] flocculant: yes, that's right [13:57] I don't know if it's normal or not [13:58] the hard drive size is 500 Go, so in Mo it's 500 000 Mo, it's long, but, I'm not sure same thing happened before [13:59] I can test with 16.04 to see the "normal" behaviour if you want [13:59] already done that ;) [14:00] but you see no difference, or you're unable to see what I saw ? [14:01] 16.04 is fine, ubuntu 16.10 is fine, xubuntu 16.10 isn't - you'll see at the bug I've confirmed it - also changed it from ubiquity to greybird [14:01] bbl [14:02] I don't understand why you said firstly "can't confirm the partition size issues" [14:05] and with libreoffice calc ? [14:06] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xfce4-announce:: ANNOUNCE: xfce4-volumed-pulse 0.2.1 released @ http://xfce.10915.n7.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-xfce4-volumed-pulse-0-2-1-released-tp48250.html (by Sean Davis-6) [14:53] nairwolf: that was a question to you - what can't you confirm? [14:53] and calc is fine here - but I think I updated from -proposed [14:54] nope - same version should be [16:00] oh, I can't confirm the issue about libreoffice calc [16:27] I've seen this issue on the daily build (10th September), but I don't see that on my computer running the devel version [17:05] not seen it [17:06] I need to test it again [21:45] bluesabre: ok, about the visual nuisance of the CSD/headerbar toolbars, e.g. in evince or file-roller, i have now submitted a merge-request to fix it: https://code.launchpad.net/~ochosi/evince/add_toolbar_class/+merge/305423 [21:45] bluesabre: note that this would have to be done for every app we care about [22:08] flocculant: fwiw, the ubiquity "progress dots" are also broken with adwaita. yay. [22:20] ochosi: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xfce-devel/2016-September/021903.html [22:21] nice [22:22] Isn't it still experimental though? [22:27] not really [22:27] at least i wouldn't consider it very experimental [22:27] Bump strandards-version to 3.9.8. [22:27] :'( somehow ubiquity doesn't seem to understand margin: -1px [22:27] strandards? [22:30] somehow i can't seem to be able to launch the gtk inspector on ubiquity [22:31] stupid pkexec seems to get in the way [22:31] yeah. blame others. [22:31] (: [22:37] so yeah, seems i've inherited that problem from adwaita [22:56] meh, that'll be harder to fix... [22:56] i hope i manage before 16.10 gets released [22:58] ochosi: are you talking about the bug I've found ? [22:59] that's not a very specific hint [22:59] or did you only find one bug so far? [23:03] nairwolf: wanna just post the link to the bug..? [23:11] This one : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/greybird-gtk-theme/+bug/1622258 [23:11] Launchpad bug 1622258 in greybird-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "Partition creation box during installation is too small" [Undecided,Confirmed] [23:11] ochosi: I thought you talked about that [23:12] nope [23:12] Because, if I remember correctly, flocculant pinged you few hours ago [23:13] yeah, well i get pinged a lot about these things :] [23:13] sorry for that... [23:13] no worries