| LocutusOfBorg | pitti, ping, please autopkgtest for ignition-transport/1.3.0-4: amd64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Always failed, i386: Always failed, ppc64el: Always failed, s390x: Always failed | 06:49 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | ignition-transport has a autpkgtestuite that runs well with protobuf3, and this is the last protobuf blocker for migration | 06:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko_, ^^^ | 06:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | for your happiness :) | 06:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | protobuf should be run against ignition proposed, and vice-verssa | 06:51 |
| * LocutusOfBorg exit | 06:51 | |
| pitti | Logan: done | 06:52 |
| pitti | Logan: sorry, tab failure | 06:55 |
| flocculant | pitti: you know anything about images and archive sync lock? or will that be someone else later in the day | 07:01 |
| pitti | flocculant: I'm afraid I don't | 07:06 |
| flocculant | okey doke :) | 07:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | please accept mia from new, the rdeps are already in place thanks | 07:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks pitti and thanks irclogs service :) | 07:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mmm pitti I'm not sure it worked retrying against -proposed... | 07:49 |
| pitti | LocutusOfBorg: well, it's still in the queue | 07:56 |
| pitti | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#queue-ubuntu-yakkety-amd64 | 07:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh thanks, I though the queue wasn't visible with the new service | 08:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | lets see if protobuf can migrate today | 08:02 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, it was awol for a while (queues) and are now back with us | 08:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: init-system-helpers (xenial-proposed/main) [1.29ubuntu2 => 1.29ubuntu3] (core) | 09:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libmatemixer to ubuntu-mate in yakkety | 09:45 | |
| === ant__ is now known as antdillon | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | cjwatson, FYI, when a build goes ENOSPACE seems to be stuck forever https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/insighttoolkit4/4.10.0-dfsg1-3ubuntu1/+build/10712957 | 11:21 |
| cjwatson | Yeah, known | 11:23 |
| cjwatson | Just cancel it, at some point I'll get round to working out how to test my fix for that in launchpad-buildd | 11:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 11:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | if you need a tester, I'm here :) | 11:27 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: No, I don't mean manual testing. | 11:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok thanks | 11:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw, many packages started failing for ENOMEM or some other similar issues | 11:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I usually "fix" them by reducing parallellism in ubuntu, or by retrying them e.g. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mia/2.4.3-2ubuntu1 | 11:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | arm64 built after three retries | 11:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I don't want such delta from Debian, but seems the infra has some issues :( | 11:34 |
| flocculant | anyone about who's got the power to fix the iso's and tracker, nothing landed for anyone since the 10th :) | 11:50 |
| cjwatson | Depends. What's broken? | 11:50 |
| flocculant | cjwatson: for those I've looked at > lockfile: Sorry, giving up on "/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/etc/.lock-archive-sync" Couldn't acquire archive sync lock! | 11:51 |
| cjwatson | Oh, reboot damage | 11:51 |
| flocculant | at least Xubuntu and Ubuntu are like that currently, gnome and lubuntu were yesterday | 11:51 |
| cjwatson | Should be fixed now | 11:51 |
| flocculant | cjwatson: thanks :) - Xubuntu is probably stuck re-building from Saturday (manually) I assume that'll sort itself when the next one builds? | 11:52 |
| cjwatson | Should do | 11:53 |
| flocculant | k - thanks again :) | 11:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | bye protobuf! /cc doko_ | 12:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | still some rebuilds are missing, but fcl migrated | 12:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but should we really rebuild stuff such as dialer-app address-book-app camera-app to have protobuf3 migrate? | 13:24 |
| * LocutusOfBorg fixes libphonenumber, that seems a blocker for the transition to end | 13:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-367 [source] (xenial-proposed) [367.44-0ubuntu0.16.04.2] | 14:08 | |
| sergiusens | infinity what are my options to get snapcraft-2.17 allowed into xenial-proposed? | 15:43 |
| apw | sergiusens, i see the yakkety version is failing its self-tests ? | 16:12 |
| sergiusens | apw yes, because snapd in yakkety is older than in xenial | 16:35 |
| apw | sergiusens, erp ... that isn't menat to happen | 16:35 |
| sergiusens | apw our xenial tests pass just fine fwiw https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/787 (View Details there) | 16:36 |
| sergiusens | apw and right, that's why I ask, what are my options :-) | 16:36 |
| apw | sergiusens, i've asked (i hope) for a test of the yakkety one with the proposed snapd, which might clear that regression out | 16:37 |
| sergiusens | apw oh, is that possible from my end? | 16:37 |
| sergiusens | I "hope" it works, I am not sure, cjwatson do you know? ^ | 16:38 |
| cjwatson | sergiusens: Well, apw said he's already triggered it. It's not possible from your end | 16:39 |
| cjwatson | But archive admins can request that kind of thing | 16:40 |
| cjwatson | Assuming apw is talking about autopkgtests | 16:40 |
| sergiusens | cjwatson right, I was thinking of the key work you've done on snapd, I've been told that gpg transistions was one of the cultprits | 16:41 |
| sergiusens | cjwatson yeah, he is, well yeah, I assume as much | 16:41 |
| cjwatson | sergiusens: I don't see gpg failures in the log? | 16:41 |
| cjwatson | sergiusens: There was a lot of noise about the gpg transition, but it shouldn't actually break anything in snapd | 16:42 |
| apw | i am talking about adt indeed, though in the new world it is hard to tell if it has worked | 16:42 |
| apw | yep the failure i see in yakkety is using snap --force-something which is not present in the one in -release | 16:42 |
| sergiusens | good to know Colin (avoiding over pinging triggers now) | 16:43 |
| sergiusens | yeah, --force-dangerous was an unexpected surprise for us | 16:43 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, like ...everything ... related .... to ... snaps ? | 16:45 |
| ogra_ | (like having "grade: " added to snap.yaml in the ubuntu-core snap on release day ... and the store choking on it :P ) | 16:47 |
| ogra_ | the wonderful inter-team communication in snappy is resulting in a constant flow of suprises :) | 16:48 |
| cjwatson | Also everything is a huge rush and communication is the first thing to go | 16:51 |
| ogra_ | yeah, sadly ... and it usually bites | 16:52 |
| sergiusens | ogra_ funny thing about grade was that it was a store folk contribution ;-) | 16:56 |
| ogra_ | heh, yeah | 16:56 |
| ogra_ | i still dont know what it is suppposed to do :) | 16:58 |
| sergiusens | cjwatson btw, why did it work at all given the dependency on snapd (>= 2.14.2~)? Maybe that is a pitti question | 17:36 |
| cjwatson | sergiusens: That dependency is only on integrationtest, and I think it's snapstest that failed | 17:37 |
| cjwatson | Er, integrationtests / snapstests respectively | 17:38 |
| sergiusens | yeah, I got it | 17:38 |
| sergiusens | thanks | 17:38 |
| cjwatson | snapstest has a tighter dep now | 17:38 |
| cjwatson | But maybe that wasn't in that release? | 17:38 |
| cjwatson | Haven't looked very closely | 17:38 |
| apw | sergiusens, ok there is now a yakkety ADT run which appears to have the yakkety-proposed version of snapd, but the tests appear to fail still | 17:53 |
| apw | Get:44 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu yakkety-proposed/main amd64 snapd amd64 2.14.2+gitcc9d039-0ubuntu5 [7,665 kB] | 17:53 |
| sergiusens | apw where are those logs? | 17:59 |
| apw | sergiusens, http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/snapcraft/yakkety/amd64 | 18:01 |
| apw | sergiusens, note the one at the top with twin triggers | 18:01 |
| sergiusens | apw great, snapd 2.14 in xenial has `--force-dangerous` while snapd in yakkety has just `--dangerous` :-( | 18:11 |
| * sergiusens blames ogra_ | 18:11 | |
| ogra_ | haha+ | 18:12 |
| ogra_ | sergiusens, xenial-proposed should have --dangerous too | 18:12 |
| ogra_ | yay for stable APIs | 18:12 |
| apw | ogra_, there is no snapd in xenial-proposed | 18:13 |
| ogra_ | well, there will be :) | 18:13 |
| sergiusens | ogra_ 2.14 in xenial does NOT have `--dangerous` | 18:13 |
| ogra_ | (i havent invented that option btw) | 18:14 |
| ogra_ | complain to gustavo | 18:14 |
| sergiusens | ogra_ 2.14 is in xenial-updates! | 18:14 |
| ogra_ | i know that trunk has --dangerous | 18:14 |
| ogra_ | and that it is supposed to land ASAP | 18:14 |
| ogra_ | (if it doesnt get renamed inbetween :P ) | 18:15 |
| apw | ogra_, without backwards compatibility ? | 18:16 |
| apw | sergiusens, it sounds like we need to work out what is meant to be where here | 18:16 |
| ogra_ | apw, really ask sommeone who is in charge ... i'm suffering the same way as you do | 18:16 |
| ogra_ | afaik it is a gustavo thing | 18:17 |
| ogra_ | though perhaps he is also just the messenger | 18:17 |
| sergiusens | apw I have no words | 18:23 |
| * sergiusens is jus upset | 18:23 | |
| sergiusens | just* | 18:23 |
| apw | sergiusens, just trying to help | 18:29 |
| sergiusens | apw and I appreciate that :-) I am not upset at you, just the situtation really | 18:34 |
| sergiusens | apw if I upload tests that use --dangerous instead of --force-dangerous to yakkety will you trigger that magic to use snapd from proposed? | 18:51 |
| apw | sergiusens, can do | 18:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wireshark [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.0+g5368c50-1] (no packageset) | 19:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wireshark [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.0+g5368c50-1] (no packageset) | 19:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wireshark [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.0+g5368c50-1] (no packageset) | 19:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wireshark [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.0+g5368c50-1] (no packageset) | 19:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wireshark [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.0+g5368c50-1] (no packageset) | 19:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.7~bzr1256-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.7.7-31-g65ace7b-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wireshark [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.0+g5368c50-1] (no packageset) | 20:11 | |
| elopio | sergiusens: ah, I remember why I wasn't in this channel. queuebot triggers a notification for me on every message. | 20:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clblas [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.10-4] (no packageset) | 20:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clblas [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.10-4] (no packageset) | 20:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clfft [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.12.2-1] (no packageset) | 20:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clblas [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.10-4] (no packageset) | 20:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clfft [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.12.2-1] (no packageset) | 20:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clfft [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.12.2-1] (no packageset) | 20:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clfft [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.12.2-1] (no packageset) | 20:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clfft [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.12.2-1] (no packageset) | 20:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clblas [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.10-4] (no packageset) | 20:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clfft [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.12.2-1] (no packageset) | 20:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clblas [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.10-4] (no packageset) | 20:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clblas [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.10-4] (no packageset) | 20:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wireshark [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.0+g5368c50-1] (no packageset) | 20:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clblas [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.10-4] (no packageset) | 20:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clfft [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.12.2-1] (no packageset) | 20:31 | |
| sergiusens | apw if you don't mind, the latest snapcraft is already published in yakkety-proposed | 20:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: libcmrt (yakkety-proposed/primary) [1.0.6+dfsg1-1] | 20:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: winff [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.5.3-7ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected init-system-helpers [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.29ubuntu3] | 21:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: init-system-helpers (xenial-proposed/main) [1.29ubuntu2 => 1.29ubuntu3] (core) | 21:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.408.4] | 22:36 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!