[01:28] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xfce4-announce:: ANNOUNCE: xfce4-volumed-pulse 0.2.2 released @ http://xfce.10915.n7.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE-xfce4-volumed-pulse-0-2-2-released-tp48256.html (by Sean Davis-6)
[01:28] <bluesabre> oh boy SwissBot is fast these days
[01:29] <Unit193> bluesabre: You say UEFI, secure boot or not?  Tried booting yuk?
[01:31] <bluesabre> Unit193, I think I disabled it a long time ago, and Windows may have reenabled it at some point, but yakkety boots (or it did earlier today and is running right now)
[01:32] <bluesabre> Unit193, should I be careful not to reboot anytime soon?
[01:33] <Unit193> bluesabre: It's likely fine, was just trying to do the qemu+ovmf UEFI booting and it's not working on Yakkety using the same version or newer ovmf as I can with Xenial.
[01:34] <bluesabre> ah, gotcha
[01:37] <Unit193> So, wondered if it still works, though I presume it does. :/
[01:43] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: [greybird] r476 Use box-shadow instead of border in progressbar's progress (... (by Simon Steinbeiß)
[01:51] <Unit193> dashy went from ITP to RFP in Deby.
[02:04] <bluesabre> that's a step backward
[02:04] <bluesabre> I think
[02:04] <Unit193> Request for Packaging vs Intent to Package.
[02:04] <bluesabre> right
[03:29] <bluesabre> ochosi, I have the package ready to go, I'll get a UIFe bug together in the morning to proceed
[03:30] <bluesabre> time for some sleep, nighty all
=== pavlushka is now known as Guest78383
=== Guest78383 is now known as pavlushka
[06:04] <flocculant> Unit193: no I don't
[06:05] <flocculant> ochosi: yes it was ;)
[06:12] <flocculant> Unit193: rather I did now and again once upon a time with vbox, not done so recently in vm, not done ever on hardware - all setup there without
[06:41] <flocculant> ochosi: the resize wasn't on bug list - is now
[07:47] <ochosi> flocculant: okeydokey, nvm. anything else i'm not aware of atm?
[10:14] <Unit193> bluesabre: Keep an eye on -xfce, in regards to greybird.
[10:14] <bluesabre> Unit193, indeed, that will simplify things if Corsac gets to it first :)
[10:41] <flocculant> ochosi: from a how does it look perspective - nothing I'm aware of 
[15:47] <pleia2> did the social medias about the final beta next week
[15:47] <pleia2> sorry for the delay, you know me
[15:48] <flocculant> pleia2: there was no rush on those at all - cos I'll be all over it Monday/Tuesday next anyway :p
[15:50] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: I'm suspecting that video and bug reporting on blueprint is likely to be postponed, but I've not done that yet - let me know :)
[16:34] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: also toying with an idea (late in cycle) that might come in useful - might be worth talking about soonish
[20:16] <nairwolf> Good evening
[20:16] <nairwolf> Does someone can confirm this bug ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1622987
[20:17] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1622987 in util-linux (Ubuntu) "Auto-completion seems broken with umount command" [Undecided,New]
[20:17] <nairwolf> I'm going to ask to #ubuntu-bugs also
[20:17] <nairwolf> And this bug : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1622260
[20:17] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1622260 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "Calc doesn't highlight focused box" [Undecided,New]
[20:17] <nairwolf> I'm unable to confirm that on ubuntu version. 
[20:17] <nairwolf> I see that only with xubuntu
[20:18] <nairwolf> BUT, I've tried on a vm today, on another computer, and I haven't seen this bug. So, I don't understand...
[20:18] <nairwolf> I've seen the Calc bug twice with two daily build different
[20:18] <flocculant> nairwolf: did you look at the umount bug - it's been confirmed
[20:19] <nairwolf> flocculant: confirmed ? Is it because I've reported this bug twice on the QA tracker ? 
[20:19] <nairwolf> One with Xubuntu, the second report was with Ubuntu
[20:19] <flocculant> no, it's because I confirmed it :p
[20:19] <nairwolf> I was the one who confirmed this bug, badly ;)
[20:20] <nairwolf> hum... how can I see you confirmed that ? 
[20:20] <nairwolf> Because I see on bugs.launchpad.net, status=New, Importance=Undecided
[20:20] <flocculant> try moving out ./config/libreoffice to desktop or something, see if you still see the bug for calc
[20:21] <nairwolf> The message from Ubuntu QA website, is an automatic message, right ? 
[20:21] <flocculant> odd - I confirmed that yesterday - anyway - redid that
[20:22] <nairwolf> okay, now I see your confirmation ;) I wasn't crazy !
[20:22] <flocculant> not this time
[20:22] <flocculant> :p
[20:22] <nairwolf> Do you mean I'm crazy other times ? :p 
[20:23] <nairwolf> I'm going to test that for libreoffice
[20:23] <nairwolf> flocculant: what is your advice exactly ? 
[20:23] <flocculant> anyway - try removing libreoffice from your local system that sees the bug - but it's not something I can confirm - neither on ANY vm's/hardware installations - it's not a xubuntu thing either, doesn't need to be on testcases if it is there
[20:24] <flocculant> remove the libreoffice folder from your .config 
[20:24] <nairwolf> what is ./config/libreoffice ? Do you mean 'mv ~/.config/libreoffice ~/Desktop" ?
[20:24] <nairwolf> oh, ok
[20:24] <flocculant> yea that'd do it
[20:24] <nairwolf> yes, I know that's weird, but you have seen my screenshot
[20:24] <flocculant> yes
[20:24] <flocculant> 4 times
[20:25] <nairwolf> I'm unable ton confirm on my actual machine. Unable to confirm on a vm. It just happen with this computer. 
[20:25] <flocculant> it doesn't change - and I still can't confirm it
[20:25] <flocculant> sigh
[20:25] <nairwolf> I should try to see if there is something with 16.04.1 with this test computer
[20:25] <nairwolf> I just need time to create the usb key
[20:25] <flocculant> nairwolf: really just move the folder - then check
[20:25] <nairwolf> yeah
[20:25] <flocculant> what?
[20:25] <nairwolf> what 'what ?' ?
[20:26] <flocculant> where exactly do you see this? 
[20:27] <nairwolf> I'm seeing this bug with my 'test computer'
[20:27] <nairwolf> I have two computers
[20:27] <nairwolf> The one I'm using now, is running devel, but I can't see this bug. 
[20:27] <nairwolf> The second one is a computer only used for test
[20:27] <flocculant> your last comment makes no sense actually on the bug - you say clean install (of 16.10) then start talking about devel
[20:27] <nairwolf> I need to create a live-usb. 
[20:27] <flocculant> they're the same versions
[20:28] <nairwolf> I talked about 16.10 ? No, I talked about 16.04.1. I will try to remove .config with 16.10
[20:28] <flocculant> regardless of which - not something can be confirmed from a live 16.10, installed 16.10, installed and updated 16.10 except by you :)
[20:28] <flocculant> InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 16.10 "Yakkety Yak" - Alpha amd64 (20160910)
[20:29] <nairwolf> I will aslo check if I see something with *this* computer with Xenial (16.04). 
[20:29] <flocculant> if it IS a 16.04 bug - then this is the wrong place - support for 16.04
[20:29] <nairwolf> sorry, I'm not clear...
[20:29] <nairwolf> It's a bug of 16.10
[20:30] <flocculant> that no-one else can confirm :)
[20:30] <nairwolf> BUT, I want to verify if the cell is focused on 16.04, with this *weird* computer.  
[20:30] <nairwolf> I know that no-one can confirm...
[20:31] <nairwolf> that's why it's weird
[20:32] <flocculant> nairwolf: so you saw this once with a clean install? 
[20:32] <nairwolf> yes !
[20:33] <flocculant> how did you get the iso? was it zsynced? if not did you check the md5sum? 
[20:33] <nairwolf> I'm using zsync
[20:33] <flocculant> then I would just ignore it if you saw it once 
[20:33] <nairwolf> no, I've seen that twice (with two different build)
[20:33] <nairwolf> We'll see if I'm able to see it again
[20:35] <flocculant> tbh nairwolf I'm really not bothered about an aberrant bug only 1 person has seen, for something that's not a Xubuntu 'package' 
[20:36] <nairwolf> I understand that, don't worry
[20:36] <flocculant> obviously no-one in here can confirm it - or they'd have said so :)
[20:36] <flocculant> we 'just' grab LO from the archive for our seed
[20:36] <nairwolf> yes, I understand that ;) But don't think I'm crazy :p
[20:37] <flocculant> well I don't think that - or if you were you'd have had to fiddle with the screenshot ;)
[20:37] <flocculant> not saying you don't see it - just saying that in the scheme of things - this is very low on the list for me 
[20:38] <nairwolf> that's fine ;)
[20:44] <nairwolf> the bug with light-locker is the most annoying for me
[20:44] <nairwolf> That's great, the small box for resizing partition has been fixed ;)
[20:45] <nairwolf> I'm glad to see a bug I've discovered being fixed rapidly ;)
[21:01] <nairwolf> flocculant: sorry to annoy with this bug. I happens again
[21:01] <nairwolf> I've removed ~/.config/libreoffice and it's still the same thing
[21:01] <nairwolf> the box is unfocused
[21:02] <nairwolf> I know that doesn't make sense, but I will make a clean install of 16.04.1 (Xenial) to see if there is, maybe, something wrong with my computer
[21:02] <flocculant> nairwolf: please go to #ubuntu+1 with this calc thing
[21:02] <nairwolf> flocculant: ok
[21:02] <flocculant> someone there might have seen it - no-one here has
[21:02] <nairwolf> however, I haven't seen that with a clean install of Ubuntu, with Yakkety
[21:03] <nairwolf> Now, I'm stopping to annoy you. 
[21:03] <flocculant> doesn't matter - it's the dev testing channel
[21:03] <flocculant> for users and stuff
[21:03] <nairwolf> ok
[21:15] <ochosi> evening
[21:15] <ochosi> flocculant: ok, i'll try to fix that one remaining greybird bug in the installer then
[21:16] <ochosi> have you checked how it looks with adwaita?
[21:16] <ochosi> cause if it's broken there too we again have a ubiquity bug on our hands
[21:51] <nairwolf> flocculant: I wanted to verify if I could see this akward bug (libreoffice Calc) on 14.04.1
[21:52] <nairwolf> Because, if the box was unfocused with 14.04.1 that would mean the problem is from my computer. 
[21:52] <nairwolf> But no, it happens only with clean install of Xubuntu, with the devel version. 
[21:53] <nairwolf> Tomorrow, I will go to #ubuntu+1
[21:53] <nairwolf> and ask them
[21:53] <nairwolf> good night