[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: urdfdom [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: urdfdom [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: urdfdom [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: urdfdom [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[06:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: urdfdom [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: urdfdom [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: urdfdom [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[07:57] <LocutusOfBorg> please accept urdfdom, fixing a FTBFS with one reverse dependency
[07:57] <LocutusOfBorg> only kido should need a rebuild
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted urdfdom [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted urdfdom [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted urdfdom [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted urdfdom [arm64] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted urdfdom [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted urdfdom [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted urdfdom [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[09:52] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: .
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[10:02] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm not sure where is the best place to report launchpad failures
[10:03] <LocutusOfBorg> but reverse-depends seems not working, and I guess because ubuntuwire is down qa.ubuntuwire.org/rdepends/
[10:12] <cjwatson> that's not a Launchpad failure
[10:12] <cjwatson> qa.ubuntuwire.org is something somebody else (tumbleweed IIRC) maintains
[10:13] <LocutusOfBorg> so, ubuntu-dev-tools relies on external websites and services :(
[10:13] <cjwatson> correct
[10:15] <Ukikie> And py2. :3
[11:24] <bluesabre> Hello release team! Xubuntu would like to include the latest greybird-gtk-theme (lp 1623855), I've already checked with others in our docs, release, and QA subteams, can I get an ACK to go ahead and upload this one today?
[11:50] <jibel> slangasek, ogra_ I asked Lukasz to SRU the changes in livecd-rootfs when he is back from holidays
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.7-31-g65ace7b-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 0.7.8-1-g3705bb5-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.8-1-g3705bb5-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-sys-filesystem (yakkety-proposed/primary) [1.1.7-1]
[14:58] <LocutusOfBorg> -mahimahi (0.93-1 to -)
[14:58] <LocutusOfBorg>     Package not in unstable, will try to remove
[14:59] <LocutusOfBorg> rmadison has a different opinion
[14:59] <LocutusOfBorg> also that "-" is making the link 404
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (trusty-proposed/main) [2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.27 => 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.28] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-hamlit (yakkety-proposed/primary) [2.7.0-1]
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-sys-filesystem (yakkety-proposed/primary) [1.1.7-1]
[17:51] <bdmurray> cyphermox: so shim-signed is good to be released to precise?
[17:53] <cyphermox> bdmurray: I believe so
[17:55] <tumbleweed> cjwatson: I don't maintain the machine, I just maintain some services running on it. #ubuntuwire is the best place to discuss problems with the machine
[17:55] <cyphermox> bdmurray: could you please also reject grub2 in xenial-proposed queue? I'll upload another with some other fixes
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.4]
[18:12] <cyphermox> ta
[18:13] <jderose> infinity: yakkety will no longer install under QEMU in UEFI mode... what package should i file a bug against for this?
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.28]
[18:49] <doko> please override the libreoffice/i386 autopkg test triggered by gcc-6; if at all, that's unrelated to one c++ fix and a installability fix, and I'd like to start the test rebuilds
[18:50] <doko> slangasek, infinity, pitti: ^^^
[19:03] <pitti> doko: hinted
[19:03] <doko> ta
[19:52] <sergiusens> bdmurray hi there, mind letting snapcraft-2.17 into xenial-updates?
[20:00] <bdmurray> sergiusens: okay, might you be able to answer a snappy question while you are here?
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adwaita-qt [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5-1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.7.0-1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ruby-sys-filesystem [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1.7-1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openscenegraph-3.4 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.4.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[20:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-sys-filesystem [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1.7-1]
[20:05] <infinity> jderose: If you can't sort out which package is to blame, start with the installer (ubiquity or d-i, depending on your install method), and we'll triage from there.
[20:06] <jderose> infinity: cool. it's happening with both desktop and server, so seems like d-i is probably a better initial target. thanks!
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adwaita-qt [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.5-1] (no packageset)
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/none) [2.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adwaita-qt [i386] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.5-1] (no packageset)
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [i386] (yakkety-proposed/none) [2.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/none) [2.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:11] <sergiusens> bdmurray sure
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adwaita-qt [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/none) [0.5-1] (no packageset)
[20:12] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I know you can use source-tag with a git repo but is there anyway to grab the latest release e.g. https://github.com/rg3/youtube-dl/releases
[20:13] <sergiusens> bdmurray err, no; is there a canonical way to figure it out without any magic?
[20:13] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I don't see snapcraft in the queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1
[20:14] <sergiusens> bdmurray strange, I see it here http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
[20:15] <bdmurray> sergiusens: ah, I misunderstood into -proposed vs into -updates
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-hamlit [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:18] <bdmurray> sergiusens: are these normally released after less than 7 days in -proposed?
[20:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: adwaita-qt [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.5-1] (no packageset)
[20:19] <sergiusens> bdmurray yes, we have an exception for day == 1
[20:19] <sergiusens> bdmurray we release every or every other week
[20:20] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I didn't see that in the SnapcraftUpdates wiki page
[20:20] <Ukikie> jderose: I was unable to get it to boot with qemu+ovmf even.
[20:21] <jderose> Ukikie: hmm, interesting. what are you using for the host OS? Xenial, Yakkety, something else?
[20:21] <sergiusens> bdmurray hmmm, slangasek where should we document the 1 day of stabilization thing?
[20:22] <jderose> Ukikie: for me it's broken with a Xenial host + Yakkety guest, but I haven't yet tried a Yakkety host + Yakkety guest.
[20:22] <bdmurray> sergiusens: slangasek is out today and tomorrow perhaps we should just do it in that SnapcraftUpdates page
[20:22] <sergiusens> bdmurray ok, sounds good, maybe arges knows as he was in the conversations
[20:22] <jderose> Ukikie: er, yeah, you were *unable* to get it to boot. yup, that's my experience... i'm using QEMU + OVMF
[20:23] <bdmurray> sergiusens: there seems to be a history of it, I just think we should document it for others too
[20:23] <Ukikie> jderose: Xenial host, ovmf from xenial or what I used to use to test secure boot was working too.  It still works on the older ISOs, just none of the Yakkety ones.
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adwaita-qt [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adwaita-qt [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [2.7.0-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed) [2.7.0-1]
[20:24] <jderose> Ukikie: okay, yeah, that's exactly matching my experience. well, except i haven't tried it with secure boot enabled.
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adwaita-qt [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [2.7.0-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted adwaita-qt [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [0.5-1]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-hamlit [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [2.7.0-1]
[20:24] <sergiusens> bdmurray do you mind editing? I don't want people to later see my name and it not being accepted
[20:25] <Ukikie> jderose: (I have a different ovmf version too that I can try, IIRC it was needed for secure boot.)  Also noted that -hda fat:/home/unit193/hda/  didn't mount correctly in new ovmf versions (esc during the ovmf logo, boot from internal shell.)
[20:28] <bdmurray> slangasek: I updated the SnapcraftUpdates wiki page regarding waiving the 7 days of aging but the reasoning behind it might make it more informative.
[20:31] <jderose> infinity: Ukikie: I filed a bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1624096
[20:32] <Ukikie> jderose: Great!  Subbed.
[20:33] <jderose> :)
[20:36] <sergiusens> Thanks bdmurray. Are we good to release?
[20:40] <bdmurray> sergiusens: I did already
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openscenegraph-3.4 [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.4.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:44] <sergiusens> Thanks then!
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openscenegraph-3.4 [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.4.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-sys-filesystem [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openscenegraph-3.4 [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed) [3.4.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-sys-filesystem [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1.7-1ubuntu1]
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openscenegraph-3.4 [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [3.4.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openscenegraph-3.4 [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.4.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (xenial-proposed/main) [2.2.0.3-2ubuntu11.2 => 2.2.0.3-2ubuntu11.3] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dkms (trusty-proposed/main) [2.2.0.3-1.1ubuntu5.14.04.8 => 2.2.0.3-1.1ubuntu5.14.04.9] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[22:07] <tsimonq2> hello release team
[22:07] <tsimonq2> I'm trying to run britney2 locally by following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration/LocalSetup
[22:08] <tsimonq2> when running britney.py I'm getting thrown this:
[22:08] <tsimonq2>   File "/home/ubuntu/britney2-ubuntu/autopkgtest.py", line 30, in <module>
[22:08] <tsimonq2>     import amqplib.client_0_8 as amqp
[22:08] <tsimonq2> ImportError: No module named 'amqplib'
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openscenegraph-3.4 [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [3.4.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[22:09] <tsimonq2> I'm not sure what to do as I have it installed already
[22:09] <tsimonq2> I figured I should ask here as you guys use this in production
[22:10] <wxl> you SURE you have amqplib installed?
[22:10] <apw> the right python version of the library ?
[22:10] <wxl> i mean that's a pretty fundamental part of the whole thing
[22:10] <tsimonq2> yes
[22:11] <tsimonq2> but 1.0.2 is in the archive and pip :/
[22:11] <wxl> pip list | grep amqplib
[22:11]  * tsimonq2 uninstalls all related packages from the archive and pip and tries to install 0.8 specifically
[22:11] <tsimonq2> $ pip list | grep amqplib
[22:11] <tsimonq2> amqplib (1.0.2)
[22:12] <wxl> yeah you should be able to install the specific version with pip
[22:13] <tumbleweed> if the error is "No module named 'amqplib'" it doesn't sound like the wrong version
[22:13] <tsimonq2> interesting... http://paste.ubuntu.com/23184075/
[22:13] <wxl> pip install amqplib==version
[22:13] <tsimonq2> I'll just keep the version installed from the archive
[22:13] <tsimonq2> so it WAS installed
[22:14] <tsimonq2> theory, I'm running with python3...
[22:14] <wxl> yes but not the specific version required
[22:14] <wxl> so run with python2.7 :)
[22:14] <tsimonq2> import apt_pkg
[22:14] <tsimonq2> ImportError: No module named apt_pkg
[22:14] <tsimonq2> argh
[22:14] <tsimonq2>   File "britney.py", line 192, in <module>
[22:15] <tsimonq2> (you get it)
[22:15] <tsimonq2> oh I know
[22:15] <tsimonq2> looking at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/67631/how-to-import-a-module-given-the-full-path#67692 now
[22:16] <wxl> this is definitely python 3 https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/+git/britney2-ubuntu/tree/INSTALL
[22:17] <tumbleweed> and your paste was definitely python 2.7
[22:17] <wxl> yup sure was
[22:17] <tsimonq2> tumbleweed: same when running with python3 so *shrug*
[22:18] <tsimonq2> I mean the error I was intitially getting
[22:18] <wxl> try using pip3, tsimonq2
[22:18] <tumbleweed> tsimonq2: so, that was bare pip, outside a virtualenv
[22:18] <tumbleweed> why di dyou even need pip?
[22:18] <tsimonq2> I uninstalled everything via pip
[22:18] <tumbleweed> it looked like the dependencies were all in the archive
[22:18]  * tsimonq2 nods
[22:20] <tumbleweed> so, if you have python3-apt installed, it should be able to import apt_pkg
[22:20] <tsimonq2> python3-apt is already the newest version (1.1.0~beta1build1).
[22:21] <tsimonq2> well I installed python-apt and it works
[22:21] <tsimonq2> now this
[22:21] <tsimonq2>     from urllib.parse import quote, urlencode
[22:21] <tsimonq2> ImportError: No module named parse
[22:21] <tsimonq2> I'll wash, rinse, and repeat
[22:21] <tumbleweed> this sounds like python 2, not 3
[22:22] <tumbleweed> are you running "python britney.py" ? because that obviously won't use python 3
[22:22] <tumbleweed> ./britney.py should, though, because it has a python3 shebang
[22:22] <tsimonq2> $ python2.7 britney.py -c britney.conf --series=yakkety -v
[22:22]  * tsimonq2 tries *again* with python3
[22:22] <tumbleweed> well that's not going to work
[22:22] <tsimonq2>     import amqplib.client as amqp
[22:22] <tsimonq2> ImportError: No module named 'amqplib'
[22:22] <tumbleweed> I mean, the python2.7 bit :)
[22:22] <tumbleweed> python3-amqplib
[22:23] <tsimonq2>   File "/home/ubuntu/britney2-ubuntu/autopkgtest.py", line 30, in <module>
[22:23] <tsimonq2>     import amqplib.client as amqp
[22:23] <tsimonq2> ImportError: No module named 'amqplib.client'
[22:23] <tsimonq2> WOW I'm stupid, thanks, progress
[22:26] <tsimonq2>   File "./britney.py", line 903, in _read_packages_file
[22:26] <tsimonq2>     pkg = intern(pkg)
[22:26] <tsimonq2> TypeError: intern() argument 1 must be str, not None
[22:26] <tsimonq2> fun fun fun :/
[22:26] <tumbleweed> didn't have the packages file it wanted?
[22:27]  * tsimonq2 downloads everything one more time
[22:38] <tsimonq2> still can't get it to work
[22:47] <tsimonq2> I'm stuck on that one error
[22:47] <tsimonq2> that page should be a bit more verbose if I'm missing something
[22:49] <tumbleweed> you ran britney-indexes?
[22:51] <tsimonq2> yes I did
[22:52] <tumbleweed> and it put the right things in the data dir
[22:52] <tsimonq2> I guess this might help: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23184175/
[22:54] <tumbleweed> does data/yakkety-proposed/Packages_amd64 look sane?
[22:55] <tsimonq2> tumbleweed: it's a binary file...
[22:55] <tsimonq2> O__O
[22:55] <tsimonq2> oh ok
[22:55] <tsimonq2> I guess it's expected
[22:55] <tsimonq2> tumbleweed: no, it doesn't look sane :P
[22:56] <tumbleweed> right, probably not unxzed ? which britney-indexes is supposed to do
[22:56] <tumbleweed> err gz
[22:57] <tsimonq2> aha!
[22:57] <tsimonq2> that's it I think
[22:58] <tsimonq2> pitti: bug in Britney it seems ^
[23:01] <tumbleweed> you got no errors from britney-indexes?
[23:01] <tumbleweed> that's not a bug in britney, but in britney-indexes, if anything
[23:06] <tsimonq2> oooh it's running
[23:16] <tsimonq2> it also makes me a bit mad I can't select two PPAs at once :/
[23:20] <tsimonq2> FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'data/yakkety/state/age-policy-dates'
[23:20] <tsimonq2> argh :(
[23:21] <tsimonq2> http://paste.ubuntu.com/23184323/