[01:14] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: [greybird] r473 Tweak the look of OSDs... (by Simon Steinbeiß)
[01:14] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: [greybird] r474 Deflate GtkEntries so they resemble Gtk2 again (Fixes #144)... (by Simon Steinbeiß)
[01:14] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: [greybird] r475 Deflate the buttons... (by Simon Steinbeiß)
[05:09] <Unit193> flocculant: Found it.
[05:58] <flocculant> thanks ochosi :)
[06:07] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ATTN: Xubuntu Core 16.10 - i386 - i386 built.
[06:33] <ochosi> flocculant: no problem. just sucks that the fixes for ubiquity will take longer, as the problems we're seeing there are also present in Adwaita
[06:33] <ochosi> so basically i havr to find a new wqy to draw progressbars :/
[06:35] <ochosi> i also checked with Ambiance and I dont really see why thats still working
[06:35] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-docs:: [yakkety] r618 Launchpad automatic translations update. (by Launchpad Translations on behalf of ubuntu-core-doc)
[06:38] <flocculant> ochosi: ok, well at the end of the day if something looks odd during install - not too much of an issue, though the partition size box could be problematic I guess
[06:39] <ochosi> yeah, that one sucks. also not an easy straight-forward fix
[06:39] <flocculant> that's nice then
[06:39] <ochosi> you can also see the same problem in other apps, e.g. xfpm 1.6.0
[06:40] <ochosi> so it's a systemwide problem
[06:40] <ochosi> basically the same is true for the progressbar problem
[06:40] <flocculant> aah - not so good then
[06:40] <Unit193> flocculant: Fixored.
[06:41] <ochosi> if i change the progressbar stuff, we have to cross-check for regressions elsewhere if it's not a clean fix
[06:41] <flocculant> indeed
[06:42] <flocculant> I'd happily be laid back about the progressbar stuff - if it means not having to worry about elsewhere tbh
[06:42] <ochosi> i already did a dirty fix yesterday, but a clean one would really be nicer..
[06:42] <ochosi> yeah, to the worst i'd also rather leave it as is then potentially break it elsewhere
[06:43] <flocculant> yup
[06:48] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ATTN: Xubuntu Core 16.10 - amd64 - amd64 built.
[06:54] <ochosi> bbl
[07:10] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: just in case you see - don't bother rebuilding iso unless you see they fixed the lock issue
[07:11] <flocculant> Unit193: yep - that's better :)
[08:11] <akxwi-dave> flocculant: ok.. will keep an eye out
[11:55] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: it should be back tomorrow
[12:02] <akxwi-dave> cheers mate
[15:32] <flocculant> bluesabre ochosi - finally added the 2 gtk3 ppa's here - better than last time, firefox is usable :)
[15:52] <Unit193> "Bug information are updated every 5 minutes." well someone knows how to English.  Also, that was clearly more than 5 ago.
[15:53] <flocculant> something's awry with bug info on tracker again - it's not remembering reported bugs
[15:54] <flocculant> I did ping stgraber bout that - but no response, possibly on holiday
[18:10] <Unit193> bluesabre: Oh, since the LO theme is now in src:libreoffice, elementary-xfce is the last thing that should be split out, and it can be a proper package all on its own! :D
[18:11] <Unit193> (Might be nice if Mythbuntu and UbuntuStudio get to no longer ship 'xubuntu-icon-theme', but 'elementary-xfce-icon-theme' :P )
[18:22] <knome> Unit193, send email to their devel lists and include me in the CC
[18:23] <Unit193> knome: I'm talking about *our* package.
[18:37] <knome> Unit193, yeah but you were talking about other flavors not shipping our package
[19:12] <Unit193> knome: Oh, oh, oh!  Did you do the wallpaper? :D
[19:30] <knome> not yet
[19:31] <knome> i've been busy whole day today
[19:47] <ochosi> knome: i can haz wallpaper??
[19:47] <ochosi> (:
[19:48] <knome> you can have an old and used.
[19:48] <Unit193> ochosi: Pull one from 6 cycles back, nobody will remember.
[19:49] <knome> ochosi, can do a wallpaper session some night, as we've done before
[19:52] <ochosi> yeah, but i'm afk from tday for a bit more than 2weeks
[19:52] <ochosi> so it'd have to be e.g. tonight
[19:52] <knome> that could work
[19:52] <knome> when are you going to bed?
[19:55] <ochosi> hm, not sure
[19:55] <ochosi> not in the next 20mins ;)
[19:55] <knome> well
[19:57] <knome> i'll boot the desktop in 5-15 mins and then PM you
[19:57] <knome> i hope the session can last more than 5-15 mins though :P
[19:59] <ochosi> is 16min 10 secs enough?
[19:59] <knome> ff
[19:59] <knome> i was thinking more like 30-45'ish
[20:08] <ochosi> heh, still the worst burndown ever: http://dev.xubuntu.org/#tab-burndown
[20:09] <ochosi> typicaal LTS+1
[20:09] <knome> yep
[20:46] <ochosi> flocculant: btw, adwaita also exhibits that problem that we seem to be having in the installer with the partition size spinbutton that isn't big enough for the text/content
[20:46] <ochosi> not that that makes it any more fun
[20:46] <ochosi> but it explains why we suddenly see it
[20:46] <ochosi> it's adwaita, hence Gtk+ itself
[20:47] <flocculant> ochosi: ack - I think I read that ^^, or an allusion to that 
[20:47] <flocculant> yep
[20:47] <ochosi> well, i mentioned it also wrt the progressbar issue
[20:47] <ochosi> but i just confirmed it for the spinbuttons as well
[20:47] <flocculant> I still am of the opinion that if we need to we can release note this
[20:47] <flocculant> aah right :)
[20:47] <ochosi> yeah, we can. i'd still prefer to somehow find a solution
[20:48] <ochosi> also wanna know what the culprit is
[20:48] <flocculant> ofc - but don't think that I'd be whining for weeks over it :)
[20:49] <flocculant> the partition size is more issue than progress obviously - but if someone's not sure - they can gparted before starting installer
[20:50] <ochosi> yeah, i'm still investigating though
[20:50] <ochosi> maybe some gtk+ devs can help shed a light on this
[20:51] <flocculant> right 
[21:03] <ochosi> flocculant: btw, what's the latest daily of yakkety i can try?
[21:04] <flocculant> 10th at the moment
[21:04] <ochosi> k, thanks
[21:04] <flocculant> no-one built since then
[21:04] <ochosi> right
[21:04] <ochosi> just need to see whether ambiance really makes it all work
[21:04] <flocculant> ochosi: right 
[21:04] <ochosi> cause on 16.04 with gtk3.20 it doesn't fix ubiquity's problem with the partition entry
[21:05] <flocculant> mmm - to be honest I didn't check that
[21:05] <flocculant> ochosi: if it's just a check I can look - have ubuntu iso already
[21:05] <ochosi> oh ok
[21:05] <ochosi> please do so
[21:05] <ochosi> a screenshot would be nice!
[21:06] <ochosi> and please check with partitions that have >=5 digits
[21:06] <ochosi> below it always works
[21:06] <flocculant> mmm 
[21:06] <flocculant> hang on
[21:07] <ochosi> http://i.imgur.com/LBn3e7a.png
[21:07] <ochosi> this is what i get
[21:07]  * flocculant builds a stupid vm
[21:07] <ochosi> that partition has a size of 217410 MB
[21:07] <flocculant> ochosi: in ubuntu?
[21:07] <ochosi> the 6 digits do the trick
[21:07] <ochosi> it's not about ubuntu necessarily, you just have to install and use their themes
[21:08] <ochosi> this is ambiance (from light-themes)
[21:08] <ochosi> the ubuntu default
[21:09] <flocculant> yup
[21:10] <ochosi> if ubuntu also screws this up, we need to file a bugreport against ubiquity
[21:12] <flocculant> ochosi: I've not got enough space anywhere on the multiple drives I have to get >=5 digits ... 
[21:12] <ochosi> :/
[21:13] <ochosi> divide et impera?
[21:14] <knome> just add a lot of non-1 digits
[21:14] <flocculant> yes I have - I'll put it in one of the media drives
[21:14] <ochosi> good thinking!
[21:15] <flocculant> ochosi: ok - how big do you want it - I've got 250Gb
[21:15] <ochosi> that's enough
[21:16] <ochosi> 6 digits should be fine
[21:18] <ochosi> flocculant: lucky for you my dl speed here is so slow that i really *have to* wait for your screenshot cause the iso will take another 30mins to download...
[21:19] <flocculant> ochosi: http://i.imgur.com/DzQlvAK.png
[21:19] <flocculant> which I think you'll be pleased to see :)
[21:19] <knome> that's silly...
[21:19] <ochosi> hehe
[21:19] <ochosi> yeah, go silly ubiquity
[21:20] <ochosi> flocculant: mind to attach that to the bug nairwolf reported and re-assigning it to ubiquity?
[21:20] <flocculant> yea ofc :)
[21:20] <ochosi> awesome, thanks!
[21:21] <flocculant> welcome - I'll get that space back now :p
[21:21] <ochosi> :D
[21:22] <flocculant> I'd go nuts if it took me 30 minutes to d/l an iso lol
[21:23] <ochosi> yeah, i'm not really at home
[21:23] <ochosi> otherwise yeah, same here ;)
[21:23] <flocculant> aah right :)
[21:25] <ochosi> so now that i dont have to worry about spinbuttons anymore...
[21:25] <flocculant> :)
[21:25] <flocculant> ochosi: ok bug reassigned, commented with screenshot 
[21:26] <flocculant> not sure who's going to want to look at that over there in Ubuntumainland :)
[21:26] <ochosi> we'll have to ping around
[21:26] <ochosi> seb128 would be my go-to-guy for this
[21:26] <ochosi> (Laney is on holidays)
[21:26] <flocculant> ok
[21:26] <flocculant> yea I was going to say that 
[21:27] <ochosi> i have to get some car stuff fixed tomorrow, if you're around and have time, please do ping him about it
[21:28] <flocculant> I'll try and catch seb before I go to work in -desktop
[21:28] <ochosi> awesome, thanks
[21:28] <flocculant> that or I'll hassle Will :p
[21:28] <flocculant> he's less likely to aks me questions ... 
[21:29] <ochosi> hehe
[21:30] <ochosi> well but who is more likely to get it fixed.? :)
[21:30] <ochosi> anyway, either of the two should be fine
[21:30] <ochosi> but we should really try to bring it to their attentio
[21:30] <ochosi> n
[21:30] <flocculant> yea ofc 
[21:30] <ochosi> i might actually write a quick patch to fix it
[21:30] <flocculant> I'll do it in the morning 
[21:30] <ochosi> it's likely going to be a one-liner
[21:32] <ochosi> hah, ok so the width in chars is set to "6" in that dialog in ubiquity
[21:32] <flocculant> :)
[21:33] <flocculant> so never going to show a Tb?
[21:34] <ochosi> Tb?
[21:34] <flocculant> terabyte
[21:34] <ochosi> yeah
[21:34] <ochosi> and obviously struggling even with GB
[21:34] <flocculant> obviously not as it doesn't show 250Gb - tired :)
[21:34] <Unit193> ochosi: Tuberculosis.
[21:35] <flocculant> ochosi: you want me to say about 6 characters or will you comment on bug? 
[21:35] <ochosi> i'll comment
[21:36] <ochosi> and maybe submit a merge request
[21:36] <ochosi> btw, it might also have to do with the fact that we switched to a wider font
[21:37] <flocculant> ok - I'll just point *them* at the bug tomorrow
[21:37] <ochosi> or DPI
[21:37] <ochosi> cause i'm really not sure why nobody noticed so far
[21:37] <ochosi> or why it wasnt an issue in gtk3.18
[21:37] <flocculant> mmm
[21:38] <flocculant> I did check 16.04 for us on hardware yesterday, but not huge drive
[21:38] <flocculant> will quickly do that now
[21:40] <ochosi> thansk
[21:40] <ochosi> thanks
[21:40] <ochosi> i'm pushing a fix as we speak
[21:41] <flocculant> grabbing ubuntu 16.04 now too
[21:42] <flocculant> ochosi: fine in 16.04 
[21:43] <flocculant> http://i.imgur.com/rQ0CE8W.png
[21:45] <ochosi> hah
[21:46] <ochosi> well obviously they must've taken back the horizontal expand
[21:46] <flocculant> can't imagine ubuntu fails - but doing that now
[21:46] <ochosi> the option simply isn't set
[21:46] <ochosi> nah, no need to check
[21:46] <ochosi> the width of that widget is so much wider, it's definitely not theme related
[21:46] <flocculant> ochosi: maybe when they stopped right aligning the skip button this happened
[21:46] <ochosi> anyway, my merge request is done
[21:46] <flocculant> k
[21:47] <flocculant> well I did check - cos I had done everything but boot it :p
[21:48] <ochosi> please also add your 16.04 screenshot
[21:49] <flocculant> ochosi: done :)
[21:49] <flocculant> really going to search bedroom for wasps and then sleep now - cya all tomorrow :)
[21:51] <ochosi> flocculant: great, nice to at least have nailed one of the two annoying installer bugs ;)
[21:51] <ochosi> night!
[21:52] <ochosi> flocculant: btw, in the future pls add these bugs to the bugs blueprint
[21:52] <ochosi> (or pls tell nairwolf to do so in case he doesn't know)