=== mup_ is now known as mup === blahdeblah is now known as blahdeblah-lunch === blahdeblah-lunch is now known as blahdeblah === frankban|afk is now known as frankban === mpavone1 is now known as mpavone [09:01] Hello. I have a question about juju 2.0 public-address. We have defined in maas 6 network spaces. Does exist a way (like a constraint) to bind Juju's public-address to one of these spaces? === Guest98165 is now known as zeus === carlosm_ is now known as udac === anita is now known as Guest63215 [15:10] conjure-up worked well to spin up an OpenStack on local LXD, so all processes are on one physical box. [15:11] is it possible to add-machine some other physical box, so I can put compute/ceph-osd on that? [15:14] I know it's possible with the manual provider to add some machine that you can ssh to [15:15] so the question is, could that same technique work even with some other provider (like local lxd)? [17:00] cory_fu: is there an issue w/ the new review queue and tests? I don't get nice little clicky links with results for the last two revisions of the Zookeeper charm: https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/5?revision=19 (Also, two of the latest set of tests seem to be stuck in "pending") === frankban is now known as frankban|afk [17:54] cory_fu kwmonroe petevg: Going to publish to bigdata-dev the latest kafka build. Any objections? (Will include build for xenial, fixes from pete on interfaces, make openjdk optional) [17:54] dont break things kjackal ! [17:54] magicalt1out: do not take the fun out of it! [17:55] Break things! Have fun! It's dev, so it's all good. [17:55] you always break things kjackal :( [17:56] He can actually blame half the things on me, this time around. [17:56] kjackal: you should submit it to the new review queue [17:57] But everything are already reviewed! [17:57] We just never pushed to bigdata-dev [17:58] magicalt1out: just get a new car to go with the palm tree! [17:58] i may [17:58] although it wont fit in my check in luggage === magicalt1out is now known as magicaltrout [18:06] when using th postgresql layer, why would it not create the -relation-* hooks? [18:22] oh, nevermind, a typo in layer.yaml [18:22] cargill: - i was about to ask what your layer.yaml contents was [18:22] cargill: also o/ greets agian. How are your adventures with juju going? [18:23] yeah yeah lpSummit whatever.... ;)3 [18:23] magicaltrout: dont hate the charmer, hate the game [18:23] hehe [18:23] nice talk [18:23] man, i skipped so much info though [18:23] i wantd to go deeper into actions [18:23] like when is it appropriate, why you would write one, etc. [18:23] well you should have scheduled a proper talk then eh? :) [18:24] yeah, but there were community members that had talks, and *that* is way more exciting than hearing me bleat on about juju primitives [18:24] hehe [18:24] i want to hear *them* bleat on about juju primitives and super neat things they are doing with them [18:28] http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/cni/ light reading for Mesos networks.... :) [18:30] magicaltrout: actually, i was looking into CNI. We abstracted SDN for this reason in the k8s bundles [18:31] have you touched on CNI so far? i don't think its complete from what i'm hearing in the k8s developer chat over on slack... but there are quite a few staging deployments on top of it. [18:31] nope i'm a complete SDN/CNI newb [18:31] ok :) [18:34] lpSummit: http://52.53.182.98:8080/ui/#/apps [18:38] magicaltrout: i think i broke it [18:40] http://52.53.182.98:5050/#/ [18:40] there's a recurring theme === degville- is now known as degville [19:46] Hey all, I'm trying to deploy openstack on a MAAS 2.0 cluster using juju 2.0-beta15. I'm using the openstack lxd bundle from https://jujucharms.com/u/openstack-charmers-next/openstack-lxd but I seem to have a more basic problem. The LXD environment never fully comes up on deployed hosts because it can't download images. [19:47] I'm seeing errors like: "juju.provisioner broker.go:97 incomplete DNS config found, discovering host's DNS config" [19:47] the host itself can resolve things like cloud-images.ubuntu.com just fine. [19:49] smgoller-, to start you are going to want the beta18 that is in the ppa [19:49] ppa:juju/devel? [19:51] smgoller-, yes [19:52] for sure, doing that now. Thanks! [20:38] lutostag: https://github.com/ubuntu/snappy-playpen/pull/238 [20:54] mbruzek: https://github.com/juju-solutions/kubernetes/pull/19/files [21:02] alexisb, got a couple other logs of interest now: [21:02] 2016-09-14 20:53:01 ERROR juju.worker.proxyupdater proxyupdater.go:160 lxdbr0 has no ipv4 or ipv6 subnet enabled [21:02] It looks like your lxdbr0 has not yet been configured. Please configure it via: [21:02] sudo dpkg-reconfigure -p medium lxd [21:03] this is on one of the machines i'm trying to deploy to [21:03] still getting the incomplete DNS config entries as well [21:05] ok, so the incomplete DNS config is not so bad [21:05] it's just pulling from the hosts resolv.conf which is fine [21:06] neutron-gateway/0 error idle 0 10.118.25.4 hook failed: "config-changed" [21:06] from juju status [21:10] hm. i'll let it keep going, because a lot is still happening [21:43] It does turn out to be possible to add manually-provisioned "ssh" machines to a model in local lxd controller. [21:43] With a controller that looks like this: default local lxd/localhost 2.0-beta18 [21:44] I was able to add a machine like this: juju add-machine ssh:ubuntu@10.124.44.246 [21:44] as long as it's reachable from the lxdbr0 bridge, it does work, and apps can be deployed to it [21:45] * pragsmike is happy [21:49] valeech, https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/openstack-dashboard [22:31] I've got some of my juju units into a weird state and I'm tryig to drop the model, but running destroy-model default does nothing apart from unselecting it [22:31] this is the only thing I can see in the controller's debug log: ERROR juju.worker.dependency "is-responsible-flag" manifold worker returned unexpected error: lease manager stopped